snip
Just to be clear before anything else. I am very careful about leaving any feedback to any account's trust page. It could be positive, neutral or even negative. If you notice, I rarely send out positive feedback to the people who borrow from my lending business. There are some limits (only I decide and other guys do not have any sign about it) and when it crosses my limit then I go and leave feedback. It's fine to leave feedback to an account which has done few grands of trades with you. They automatically earn it. The same with negative. If anyone defaults a loan or any trade with me, I give them enough time just to make sure that I am not harming them. When things become very clear that they do not have any intention to pay back, and I believe 100% that I am correct only then I leave negative.
I also believe that giving out negative very easily eventually harm the system. It becomes less important when mass people start receiving tags for doing little mistakes like leaving out some opinion that is not globally accepted like the flat earth believers, or giving some opinion, and later it found out that it was wrong.
But in the case of Adkinsbet we all know that we did not tag them after popping up one or two accusations. There were accusations after accusations and most of these accusations were looking very legit. The accusers were giving enough proofs that adkinsbet were not able to defend them anymore at some point. And not to mention the case of realscout. I knew about it from the very beginning as he was always telling me that they are holding his winning and making one after anther excuses. Even they were so scammy that at some point they changed his selections just to give him a reason that it was a lost bet.
So there were no questions about Adkkinsbet were selectively scamming.
Now let's talk about those puppet accounts. Those were the accounts who were defending every wrong doings by adkinsbet from the very beginning. When a legendary member, hero member leave a positive input, defend a business - newbies and people on the web who do not have much idea how to look at the history of a user accept those input as granted and do the business with that service site.
Using those shill accounts adkinsbet scammed all those users on the forum which is a no-brainer. And look at them, still those accounts are shamelessly defending adkinsbet as if they do not know anything and adkinsbet are the one who are victims here.
Allowing those accounts freely making comments about defending adkinsbet meaning we are giving adkinsbet the platform to take advantage again.
Actmyname has made references to how easy it is for a scammer to just switch accounts, create a new alt, or buy a high ranking account, and keep promoting the same scam.
Shilling from a brand-new account and shilling from a higher rank account has difference. And when another high rank account pops up - we may not spot it immediately but sooner or later they will be spotted and doing the same action against that high rank account will be the right thing I guess.
Update:
All the following users has been tagged:
BlackFor3st, ronaldo40, wildan88, sempak, Cacingkemi, BitcoinAccepted, MI6, deadthings, aomakun, BTCGOLD, imutlinda, cutesgirl, codegnome, coin.princess
Source: Opposing the flag against adkinsbet.
This does not mean that just because you opposed the flag, you got tagged.
I do not have much time to look each and every account's post history and to find other users who are regularely defending adkinsbet with their statements. So I have chosen the shortcut. If any of the above account does not have any post that is defending adkinsbet, and it is not older than last 30 days then PM me I will remove the tag.
