[Overview] Comprehensive list of Crypto Sportsbooks -New Poll-

[Sunderland]

Please consider adding CoinRoyale - the original Provably Fair Bitcoin Casino since 2013 into the list, welcome bonus up to 5 BTC and there is Royalty and Referral program.

As requested. CoinRoyale has been added to the list. Thanks for the suggestion.  
Trying to add sportsbook's logos along with the name but having some issues with it at the moment.

Nice! Im sorry for a late replies.
Will inform you again here when I found other "trusted casino" on bitcointalk from years ago and still running without any issue.
And the logo looks perfect now, many thanks vennali.

[Pmalek]

Thank you all for the feedback and the help. I'll probably get to it this weekend and start working on the reviews. Still would like to see a few more votes in to start doing so, in confidence. In any case, if I do start with the reviews. It will mostly be basic information that are in the table already+ a bit more that has been missed out.

If you want to do things differently and be unique compared to the competition, you could focus a bit more on what you don't like about a specific crypto casino. Each review is usually about the good, but very few reviews have a well thought-out 'the bad' or 'what casino X could do better' section. In it, you can mention some things you didn't like. It could be anything like slow-loading pages, outdated UI, high wagering requirements, small welcome bonus, unfair T&Cs, etc.

[vennali]

Thank you all for the feedback and the help. I'll probably get to it this weekend and start working on the reviews. Still would like to see a few more votes in to start doing so, in confidence. In any case, if I do start with the reviews. It will mostly be basic information that are in the table already+ a bit more that has been missed out.

If you want to do things differently and be unique compared to the competition, you could focus a bit more on what you don't like about a specific crypto casino. Each review is usually about the good, but very few reviews have a well thought-out 'the bad' or 'what casino X could do better' section. In it, you can mention some things you didn't like. It could be anything like slow-loading pages, outdated UI, high wagering requirements, small welcome bonus, unfair T&Cs, etc.

Thank you for your suggestion. I appreciate your point of view and I agree that it is important to be unique and honest if I'm writing reviews. However, I also think that focusing too much on the negative aspects of a sportsbook could backfire and make me seem biased or unfair. Some people might wonder why I chose to review a sportsbook with their features that I didn’t like, or how I can compare it to others without mentioning their flaws. I prefer to highlight the positive features and let the readers decide for themselves if they want to try the sportsbook out or not. That way, I can avoid unnecessary conflicts. Maybe I could add a section at the end of each review where I briefly mention some areas of improvement or suggestions for the sportsbook, but without being too harsh or negative. What do you think?

[Pmalek]

<Snip>

Obviously, the negatives and the things that can be improved shouldn't have too much of a focus in your review. I just meant that you could mention it honestly if you notice that something is not according to your taste. Reading reviews where everything is explained as being perfect and top-notch also looks biased, so adding a bit of the opposite is good for the balance and makes it look like the writer knows what he is talking about and knows what he wants to see.

[vennali]

<Snip>

Obviously, the negatives and the things that can be improved shouldn't have too much of a focus in your review. I just meant that you could mention it honestly if you notice that something is not according to your taste. Reading reviews where everything is explained as being perfect and top-notch also looks biased, so adding a bit of the opposite is good for the balance and makes it look like the writer knows what he is talking about and knows what he wants to see.

Really appreciate and value your suggestions. I will definitely add a “pros” and “cons” section at the end of each review, so that people who don’t like to read long paragraphs can get a gist of it in a few words. I will also try to be more critical of the sportsbooks and include constructive criticism in my reviews.

[vennali]

Updated some of Nitrobetting's additional notes by going through their thread. They are not available in my region, so, I'm not able to test them out. It is also against their TOS to use VPN while using their service. So, I'm not going to risk it and try them out, until I move to Europe or countries where they are available. If anyone uses Nitrobetting (and BK8) here, would be great if you could help me add more info there is. Thanks in advance.

[notblox1]

I dont trust most websites with rating and some forum members are even worse with their ratings.
Most of the times there is money involved and money easily moves places and ratings
Your updated comprehensive list looks good, and only thing I would like to see is positive and negative sides for each casino.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

I dont trust most websites with rating and some forum members are even worse with their ratings.
Most of the times there is money involved and money easily moves places and ratings
Your updated comprehensive list looks good, and only thing I would like to see is positive and negative sides for each casino.

Lolz, money answereth all things, with money, a scam casinos can have the very best rating anybody can ever imagine, but this is mostly for review and rating sites out there and outside of this forum.

When it comes to this forum, I think we can be trusted, regardless of the fact that some members still would gladly take money to promote a well known scam, but this set is just minority looking a the overall total number of users of this forum, here, can be still find the best of casino reviews and ratings, ones that are really genuine and totally based on a user's experience, not one altered or influenced by money or some other gifts like bonuses or free spin etc.

[vennali]

I dont trust most websites with rating and some forum members are even worse with their ratings.
Most of the times there is money involved and money easily moves places and ratings
Your updated comprehensive list looks good, and only thing I would like to see is positive and negative sides for each casino.

I am willing to share my honest opinions on every sportsbook on bitcointalk, but I don’t want to make enemies here. Since many of them have signature campaigns, I’m sure it will offend a lot of people who'd feel obliged to represent the sportsbook in their signature. Will just add constructive criticism unless there are many scam accusations on a respective sportsbook.

Lolz, money answereth all things, with money, a scam casinos can have the very best rating anybody can ever imagine, but this is mostly for review and rating sites out there and outside of this forum.

When it comes to this forum, I think we can be trusted, regardless of the fact that some members still would gladly take money to promote a well known scam, but this set is just minority looking a the overall total number of users of this forum, here, can be still find the best of casino reviews and ratings, ones that are really genuine and totally based on a user's experience, not one altered or influenced by money or some other gifts like bonuses or free spin etc.

It is very hard to get an unbiased opinion on anything, honestly. Anyways, looking at the voting, it seems like people don't really want reviews. Just the list seems fine. So, I'm not gonna bother researching through every sportsbook on the list as of now. Would love it if more people voted in though. Let's see.

[Rating Place]

It is very hard to get an unbiased opinion on anything, honestly. Anyways, looking at the voting, it seems like people don't really want reviews. Just the list seems fine. So, I'm not gonna bother researching through every sportsbook on the list as of now. Would love it if more people voted in though. Let's see.

You definitely need thick skin at first to do ratings and reviews. As you said if they get paid by another site, they are going to criticize your ratings. Some may even stalk you. With the ratings I do in 10 years there hasn't been 1 "A" or "B" rated book that's gone under with our money. Some still criticize and stalk but after a while you figure out why they are doing it and it really doesn't bother you. There have been 50, almost all "D" and "F" , a couple "C" such as Betnomi, that are out of business and most with our money. One is still open right now Coins.game that's "F". Your thread is great with or without reviews.

[bittraffic]

I dont trust most websites with rating and some forum members are even worse with their ratings.
Most of the times there is money involved and money easily moves places and ratings
Your updated comprehensive list looks good, and only thing I would like to see is positive and negative sides for each casino.

Lolz, money answereth all things, with money, a scam casinos can have the very best rating anybody can ever imagine, but this is mostly for review and rating sites out there and outside of this forum.

When it comes to this forum, I think we can be trusted, regardless of the fact that some members still would gladly take money to promote a well known scam, but this set is just minority looking a the overall total number of users of this forum, here, can be still find the best of casino reviews and ratings, ones that are really genuine and totally based on a user's experience, not one altered or influenced by money or some other gifts like bonuses or free spin etc.

Users outside this forum though are relying on reviews and rating sites. One thing that I see is that some of them only register here to create a scam accusation thread but it was already late since they already lost money.

But I think all sportsbook that have been running for a long time will not risk their reputation to scam as they have invested so much in the business already. It's the new ones that are to watch out for as users will have no idea when they are going to just snap all of a sudden.

[notblox1]

I am willing to share my honest opinions on every sportsbook on bitcointalk, but I don’t want to make enemies here. Since many of them have signature campaigns, I’m sure it will offend a lot of people who'd feel obliged to represent the sportsbook in their signature. Will just add constructive criticism unless there are many scam accusations on a respective sportsbook.

That is fine.
Writing cons and pros is not going to create any enemies, it can only help improve casinos and make them better.
It is best to be neutral if possible, but I always publicly wrote my bad and good experience with all casinos I used.
This is the best way to give honest feedback, and I would not accept money to change my opinion

[Lida93]

I am willing to share my honest opinions on every sportsbook on bitcointalk, but I don’t want to make enemies here. Since many of them have signature campaigns, I’m sure it will offend a lot of people who'd feel obliged to represent the sportsbook in their signature. Will just add constructive criticism unless there are many scam accusations on a respective sportsbook.

That is fine.
Writing cons and pros is not going to create any enemies, it can only help improve casinos and make them better.
It is best to be neutral if possible, but I always publicly wrote my bad and good experience with all casinos I used.
This is the best way to give honest feedback, and I would not accept money to change my opinion

Providing an honest opinion about a casino be it bad or good shouldn't be something that should earn a user enemies and as a gambler if you're accurate about whatever opinion you're bringing to the public based on your experience with a casino then it should be done without fear or favour.

 Though I understand the fears, because there are some persons that would want to gain cheap recognition by bashing another just because whatever honest opinion as given doesn't go down well with a casino they represent or are nursing an interest to represent it in signature and they would want to stand in the gap to attack you in order to gain a cheap recognition. But be it as it may, we shouldn't be afraid to deliver honest informations whether people will like it or not. But a casino that wants to improve and be in the vanguard among other casinos in the industry will always be open to constructive honest criticism as to build on those gaps and lapses

[vennali]

Thanks for the suggestions guys, I'll get to work over the weekend. I have a plan in mind, involving the patrons of 1 sportsbook(each week) on bitcointalk to write their pros and cons of using the sportsbook, in this thread. So I can get some honest reviews of people who consistently use the sportsbook. Or, Write the review first, and then ask the patrons, if the review is accurate and what pros and cons am I missing, that is crucial for everyone to know.

PS: Please do vote, if you still haven't. Polls are still inconclusive on whether I should add reviews or not. Need more data!!

[3kpk3]

Thanks for the suggestions guys, I'll get to work over the weekend. I have a plan in mind, involving the patrons of 1 sportsbook(each week) on bitcointalk to write their pros and cons of using the sportsbook, in this thread. So I can get some honest reviews of people who consistently use the sportsbook. Or, Write the review first, and then ask the partons, if the review is accurate and what pros and cons am I missing, that is crucial for everyone to know.

This is a good plan. Honest, unbiased reviews are tough to find these days which is why this strategy of yours could be effective as long as there are plenty of such reviews in this particular thread.

Also, don't worry about making enemies because this is Bitcointalk where free speech is literally everything.

[Mahdirakib]

Thanks for the suggestions guys, I'll get to work over the weekend. I have a plan in mind, involving the patrons of 1 sportsbook(each week) on bitcointalk to write their pros and cons of using the sportsbook, in this thread.

Aren't you a sports bettor too? The best thing would be to verify the pros and cons by yourself. You have to observe the odds, benefits and betting market of a bookie in every week (by placing bets), then make a short list of their pros and cons based on your betting experience. Another forum member has reviewed a lot of casinos and rated them based on his own experience (see here). You may follow his pattern to compare the sportsbooks.

[vennali]

Thanks for the suggestions guys, I'll get to work over the weekend. I have a plan in mind, involving the patrons of 1 sportsbook(each week) on bitcointalk to write their pros and cons of using the sportsbook, in this thread.

Aren't you a sports bettor too? The best thing would be to verify the pros and cons by yourself. You have to observe the odds, benefits and betting market of a bookie in every week (by placing bets), then make a short list of their pros and cons based on your betting experience. Another forum member has reviewed a lot of casinos and rated them based on his own experience (see here). You may follow his pattern to compare the sportsbooks.

Yes, I used to get my primary income through sports betting for a couple of years(my main job didn't pay well). I have been sports betting for over 11 years now but at the moment, it's mostly on and off. I would like to review every sportsbook by testing them out and that is the right way of going through it. It is a strenuous and time-consuming task. Thanks for sharing the other list but he did try to get more views to his website(nothing wrong with it). While I do not have a website of my own like that. I will surely start the reviews for the sportsbooks that I've already used and have a fair idea of the experience and will also ask about the pros and cons from the playerbase of the sportsbook. To get even better idea. There are a couple of sportsbook on the list, that I cannot access though. So, that's a roadblock that I can think of, from the top of my head. 

[Rating Place]

Thanks for the suggestions guys, I'll get to work over the weekend. I have a plan in mind, involving the patrons of 1 sportsbook(each week) on bitcointalk to write their pros and cons of using the sportsbook, in this thread.

snip

Snip.............There are a couple of sportsbook on the list, that I cannot access though. So, that's a roadblock that I can think of, from the top of my head. 

You can use a VPN, then deposit and withdraw a small amount. The only two that will bother you are Maverick Games and Roobet. The rest of them aren't going to ask for KYC.

[vennali]

You can use a VPN, then deposit and withdraw a small amount. The only two that will bother you are Maverick Games and Roobet. The rest of them aren't going to ask for KYC.

Thanks for the suggestion. I'll most likely just do that. Luckily Maverick and Roobet work just fine in my location, so if they do ask for KYC, it should be a problem. I will try to do 1 review per week and start with Stake. I have extensively used Stake as a sportsbook over the past year or so and it will be comparatively easy for me to kick things off. I see that you've started writing reviews on sportsbooks as well and it's nice to see. Looking forward to more reviews in the future.

[CODE200]

If you want to do things differently and be unique compared to the competition, you could focus a bit more on what you don't like about a specific crypto casino. Each review is usually about the good, but very few reviews have a well thought-out 'the bad' or 'what casino X could do better' section. In it, you can mention some things you didn't like. It could be anything like slow-loading pages, outdated UI, high wagering requirements, small welcome bonus, unfair T&Cs, etc.

Of all that you've mentioned, I believe that the unfair Terms and Conditions is probably is the most difficult thing that you can be different when it comes to other casinos because as much as you want to attract players with a fair and almost favoring them T&C, the need for the upkeep and survivability of the business would be the priority of any business owner and so there's just some terms and conditions that the players need to agree upon no matter what because doing so would be detrimental to the profits or the reputation of the casino. Slow loading pages if I recall has something to do with the Internet of the users mostly so I don't think that it's something that can be easily fixed, I don't have any web development expertise so I'm not entirely sure that this problem is out of our hands. When it comes to outdated UI, just put a big funding on your web developing department, you pay good and you get a good website.