Can the world be without poverty

[Robinson66]

Poverty will exist. Some countries may help the poor, but some small countries cannot help, so the poor are still poor. Everyone has their own way of life. Everyone's pursuit is different. The rich may lead a busy life. The poor live a happy life, the rich may enjoy it, the poor live a rich life, but there are also active people among the poor who succeed through their own efforts, and the rich may also fail and become poor due to investment failures. But in the world It will not completely eliminate the poor. It can only be said that the poor will work hard to get rich.

[1715049511]

1715049511

[1715049511]

1715049511

[1715049511]

1715049511

[1715049511]

1715049511

[breathlessz]

Economically, can there be a way people can live and no one will be poor?

Theoretically it can exist but not in reality. As long as there are greedy single minded people in power, we can never achieve an economically viable living for all. Take a look at this well defined article. The rich can always find a way to evade taxes and accumulate more wealth than they could possibly live out. We can only dream of a world where wealth is properly distributed and opportunities are well within reach of everyone.

this happens a lot in the liberal system, where there is always a gulf between the rich and the poor. It is unfortunate that most of them are rich people who are not open in terms of their tax obligations, it also causes the delay in the government's program for the common welfare. so that it is impossible to eradicate poverty in that country let alone in this world, we can only indicate the success of reducing the number of poor people

[CHENIEN]

In my opinion, Since we are here in what a wonderful world is, poverty is always staying externally and then there are no justifications suchlike perfect accessories of life with a key to farewell poverty in one hit, on the other spot, we aren't exempted with population increase, I think it is unstoppable in the extensive way of life playing, in practical reason, poverty was inherited from our ancestors, perhaps this our true life on earth, which is, no one can deny it.

[Quidat]

In my opinion, Since we are here in what a wonderful world is, poverty is always staying externally and then there are no justifications suchlike perfect accessories of life with a key to farewell poverty in one hit, on the other spot, we aren't exempted with population increase, I think it is unstoppable in the extensive way of life playing, in practical reason, poverty was inherited from our ancestors, perhaps this our true life on earth, which is, no one can deny it.

Not something that can be just resolved out in one go and for sure all of governments is trying out to get rid of this global problem but due to increase of population then theres no way
that you can really able to suppress it nor matter what and how much you would really allocate when it comes to be on the funds used. Poverty would be still existing no matter what.
We do love to see a poverty-free world but it cant just be possible.There would be always inequality here on this world and lets just accept that fact but somehow
there are lots of organizations which do really make those steps even though its simple but at least it is something that do patch up.

[bitzizzix]

Poverty alleviation is difficult to achieve but by no means impossible, and it seems that the problem of poverty is faced with apathy when freedom of speech and religion is violated in this country or elsewhere, people protest against each other globally, but when poverty violates the rights of half of the world's population, most of us turn away and move on with our lives without looking around.
especially socio-economically poor, because they have nothing and just have to fight very hard to survive.
It is time for us as children of the nation to take real steps to try to start from small things that are around us to form forums or small social action groups, and do not rule out the possibility of becoming a forum or social institution that has the potential to change society and especially the poor.

and I do it in the area around me forming a caring organization and it really helps them and if every area does something like that at least it can help the poverty around.

[Sithara007]

Poverty will exist. Some countries may help the poor, but some small countries cannot help, so the poor are still poor. Everyone has their own way of life. Everyone's pursuit is different. The rich may lead a busy life. The poor live a happy life, the rich may enjoy it, the poor live a rich life, but there are also active people among the poor who succeed through their own efforts, and the rich may also fail and become poor due to investment failures. But in the world It will not completely eliminate the poor. It can only be said that the poor will work hard to get rich.

It is not the duty of the "rich" countries or corporations from these nations to help the poor ones. The poor countries are in such state, because of their own issues, such as population explosion and corruption. Examples are easy to find, such as Sub Saharan Africa and countries such as Afghanistan. They need to take care of these issues first, before taking the begging bowl in front of the rich nations. Because unless they resolve these issues, any assistance that is received from the richer nations will be stolen or misspent. 

[Keila Faith Villanueva]

Although your thoughts touched me a bit, it cannot be changed. People at different levels will do different things. If there are no poor people in the world, I think there may be many lazy people who are unwilling to work, fight for themselves, and settle for the status quo. Or some war-torn countries whose governments are powerless. How can we help them?

[Nora Olin]

If machines replace human jobs, the unemployment rate should increase greatly. Knowledge is important, but some people with insufficient knowledge or middle-aged people may have become accustomed to manual labor, and machines have replaced them. If they have no income, machines will cause people to become poorer.

[JillianTaft]

There are also rich people who started from scratch. I think the poor must study harder than others. The strong wins, spiritual wealth is the most important. If they rely on the help of others to get rich, but they do not have the ability to manage finances, they will eventually become poor, and relying on themselves is the safest.

[XUNing]

There is a hierarchy in the world. It is impossible to eradicate poverty, only gradually alleviate poverty.
Everything in the world should be balanced. If poverty is eliminated to become rich, there will be no sense of competition and life will become meaningless.

[EvieLannister]

It may reduce poverty, but it is impossible to eliminate poverty completely, because the global economy of COVID-19 has decreased. Even if the economy is slowly recovering, many poor families are still becoming poorer. Many ordinary families may be due to the economic downturn Have an impact. But these poor families are also working hard to reduce the poverty gap, but these efforts are insignificant, but the poor have a poor lifestyle, and they still have to spend every day happily.

[Sithara007]

The more automation we face the more we need to take care of the unemployed people. Social benefits need to rise with the standard of living, it's just a matter of time until we get a base income by the government. In the end rich and poor are relative terms. If 90% of the population are Billionaires and 10% are only millionaires than we would consider them poor, even though they are millionaires.

There is no basis in saying that automation takes away jobs. When computers were first introduced in the 1980s, the same argument was being made. Here in India, the communist party cadre attacked businesses where computers were installed and destroyed them. Now the children of these same leaders are working in IT firms. If automation takes away jobs, then how did the unemployment rate went down in the 90s, when computers became more popular? Rather than taking away jobs, they created new opportunities.

[nhaila]

Poverty is the one of the main curse In a country, no One can eliminate poverty at all. In primative world poverty belonged, today poverty exist and in the future world poverty will have. It couldn't be eliminated 100%...

[Vishnu.Reang]

It may reduce poverty, but it is impossible to eliminate poverty completely, because the global economy of COVID-19 has decreased. Even if the economy is slowly recovering, many poor families are still becoming poorer. Many ordinary families may be due to the economic downturn Have an impact. But these poor families are also working hard to reduce the poverty gap, but these efforts are insignificant, but the poor have a poor lifestyle, and they still have to spend every day happily.

Most of the progress that has been made against poverty during the last decade has been undone by the pandemic. In the worst affected countries such as Brazil and India, the number of people living in extreme poverty has gone up drastically. And the full impact from the pandemic is yet to appear. It will be visible in the next one or to years, as the governments run out of money for their stimulus packages. It is going to be difficult times for people across all social and economic classes. And the effects will be more amplified for those without significant savings.

[bengsabeng]

destiny determines everything. If working hard can make people rich, construction workers will be the richest. If intelligence made people rich, surely the person with the title of professor would be the richest man. all we have to do is keep trying and be grateful because that is the key to everything.

[conected]

Poverty is the one of the main curse In a country, no One can eliminate poverty at all. In primative world poverty belonged, today poverty exist and in the future world poverty will have. It couldn't be eliminated 100%...

- But you can look at the percentage of poverty from primitive times and compare it to the most recent years in a particular country, you'd be surprised at how much income and poverty have improved, a project like poverty eradication will take many centuries to complete, rapid progress is impossible, sometimes with unexpected difficulties, poverty will rise again and this current pandemic is such a process but that doesn't mean the eradication of poverty will stop, time will prove that the complete elimination of poverty is possible

[Barinekapaul]

The Idea of having a world that is free of poverty is what is not easy to come by from my own point of view.
Poverty cannot stop as far as there is growth and population increase, as the available resources become scarce as the day goes by.
So living in a poverty-free world is something that is hard to achieve.

The rich who controls the wealth keep aspiring to get more and can go any miles as far as they get more money, thereby living and making the poor become more poorer why the rich continue in their riches, making equality not achievable.

[marine4u]

Poverty cannot go away, as long as stupidity, laziness, and corruption persist. no one in this world wants to be poor but there is nothing they can do when they are still stupid and lazy. I once asked a lot of poor people randomly and the words that came out of them were "just living like this is comfortable"

Lol, Certainly worldwide there will be no more poverty, but it is up to the government apparatus of each country to act and change the state more positively, promote economic and social development, fight inflation,  unemployment reduction is a rather difficult topic.  Especially during the current covid pandemic.  It has increased poverty rates.  I believe so and think that it will take a long time to achieve everyone's wishes.

[Sithara007]

Lol, Certainly worldwide there will be no more poverty, but it is up to the government apparatus of each country to act and change the state more positively, promote economic and social development, fight inflation,  unemployment reduction is a rather difficult topic.  Especially during the current covid pandemic.  It has increased poverty rates.  I believe so and think that it will take a long time to achieve everyone's wishes.

The government has certain responsibilities, such as making healthcare and education accessible to all. But at the same time, I would say that the general population should not rely entirely on the government to get out of poverty. The government can only provide opportunities. It is the responsibility of the individuals to make use of these opportunities. We also need to remember that there is a considerable section of the population, which rely solely on government handouts. How they will get out of poverty, if they solely rely on these freebies and handouts?

[xSkylarx]

Lol, Certainly worldwide there will be no more poverty, but it is up to the government apparatus of each country to act and change the state more positively, promote economic and social development, fight inflation,  unemployment reduction is a rather difficult topic.  Especially during the current covid pandemic.  It has increased poverty rates.  I believe so and think that it will take a long time to achieve everyone's wishes.

The government has certain responsibilities, such as making healthcare and education accessible to all. But at the same time, I would say that the general population should not rely entirely on the government to get out of poverty. The government can only provide opportunities. It is the responsibility of the individuals to make use of these opportunities. We also need to remember that there is a considerable section of the population, which rely solely on government handouts. How they will get out of poverty, if they solely rely on these freebies and handouts?

Agree! There are numerous actions that the government should do. We all know that there is a group of people that is solely reliant on government funds, such as when the government gives them money on a monthly basis to assist them. However, as you can see, some of these people are not maximizing the money they receive, instead they are just  buying something and then wait for the government to give them more money. They really don't used to earn more money from it like they should have a business or others that could also supply them with food or money instead of just waiting on the government.