Bounty Managers Wearing Bitcoin Signature, Funny Irony

[Kunnu]

If a bounty manager don't want to take much risk then he/she wouldn't hesitate to take part in the bounties of service section where mostly bounty rewards to be paid in BTC basically it's all depends in which option bounty managers find themselves suitable so I don't think there is something funny or wrong after all every member has right to wear signature based on their rank and forum rules.

[BIT-BENDER]

  It tantamount to having and advertising a signature campaign and never using, or patronizing the services of the signature they advertise, it's business sometimes don't make a mole out of an ant hill out of it, they work for the bounty by organising there campaign, -if the bounty cared much they can entice them with higher pay to have on their signature- we  shouldn't mind if they work well in both department that's required of them

[virasog]

I have been seeing that bounty managers abandon to wear bounty that they are promoting or any other bounty but wear signature, I'm wondering on that, and why 

They publish bounty in bounty section and come to service section to apply and wear signature. Is that not funny to you?

This is not funny at all. The bounty managers have the right to wear signature of any bounty / Service. If they are not promoting the bounty and only working as a manager, there is no need for them to wear that signature. Also, many bounty managers are running more than one bounty at a time, so obviously they can't wear signatures of multiple bounties simultaneously.

[JohnBitCo]

The irony of it is that they manage bounty but promote bitcoin paying signature. Lol

Most of the bounty managers are well known and reputed. Therefore, if they apply in any high paying bitcoin signature campaign, they get preference over the others and hence get selected. They are already earning the bounty tokens by managing the bounty campaigns, so why not they decide to earn some bitcoins also at the same time by enrolling in bitcoin signature campaign.

[libert19]

How do you expect them to judge their own posts? They are the one who's managing the bounty, they can fill out whatever numbers they want without anyone knowing whether they indeed completed the bounty posts or if the post quality was good enough.

[goaldigger]

How do you expect them to judge their own posts? They are the one who's managing the bounty, they can fill out whatever numbers they want without anyone knowing whether they indeed completed the bounty posts or if the post quality was good enough.

That’s why quality manager exist, simply because we can’t trust all the manager especially the new one. Imagine, having a lot of bounty campaign, then how can we expect a manager to wear all of that? They are being paid to run the campaign and not for wearing signature and I guess that’s two are different.

[Viscore]

How do you expect them to judge their own posts? They are the one who's managing the bounty, they can fill out whatever numbers they want without anyone knowing whether they indeed completed the bounty posts or if the post quality was good enough.

That’s why quality manager exist, simply because we can’t trust all the manager especially the new one. Imagine, having a lot of bounty campaign, then how can we expect a manager to wear all of that? They are being paid to run the campaign and not for wearing signature and I guess that’s two are different.

Why would we have to mind what they are wearing?

Some campaign manager does not even wear a signature and yet they promote a successful campaign. It's all about the trust of the community and advertiser would choose a bounty manager that has a good reputation in the community as that would give a better chance for the project they promoted to succeed.

[bigcash2011]

I have been seeing that bounty managers abandon to wear bounty that they are promoting or any other bounty but wear signature, I'm wondering on that, and why 

They publish bounty in bounty section and come to service section to apply and wear signature. Is that not funny to you?

They do that because they understand that many bounty they promote will never get to the market, many will exit when you invest your money.

They apply in signature because they know bitcoin payment is king, in every exchange, every P2P transaction and easily converted to fiat.

Why do they manage what they are not sure of return and go over to keep applying in bitcoin paying campaign while you keep relying on them to deliver, help you to get payment. You know this may not happen because they have taken payment from the bounty team and also earn from signature campaign.

They come to apply to signature and can't do research on the bounty, that is why scam is more in bounty.

Why don't they bargain for payment with altcoins with high value like etheruem , bnb, USDT etc.

If I were the team, I will include it in the terms...

And the signature section too can help to stop this if they stop them to concentration making bounty better

And if this is done, you see shit bounties won't come up lol

I wonder that bounty managers still have to apply to signature campaign and get accepted and start the job of promoting another project apart from the bounty they are handling. This is funny indeed, hahaha 

I don't think is encouraging to see. That is basically the concern

The irony of it is that they manage bounty but promote bitcoin paying signature. Lol

I personally feel tgat signature bounty market is no more the same like it used to be back in 2015 to 2017 when everyone was making good income from signature campaigns but now seems like this sector is fading away because most bounty campaigns are not offering signature campaigns and even those who are offering have allocated small budget for signature which is really discouraging and if this thing continues i thing people will stop participating in signature campaigns. As for as bounty managers are concerned, they have the right to select the project that they deem more lucrative.

[randegibran]

Bounty manager not believe maybe with his project promoting about success or not for the future, so they try to join with other bounty campaign and use different signature code between his promoting bounty campaign and as bounty manage, I think not all project bounty become success because many project failed without any exchange market for listing.

[abel1337]

Bounty manager not believe maybe with his project promoting about success or not for the future, so they try to join with other bounty campaign and use different signature code between his promoting bounty campaign and as bounty manage, I think not all project bounty become success because many project failed without any exchange market for listing.

That said is the risk of joining a bounty campaign. There are bounty hunters that are considering a project a failed project if they can't deliver their project's token listed into an exchange which leaves bounty participants 0 gain from them. If bounty hunters want to have an assurance on their payment, They should switch to signature campaign on the service board because the signature campaign pays weekly and is managed by reputable managers.

As per bounty managers who are not wearing their client's project signature, I think it is a self-choice not to wear it plus there are limitations on the signatures to be worn, We can only wear a single signature. The bounty manager's job is to manage the campaign, this is why bounty managers are putting disclaimers in their threads saying that they are only hired and don't have ties to the team in case a bad thing happened.

[Anonylz]

No it doesn't look funny and I don't know why you should see it as funny because bounty is bounty whether being paid with btc or paid with tokens, that's their personal choice, the bottom line is you are wearing a signature and doing post you would not have ordinarily done if you are not being paid to do so, don't give it class,
you are being paid to post irrespective of the mode of payment,.

I hope you understand that being paid with btc does not make the project you are wearing the signature any more legit than the rest, any greedy ass dev will still rug pull or exit scam irrespective of what they paid with during their bounty campaign, plus it does not mean the team will work any more harder than the rest,
There are many btc paying campaign that are known scam.

[skarais]

Campaign manager are those whose management service are employed by altcoin project developers. They make deal prior to campaign launch and some of them may offer their signature space for rent by project they oversee. But all manager have the right to accept and refuse to use signature as long as they get paid more than their other contract. They do not have to use the supervised campaign signature as long as there is no agreement between the project team manager.

I don't think it's ironic for a manager in the case you're asking. I think it's only natural that they prioritize higher pay for their signature space and maybe they'll agree to use the signature of a project they supervise if they're paid accordingly. As far as I know, when someone hires their management service, the profile and signature space are not included in the deal before the deal is made.

[randegibran]

I think is not big problem when getting bounty manager campaign use other signature campaign code based on his bounty manage, they want to get more with bounty campaign and try how to get passive income in many way, as bounty manager and try to be bounty participants, almost bounty not guarantee so he try with many bounties campaign and hope have worth and higher price coin bounty campaign.

[Matimtim]

I think being bounty manager it doesn't mean they need to advertise that company too, is not included in their responsibility as manager, meaning they can advertise different  project and the same time they can manage another projects too.

I think this thing is case to case bases, because like if the manager who is trusted manager in this forum is currently advertising a certain project then,  they can  manage another projects and the same time or its depends on his discretion.

[isaac_clarke22]

Nothing wrong with that, OP.
There are things called "agreement" or "contract". They just need to manage the campaign that they were hired at. They're managers not the advertisers though some BM do that, but they aren't obliged to wear if the owner or the devs don't even require it.

It's like you're saying that when a software developers works in a company then he doesn't have the option to freelance after work.

[semobo]

There are advantages and disadvantages, managers doing that may want to get additional income and not don't care about the project they are promoting, it has always been like that most of the new projects will fail, not only in the bounty even those who have raised funds and have listed will be lost in no time if the project is released.

The job of bounty manager is to maintain the stakes for every week and check for any fake applicant, links, tweets, etc but if they are promoting a scam project after they known to scam people then their reputation will get ruined and there are lot of examples can be given for such cases and the one I still know is aTriz who was one of the most wanted campaign manager in the past but helped scam prject to fake their raised money give an end to his career.

[Jackl87]

Just because they manage a bounty of a certain project does not automatically imply that they also have to wear their signature to or take part in that bounty too.
Bounty Manager are also "normal" users of this forum and not employees of the projects that are doing the bounty.
I also think it's better if bounty managers are not taking part in the bounty that they are managing because most bounties have limited numbers or a limited pool.

[rozak]

Just because they manage a bounty of a certain project does not automatically imply that they also have to wear their signature to or take part in that bounty too.
Bounty Manager are also "normal" users of this forum and not employees of the projects that are doing the bounty.
I also think it's better if bounty managers are not taking part in the bounty that they are managing because most bounties have limited numbers or a limited pool.

Of course, it wouldn't be nice when the bounty manager was involved in a campaign that he handled himself.
As your deed, the bounty manager is an ordinary member of this forum, they are free to use their signature even to change the signature of all the campaigns they handle.
but at the moment I believe. that some of the existing and active bounty managers are well-performing people with excellent reputations as well. Look at the moment there are lots of new bounty managers, but those who stay with good reputations still have projects for them to handle.

[kooboat]

This is an intriguing  post, but I don't  see any conflict of interest  here. Bounty  managers are also interested  in making  money just like bounty hunters. This has been the practice  for a very long  time  now, bounty managers can always wear different signatures in contrast to that of the bounty being managed. It's  just a normal situation  of someone having  two paid jobs.  Most Bounty  hunters also do a lot of bounty campaigns  at a particular  point in time.

[ice18]

Nothing is to be argued here its the right of every people here to join what he wants even if his a bounty manager, admin, mods or any position they are holding as long as there's no conflict and no violated rules in this forum.