Bounty Managers Wearing Bitcoin Signature, Funny Irony

[palle11]

I have been seeing that bounty managers abandon to wear bounty that they are promoting or any other bounty but wear signature, I'm wondering on that, and why 

They publish bounty in bounty section and come to service section to apply and wear signature. Is that not funny to you?

They do that because they understand that many bounty they promote will never get to the market, many will exit when you invest your money.

They apply in signature because they know bitcoin payment is king, in every exchange, every P2P transaction and easily converted to fiat.

Why do they manage what they are not sure of return and go over to keep applying in bitcoin paying campaign while you keep relying on them to deliver, help you to get payment. You know this may not happen because they have taken payment from the bounty team and also earn from signature campaign.

They come to apply to signature and can't do research on the bounty, that is why scam is more in bounty.

Why don't they bargain for payment with altcoins with high value like etheruem , bnb, USDT etc.

If I were the team, I will include it in the terms...

And the signature section too can help to stop this if they stop them to concentration making bounty better

And if this is done, you see shit bounties won't come up lol

I wonder that bounty managers still have to apply to signature campaign and get accepted and start the job of promoting another project apart from the bounty they are handling. This is funny indeed, hahaha 

I don't think is encouraging to see. That is basically the concern

The irony of it is that they manage bounty but promote bitcoin paying signature. Lol

[20kevin20]

Being a bounty manager does not mean you have to necessarily support the said project. Some people simply want to do business and do not care that much about the bounty projects they manage - if the projects turn into scams, it's the image of the managers that gets tainted.

Moreover, bounties are short-term so if they were to wear signatures of the bounties they managed,
 1. they cannot wear multiple sigs at the same time so they can only choose 1 project to support
 2. after a short timespan, they will have to look for a new deal

Bitcoin sig campaigns are usually running long-term (at least the successful ones). They're "safer", if you will.

[kenelmark]

I have also thought like this in the past, where a manager is following the Bitcoin campaign and at the same time he is promoting the Altcoin campaign, this is obviously funny and I myself have also thought that the campaign he manages will not be maximally successful, even though it is. makes me quip at this point, because what you say is absolutely true, because Bitcoin is king, so the campaign with Bitcoin payments is still the best than Altcoins.

[cryptoaddictchie]

It's the manager prerogative to wear the signature they have been given the task too. Of course they will choose a more rewarding or satisfying compensation, this is a common sense I think. If you are a manager then you get a contract for handling campaign, usually you'll go for a regular signature that pays fiat or bitcoin.

Not saying his not supporting the project he handled but he is just commission to do the bounty service nothing more btt of course they make sure the project is legit so it wouldn't do bad record on their portfolio.

[crwth]

The irony of it is that they manage bounty but promote bitcoin paying signature. Lol

You do know that if it weren't for the bounty managers (the trusted ones), it wouldn't be safe to participate in it? There are many cases in which the bounty providers control it, and then when bounty hunters have done the tasks, they skip on you and never pay you with what you have done.

Anyway, it will depend on the bounty manager on what he will do with his signature space. Some will be paying for a higher amount for the fees managing their campaigns with signature space, but mostly, it's not in their intention. If they can afford to pay it, I don't think they should be locked into one because he is handling it.

For sure, they would background check the company, etc, if it's reputable or not. They wouldn't directly be advertising it for sure.

[Viscore]

It was the team's decision to let the BM manager wear signature what he wants to wear. And for sure, they have agreed with the terms and conditions, of course, if I have already in the BTC signature campaign and some ask me to run a bounty program (legit) offering high service fees and wanting to change the signature in support of their project, I have to accept it provided that they will pay in BTC every week. But I feel it was not the deal they've talked about. Pretty Irony, yeah, but this is about money, and they are safe with the BTC payment campaign.

[Dedewahyu]

Nothing prevents a bounty manager from wearing the avatar and signature of another project, sometimes a bounty manager handles some of the projects he manages, so for me it doesn't matter.

[Yogee]

CryptopreneurBrainboss wearing BestChange signature.
pakhitheboss wearing Roobet.
Hhampuz is also promoting altcoin bounties.

Perhaps they will read this topic and share their opinion.

I do not find it ironic to be honest with you. The job is to manage a campaign and it does not mean wearing signature is part of the deal. You can use Brainboss service ANN as an example https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5124215.0

[btcltcdigger]

CryptopreneurBrainboss wearing BestChange signature.
pakhitheboss wearing Roobet.
Hhampuz is also promoting altcoin bounties.

Perhaps they will read this topic and share their opinion.

I do not find it ironic to be honest with you. The job is to manage a campaign and it does not mean wearing signature is part of the deal. You can use Brainboss service ANN as an example https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5124215.0

It could be simply to avoid any conflict of interest. Otherwise BM would have to grade himself on a weekly basis.
But lets be honest, BTC campaign will always be more sought after than altcoin campaigns.

[mekar sari]

I have seen a lot of managers while holding bounties but they are using other project avatars as long as I know it is a permissible action because there are no rules at all regarding the bounty manager who must use the bounty he handle so I thought it wasn't funny because one bounty manager can hold handle many bounty

[mersal]

One bounty manager can promote multiple campaigns at once so how they can support all the projects at once? because they can wear only one signature at a time to be visible under their profile.

Bounty manager also hired by the team to managed the participants and calculate stakes if bounty wants the manager to wear the signature then they may wear it for appropriate payment but as far as I know most bounty managers work for partial BTC payment and remaining in their tokens and no bounties fall under this category may not get interested by them.

[ashmodeus]

of course that depend of their desire , its a common thing i guess, even for veteran manager like hampuz or yahoo. sometimes they just created bounty without using that signature and even they have own signature to paying who use that signature, its doesn't mean they managed the scam project or something like that since it can damage their reputation. so the point is , don't look manager do such thing , look their reputation first before joined a bounty program. u know what, i've joined many many bounty with different types of managers, and mostly, i just got nothing from manager who also using the same signature as they managed.

[Yogee]

....
It could be simply to avoid any conflict of interest. Otherwise BM would have to grade himself on a weekly basis.

That's a funny thing but I can see your point. I didn't think they would be bound by the same rules of the bounty campaign since they are the one in charge.

.... because they can wear only one signature at a time to be visible under their profile.

Can somebody please verify? My knowledge on this is members can fit in two or more signatures depending on the size or the number of characters.

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

Love the discussion here, OP do understand that the service been hire here is my management skills and not my signature privilege. My signature space is a privilege and I can use it to advertise whatever I want not minding what project I'm currently overseeing their promotion on the forum. Beside most of us were already working for the project we're currently advertising on our signature space before the bounties came along, you don't just expect us to dump them when they're quite high quality and have very decent payment.

I personally have been offer deals for my space by some campaign I have managed (to be paid fully in whatever coin I want including theirs) but I choose not to accept that offer to avoid unnecessary scenario. For now I don't think it is idea I manage myself but probably in future that'll come into the picture. Bounty manager aren't linked to the success of a project which is why investing or joining a campaign just because of the reputation of the manager isn't advice.

We can do all our due diligence and still the project would end up not been successful or scamming their investors. The most important thing is that our promoters we hired get paid which is why an escrow is always recommended.

[palle11]

CryptopreneurBrainboss wearing BestChange signature.
pakhitheboss wearing Roobet.
Hhampuz is also promoting altcoin bounties.

Perhaps they will read this topic and share their opinion.

I do not find it ironic to be honest with you. The job is to manage a campaign and it does not mean wearing signature is part of the deal. You can use Brainboss service ANN as an example https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5124215.0

It could be simply to avoid any conflict of interest. Otherwise BM would have to grade himself on a weekly basis.
But lets be honest, BTC campaign will always be more sought after than altcoin campaigns.

Hello guys, please lets not make mess of this thread. We can read the page again to really get the intent ,gist and dynamics of the post and not politicize it or count post with it. I understand exactly why this was posted here and not in bitcoin board.

You guys dragging in signature managers here, huh... why.

The signature campaign managers you dragging in (Hhampuz, CryptopreneurBrainboss and other signature are so known, reputable for signature and surely they open thread for bounty, that is not what this thread try to discuss.

What the thread is discussing is bounty managers running after signature campaign. They can make the bounty section better by insisting on payment for hunters in valuable altcoins.

Promoting a bounty project is different from wearing a signature.

Anyway, is always a choice for hunter but bounty managers should start looking at changing the dynamics on the reward.

[casperBGD]

One bounty manager can promote multiple campaigns at once so how they can support all the projects at once? because they can wear only one signature at a time to be visible under their profile.

Bounty manager also hired by the team to managed the participants and calculate stakes if bounty wants the manager to wear the signature then they may wear it for appropriate payment but as far as I know most bounty managers work for partial BTC payment and remaining in their tokens and no bounties fall under this category may not get interested by them.

yeah, they do not have to support project which promote, but it would be a good thing, don't you think?
I know that bounty manager could not know if the project will be successful or not, who would know that? that does not know even the founder, but some scams could be seen from the first point, and I would advise everyone to skip promotion on those projects

when something is fishy in the project, it is not without a reason

[masterrex]

That was also my wondering question before, Why the Bounty Manager has not worn the signature of the bounty campaign that they handled, But that was only out of ignorance because I figure out why and it's simple it's their own choices to wear the signature or not because they only paid to manage that particular Bounty campaign and not by wearing on that project signature. which is the role of the signature campaign participants simple as that.

[TopTort777]

Then what should a bounty manager do, if he manages 2 or more campaign? Wear half of each projects signature? Wear one signature on odd days, and other on even? I think bounty managers are free to support anything they want in their signature. Same as people that work on Coca-Cola factory. They can drink what ever they want. Of course it will be funny if Pepsi worker drinks Coca-Cola during his shifts. But if he get a warning for not being loyal, he can simply sue Pepsi for that.

[orions.belt19]

Promoting a bounty project is different from wearing a signature.

Anyway, is always a choice for hunter but bounty managers should start looking at changing the dynamics on the reward.

I don't quite understand this because is it not the whole point of wearing the signature? To promote the project?

As a campaign manager, I don't find it ironic at all for them to wear the signature. After all, you are running a campaign which ensures that its participants will successfully promote the said project and by wearing the signature, you help in promoting.

Regarding the dynamics on the reward, the usually depends on the project and their developers. If you are developing a token, then its likely for you to give out payments as the tokens itself because you strongly believe in the potential of their project. It's sort of like giving out shares for the company. Whether or not the token gains value of course will depend on the success of the project and developers. Most btc campaigns are not token based, these are mixers and gambling sites etc. so they don't have their own tokens to give out thus the rewards are in btc.

[Ken_terrance]

As a matter of fact not everyone cares, bounty managers may decide to promote other project that's different from the one they are managing, there is no rule that bounty managers must not promote other projects when they are managing another, they are going to get paid managing the bounty that's their job, whichever project they plan to promote is non of the teams business

[virasisog]

Bounty managers are hired to manage campaigns, I guess this depends on the bounty manager and the team's agreement whether if they will require the manager to wear the signature and be part of the promotion, or they are just there to check the quality of posts and count the posts each participants has made to be eligible for payment, then submit the report to the team for payment.

Some managers are hired to manage multiple projects at the same time and it will be impossible for them to wear all this signature at a time. I see nothing wrong with managers wearing a different signature from what they are managing.

[tvplus006]

I have met bounty managers who carried signature with payment in bitcoins and at the same time conducted campaigns in which the payment was also in bitcoins, only slightly higher. I think it's right that they don't jump from one signature to another if the payment in one of them is higher, and continue to carry the signature if they joined it earlier.

[Coyster]

I think the moment a bounty manager launches a new campaign on the forum, he already promotes it, it matters not if he wears their signature or not, but by basically making the campaign open for others to advertise in and around the forum the campaign manager is by extension telling us all that he has done research on the said project and considers it good for advertisement. And as such if any user finds something wrong with the project, a report is immediately made to the manager to close the campaign, that's the reason why bounty managers face quite a lot of criticism when bounties/campaigns go wrong.

Thus what I'm saying is that you can be less concerned with whatever signature your BM wears, it's their signature after all, and they can only advertise one company at a time on it, but can advertise so many more by just overseeing their different campaigns, what's more important is the reputation of the BM in question and not what's on his signature.

[Sterbens]

on the plus side maybe it's his way of taking every part. and he didn't want to be left behind. Especially with the bitcoin signature, it's definitely a matter of pride (if that's me). showing off what she's wearing, like we're applying for a job at a Coca-Cola store wearing Pepsi-branded clothes. will it be laughed at?
I am neutral, I will not say something that I have not experienced, because I cannot be a bounty manager yet, so I appreciate whatever he does.

[randegibran]

Some time I am very funny looking with bounty manager campaign using other signature based on what his bounty campaign manage, I think he still looking for much money from other bounty campaign because almost bounty manager not independent with his bounty manage, just few bounty campaign manager never take part for joining other bounty campaign and better use empty signature on his account.

[palle11]

Then what should a bounty manager do, if he manages 2 or more campaign? Wear half of each projects signature? Wear one signature on odd days, and other on even? I think bounty managers are free to support anything they want in their signature. Same as people that work on Coca-Cola factory. They can drink what ever they want. Of course it will be funny if Pepsi worker drinks Coca-Cola during his shifts. But if he get a warning for not being loyal, he can simply sue Pepsi for that.

The point is that signature campaign is organized and every one can see that. There should be clean up in bounty and not to run off to wear signature and get paid in bitcoin and they are able to convert, do whatever they want with it weekly as there sweat.

A good example is the bounty going with Murat, one of the most trusted. The reward is weekly that is also in his wallet as escrowed. And the project is already existing, and trading in three different exchanges.

Thread is below. Such projects in bounty section will time will organize the section.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5313677.0

[Furious 7]

The bounty manager has the right to use any signature because he only manages it, maybe more pay means that the manager intends to use the company's signature, therefore every participant must have the post quality that the manager wants, so this is the manager's choice when the btc paid bounty campaign is held. run.

I just think that every manager is always different, but their job is very professional. That is what I admit that they are looking for quality, not just a jump to find a bigger $$, sometimes participants like that, the manager doesn't like it.

[thesmallgod]

I do not think that you are totally right. If you watch some of them, particularly the legendary members,you will realized some of them wear signature campaign of some services they had a long time partnership with even before they decide to manage a bounty campaign. Secondly, everyone know that getting payment in bitcoin is the best rather than token that you are not sure it will even get listed. So I believe taking part in bitcoin paid services and also managing campaign is a good decision which I am sure you will also partake if you are given the chance. Lastly, managers have term and conditions for accepting a campaign and if wearing the project signature is not part of the agreement, I do not see reason why he/she should wear the signature when he/she can make use of the space for something else

[mersal]

.... because they can wear only one signature at a time to be visible under their profile.

Can somebody please verify? My knowledge on this is members can fit in two or more signatures depending on the size or the number of characters.

You can have up to 4000 characters in your profile space but the design of every bounty is in a way that is going to occupy the complete visibility section below your posts which means even if you wear multiple signatures the visible signature is going to one in the top.

[optimisticcm]

I have been seeing that bounty managers abandon to wear bounty that they are promoting or any other bounty but wear signature, I'm wondering on that, and why 

They publish bounty in bounty section and come to service section to apply and wear signature. Is that not funny to you?

They do that because they understand that many bounty they promote will never get to the market, many will exit when you invest your money.

They apply in signature because they know bitcoin payment is king, in every exchange, every P2P transaction and easily converted to fiat.

Why do they manage what they are not sure of return and go over to keep applying in bitcoin paying campaign while you keep relying on them to deliver, help you to get payment. You know this may not happen because they have taken payment from the bounty team and also earn from signature campaign.

They come to apply to signature and can't do research on the bounty, that is why scam is more in bounty.

Why don't they bargain for payment with altcoins with high value like etheruem , bnb, USDT etc.

If I were the team, I will include it in the terms...

And the signature section too can help to stop this if they stop them to concentration making bounty better

And if this is done, you see shit bounties won't come up lol

I wonder that bounty managers still have to apply to signature campaign and get accepted and start the job of promoting another project apart from the bounty they are handling. This is funny indeed, hahaha 

I don't think is encouraging to see. That is basically the concern

The irony of it is that they manage bounty but promote bitcoin paying signature. Lol

Well i think due to competition in the bounty management niche the bounty managers have to offer less fee to win the campaign so because they are not making enough from managing a campaign they are free to join and promote a project that seem attractive to them but yes it is kind of funny but it is a fact.

[rat03gopoh]

~snip~
What the thread is discussing is bounty managers running after signature campaign. They can make the bounty section better by insisting on payment for hunters in valuable altcoins.

Promoting a bounty project is different from wearing a signature.

Anyway, is always a choice for hunter but bounty managers should start looking at changing the dynamics on the reward.

This has been discussed for a long time and is the big hope of bounty participants.
But, you have to understand why they're running the campaign? Startup projects generally don't own and try to collect more valuable altcoins as more important development caps, especially for listing and operational costs, and hiring some professional workers.If I were a team, I also understand that hiring random people who aren't necessarily marketing professionals (bounty participants) has a low level of effectiveness. That's why I only offer my own new, under-valued altcoin as a "guarantee" of proper payments.

If you have the special professionalism they need, of course they'd hire you and will be paid more properly.

[Maestro75]

It is selfishness that makes those managers do that. They know that most of the bounties they manage are shit projects but because they receive payments in bitcoin from the project teams they think it is ok to promote the bounties. Bounty hunters have suffered because of this and I think that managers who manage failed projects know from the beginning that those projects were going to fail. I think it will be better for projects to insist on paying whoever that manages them in the projects token. May be those who manage this forum should make a rule to effect this.

[Renampun]

*I feel it's okay and there's nothing wrong with that...
The campaign manager is the only someone who is assigned by the developer to market their product in this forum and usually, it is an agreement between the developer and BM.

[paxmao]

I have been seeing that bounty managers abandon to wear bounty that they are promoting or any other bounty but wear signature, I'm wondering on that, and why 

They publish bounty in bounty section and come to service section to apply and wear signature. Is that not funny to you?

...

It not unusual to be honest, firstly they have the right to do so, secondly they may be managing more than one campaign and thirdly and being honest, many people are working in the forum in whatever is more profitable at the moment. No criticism here, I have translated and signed for another campaign myself. One other reason is to spread your risk, since many campaigns disappear into thin air for one reason or another.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

In as much as I quite agree with you, I still believe that it's not necessarily compulsory that the bounty managers must join to promote whatever project they are managing, I mean we all are looking for a way to earn money which does not exclude the managers, and no one including the managers stops us or anyone from applying for the bitcoin paying bounties in the service section as well, so long you meet the requirements, the managers will never stop you from applying for bitcoin paying bounties, so this is to say that we all are as free as they are to promote which ever project we choose to promote, I believe that if you and I meet the requirements to be accepted in bitcoin paying bounties, we wouldn't be doing bounties in the altcoins section.

[Mtaiwo]

i think they have the freedom if there agreement with project they are promoting does not compulsory them to wear it, what i see in them is that they love to maximize opportunity so to me.

[Mtaiwo]

i think they have the freedom if there agreement with project they are promoting does not compulsory them to wear it, what i see in them is that they love to maximize opportunity so to me.

[palle11]

I have also thought like this in the past, where a manager is following the Bitcoin campaign and at the same time he is promoting the Altcoin campaign, this is obviously funny and I myself have also thought that the campaign he manages will not be maximally successful, even though it is. makes me quip at this point, because what you say is absolutely true, because Bitcoin is king, so the campaign with Bitcoin payments is still the best than Altcoins.

Sure you understand the point there. The bounty manager is not going to care much about the success and reward of hunters. That is why there are many failed bounty. Except for the very few managers that have worked to be trusted.

Some bounty managers are also newbies, members, full members account. Why do we expect.

[coinmaster241]

It's familiar to me, there are many bounty managers like that, why? ... I think there are many reasons, we just keep thinking positively
1. it could be that he knows that the project he is managing is less attractive in global market and in the future
2. Bounty manager needs income for life necessities
3. Same Time with bounty he was running. etc

[shoreno]

aside from that there are also managers that manages a bitcoin paying campaign but they wear other signatures that also pays in bitcoin . im not against to this but sometimes that boggles my mind  . they already get paid for managing a campaign and they dont necesarily need to apply or make themselves as one of us common/regular participants  .

  or they can wear a signature but why not wear the signature of the company they are working with. idk why but we feel contented seeing that

[pakhitheboss]

Signature and avatar are a personal space given by Bitcointalk to all ranking members. A member can become a bounty manager and use his personal space to promote his existing project or promote another. It is his/her personal choice. Some projects make it mandatory for the bounty manager to put their signature and avatar and some don't.

[Lantind]

Signature and avatar are a personal space given by Bitcointalk to all ranking members. A member can become a bounty manager and use his personal space to promote his existing project or promote another. It is his/her personal choice. Some projects make it mandatory for the bounty manager to put their signature and avatar and some don't.

And do you think that the campaign that you manage can be successful with the maximum? and to what extent do you care about the campaign you are managing? because a manager also has limits of concern and limits on his job as a manager.

[TheUltraElite]

I dont think Bounty managers should be judged for wearing a certain project's signature provided that project is not a scam.

What a user wears in their signature is their choice - just like the choice of T-shirt that you wear when going out on a party. Would you like it if someone kept telling you that the clothing is "inappropriate" or that someone like them should not wear that?

Bounty managers are not "Altcoin promoters" by any means. They are also members of this forum. The irony is only on the people who find it funny that they wear a signature that they wish to wear, paid or non-paid.

[cabalism13]

MONEY SPEAKS LOUDER THAN ANYTHING

This is the only fact here, Besides if a certain project doesn't  offer much they should somehow agree to the manager's terms instead of making demands or anything.
Like if a certain bounty hires me and can only pay 20 usd for their Ann no problem, but don't  expect me to advertise it.
Services will be left as is, no extra deals.

[mersal]

MONEY SPEAKS LOUDER THAN ANYTHING

This is the only fact here, Besides if a certain project doesn't  offer much they should somehow agree to the manager's terms instead of making demands or anything.
Like if a certain bounty hires me and can only pay 20 usd for their Ann no problem, but don't  expect me to advertise it.
Services will be left as is, no extra deals.

OP thinks that bounty managers can demand from the team to pay in BTC or USDT for all the participants but why they should do when people are available to work for free?

Only if a bounty hunter changes the manager will be forced to change or else nothing is going to be changed.

[cabalism13]

MONEY SPEAKS LOUDER THAN ANYTHING

This is the only fact here, Besides if a certain project doesn't  offer much they should somehow agree to the manager's terms instead of making demands or anything.
Like if a certain bounty hires me and can only pay 20 usd for their Ann no problem, but don't  expect me to advertise it.
Services will be left as is, no extra deals.

OP thinks that bounty managers can demand from the team to pay in BTC or USDT for all the participants but why they should do when people are available to work for free?

Only if a bounty hunter changes the manager will be forced to change or else nothing is going to be changed.

Actually they can, as USDT is a stable coin and this has a possibility especially if a certain project is only starting for their marketing  strategies, then come with a changed after they settle and be somewhat have a stable community.
Well, this depends upon their agreement, so to sum up, Bounty Managers here in the forum are just also like us Sig Participants.

[TopTort777]

Then what should a bounty manager do, if he manages 2 or more campaign? Wear half of each projects signature? Wear one signature on odd days, and other on even? I think bounty managers are free to support anything they want in their signature. Same as people that work on Coca-Cola factory. They can drink what ever they want. Of course it will be funny if Pepsi worker drinks Coca-Cola during his shifts. But if he get a warning for not being loyal, he can simply sue Pepsi for that.

The point is that signature campaign is organized and every one can see that. There should be clean up in bounty and not to run off to wear signature and get paid in bitcoin and they are able to convert, do whatever they want with it weekly as there sweat.

A good example is the bounty going with Murat, one of the most trusted. The reward is weekly that is also in his wallet as escrowed. And the project is already existing, and trading in three different exchanges.

Thread is below. Such projects in bounty section will time will organize the section.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5313677.0

I still dont get it. Being bounty manager is just work. It is not obligatory to wear signature of a project you manage. What if Bounty manager really supports what is in his signature. If you work in McDonalds, their food should not be the only one you should eat.

I'm sure this situation is not about money or because Bitcoins/altcoins being easier to receive/convert/spend. Even if a project they manage pays more in tokens, and they are traded, I wont be the that sure that bounty manager would immediately switch his btc/eth/usdt signature to token/coin one.

[cheezcarls]

Bounty managers run more than one crypto project to manage, so they can’t wear all of their signatures you know? They have the right to choose which signature would they like to wear despite managing multiple campaigns. It’s their choice and you have to respect that, as they don’t just focus on one income source only.

[Yogee]

CryptopreneurBrainboss wearing BestChange signature.
pakhitheboss wearing Roobet.
Hhampuz is also promoting altcoin bounties.

Perhaps they will read this topic and share their opinion.

I do not find it ironic to be honest with you. The job is to manage a campaign and it does not mean wearing signature is part of the deal. You can use Brainboss service ANN as an example https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5124215.0

It could be simply to avoid any conflict of interest. Otherwise BM would have to grade himself on a weekly basis.
But lets be honest, BTC campaign will always be more sought after than altcoin campaigns.

Hello guys, please lets not make mess of this thread. We can read the page again to really get the intent ,gist and dynamics of the post and not politicize it or count post with it. I understand exactly why this was posted here and not in bitcoin board.

Dude, I didn't think about forum politics or what ever you are talking about.
What about post count?
I don't understand why you have to bring what board this is posted.

You guys dragging in signature managers here, huh... why.

That's because Brainboss and pakhitheboss are also altcoin bounty managers wearing a signature that's paid in BTC.

The signature campaign managers you dragging in (Hhampuz, CryptopreneurBrainboss and other signature are so known, reputable for signature and surely they open thread for bounty, that is not what this thread try to discuss.

What the thread is discussing is bounty managers running after signature campaign. They can make the bounty section better by insisting on payment for hunters in valuable altcoins.

With the exception of Hhampuz who doesn't apply for signature campaigns paid in BTC, the other campaign managers applied in another campaign while managing a bounty so they can also answer questions that you asked. Don't you think they are the best people to respond here or are they exempted because you're afraid of what they have to say? Don't cower now after boldly making this post.

......

btcltcdigger's response is not politicizing your thread. He is also a bounty manager by the way.

[Cling18]

One bounty manager can promote multiple campaigns at once so how they can support all the projects at once? because they can wear only one signature at a time to be visible under their profile.

Bounty manager also hired by the team to managed the participants and calculate stakes if bounty wants the manager to wear the signature then they may wear it for appropriate payment but as far as I know most bounty managers work for partial BTC payment and remaining in their tokens and no bounties fall under this category may not get interested by them.

yeah, they do not have to support project which promote, but it would be a good thing, don't you think?
I know that bounty manager could not know if the project will be successful or not, who would know that? that does not know even the founder, but some scams could be seen from the first point, and I would advise everyone to skip promotion on those projects

when something is fishy in the project, it is not without a reason

I see nothing wrong with that as long as they're trusted and were able to handle their projects well, it's fine if they support other projects. Most bounty managers these days are handling different projects so it will be hard for them to promote and support a single project so they have the freedom to choose.

[Ziskinberg]

I've seen a bounty manager that has promoted different bounty, so it's up to him if he will promote by wearing a signature on his profile or not. His job is to run the campaign, that's it, wearing a signature is another thing, but as long as he do his main job effectively, I think there's no problem with that.

I can even see a bounty manager who wear a signature of his service, but able to run a successful bounty campaign.

IMO, it's not a big deal as long as the promoters agree with the job of the bounty managers.

[JooBra]

I've seen a bounty manager that has promoted different bounty, so it's up to him if he will promote by wearing a signature on his profile or not. His job is to run the campaign, that's it, wearing a signature is another thing, but as long as he do his main job effectively, I think there's no problem with that.

I can even see a bounty manager who wear a signature of his service, but able to run a successful bounty campaign.

IMO, it's not a big deal as long as the promoters agree with the job of the bounty managers.

Job is a job and what he is wearing on his profile it's his decision. Maybe he is dealing with couple of bounties at the same time and etc. It's not on us to tell anything.

[eaLiTy]

Hello guys, please lets not make mess of this thread. We can read the page again to really get the intent ,gist and dynamics of the post and not politicize it or count post with it. I understand exactly why this was posted here and not in bitcoin board.

It is not about getting political, looks like the OP has a satirical way of asking why the altcoin campaign managers are enrolled in BTCitcoin based campaigns and it has the same over all outlook what you mentioned on bounty managers to look for change in the dynamics of the reward.

What the thread is discussing is bounty managers running after signature campaign. They can make the bounty section better by insisting on payment for hunters in valuable altcoins.

 Anyway, is always a choice for hunter but bounty managers should start looking at changing the dynamics on the reward.

It is basically not possible if they are promoting a project as the team is trying to collect money for the project and if they start giving out BTCitcoin and other valuable asset it will be a big burden from the beginning and no team will be willing to take that risk if they are currently having a limited budget and since everything is transparent on how the rewards are distributed if you think that the bounty is not worth then you can skip that as well and there are a few projects that gives out bounty in valuable asset and the percentage is really low when you compare the overall bounty landscape .

[cabalism13]

IMO, it's not a big deal as long as the promoters agree with the job of the bounty managers.

Well as you can see in this thread it is indeed a big deal LoL. (sarcasm maybe?)

Job is a job and what he is wearing on his profile it's his decision.

Just like what I've said earlier Money speaks louder above all here, and I think that applies to every CM here especially those who have been offered a long time business, not just here on altcoin but on bitcoin paid campaigns as well

[mersal]

MONEY SPEAKS LOUDER THAN ANYTHING

This is the only fact here, Besides if a certain project doesn't  offer much they should somehow agree to the manager's terms instead of making demands or anything.
Like if a certain bounty hires me and can only pay 20 usd for their Ann no problem, but don't  expect me to advertise it.
Services will be left as is, no extra deals.

OP thinks that bounty managers can demand from the team to pay in BTC or USDT for all the participants but why they should do when people are available to work for free?

Only if a bounty hunter changes the manager will be forced to change or else nothing is going to be changed.

Actually they can, as USDT is a stable coin and this has a possibility especially if a certain project is only starting for their marketing  strategies, then come with a changed after they settle and be somewhat have a stable community.
Well, this depends upon their agreement, so to sum up, Bounty Managers here in the forum are just also like us Sig Participants.

But paying in another crypto like BTC or stable coin or any listed altcoin is like project team paying from their pockets so they will less likely to do unless they are forced to do but blaming completely the bounty managers are nit fair because they will also negotiate with the team for alternative payments if there is not enough participants to promote the project.

[randegibran]

Many bounties campaign manager not using signature code like what his campaign promoting because they not sure with his project promotion and think now worth it only take earning from bounty campaign, so he try to get income with other signature campaign. Looks funny he come he can promote other campaign but why not use his bounty campaign, does his campaign is not profitable or become shit coin so try to promote other project?

[semobo]

OP why not you become a bounty manager and demand BTC payments for every campaign you are managing?

Bounties are profitable in 2017 and that's the end of it, any real investors rarely invest on the projects based on bounties in 2021.

[SquallLeonhart]

I've seen a bounty manager that has promoted different bounty, so it's up to him if he will promote by wearing a signature on his profile or not. His job is to run the campaign, that's it, wearing a signature is another thing, but as long as he do his main job effectively, I think there's no problem with that.

I can even see a bounty manager who wear a signature of his service, but able to run a successful bounty campaign.

IMO, it's not a big deal as long as the promoters agree with the job of the bounty managers.

I do agree that it is definitely something that bounty managers care about in the end, but it is not the only thing they care neither, I have seen people that carry their own signature and that is the boss move I have ever seen. I mean think about it, we are talking about carrying your own signature lol, that is really as cool as it gets.

You could do a bounty for more than one place as well, so you can pick one of them while not carrying the other one, there are basically many reasons why a bounty manager may not wear that bounties signature. At the same time we will not really be bothered by bounty manager carrying another bounty, because that will not affect the bounty they are running, so it wouldn't really matter. However if they do, that is not an extra point neither, maybe they will get paid more who knows, but that's it, nothing for us.

[Ziskinberg]

I've seen a bounty manager that has promoted different bounty, so it's up to him if he will promote by wearing a signature on his profile or not. His job is to run the campaign, that's it, wearing a signature is another thing, but as long as he do his main job effectively, I think there's no problem with that.

I can even see a bounty manager who wear a signature of his service, but able to run a successful bounty campaign.

IMO, it's not a big deal as long as the promoters agree with the job of the bounty managers.

Job is a job and what he is wearing on his profile it's his decision. Maybe he is dealing with couple of bounties at the same time and etc. It's not on us to tell anything.

Wearing a signature does not directly promoting the campaign, most signature campaigns does not even require to participate in the ANN thread discussion as it's a violation per forum rules, wearing a sig yes is a personal choice and your posting style should not change. Also, one can wear a signature without getting paid, don't mind people who judge you wearing a sig, again it's not a big deal.

[wxxyrqa]

I believe that, first of all, everything depends on the conditions facing the Bounty manager. His main task is to conduct a Bounty company in accordance with the specified rules and conditions, and the team hardly sets conditions for the Bounty manager to wear a signature or Avatar. In addition, recently very often there are Bounty managers, whose accounts are generally J.member or member, so the account of the manager who creates the Bounty theme is only formal.

[Kunnu]

If a bounty manager don't want to take much risk then he/she wouldn't hesitate to take part in the bounties of service section where mostly bounty rewards to be paid in BTC basically it's all depends in which option bounty managers find themselves suitable so I don't think there is something funny or wrong after all every member has right to wear signature based on their rank and forum rules.

[BIT-BENDER]

  It tantamount to having and advertising a signature campaign and never using, or patronizing the services of the signature they advertise, it's business sometimes don't make a mole out of an ant hill out of it, they work for the bounty by organising there campaign, -if the bounty cared much they can entice them with higher pay to have on their signature- we  shouldn't mind if they work well in both department that's required of them

[virasog]

I have been seeing that bounty managers abandon to wear bounty that they are promoting or any other bounty but wear signature, I'm wondering on that, and why 

They publish bounty in bounty section and come to service section to apply and wear signature. Is that not funny to you?

This is not funny at all. The bounty managers have the right to wear signature of any bounty / Service. If they are not promoting the bounty and only working as a manager, there is no need for them to wear that signature. Also, many bounty managers are running more than one bounty at a time, so obviously they can't wear signatures of multiple bounties simultaneously.

[JohnBitCo]

The irony of it is that they manage bounty but promote bitcoin paying signature. Lol

Most of the bounty managers are well known and reputed. Therefore, if they apply in any high paying bitcoin signature campaign, they get preference over the others and hence get selected. They are already earning the bounty tokens by managing the bounty campaigns, so why not they decide to earn some bitcoins also at the same time by enrolling in bitcoin signature campaign.

[libert19]

How do you expect them to judge their own posts? They are the one who's managing the bounty, they can fill out whatever numbers they want without anyone knowing whether they indeed completed the bounty posts or if the post quality was good enough.

[goaldigger]

How do you expect them to judge their own posts? They are the one who's managing the bounty, they can fill out whatever numbers they want without anyone knowing whether they indeed completed the bounty posts or if the post quality was good enough.

That’s why quality manager exist, simply because we can’t trust all the manager especially the new one. Imagine, having a lot of bounty campaign, then how can we expect a manager to wear all of that? They are being paid to run the campaign and not for wearing signature and I guess that’s two are different.

[Viscore]

How do you expect them to judge their own posts? They are the one who's managing the bounty, they can fill out whatever numbers they want without anyone knowing whether they indeed completed the bounty posts or if the post quality was good enough.

That’s why quality manager exist, simply because we can’t trust all the manager especially the new one. Imagine, having a lot of bounty campaign, then how can we expect a manager to wear all of that? They are being paid to run the campaign and not for wearing signature and I guess that’s two are different.

Why would we have to mind what they are wearing?

Some campaign manager does not even wear a signature and yet they promote a successful campaign. It's all about the trust of the community and advertiser would choose a bounty manager that has a good reputation in the community as that would give a better chance for the project they promoted to succeed.

[bigcash2011]

I have been seeing that bounty managers abandon to wear bounty that they are promoting or any other bounty but wear signature, I'm wondering on that, and why 

They publish bounty in bounty section and come to service section to apply and wear signature. Is that not funny to you?

They do that because they understand that many bounty they promote will never get to the market, many will exit when you invest your money.

They apply in signature because they know bitcoin payment is king, in every exchange, every P2P transaction and easily converted to fiat.

Why do they manage what they are not sure of return and go over to keep applying in bitcoin paying campaign while you keep relying on them to deliver, help you to get payment. You know this may not happen because they have taken payment from the bounty team and also earn from signature campaign.

They come to apply to signature and can't do research on the bounty, that is why scam is more in bounty.

Why don't they bargain for payment with altcoins with high value like etheruem , bnb, USDT etc.

If I were the team, I will include it in the terms...

And the signature section too can help to stop this if they stop them to concentration making bounty better

And if this is done, you see shit bounties won't come up lol

I wonder that bounty managers still have to apply to signature campaign and get accepted and start the job of promoting another project apart from the bounty they are handling. This is funny indeed, hahaha 

I don't think is encouraging to see. That is basically the concern

The irony of it is that they manage bounty but promote bitcoin paying signature. Lol

I personally feel tgat signature bounty market is no more the same like it used to be back in 2015 to 2017 when everyone was making good income from signature campaigns but now seems like this sector is fading away because most bounty campaigns are not offering signature campaigns and even those who are offering have allocated small budget for signature which is really discouraging and if this thing continues i thing people will stop participating in signature campaigns. As for as bounty managers are concerned, they have the right to select the project that they deem more lucrative.

[randegibran]

Bounty manager not believe maybe with his project promoting about success or not for the future, so they try to join with other bounty campaign and use different signature code between his promoting bounty campaign and as bounty manage, I think not all project bounty become success because many project failed without any exchange market for listing.

[abel1337]

Bounty manager not believe maybe with his project promoting about success or not for the future, so they try to join with other bounty campaign and use different signature code between his promoting bounty campaign and as bounty manage, I think not all project bounty become success because many project failed without any exchange market for listing.

That said is the risk of joining a bounty campaign. There are bounty hunters that are considering a project a failed project if they can't deliver their project's token listed into an exchange which leaves bounty participants 0 gain from them. If bounty hunters want to have an assurance on their payment, They should switch to signature campaign on the service board because the signature campaign pays weekly and is managed by reputable managers.

As per bounty managers who are not wearing their client's project signature, I think it is a self-choice not to wear it plus there are limitations on the signatures to be worn, We can only wear a single signature. The bounty manager's job is to manage the campaign, this is why bounty managers are putting disclaimers in their threads saying that they are only hired and don't have ties to the team in case a bad thing happened.

[Anonylz]

No it doesn't look funny and I don't know why you should see it as funny because bounty is bounty whether being paid with btc or paid with tokens, that's their personal choice, the bottom line is you are wearing a signature and doing post you would not have ordinarily done if you are not being paid to do so, don't give it class,
you are being paid to post irrespective of the mode of payment,.

I hope you understand that being paid with btc does not make the project you are wearing the signature any more legit than the rest, any greedy ass dev will still rug pull or exit scam irrespective of what they paid with during their bounty campaign, plus it does not mean the team will work any more harder than the rest,
There are many btc paying campaign that are known scam.

[skarais]

Campaign manager are those whose management service are employed by altcoin project developers. They make deal prior to campaign launch and some of them may offer their signature space for rent by project they oversee. But all manager have the right to accept and refuse to use signature as long as they get paid more than their other contract. They do not have to use the supervised campaign signature as long as there is no agreement between the project team manager.

I don't think it's ironic for a manager in the case you're asking. I think it's only natural that they prioritize higher pay for their signature space and maybe they'll agree to use the signature of a project they supervise if they're paid accordingly. As far as I know, when someone hires their management service, the profile and signature space are not included in the deal before the deal is made.

[randegibran]

I think is not big problem when getting bounty manager campaign use other signature campaign code based on his bounty manage, they want to get more with bounty campaign and try how to get passive income in many way, as bounty manager and try to be bounty participants, almost bounty not guarantee so he try with many bounties campaign and hope have worth and higher price coin bounty campaign.

[Matimtim]

I think being bounty manager it doesn't mean they need to advertise that company too, is not included in their responsibility as manager, meaning they can advertise different  project and the same time they can manage another projects too.

I think this thing is case to case bases, because like if the manager who is trusted manager in this forum is currently advertising a certain project then,  they can  manage another projects and the same time or its depends on his discretion.

[isaac_clarke22]

Nothing wrong with that, OP.
There are things called "agreement" or "contract". They just need to manage the campaign that they were hired at. They're managers not the advertisers though some BM do that, but they aren't obliged to wear if the owner or the devs don't even require it.

It's like you're saying that when a software developers works in a company then he doesn't have the option to freelance after work.

[semobo]

There are advantages and disadvantages, managers doing that may want to get additional income and not don't care about the project they are promoting, it has always been like that most of the new projects will fail, not only in the bounty even those who have raised funds and have listed will be lost in no time if the project is released.

The job of bounty manager is to maintain the stakes for every week and check for any fake applicant, links, tweets, etc but if they are promoting a scam project after they known to scam people then their reputation will get ruined and there are lot of examples can be given for such cases and the one I still know is aTriz who was one of the most wanted campaign manager in the past but helped scam prject to fake their raised money give an end to his career.

[Jackl87]

Just because they manage a bounty of a certain project does not automatically imply that they also have to wear their signature to or take part in that bounty too.
Bounty Manager are also "normal" users of this forum and not employees of the projects that are doing the bounty.
I also think it's better if bounty managers are not taking part in the bounty that they are managing because most bounties have limited numbers or a limited pool.

[rozak]

Just because they manage a bounty of a certain project does not automatically imply that they also have to wear their signature to or take part in that bounty too.
Bounty Manager are also "normal" users of this forum and not employees of the projects that are doing the bounty.
I also think it's better if bounty managers are not taking part in the bounty that they are managing because most bounties have limited numbers or a limited pool.

Of course, it wouldn't be nice when the bounty manager was involved in a campaign that he handled himself.
As your deed, the bounty manager is an ordinary member of this forum, they are free to use their signature even to change the signature of all the campaigns they handle.
but at the moment I believe. that some of the existing and active bounty managers are well-performing people with excellent reputations as well. Look at the moment there are lots of new bounty managers, but those who stay with good reputations still have projects for them to handle.

[kooboat]

This is an intriguing  post, but I don't  see any conflict of interest  here. Bounty  managers are also interested  in making  money just like bounty hunters. This has been the practice  for a very long  time  now, bounty managers can always wear different signatures in contrast to that of the bounty being managed. It's  just a normal situation  of someone having  two paid jobs.  Most Bounty  hunters also do a lot of bounty campaigns  at a particular  point in time.

[ice18]

Nothing is to be argued here its the right of every people here to join what he wants even if his a bounty manager, admin, mods or any position they are holding as long as there's no conflict and no violated rules in this forum. 

[randegibran]

I love with Hhmpuz bounty campaign distribution on date because their promise sent coin today and they have sent all without complaint any payment fees transaction, maybe if any other bounty campaign manager will give reason with eth gas fee but not for Hhmpuz bounty campaign, I like this bounty campaign manager can distribution on time.

[bitzizzix]

Nothing is to be argued here its the right of every people here to join what he wants even if his a bounty manager, admin, mods or any position they are holding as long as there's no conflict and no violated rules in this forum. 

Yes, it's funny to argue with it because a manager must already know and be an expert in his field what to do so as not to cause conflict.
The manager just does what is agreed beforehand and it's all for all of us who are here for us to get the job and don't have to talk about it because a manager is someone who better understands what to do for the job in his field.

[J1mb0]

The bounty manager is also the person hired to manage, they are not responsible for the success or failure of the project they manage. And the bounty manager is completely signed up for the project he wants, I think this is completely normal.

[sayaya17]

As long as it follows the rules, any member of the forum may here participate in any campaign, including the manager. Who does not want to follow the bitcoin payment signature campaign, if it enters the qualification surely most people also want to follow it, let alone bitcoin is bullish and the price is getting more expensive. This is an opportunity for anyone to get it, either from a signature campaign with bitcoin payments or by trading.

[Traderbtcc]

I don't know why you feel it's wrong, personally I can't find any thing wrong with that, cause the last time I checked it's not mandatory that they must wear the signature code of whatever project they are managing/promoting, also maybe the campaign manager is probably in need of money and bitcoin signature can get him/her the money since they will get payment weekly, unlike bounty where they have to wait till the token gets listed,no harm in that.

[ElaineGanda]

Well I don't see any problem with it because as fas as I know those bounty managers have the consent of their clients. Besides, a bounty manager has a lot of on going project that is why their signature and avatar will always vary depends on what they want to wear.

[Icologies]

Well I don't see any problem with it because as fas as I know those bounty managers have the consent of their clients. Besides, a bounty manager has a lot of on going project that is why their signature and avatar will always vary depends on what they want to wear.

I agree because one bounty manager can hold multiple bounties and it has no rules at all so there's nothing funny in this
I thought it was natural and maybe this problem already be resolved right Gift Managers Wearing Signatures another

[dunfida]

The irony of it is that they manage bounty but promote bitcoin paying signature. Lol

Its none of your business on what those managers do have in mind and come to think that it isnt necessary for them to wear off a bounty signature that theyve been managing.
Lets say they do manage 10 campaigns, it isnt really needed for them to wear off those signature alternately? thats pure nonsense.Also, the company that would hire
them wouldnt really be making it compulsory even if they do hire the manager doesnt mean that they should wear off sig.If those managers been wearing off
bitcoin paying campaigns then its their choice, its none of our business.

[Lordhermes]

I don't know why you feel it's wrong, personally I can't find any thing wrong with that, cause the last time I checked it's not mandatory that they must wear the signature code of whatever project they are managing/promoting, also maybe the campaign manager is probably in need of money and bitcoin signature can get him/her the money since they will get payment weekly, unlike bounty where they have to wait till the token gets listed,no harm in that.

What people don't understand is that, the bounty manager is never responsible for any project that fail at certain point in time, bounty manager work is generally to make sure the project is promoted to every corner and pays off the hunters when due, so if his interested in promoting multiple bounties at same time based on his time schedule for successful management, it's alright for him as well.

[ElmedoRator]

But whether this matter really matters or has any meaning in this space, it is your opinion that you do not like it, but I see no problem. What about BM? They're gods or whatever sublime you see them wearing another campaign signature is ironic, just do well what they have to do.

[aryana42]

But whether this matter really matters or has any meaning in this space, it is your opinion that you do not like it, but I see no problem. What about BM? They're gods or whatever sublime you see them wearing another campaign signature is ironic, just do well what they have to do.

Actually, this kind of thing does not need to be debated or questioned, because it is a personal right of someone, including a manager as well, because this does not only concern how good the project is, but also about the likes and beliefs of the projects he participates in, even though on average On average, the participants who took part in certain projects were due to the good projects and the large payouts, both in the form of BTC and in the form of an Altcoin project.

[acdc]

It's the manager prerogative to wear the signature they have been given the task too. Of course they will choose a more rewarding or satisfying compensation, this is a common sense I think. If you are a manager then you get a contract for handling campaign, usually you'll go for a regular signature that pays fiat or bitcoin.

Not saying his not supporting the project he handled but he is just commission to do the bounty service nothing more btt of course they make sure the project is legit so it wouldn't do bad record on their portfolio.

That's right, the bounty manager is also a bounty hunter and he can put an signature on someone who pays high salaries.
Projects that he manages are simply paid to do that, he has no responsibility to promote the project.

I agree, the bounty manager is not a member of the project, he is like a bounty hunter participating in some part of the bounty program.
If he has a reputable account it is not uncommon for him to use it to promote another project with higher salaries.

[dhemasm]

I don't think there's anything wrong with that, as long as the bounty manager doesn't have a contract that requires him not to promote other projects through his signature, while not the others by promoting Fraud Project I think it's their right to participate in the signature campaign they want.

[adzino]

I don't see any "irony" over here. The bounty managers aren't required to wear the signature of the program they are promoting. It's their signature space and they can do what they want with it. They get paid for maintaining the bounty program, not for wearing the signature. Or probably they aren't allowed to wear the bounty signature and join the program since they maybe able to manipulate their own data.
But yeah, that's funny. They know that those bounty program pays shit, and hence even if they have option to join them, they don't lol.

[randegibran]

Often a bounty manager will manage many different projects at the same time.
Obviously he cannot use the signature for all projects at the same time, in which case he has the right to use the signature for the best project and pay the highest salary.

They have many project manage on the same time so its confused if using all signature campaign, but I think most worth if using his signature only like promoting about his manage campaign, not using other signature code on his account. Check with some bounty campaign manager not using signature code from other project.

[ElaineGanda]

Well I don't see any problem with it because as fas as I know those bounty managers have the consent of their clients. Besides, a bounty manager has a lot of on going project that is why their signature and avatar will always vary depends on what they want to wear.

I agree because one bounty manager can hold multiple bounties and it has no rules at all so there's nothing funny in this
I thought it was natural and maybe this problem already be resolved right Gift Managers Wearing Signatures another

Their cleint should not avoid them to use different signature because it is included on their contract. Besides the only job of bounty manager is to handle and manage a certain project. It is not their job to help the project to advertise or endorse the project.

[palle11]

I don't see any "irony" over here. The bounty managers aren't required to wear the signature of the program they are promoting. It's their signature space and they can do what they want with it. They get paid for maintaining the bounty program, not for wearing the signature. Or probably they aren't allowed to wear the bounty signature and join the program since they maybe able to manipulate their own data.
But yeah, that's funny. They know that those bounty program pays shit, and hence even if they have option to join them, they don't lol.

One of the guys seating on the fence, funny again.

They know that those bounty program pays shit, and hence even if they have option to join them, they don't lol.

This is contradicting yourself. And it means you are understanding my view.
Have you seen a signature campaign manager wearing bounty logo? But bounty managers wear signature logo. The point is they can clear up the bounty by bringing up bounties that pay with bnb, etheruem, litecoin, monero and many other high value altcoins.

[ultrloa]

I don't see any "irony" over here. The bounty managers aren't required to wear the signature of the program they are promoting. It's their signature space and they can do what they want with it. They get paid for maintaining the bounty program, not for wearing the signature. Or probably they aren't allowed to wear the bounty signature and join the program since they maybe able to manipulate their own data.
But yeah, that's funny. They know that those bounty program pays shit, and hence even if they have option to join them, they don't lol.

One of the guys seating on the fence, funny again.

They know that those bounty program pays shit, and hence even if they have option to join them, they don't lol.

This is contradicting yourself. And it means you are understanding my view.
Have you seen a signature campaign manager wearing bounty logo? But bounty managers wear signature logo. The point is they can clear up the bounty by bringing up bounties that pay with bnb, etheruem, litecoin, monero and many other high value altcoins.

There's nothing to debate about this since signature campaign management job is focus to handle the campaign and give the weekly reports(counting the post made) to the owners and signatures space is not included in this package. If the owners want their manager to where their signature codes well that's another contract that needed to be discuss and the payment from it is separate from bounty campaign managing.

[Argoo]

I have also thought like this in the past, where a manager is following the Bitcoin campaign and at the same time he is promoting the Altcoin campaign, this is obviously funny and I myself have also thought that the campaign he manages will not be maximally successful, even though it is. makes me quip at this point, because what you say is absolutely true, because Bitcoin is king, so the campaign with Bitcoin payments is still the best than Altcoins.

I do not see anything bad or unusual in this. If payment for a subscription campaign is made in bitcoins, such a campaign usually lasts a very long time, sometimes for years, and there is a strictly limited number of participants. If you reset this signature, then you probably won't go back there.
I have also seen a similar situation several times. However, if the bounty campaign manager carries a fresh signature of a company that is paid with tokens, then this is really suspicious.

[guydin]

I agree that many Bounty are simply using investors to draw out money. There is no guarantee that you will receive the promised reward. Now people do not care about their decency and conscience, everyone wants one thing - to earn, and it does not matter in an honest way or by deception. When I hear about giveaways that promise big rewards, it makes me laugh. After a huge number of negative reviews, I'm generally surprised that someone else believes that it is really possible to make money on the Bounty. Better not to waste your time on this pointless activity.

[randegibran]

Not most important about bounty campaign manager use different signature code from his bounty manage depend if payment running well and on time, I think most have debate right now why bounty campaign manager not distribution coin on the schedule because ICO project have early send coin to bounty manager, why they want waiting for coin distribution after have cheap price.

[palle11]

If the owners want their manager to where their signature codes well that's another contract that needed to be discuss and the payment from it is separate from bounty campaign managing.

The idea is the bounty managers don't need to take up bounty jobs they know are shit and that owners won't pay, or that are not listed and trading. Some bounty hunters have shit tokens in their wallets that are not in exchange for a long time and that means a wasted time while bounty managers have received their payment either in dollar, bitcoin, etheruem etc.anyhow

[leea-1334]

I do not find it funny. I think it is fine to wear a signature, a avatar and be in a project supporting it for all different projects. It is just space on your forum profile in the end.

I do believe in supporting AND using the project you promote though,,, I think the stranger thing to point out is not many people actually use the service that they are promoting.

[Emitdama]

They publish bounty in bounty section and come to service section to apply and wear signature. Is that not funny to you?

Promoting a product/service and helping promote something are two different things. You might promote something but as a job, you are helping someone promote their project. If they are promoting a scam though, that's where it is wrong.

They do that because they understand that many bounty they promote will never get to the market, many will exit when you invest your money.

Yeah, that but also the fact that bounty in altcoins pays much less as compared to the BTC or direct payment campaigns. Campaign managers are also participants in other campaigns and everyone wants the highest possible payment for the efforts they put into writing posts.

Consider this, does an actor promoting a product always use that product? No. they are promoting it as they don't mind doing it but they use something else because they prefer it.

Also, going as per your logic what will happen if a bounty manager is promoting multiple campaigns? They cannot wear them all at the same time, right?

Yes, some might agree with you that if you help promote a project you should also promote it, but I don't see a problem in either of the two.

[bryant.coleman]

I don't think that there is anything wrong in bounty managers wearing signatures from other campaigns. Most of the managers take care of multiple projects and it is not practical for them to display the signature from all the projects that they are managing. Also, most of the bounty campaigns last for one or two months, while many of the signature campaigns (which make the payment in BTC) are more long lasting. Why should the bounty managers leave their trusted signature campaign to display the bounty signature?

[omone1]

Laughing out loud! Only few of the BM care about the project they are promoting and their community too, Most times it's just about the money they will be paid. This is why I selectively get involved in bounty and don't participate in much pool.

[Lanatsa]

Laughing out loud! Only few of the BM care about the project they are promoting and their community too, Most times it's just about the money they will be paid. This is why I selectively get involved in bounty and don't participate in much pool.

Put up yourself on managers situation, for sure we would really be doing the same thing when it comes on how we do look for work and trying to make money as much as we can.

We cant just stick out on a project and be loyal because if we do consider on how many fraud projects in the market in the end of the bounty then as a manager then you are
really aware on that kind of situation where you cant just trust up even you are the ones who do make out some community handling for them.

They would always go to the secure side of things of which an understandable thing.

[SistaFista]

Mate, it is ok if you thinks like that, but there are some possibilities that makes bounty managers not wear the signature of their handled bounties.
For example, before they manage bounty campaign, they already have or currently participating on signature campaign of other project (maybe the payment is better) so they still wear the signature from other campaign while manage their bounty campaign.
I think there is no bounty manager wants the project they handle to fail and leave them unpaid.

[mamesso]

Laughing out loud! Only few of the BM care about the project they are promoting and their community too, Most times it's just about the money they will be paid. This is why I selectively get involved in bounty and don't participate in much pool.

Your jokes are not funny, buddy, You speak like that because you have never been a bounty manager. Lol.
You need to know, BM task is only to manage the campaign and there is no agreement that requiring BM uses the signature and avatar of a particular project that she is managing. What if BM is managing 2 or 3 campaigns at the same time, whether they should use the signature and avatar at the same time too. Think.

Here we don't need to put BM in a corner because they don't use the signature of the project they are managing. They are just like us, have a human nature and of course they also want to get more income to support their children and their wives.

Look at how they work. CryptopreneurBrainboss, yahoo62278, Hhampuz, pakhitheboss and some other trusted managers. They use different signature and avatar, but the projects they work on are always being hunted down by bounty hunter.

They are very selective when accepting an offer to manage a bounty, because if the project they are working with becomes a scam, hence their good name is at stake.
We have to thank them, because with a trusted bounty manager like them, will make our work as a bounty hunter easier.
And it needs to be underlined, No bounty manager wants a project they work on to fail.

[youdacapt]

I have been seeing that bounty managers abandon to wear bounty that they are promoting or any other bounty but wear signature, I'm wondering on that, and why 

They publish bounty in bounty section and come to service section to apply and wear signature. Is that not funny to you?

They do that because they understand that many bounty they promote will never get to the market, many will exit when you invest your money.
 

We need to understand that bounty managers are humans just as we are, with different needs; if a bounty manager is hosting an AAA Bounty with 40$ rewards; then has an offer to  wear signature for a bounty BBB with 75$ rewards, As regards altcoin bounties, you never can tell if the bounty manager will receive the tokens as part of payment, which means they do not necessarily have to work with the bounty or if the bm needs the btc payment even more urgently; it is only naturally that he goes for the big and better  pay for present need.

[Marvelman]

I don't find that ironic. I worked in a marketing agency, does that mean I should have changed my lifestyle every time I promoted some new brand as part of my job? Did I have to change my car every time I run a campaign for another car brand?
And what about when I run two campaigns at the same time? How should I decide which brand to promote?

[bakasabo]

Laughing out loud! Only few of the BM care about the project they are promoting and their community too, Most times it's just about the money they will be paid. This is why I selectively get involved in bounty and don't participate in much pool.

All bounty managers are kind of freelancers. Ever seen a freelancer doing only one single work/task/project ? These kind of freelancers probably dying from hunter, but our bounty managers (I'm sure in this) have a habit to eat at least 3 times per day.

Wearing a signature is not the only to care about the project and promotion? Take a look for example on bubbalex. He never wears signature of a project he manages, but he continues to post news and manage ANN topic even after bounty is over.

[fia_naila]

Whats wrong with bounty managers using bitcoin signature ? Ibknow most of bitcoin maxis is not support ICO. They usually call it scam or shitcoin. But i think there are still many bitcoiner which support altcoin. Vitalik it self was bitcoiner maxis.

[distr@yopmail.com]

Whats wrong with bounty managers using bitcoin signature ? Ibknow most of bitcoin maxis is not support ICO. They usually call it scam or shitcoin. But i think there are still many bitcoiner which support altcoin. Vitalik it self was bitcoiner maxis.

there really isn't a problem with that. bounty managers want to get something more definite than what they can work on. while the campaigns they promote are sometimes only in small numbers. of course, joining in another campaign that pays them with payment definitely doesn't hurt as long as he complies with the expected qualifications and rules.

This forum is free for anyone with interests and goals.
There are no rules binding bounty managers to participate in other manager campaigns.
develop yourself to achieve your own goals.

[Beparanf]

Whats wrong with bounty managers using bitcoin signature ? Ibknow most of bitcoin maxis is not support ICO. They usually call it scam or shitcoin. But i think there are still many bitcoiner which support altcoin. Vitalik it self was bitcoiner maxis.

there really isn't a problem with that. bounty managers want to get something more definite than what they can work on. while the campaigns they promote are sometimes only in small numbers. of course, joining in another campaign that pays them with payment definitely doesn't hurt as long as he complies with the expected qualifications and rules.

This forum is free for anyone with interests and goals.
There are no rules binding bounty managers to participate in other manager campaigns.
develop yourself to achieve your own goals.

The irony is, why they will find another campaign while the one they are managing has open slot, it just mean that the Bounty Manager has no confidence on the bounty campaign that they manage which I agree partly especially when The bounty manager is applying on signature campaign while running the campaign for almost a week or more.

But I get why Bounty manager still looking for campaign on Services section. Some of them is looking for a define payment in Bitcoin for a short period of time. But it's really ironic seeing this kind of scenario. #Realtalk

[Spaffin]

Why should a manager participate in his Bounty company and spend his time writing posts, if he already has a lot of work, taking into account filling out spreadsheets of Not only the signature campaign, but also social networks.
I believe that the Bounty manager receives a large enough remuneration not to participate at all in the Bounty company that he represents. Today, Bounty Hunters receive too little rewards and for a Bounty manager this is a trifle. Moreover, considering that managers run several companies at the same time.