Keyhunt - development requests - bug reports

[math09183]

Did you observer any increase in memory usage with a new version?

[1715297063]

1715297063

[1715297063]

1715297063

[1715297063]

1715297063

[WanderingPhilospher]

Seems tha the calculation is correct. That is why that puzzle is not solved yet. We all try it by our selfs just hopping for luck.

By the way i made some videos about keyhunt:

keyhunt - Why the program show 0 keys/s?
Keyhunt Solving the 63 bit puzzle, just testing

Regards!

Albert, I think your videos will help people understand, especially the "0 keys" question!

[therealbtcdave]

How is the "-r" range supposed to work? I ran a test using keyhunt in address mode but set the range limited to 1:10.

I expected keyhunt to find the first 3 address only and stop searching due to the range I set. keyhunt found the first 3 addresses and more! I was confused why it found more than the first 3 addreses and continued searching past the range that was set?

Test:

./keyhunt -m address -f tests/1to32.txt -r 1:10

[albert0bsd]

Albert, I think your videos will help people understand, especially the "0 keys" question!

yes that is why i do it, any request for a new video just tell me

How is the "-r" range supposed to work? I ran a test using keyhunt in address mode but set the range limited to 1:10.

I expected keyhunt to find the first 3 address only and stop searching due to the range I set. keyhunt found the first 3 addresses and more! I was confused why it found more than the first 3 addreses and continued searching past the range that was set?

Test:

./keyhunt -m address -f tests/1to32.txt -r 1:10

-r 1:10 is too small, i need to check the code but i remeber that the limit is something like 65K keys there are some internal limits for the number of operations, the minimal number of keys is 1024 but the code doesn't limit it, i need to chage it to show a warning in screen.

[therealbtcdave]

Albert, I think your videos will help people understand, especially the "0 keys" question!

yes that is why i do it, any request for a new video just tell me

How is the "-r" range supposed to work? I ran a test using keyhunt in address mode but set the range limited to 1:10.

I expected keyhunt to find the first 3 address only and stop searching due to the range I set. keyhunt found the first 3 addresses and more! I was confused why it found more than the first 3 addreses and continued searching past the range that was set?

Test:

./keyhunt -m address -f tests/1to32.txt -r 1:10

-r 1:10 is too small, i need to check the code but i remeber that the limit is something like 65K keys there are some internal limits for the number of operations, the minimal number of keys is 1024 but the code doesn't limit it, i need to chage it to show a warning in screen.

Ok I am following on the range being too small. I will try with a larger range and see if keyhunt works correctly. It would be helpful to know exactly what the minimum range limit is. So since I did not get the results I expected I held off on doing additional tests. A warning in the console would definitely be helpful if you use a range that is too small. Thanks for the quick response too.

[adaris]

is it possible to add a mode -B dance to xpoint mode?

[bigvito19]

Is xpoint mode sequential or random when searching for keys?

[albert0bsd]

By the way guys i just add support for
- Ethereum
- Minikeys

Also i double the speed for rmd160 and add stride option for xpoint, rmd160, address, and ethereum.

is it possible to add a mode -B dance to xpoint mode?

I need to make changes in the code to work with those new modes.

Is xpoint mode sequential or random when searching for keys?

That depend if you enable the flag -R, with that it is random. without it is sequential.

Best regards!

[physis11]

Hi, is it possible for you to consider making a video, or even a step-by-step note on how to test find ethereum's private key, using a known public key.
I couldn't find a step by step about it and I couldn't do it.

By the way guys i just add support for
- Ethereum
- Minikeys

[physis11]

Do you have the pubkey? If not, but you had outgoing transactions, I or you could find the pubkey. Having the pubkey greatly reduces search time. You can use a variety of programs to help find your private key, especially with public key.
[/quote]

Hi, I'm new to this research. I know it's practically impossible to look up all the private keys.
But with the public key is it possible? How much time?
i have been playing with bsgs but to no avail

single address

./keyhunt -m bsgs -f tests/1to32.eth -b 120 -k 640 -t 3 -q -S -B dance

[dextronomous]

Dear alberto,
how is this not ok? or is it ok?
how much time should this last processing take,
already a long few hrs. passed,. thanks
./keyhunt -m bsgs -f pubs.txt -b 120 -k 1024 -q -t 6
+] Version 0.1.20210412 secp256k1

• Setting mode BSGS
• Min range: 800000000000000000000000000000
• Max range: 1000000000000000000000000000000
• Setting k factor to 1024
• Set quiet thread output
• Setting 6 threads
• Opening file pubs0-65.txt
• Added 1129 points from file
• Bit Range 120
• Setting N up to 17592186044416.
• Init 1st bloom filter for 4294967296 elements : 14722.00 MB
• Init 2nd bloom filter for 214748365 elements : 736.13 MB
• Allocating 0.5 MB for 4096 aMP Points
• Precalculating 4096 aMP points
• Allocating 3276.80 MB for 214748365 bP Points
• processing 4294963200/4294967296 bP points : 99%

[albert0bsd]

Dear alberto,
how is this not ok? or is it ok?
how much time should this last processing take,
already a long few hrs. passed,. thanks

Hi, that is not OK but i seen that you are using an old version, that problem is already solved in the newest version.

But with the public key is it possible? How much time?
i have been playing with bsgs but to no avail

It can take from one day to one trillion trillion years or more.

[nomadsena]

While specifying bit rage with -b in bsgs when giving 30 bit range -b 30 its throwing error "range too small". Do i need to change anything in the code or just use -r instead.

[albert0bsd]

In those case you need to use a small N value, like 0x40000000 (30 bits) or 0x1000000 (24 bits)

Code:

-n 0x40000000 

Code:

-n 0x1000000

the default N value is 0x100000000000 enough to cover some 44 bits in  a single operation using only some 1 or 2 MB of RAM

Code:

-n 0x100000000000

So i dont see the necessity to specify a lower range, unless you are doing some test for your self.

[nomadsena]

In those case you need to use a small N value, like 0x40000000 (30 bits) or 0x1000000 (24 bits)

Code:

-n 0x40000000 

Code:

-n 0x1000000

the default N value is 0x100000000000 enough to cover some 44 bits in  a single operation using only some 1 or 2 MB of RAM

Code:

-n 0x100000000000

So i dont see the necessity to specify a lower range, unless you are doing some test for your self.

Exactly. i was testing the code, if i have compiled it right and the code is working.

[mausuv]

In those case you need to use a small N value, like 0x40000000 (30 bits) or 0x1000000 (24 bits)

Code:

-n 0x40000000 

Code:

-n 0x1000000

the default N value is 0x100000000000 enough to cover some 44 bits in  a single operation using only some 1 or 2 MB of RAM

Code:

-n 0x100000000000

So i dont see the necessity to specify a lower range, unless you are doing some test for your self.

please guide me

my pc for 80 cpu 256 GP ram, 1TP stroage

 ./keyhunt -m bsgs -f 120.txt -b 120 -S -t 2 - k 10 >>>>>>>>>> k value i am increaae system bloom filter error why
only one public key use 2 petakeys / per seconed
how to reached 10 Exabyte keys per second please solve my problem

[albert0bsd]

Please post here your error

[mausuv]

Please post here your error

my question update
edit: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5322040.msg58715394#msg58715394

[albert0bsd]

Something is not right with your errors

For K = 1024 the bloom filter is only 4294967296  elements and your error show 110010218577920 that is something more, DID YOU EDIT THE CODE?

Another question is WHY THE FUCK are you using  YELLOW COLOR TO POST TEXT? Are you retard or just one more troll?

I hate python and i will never going to write one python.

[nomadsena]

Is using intel optane persistent memory has any effect on the speed compared to the regular Dram? Has anyone tested with it ?

Is using intel optane persistent memory has any effect on the speed compared to the regular Dram? Has anyone tested with it ?

And one more thing dose the refersh rate of the RAM effect the performance in anyway

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]