Keyhunt - development requests - bug reports

[albert0bsd]

In the post:
 Range
-- from : 0x1
-- to   : 0xfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffebaaedce6af48a03bbfd25e8cd0364141

And what you expected? found the key in seconds?

Genius...... That is the whole range if there is a program to found a key in seconds the bitcoin and all alt-coins will worth ZERO

Please don't ask stupid questions here

[1714308846]

1714308846

[1714308846]

1714308846

[1714308846]

1714308846

[1714308846]

1714308846

[ccinet]

Code:

./keyhunt -m vanity -l compress -r 30000000000000000:3ffffffffffffffff -R -v 13zb1hQ -n 0x6000000 -q -s 10 -t4
[+] Mode vanity
[+] Search compress only
[+] Random mode
[+] Added Vanity search : 13zb1hQ
[+] Quiet thread output
[+] Stats output every 10 seconds
[+] Threads : 4
[+] N = 0x6000000
[+] Range 
[+] -- from : 0x30000000000000000
[+] -- to   : 0x3ffffffffffffffff
[+] Bloom filter for 1 elements.
[+] Loading data to the bloomfilter total: 0.03 MB
[+] Total 5566996480 keys in 310 seconds: ~17 Mkeys/s (17958053 keys/s)
Vanity Private Key: fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffebaaedce6af48a0380b2513a178946f75
pubkey: 03b32edf683e27c1c866c915f093c3e88d4dbedbb81cc48e5f7355dbfd731ab8ba
Address 13zb1hQVwAhBbaDUusG6ogrq3ZnN1WJy5w
rmd160 20d45a6a6f3f0f3f3fbf3d6d7ba46818b1dc1d5c

The first number in the range is greater than the second, it seems that this caused abnormal operation.
Strange 

[Ra al Ghul]

Alberto is a Legend would love to meet him one day 

[satashi_nokamato]

Code:

./keyhunt -m vanity -l compress -r 30000000000000000:3ffffffffffffffff -R -v 13zb1hQ -n 0x6000000 -q -s 10 -t4
[+] Mode vanity
[+] Search compress only
[+] Random mode
[+] Added Vanity search : 13zb1hQ
[+] Quiet thread output
[+] Stats output every 10 seconds
[+] Threads : 4
[+] N = 0x6000000
[+] Range 
[+] -- from : 0x30000000000000000
[+] -- to   : 0x3ffffffffffffffff
[+] Bloom filter for 1 elements.
[+] Loading data to the bloomfilter total: 0.03 MB
[+] Total 5566996480 keys in 310 seconds: ~17 Mkeys/s (17958053 keys/s)
Vanity Private Key: fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffebaaedce6af48a0380b2513a178946f75
pubkey: 03b32edf683e27c1c866c915f093c3e88d4dbedbb81cc48e5f7355dbfd731ab8ba
Address 13zb1hQVwAhBbaDUusG6ogrq3ZnN1WJy5w
rmd160 20d45a6a6f3f0f3f3fbf3d6d7ba46818b1dc1d5c

The first number in the range is greater than the second, it seems that this caused abnormal operation.
Strange  

Your key is still in the given range if you subtract it from N, you will see this one

Code:

0x000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003b4ad4aeb57a1d1cc
Public_key=
02b32edf683e27c1c866c915f093c3e88d4dbedbb81cc48e5f7355dbfd731ab8ba
Compressed_address=
1N2DPnTjPep2ZWr9JwCGFzAJF39xkspPMc

You should read the instructions about how to use -N value to avoid going out of range.

[albert0bsd]

• Added Vanity search : 13zb1hQ
  ...
  Vanity Private Key: fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffebaaedce6af48a0380b2513a178946f75
  ...
  

First if you are going to use vanity use more than 15 characters not just 7 or  8.

Seconds yes that key is outside of the range because keythunt for address/rmd160/xpoint search on both sides of the curve it do this because if I only seach for one side of the curve the performance would be lesst than the half of it ( It will have less than the half of the current speed ).

It think on this like a feature not a bug... so please use more than 15 characers for your vanity search.

• Added Vanity search : 13zb1hQ
  ...
  Vanity Private Key: fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffebaaedce6af48a0380b2513a178946f75
  ...
  

First if you are going to use vanity use more than 15 characters not just 7 or  8.

Seconds yes that key is outside of the range because keythunt for address/rmd160/xpoint search on both sides of the curve it do this because if I only seach for one side of the curve the performance would be lesst than the half of it ( It will have less than the half of the current speed ).

It think on this like a feature not a bug... so please use more than 15 characers for your vanity search.

Alberto is a Legend would love to meet him one day  

Its not a big deal, I am just another random guy with regular life problems

[AndrewWeb]

Ok, I installed Keyhunt on Bodhi Linux 7.0 copied file 130.txt from folder test to folder keyhunt and executed ./keyhunt -m bsgs -f 130.txt -b 130 -R
 
When it finds the key, will it create a file with the found key in the keyhunt folder ? Like the file VANITYKEYFOUND.txt in the keyhunt folder ?

[ccinet]

Ok, I installed Keyhunt on Bodhi Linux 7.0 copied file 130.txt from folder test to folder keyhunt and executed ./keyhunt -m bsgs -f 130.txt -b 130 -R
 
When it finds the key, will it create a file with the found key in the keyhunt folder ? Like the file VANITYKEYFOUND.txt in the keyhunt folder ?

./keyhunt -m bsgs -f 130.txt -b 130 -R    You're going to need luck 

The VANITYKEYFOUND.txt file is generated only when the hunter finds a key in vanity mode.

[AndrewWeb]

Ok, I installed Keyhunt on Bodhi Linux 7.0 copied file 130.txt from folder test to folder keyhunt and executed ./keyhunt -m bsgs -f 130.txt -b 130 -R
 
When it finds the key, will it create a file with the found key in the keyhunt folder ? Like the file VANITYKEYFOUND.txt in the keyhunt folder ?

./keyhunt -m bsgs -f 130.txt -b 130 -R    You're going to need luck 

The VANITYKEYFOUND.txt file is generated only when the hunter finds a key in vanity mode.

Yes I understand that. But will it generate KEYFOUND.txt in bsgs mode ?

[citb0in]

RTFM ?
do a test with lower key and see what happens?

[ccinet]

Ok, I installed Keyhunt on Bodhi Linux 7.0 copied file 130.txt from folder test to folder keyhunt and executed ./keyhunt -m bsgs -f 130.txt -b 130 -R
 
When it finds the key, will it create a file with the found key in the keyhunt folder ? Like the file VANITYKEYFOUND.txt in the keyhunt folder ?

./keyhunt -m bsgs -f 130.txt -b 130 -R    You're going to need luck 

The VANITYKEYFOUND.txt file is generated only when the hunter finds a key in vanity mode.

Yes I understand that. But will it generate KEYFOUND.txt in bsgs mode ?

Try puzzle 32 near the key to see how it works

./keyhunt -m vanity  -r AB958105:C52F1A9F -R -v 1FRoHA9xew -l compress -t 4 -e -n 0x400

[AndrewWeb]

Ok, I installed Keyhunt on Bodhi Linux 7.0 copied file 130.txt from folder test to folder keyhunt and executed ./keyhunt -m bsgs -f 130.txt -b 130 -R
 
When it finds the key, will it create a file with the found key in the keyhunt folder ? Like the file VANITYKEYFOUND.txt in the keyhunt folder ?

./keyhunt -m bsgs -f 130.txt -b 130 -R    You're going to need luck  

The VANITYKEYFOUND.txt file is generated only when the hunter finds a key in vanity mode.

Yes I understand that. But will it generate KEYFOUND.txt in bsgs mode ?

Try puzzle 32 near the key to see how it works

./keyhunt -m vanity  -r AB958105:C52F1A9F -R -v 1FRoHA9xew -l compress -t 4 -e -n 0x400

Isn't that vanity mode ? Do you have a code for bsgs mode ? that will find a key right away.

BTW: your vanity code found 32. I can see it in the file VANITYKEYFOUND.txt

RTFM ?
do a test with lower key and see what happens?

Found it !

"FAQ

Where the privatekeys will be saved? R: In a file called KEYFOUNDKEYFOUND.txt"

[ccinet]

RTFM ?
do a test with lower key and see what happens?

Found it !

"FAQ

Where the privatekeys will be saved? R: In a file called KEYFOUNDKEYFOUND.txt"

Exact. KEYFOUNDKEYFOUND.tx
what did you find? the puzzle 130?

[AndrewWeb]

RTFM ?
do a test with lower key and see what happens?

Found it !

"FAQ

Where the privatekeys will be saved? R: In a file called KEYFOUNDKEYFOUND.txt"

Exact. KEYFOUNDKEYFOUND.tx
what did you find? the puzzle 130?

Not yet

Give me a code to do a test with lower key.

[ccinet]

RTFM ?
do a test with lower key and see what happens?

Found it !

"FAQ

Where the privatekeys will be saved? R: In a file called KEYFOUNDKEYFOUND.txt"

Exact. KEYFOUNDKEYFOUND.tx
what did you find? the puzzle 130?

Not yet

Give me a code to do a test with lower key.

There is no such thing as that, if you want to narrow the range you should look at (2^130)-(2^129) or 680564733841876926926749214863536422913,
the lucky number can be randomly anywhere in that range.
The problem is that 0.0000000001% of the range is 68056473384187692692674921486. ​​
There are still more grains of sand there than there are on all the beaches in the world combined.

[AndrewWeb]

Ok, I made a 65.txt file in folder keyhunt and used this code

./keyhunt -m bsgs -f 65.txt -r 1a830000000000000

It found the puzzel 65 privatkey right away. I can see it in the file KEYFOUNDKEYFOUND.txt

[ccinet]

Ok, I made a 65.txt file in folder keyhunt and used this code

./keyhunt -m bsgs -f 65.txt -r 1a830000000000000

It found the puzzel 65 privatkey right away. I can see it in the file KEYFOUNDKEYFOUND.txt

brilliant!

[AndrewWeb]

Ok, I made a 65.txt file in folder keyhunt and used this code

./keyhunt -m bsgs -f 65.txt -r 1a830000000000000

It found the puzzel 65 privatkey right away. I can see it in the file KEYFOUNDKEYFOUND.txt

brilliant!

Could you explain why you just have a part of the puzzle 32 address here ?

./keyhunt -m vanity  -r AB958105:C52F1A9F -R -v 1FRoHA9xew -l compress -t 4 -e -n 0x400

[ccinet]

Ok, I made a 65.txt file in folder keyhunt and used this code

./keyhunt -m bsgs -f 65.txt -r 1a830000000000000

It found the puzzel 65 privatkey right away. I can see it in the file KEYFOUNDKEYFOUND.txt

brilliant!

Could you explain why you just have a part of the puzzle 32 address here ?

./keyhunt -m vanity  -r AB958105:C52F1A9F -R -v 1FRoHA9xew -l compress -t 4 -e -n 0x400

It is intended for custom addresses like 1Magni1 but the rest of the public address is not known

[citb0in]

What do you expect, you run a program find a key and getting a millionair ? RTFM! No pain no gain. This is nothing for "From Zero To Hero" fanboys. Do your maths. RTFM.

[AndrewWeb]

What do you expect, you run a program find a key and getting a millionair ? RTFM! No pain no gain. This is nothing for "From Zero To Hero" fanboys. Do your maths. RTFM.

Take it easy. I am a Newbie getting to know Keyhunt. I am at 5 Petakeys/s right now. So what if I get the millions? what's it to you?