I will try to give some answers here without getting into the "biased" territory.
What difference it makes if we can prove we have 50 BTC , as long as we know what we do and our mixing has been successful and no accusations, we even have happy clients posting their feedback.
That's because you are too new and we all know (and you know too) that online feedback is easy to fake / buy.
If we leak our vendors or sign on the 50 BTC, then we become trackable and the coins dispensed becomes of no value. there will be a corpulent between us and the BTC balance which will be tied along.
In theory you're right. But since the request was to prove yourself to one trusted member, that information is most probably safe enough and you should not worry.
All in all, sorry, but the provided excuses are rather weak, which basically decreases your credibility even more...
Agree fake review is easy to buy, but no scam accusation is a track record that needs consistency
How to know that one of this trusted member is not FED ?
What difference it makes if we can prove we have 50 BTC
who first said they were holding 50 Bitcoins?
it was you who said you were holding 50 bitcoins, so it is legitimate the question that VOD posed, if you say you have 50 bitcoins then you have to post proof of those 50 bitcoins.
as long as we know what we do and our mixing has been successful and no accusations, we even have happy clients posting their feedback. How transparent can a mixer be?
you said you had 50 bitcoins, nobody forced you, you said it because you wanted to show that your mixer has enough money, right? then show proof
We have to ensure none or least internal mechanism is revealed to ensure continuous privacy enhancements. If we leak our vendors or sign on the 50 BTC, then we become trackable and the coins dispensed becomes of no value. there will be a corpulent between us and the BTC balance which will be tied along.
in this forum there are trustworthy people, Vod Is a very trustworthy person, but there is @LoyceV who is very active in the forum and I think you could show him proof, but you can also show it for vod.
Its like you wanna see my genitals to see if i am a girl or boy. I am not comfortable showing my genitals.
Same concept
it is not the same concept
Ok say i say i am a cocain dealer, i say i can supply 20 KG a month, should prove to every tom dick and harry that i can supply 20 KG a month, the location and all my clintele ??
if we reveal the holding address, then the mixing becomes not reliable since blockchain is public and trackable. we cant do that.
When i reveal
What difference it makes if we can prove we have 50 BTC
who first said they were holding 50 Bitcoins?
it was you who said you were holding 50 bitcoins, so it is legitimate the question that VOD posed, if you say you have 50 bitcoins then you have to post proof of those 50 bitcoins.
as long as we know what we do and our mixing has been successful and no accusations, we even have happy clients posting their feedback. How transparent can a mixer be?
you said you had 50 bitcoins, nobody forced you, you said it because you wanted to show that your mixer has enough money, right? then show proof
We have to ensure none or least internal mechanism is revealed to ensure continuous privacy enhancements. If we leak our vendors or sign on the 50 BTC, then we become trackable and the coins dispensed becomes of no value. there will be a corpulent between us and the BTC balance which will be tied along.
in this forum there are trustworthy people, Vod Is a very trustworthy person, but there is @LoyceV who is very active in the forum and I think you could show him proof, but you can also show it for vod.
Its like you wanna see my genitals to see if i am a girl or boy. I am not comfortable showing my genitals.
Same concept
it is not the same concept
I dont know VOD , can you send me his picture and address and mobile number to prove he is not the FED ?
[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]