.

[vinca BK.]

.

[milewilda]

In fact, many now use the Martingale system instead of doing one stroke of luck, and the strange thing is that it is also liable to lose the same "chance" if it plays one betting with all the amount, and the question here is, why do gamblers prefer this system to a single roll?

Preference! This is actually depending on how someone will be handling out his total capital.There are some who do minds on prolonging the game and make  the most of it
with using those common strategies like martingale and hoping that they could profit out in a certain period of time which is actually a wrong mindset to have because
if you arent lucky and doesnt really mind off on when to take profits then you would still lost it all.
There are some people who doesnt like to prolong the game but instead they do make out single roll or max bet on 1 chance and neither it could be a win or
loss.

[smyslov]

In fact, many now use the Martingale system instead of doing one stroke of luck, and the strange thing is that it is also liable to lose the same "chance" if it plays one betting with all the amount, and the question here is, why do gamblers prefer this system to a single roll?

For me, it takes out the fun and excitement in playing a dice game if you are going to pour everything in one roll, I prefer doing martingale or other similar games that will prolong the game even if I know that I might eventually lose the game, but there's excitement in every roll if I lose everything in one roll, I will not feel the enjoyment, it takes several rolls for me to enjoy gambling.

[Lanatsa]

In fact, many now use the Martingale system instead of doing one stroke of luck, and the strange thing is that it is also liable to lose the same "chance" if it plays one betting with all the amount, and the question here is, why do gamblers prefer this system to a single roll?

For me, it takes out the fun and excitement in playing a dice game if you are going to pour everything in one roll, I prefer doing martingale or other similar games that will prolong the game even if I know that I might eventually lose the game, but there's excitement in every roll if I lose everything in one roll, I will not feel the enjoyment, it takes several rolls for me to enjoy gambling.

I don't feel any excitement when you do make out bets using martingale because the thing you could do is to look at those rolls neither you would get some streak or not.

When you are really intending to make out some enjoyment then nothing beats out when you do manual bets or rolls and I do agree that if someone do really targets out on seeking for leisure
or entertainment then most like they will really be using up some strategy to make the game duration longer.

For those one time bets are the ones who clearly look for profit on point.

[LUCKMCFLY]

In the martingale there is emotion and adrenaline present at all times, and if you win they give you more strength to keep trying because you think you will continue to have the same luck or even more, when it is a single shot it feels like you drink 1 or 2 Tekilas do not matter to you, but you want to live in the moment and whatever happens, you will not mind, however, I do not recommend betting on the martingale, it is better to bet more moderately.

[Kittygalore]

With Martingale, you can gamble more times co.pared to one time bet which is in the name itself. The problem with Martingale though is that you should have a lot of money for show to survive losses because each loss is going to increase your bet which aims to recover the past loss as quick as possible but it can also deplete your money real fast.

[janggernaut]

You can call that one time bet by YOLO. So your qeuestion is between martingale and Yolo, which one we prefer?
If you sure your bet is likely going win, just Yolo your bet. If you aren't sure, you can use martingale strategy and make your bet can handle xx streaks you want.

Move this thread to gambling disscussion thread.

[ralle14]

I guess it's because losing is inevitable in gambling and knowing that you're going to lose the money you'd might as well do it in a time consuming way like martingale rather than just going all in. Also dividing your bankroll into several bets is one of the best ways to gamble because you'll rarely make money from gambling (specifically casino games). Putting everything in a single bet is just one of the worst because if you lose you might rethink to that situation again and maybe the outcome could've been different by going with a different strategy.

[harizen]

why do gamblers prefer this system to a single roll?

Let's not put some technical explanation about it as it was only simply a gambler's self-approach.

There is no specific reason at all why others are doing a martingale type of betting. If they are comfortable with it, then so be it.

And lastly, there is no source we can look at that martingale is prefer by most gamblers nowadays instead of a single roll so I don't know where you got that idea. There are lots of betting options that gamblers are using during their respective session.

[Wexnident]

Cause the martingale system guarantees that you wouldn't lose out as long as your bankroll could handle it. And most gamblers out there aren't in it to play to enjoy, but rather play to earn, hence why. Plus, with the offset of any loss, any wins you get would basically guarantee that much of a profit. So if you can hold on for as long as you can, it's basically guaranteed profit. One-time bet on the other hand is just a 50/50 chance. If we compare the two, it's like comparing one strategy where you're skewing the chance for the overall result to your side, while the other is just, well, hit or miss.

[mu_enrico]

In fact, many now use the Martingale system instead of doing one stroke of luck, and the strange thing is that it is also liable to lose the same "chance" if it plays one betting with all the amount, and the question here is, why do gamblers prefer this system to a single roll?

This phenomenon is not just for martingale, but a question why people prefer minimum bets (or more bets) than all-in? Obviously because all-in resulting in a very short playing time. If you are unlucky, you will close your browser in two seconds, lol.

At least if you lose via many bets, you will get the entertainment side of gambling, as if you spent $$$ on a horrible movie.

[avikz]

In fact, many now use the Martingale system instead of doing one stroke of luck, and the strange thing is that it is also liable to lose the same "chance" if it plays one betting with all the amount, and the question here is, why do gamblers prefer this system to a single roll?

That can be considered as a personal preference, ain't it? Martingale is a strategy to make money and also to help the gambling houses make money! If you are considering casino gambling as a way to make money, you would probably want to try such tricks! Also for those people who prefer some adrenaline rush during gambling, may want to elongate their gambling using such processes instead of a single bet! But anyway, it's really a personal preference of gambling at the end of the day!

[swogerino]

In fact, many now use the Martingale system instead of doing one stroke of luck, and the strange thing is that it is also liable to lose the same "chance" if it plays one betting with all the amount, and the question here is, why do gamblers prefer this system to a single roll?

Only unexperienced gamblers may prefer something like martingale which is proven that does not work in the long run.Many casinos place betting limits so even if your balance is big and can handle a lot of plays they make sure that even people using martingale lose out during a long session.

[Beparanf]

In fact, many now use the Martingale system instead of doing one stroke of luck, and the strange thing is that it is also liable to lose the same "chance" if it plays one betting with all the amount, and the question here is, why do gamblers prefer this system to a single roll?

Losing slowly is less stress compared to losing all your money at 1 roll. Regret is the most common gambling side effect after playing so people don't to regret on that one big decision, Besides that, People usually gamble for fun and spend some leisure time. That 1 roll strategy is not suited for most of the people who play gambling.

[DoublerHunter]

In fact, many now use the Martingale system instead of doing one stroke of luck, and the strange thing is that it is also liable to lose the same "chance" if it plays one betting with all the amount, and the question here is, why do gamblers prefer this system to a single roll?

^ I think this might have a simple answer, I am not really in the martingale approach every time but sometimes I do. And when I do, I just simply want to play it safe and try to take time to enjoy my gambling game. Especially when I had a loss on the previous day. Martingale can actually give you the sense of chances, cause when you lose, you still have a lot of tries to win back. For me, you can only use the one-time-bet strategy when you have a huge of capital. A one-time bet for a small-time gambler is not really effective as we tend to use 90% of cash when we gamble but still not enough. We do not have backups. That is why some of us prefer to use martingale instead just to enjoy the game.

[qwertyup23]

In fact, many now use the Martingale system instead of doing one stroke of luck, and the strange thing is that it is also liable to lose the same "chance" if it plays one betting with all the amount, and the question here is, why do gamblers prefer this system to a single roll?

The answer would most probably the preference of a gambler as such question is relatively subjective.

The martingale strategy involves betting an amount which doubles as long as you keep losing such bet. The advantage of this system is that, players with a larger capital are able to recover their losses via multiple bets. On the other hand, one-time-bets, from the name itself, involves only ONE significantly large bet which is a "do or die" system. Either you go home lucky or go home crying.

[Mauser]

In fact, many now use the Martingale system instead of doing one stroke of luck, and the strange thing is that it is also liable to lose the same "chance" if it plays one betting with all the amount, and the question here is, why do gamblers prefer this system to a single roll?

Personally I prefer to do a martingale strategy than just bet one time big. I remember the youtube video where a guy sold everything he had just to put it all on one bet at roulette. You must have balls of steel to do that. I think the majority of us prefer to follow a long term strategy so we can gamble more. If we just bet once and lose, everything is gone. The odds might be close to 50/50 but the variance is going to be huge with just one bet. Have you made a lot of profit with just rolling once?

[harizen]

why do gamblers prefer this system to a single roll?

There is no source we can look at that martingale is prefer by most gamblers nowadays instead of a single roll so I don't know where you got that idea.

No, there is, in any casino, you can see in Bets history, that all bets are very small, of course they follow some strategy, for this there is a separate section for Big Bets, which indicates that these have made a real bet that does not follow any strategy, and we find it It always increases at a small rate every hour (whether it is from the same person or different people) in popular casinos, while the Bet History increases by more than 10 per second from different people.

How come you came up to the conclusion that martingale is preferred by most gamblers right now as their betting strategy just by looking at bets history? Do you see a long streak there with a martingale betting? And it should be done by different users and not just one.

Well then, if that's your source then so be it and I won't argue with that.

[maydna]

In fact, many now use the Martingale system instead of doing one stroke of luck, and the strange thing is that it is also liable to lose the same "chance" if it plays one betting with all the amount, and the question here is, why do gamblers prefer this system to a single roll?

Losing slowly is less stress compared to losing all your money at 1 roll. Regret is the most common gambling side effect after playing so people don't to regret on that one big decision, Besides that, People usually gamble for fun and spend some leisure time. That 1 roll strategy is not suited for most of the people who play gambling.

Losing slowly can make a gambler stay for some time in the gambling site than losing in just 1 roll. Yes, the feeling of regret will be bigger for losing in 1 roll than in many time because they will still have a chance to win in the next roll. People search for how they can have fun and enjoy their time even if they lose their money in one hour or more. Perhaps, if you are in a hurry because of an urgent situation, you can just use bet in 1 roll to bet for the last and you do not care about the result.

[madnessteat]

The mathematical model of Martingale suggests that with a bankroll tending towards infinity, the player will be in the black. In reality, this strategy does not give the player any advantage over the casino and many are convinced of this from personal experience.