🔥 Crypto-Gambling.Net 🔥 Crypto Casino Reviews By A Real Insider ✅

[DNL]

[babygun]

Hi. I'm Daniel, and I'm the owner of https://crypto-gambling.net/

I have worked in the iGaming industry, more specifically the crypto side of it, for several years. My experience within the field goes around several different levels and areas and has grown quite extensive.

My vision with the site is to create a site with as transparent reviews as possible while giving my take on each site from the perspective of a person that knows the ins and outs.
One of the core principles of the site is that I will never review a site, that I have actively worked for within the past year. I think that's the only fair thing to do in my position.

All sites that are reviewed on my site, have gone through real deposits and withdrawals manually by me to ensure the process is smooth.
I hope to one day be able to present as much real information as possible about each casino on their reviews, but I will have to admit that the information provided is not yet 100% thorough, and there are areas to improve. I would appreciate feedback to help me with this, so I can provide even better reviews than currently.

I am also considering adding a page with insider information about the industry - If I do that, I would love some ideas on what type of question and information it should contain(besides the stuff I already have in mind myself)

Current reviews:
Roobet - 4.5/5 stars
Winz.io - 4.8/5 stars
Stake.com - 5/5 stars
7Bitcasino - 4.5/5 stars
Bitcasino.io - 4.3/5 stars
Gamdom - 4/5 stars
Cloudbet - 3.8/5 stars

^ Some of these are still work in progress, and I appreciate feedback on them. I plan on adding the possibility for users to comment on reviews as well. Some of the wording on some of the reviews can be a bit weird. I'm working on fixing those.

Hi and welcome to the forum. I just checked your Roobet review and I like it, detailed and nice structured.
However there are some errors in it; till date Roobet doesn't offer a sportsbook and the minimum to withdraw using BTC/ETH/LTC is always 10$.

[DNL]

Hi and welcome to the forum. I just checked your Roobet review and I like it, detailed and nice structured.
However there are some errors in it; till date Roobet doesn't offer a sportsbook and the minimum to withdraw using BTC/ETH/LTC is always 10$.

Thanks I have been here for a few years, but never really posted before now.
And I have no idea how the sportsbook part managed to sneak in there. I fixed it.
Added the minimum withdrawal as well, and will make a note to do it for all the other ones as well. - I think the information had become outdated since it was written. It was made before Litecoin was added(which was like a month or two ago if I remember right?) - Always good to get updated

[nakamura12]

There is a thread here in this forum that you can check and gather information for your reviews of each site if you have it on your site. I haven't check your site but just in case you have a review of it then this thread will sure be of help. It is about the minimum withdrawal amount and cryptocurrency accepted. Don't mind the withdrawal fee as it might change for some casinos compared to post above that the fee is always $10. Here's the thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5333602.0 and welcome to the forum by the way.

[harizen]

All sites that are reviewed on my site, have gone through real deposits and withdrawals manually by me to ensure the process is smooth.

That's how a real review really works - with actual deposits and withdrawals and sharing a real gaming experience and not just compiling any positive reviews from various sources on the web or just stating "the site is smooth and user-friendly etc.". Obviously, anyone can say that they are actually doing that but I'm sure you are transparent here. I appreciate that.

but I will have to admit that the information provided is not yet 100% thorough, and there are areas to improve,

Honestly, there is no 100% perfect review because users will have different experiences dealing with a certain site. What matters here is, your review should be updated regularly for let's say, a 1-2 month basis, if possible.

And one thing, I've noticed that some CONS you provided is about a site not having a phone number to contact. Is this really a CONS to be considered especially for a gambling site? What's your input here?

[dunfida]

You have missed out several gambling sites that would be worth also into the list.

1. Crypto.games
2. Bitdice.me
3. Rollbit.com

Btw, dont know about that Real insider review.This is something new into my ears.

[acroman08]

are you planning on adding gambling game categories that are on a gambling site? I just thought having that kind of feature would help someone using your website that is looking for a specific gambling game on a website and wouldn't have to visit each website to check whether the game they are looking for is available.

anyway, I hope you consider reviewing duelbits.

[Saisher]

You have missed out several gambling sites that would be worth also into the list.

1. Crypto.games
2. Bitdice.me
3. Rollbit.com

Btw, dont know about that Real insider review.This is something new into my ears.

Not only on your list but old and reputable gambling sites like 777Coin and Bitvest they are worth adding to any gambling review sites, they have proven their worth over the years and they have one of the longest signature campaigns here, I'm sure you have seen these gambling sites their reputation and their features.

[DNL]

There is a thread here in this forum that you can check and gather information for your reviews of each site if you have it on your site. I haven't check your site but just in case you have a review of it then this thread will sure be of help. It is about the minimum withdrawal amount and cryptocurrency accepted. Don't mind the withdrawal fee as it might change for some casinos compared to post above that the fee is always $10. Here's the thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5333602.0 and welcome to the forum by the way.

Ah thanks

All sites that are reviewed on my site, have gone through real deposits and withdrawals manually by me to ensure the process is smooth.

That's how a real review really works - with actual deposits and withdrawals and sharing a real gaming experience and not just compiling any positive reviews from various sources on the web or just stating "the site is smooth and user-friendly etc.". Obviously, anyone can say that they are actually doing that but I'm sure you are transparent here. I appreciate that.

but I will have to admit that the information provided is not yet 100% thorough, and there are areas to improve,

Honestly, there is no 100% perfect review because users will have different experiences dealing with a certain site. What matters here is, your review should be updated regularly for let's say, a 1-2 month basis, if possible.

And one thing, I've noticed that some CONS you provided is about a site not having a phone number to contact. Is this really a CONS to be considered especially for a gambling site? What's your input here?

Probably not. While some people like it, it's not really the norm of the gambling industry anyways. I'll get that sorted out.

You have missed out several gambling sites that would be worth also into the list.

1. Crypto.games
2. Bitdice.me
3. Rollbit.com

Btw, dont know about that Real insider review.This is something new into my ears.

Rollbit after they've done their recent re-work have been on the drawing table. Crypto.games will probably come as well. Not sure about Bitdice.me yet.

are you planning on adding gambling game categories that are on a gambling site? I just thought having that kind of feature would help someone using your website that is looking for a specific gambling game on a website and wouldn't have to visit each website to check whether the game they are looking for is available.

anyway, I hope you consider reviewing duelbits.

Yeah, I am. The support is already somewhat there in the site, but I haven't yet utilized it. You can technically look up slot providers on the site right now, but I wanna make a separate page with as many games as possible.

Duelbits will probably be done soon as well.

Not only on your list but old and reputable gambling sites like 777Coin and Bitvest they are worth adding to any gambling review sites, they have proven their worth over the years and they have one of the longest signature campaigns here, I'm sure you have seen these gambling sites their reputation and their features.

Never heard of 777Coin before, but I have used Bitvest in the past(Many years ago). At least Bitvest will get a spot on the page in the future.

[aysg76]

At first welcome to this forum and it's good to see another insider giving reviews about different casinos.I have gone through 2-3 reviews you have made on Roobet and Stake and found them quite useful and in depth discussion is made for each them like interface, games, account which was nice feature to add on.

Unlike others you are giving reviews of casino you have not been a part of which provides transparency and no partiality on your behalf and keep it the same way.Going through deposit procedure to know the smooth functioning of casino payment gateway is best part on review basis and helps to know exactly how much time it will take and minimum amount for any coin.

Just look at some other sites also like BTCgosu are also geniune players in providing real time review for many casinos is detail and are trusted platform on the forum.

Try to add some more on your list like my signature @Rollbit ,@Duelbits on your updated list and build the trust of players on your site with same principles being followed.

Best wishes to you on your new project.

[DNL]

At first welcome to this forum and it's good to see another insider giving reviews about different casinos.I have gone through 2-3 reviews you have made on Roobet and Stake and found them quite useful and in depth discussion is made for each them like interface, games, account which was nice feature to add on.

Unlike others you are giving reviews of casino you have not been a part of which provides transparency and no partiality on your behalf and keep it the same way.Going through deposit procedure to know the smooth functioning of casino payment gateway is best part on review basis and helps to know exactly how much time it will take and minimum amount for any coin.

Just look at some other sites also like BTCgosu are also geniune players in providing real time review for many casinos is detail and are trusted platform on the forum.

Try to add some more on your list like my signature @Rollbit ,@Duelbits on your updated list and build the trust of players on your site with same principles being followed.

Best wishes to you on your new project.

Thanks. Glad to hear that you liked them

I plan on adding as many casinos as I possibly can to the site, so they should be coming eventually. Hopefully soon.

[acroman08]

since you have become a Jr. Member now and it comes with the feature of being able to post images on posts and threads. I suggest Editing and polishing the thread to make it more attractive to possible users in the forum. Good luck!

[DNL]

since you have become a Jr. Member now and it comes with the feature of being able to post images on posts and threads. I suggest Editing and polishing the thread to make it more attractive to possible users in the forum. Good luck!

Yeah, I plan on doing that. Just gotta see how everybody else does it for some inspiration first.

[Haunebu]

I liked the design of your site and how all the information is neatly organized. However, I found some glaring issues.

- Roobet doesn't have a sportsbook section and you should have deducted more stars since they enforce KYC.

- You reviewed a site that I have never heard of(Winz.io), but you didn't review several popular hotshots like Crypto.Games, Primedice, Sportsbet, Nitrogen Sports etc.

These are just a couple of issues that I observed. Decent first impressions overall!

[DNL]

I liked the design of your site and how all the information is neatly organized. However, I found some glaring issues.

- Roobet doesn't have a sportsbook section and you should have deducted more stars since they enforce KYC.

- You reviewed a site that I have never heard of(Winz.io), but you didn't review several popular hotshots like Crypto.Games, Primedice, Sportsbet, Nitrogen Sports etc.

These are just a couple of issues that I observed. Decent first impressions overall!

Glad to hear that.

Weird about the Roobet sportsbook. I thought I had already removed it, but it has been fixed now regardless. And I guess that's true, but on the other hand - Most casinos enforces KYC. I have never experienced Roobet enforcing it though. Do you know anything about the limits?

More of the popular ones are coming. It varies a lot which ones are 'popular' based on where you find them as well. A lot of casinos are known on BitcoinTalk, while casinos known on etc. Twitter are usually completely different.

[Mahdirakib]

Honest review of gambling sites based on a gambler experience is really something worth. There was another forum member (GamblingBro) who tried to make review based on his personal gambling experience but haven't heard anything from him after his first review. Hopefully you won't stop making reviews.

In Roobet review cons section you mentioned that “The RTP is higher than on other sites”. RTP means ‘Return to Player’. Actually the higher RTP is beneficial for gamblers. But the RTP is low at Roobet, isn't it? You should correct that. Higher house edge or lower RTP should be in cons section of a gambling site review.

[DNL]

Honest review of gambling sites based on a gambler experience is really something worth. There was another forum member (GamblingBro) who tried to make review based on his personal gambling experience but haven't heard anything from him after his first review. Hopefully you won't stop making reviews.

In Roobet review cons section you mentioned that “The RTP is higher than on other sites”. RTP means ‘Return to Player’. Actually the higher RTP is beneficial for gamblers. But the RTP is low at Roobet, isn't it? You should correct that. Higher house edge or lower RTP should be in cons section of a gambling site review.

I have been running this site since October so far, and I have no plans on quitting at all.

And yeah, you're right. Not sure how I managed to get house edge and RTP mixed up in my head. I've fixed that.

[stomachgrowls]

I would like to suggest Crypto.games

1. VIP membership
2. Provably fair
3. Fast withdrawals
4. Progressive jackpots
5. Low house edge
6. Secure and private

Lastly, Try to look on Btcgosu website and you might get some idea as well.

[RHavar]

My vision with the site is to create a site with as transparent reviews as possible while giving my take on each site from the perspective of a person that knows the ins and outs.

Not to be overly frank, but c'mon. All the links are just undisclosed ref links, and you exclude some of the best and biggest sites (imo bustabit, bustadice) because they don't offer an affiliate program.

One of the core principles of the site is that I will never review a site, that I have actively worked for within the past year. I think that's the only fair thing to do in my position.

Are you trying to say you've "actively worked for" all these casinos in the past year? I find that so hard to believe, that I wouldn't even know what position would allow you to do that? 0.0
I also kind of doubt you've worked in the industry at all based on your reviews. Like take the your roobet 4.5/5 rating. It's almost unconscionable to recommend them for any number of reasons. Their house edge is often multiple times greater than their competitors for the same thing, their KYC policies are many times worse, and have a history of highly unethical behavior of giving effectively fake money to streamers to promote their casino.

I am also considering adding a page with insider information about the industry - If I do that, I would love some ideas on what type of question and information it should contain(besides the stuff I already have in mind myself)

I actually was once thinking of this. If you talk to some of the real insiders (e.g. some big casino owners), they know a lot interesting of stuff that isn't public and they wouldn't want to come back to them.  One idea I had was you could ask each of the main insiders for a public key, and you could create a (1,n)-threshold scheme where any one of the participants can sign a message but it's impossible to tell which. That way you could get candid information from someone who actually knows what they are talking about, while they know it can't be attributed to them.

[DNL]

My vision with the site is to create a site with as transparent reviews as possible while giving my take on each site from the perspective of a person that knows the ins and outs.

Not to be overly frank, but c'mon. All the links are just undisclosed ref links, and you exclude some of the best and biggest sites (imo bustabit, bustadice) because they don't offer an affiliate program.

One of the core principles of the site is that I will never review a site, that I have actively worked for within the past year. I think that's the only fair thing to do in my position.

Are you trying to say you've "actively worked for" all these casinos in the past year? I find that so hard to believe, that I wouldn't even know what position would allow you to do that? 0.0
I also kind of doubt you've worked in the industry at all based on your reviews. Like take the your roobet 4.5/5 rating. It's almost unconscionable to recommend them for any number of reasons. Their house edge is often multiple times greater than their competitors for the same thing, their KYC policies are many times worse, and have a history of highly unethical behavior of giving effectively fake money to streamers to promote their casino.

I am also considering adding a page with insider information about the industry - If I do that, I would love some ideas on what type of question and information it should contain(besides the stuff I already have in mind myself)

I actually was once thinking of this. If you talk to some of the real insiders (e.g. some big casino owners), they know a lot interesting of stuff that isn't public and they wouldn't want to come back to them.  One idea I had was you could ask each of the main insiders for a public key, and you could create a (1,n)-threshold scheme where any one of the participants can sign a message but it's impossible to tell which. That way you could get candid information from someone who actually knows what they are talking about, while they know it can't be attributed to them.

You're accusing me of not including bustabit/bustadice just because they don't offer an affiliate program. That's simply just false. There are 7 sites so far. There are many sites that are not yet reviewed, and frankly, I don't think there is much to review on bustabit/bustadice, although there will surely come a review someday. Daniel is a great guy, and I admire him(as well as Ryan) for what has been achieved in the brand.

I don't understand what you mean by the "Are you trying to say you've "actively worked for" all these casinos in the past year?" - Which casinos are you referring to here?
I haven't seen direct examples of their house edges being multiple times greater than competitors(At least not direct competitors), I have never heard about anyone ever having to do a KYC on there, and while there is some unethical marketing in there, I would say that can count for most sites.
With that being said, I expect Roobet to slowly move further down the list as more sites are getting added.

And well, while that is a possibility, I literally don't see why, and on top of that, I can also guarantee that it's a format that I would never use on my own site.