🔥 Crypto-Gambling.Net 🔥 Crypto Casino Reviews By A Real Insider ✅

[zanezane]

~

Guess it could be a fun project. I'll put some thought into it and work on it. It would probably have to be a separate project though.

Hopefully you find it really fun to do this because some of my friends that works in the IT sector don't find it amusing to work on a project. Why would you separate the project though? Will it be easier to do so than integrating it in the website?

[DNL]

~

Guess it could be a fun project. I'll put some thought into it and work on it. It would probably have to be a separate project though.

Hopefully you find it really fun to do this because some of my friends that works in the IT sector don't find it amusing to work on a project. Why would you separate the project though? Will it be easier to do so than integrating it in the website?

Well yes, but I also feel like the concepts work better separately than combined.

[LUCKMCFLY]

According to how I see the ratings in OP they are not bad at all, really the sites you have are excellent, I want to know something, for the selection of casinos what criteria do you take into account? I imagine that apart from the reputation also the history? I mean, the age of the casino.

There are a number of casinos that are relatively young, some are nascent, but have built a great community and give a lot to talk about, I think you can imagine what casinos can be, in fact in the forum they have a lot of good Ann in the game area of chance. I have seen reviews of other sites and if they have any divergence, but they are small, some take it as very significant, but in the end I think that to give a final verdict they take into account the age.

Well, generally speaking, I wanna have as many sites listed as possible.
In terms of the ratings themselves, I generally judge on as many factors as possible.

I understand, as I have seen in the forum some sites that are also dedicated to making this type of reviews, how is it different from the others? Some are quite radical in what they think and some users do not have any kind of tact to say things, in fact some are quite strong.

If I have the professional opinion that you establish and if I compare it with another site, why should I trust yours more than that of direct competition? I know that some factors to consider should have an impact on its availability for all countries, although the licenses give more confidence to the sites to the players, they can leave out many that really show talent.

[DNL]

According to how I see the ratings in OP they are not bad at all, really the sites you have are excellent, I want to know something, for the selection of casinos what criteria do you take into account? I imagine that apart from the reputation also the history? I mean, the age of the casino.

There are a number of casinos that are relatively young, some are nascent, but have built a great community and give a lot to talk about, I think you can imagine what casinos can be, in fact in the forum they have a lot of good Ann in the game area of chance. I have seen reviews of other sites and if they have any divergence, but they are small, some take it as very significant, but in the end I think that to give a final verdict they take into account the age.

Well, generally speaking, I wanna have as many sites listed as possible.
In terms of the ratings themselves, I generally judge on as many factors as possible.

I understand, as I have seen in the forum some sites that are also dedicated to making this type of reviews, how is it different from the others? Some are quite radical in what they think and some users do not have any kind of tact to say things, in fact some are quite strong.

If I have the professional opinion that you establish and if I compare it with another site, why should I trust yours more than that of direct competition? I know that some factors to consider should have an impact on its availability for all countries, although the licenses give more confidence to the sites to the players, they can leave out many that really show talent.

What I hope to do eventually is offer way more information than other sites. Currently, I think I am on-pair or slightly above, but it can still get improved.
Another thing would be mentioning stuff that normal gamblers may not know.

I don't consider availability a real factor in reviews. All restricted countries is mentioned on the reviews, but it shouldn't affect the actual rank. You can easily get restricted from a bunch of countries just by getting a Curacao license and a few payment processors.

[aysg76]

Just launched a brand new Rollbit review

You should have also mentioned about their trading gambling game on which you have to hit up or high and bust price which is really a new addition to crypto casinos and players have really liked that and you should have increased the rating for that events they are organizing at regular intervals.They are becoming quite popular at moment and developing new games and improving interface for user experience.Try to get in detail for every casino you are reviewing.

[DNL]

Just launched a brand new Rollbit review

You should have also mentioned about their trading gambling game on which you have to hit up or high and bust price which is really a new addition to crypto casinos and players have really liked that and you should have increased the rating for that events they are organizing at regular intervals.They are becoming quite popular at moment and developing new games and improving interface for user experience.Try to get in detail for every casino you are reviewing.

I am mentioning it several times. The only unique thing about it is really the fact that you can do 1000x leverage on some coins. Let's see how long they can keep it up, I think there is a very good reason why real trading platforms had to stop offering 1000x leverage after a very short bit.

[DNL]

Currently working on Thunderpick review, any other requests?

[LUCKMCFLY]

According to how I see the ratings in OP they are not bad at all, really the sites you have are excellent, I want to know something, for the selection of casinos what criteria do you take into account? I imagine that apart from the reputation also the history? I mean, the age of the casino.

There are a number of casinos that are relatively young, some are nascent, but have built a great community and give a lot to talk about, I think you can imagine what casinos can be, in fact in the forum they have a lot of good Ann in the game area of chance. I have seen reviews of other sites and if they have any divergence, but they are small, some take it as very significant, but in the end I think that to give a final verdict they take into account the age.

Well, generally speaking, I wanna have as many sites listed as possible.
In terms of the ratings themselves, I generally judge on as many factors as possible.

I understand, as I have seen in the forum some sites that are also dedicated to making this type of reviews, how is it different from the others? Some are quite radical in what they think and some users do not have any kind of tact to say things, in fact some are quite strong.

If I have the professional opinion that you establish and if I compare it with another site, why should I trust yours more than that of direct competition? I know that some factors to consider should have an impact on its availability for all countries, although the licenses give more confidence to the sites to the players, they can leave out many that really show talent.

What I hope to do eventually is offer way more information than other sites. Currently, I think I am on-pair or slightly above, but it can still get improved.
Another thing would be mentioning stuff that normal gamblers may not know.

I don't consider availability a real factor in reviews. All restricted countries is mentioned on the reviews, but it shouldn't affect the actual rank. You can easily get restricted from a bunch of countries just by getting a Curacao license and a few payment processors.

I think that at the time of making a review, the fact of those casinos that does not give access to players from prohibited countries should also weigh a lot, in that case what factors influence? Because since players from prohibited countries are more hungry to play and win, and they look for a way to enter through VPN, in addition, players who enter with VPN can have a lot of risk when withdrawing their winnings, since casinos they can demand KYC and problems can form, in fact cases of that style have already occurred and it causes some sites to be compromised even because of their reputation.

[worle1bm]

Factors to determine;

-Fees
-HE
-UI/UX
-Support
-Perks and bonuses

Although you have mentioned most of the points that you should look for while playing or reviewing any casino but I would also like to add some more to your list:

- Cryptocurrencies accepted as deposit
- Types of games they are offering like slot games,sportsbook
- Security like 2FA enabled or not
-KYC related issues

So they all jointly make a legit casino and players trust over that particular casino.Rest it all depends on you what you are looking for.

[DNL]

According to how I see the ratings in OP they are not bad at all, really the sites you have are excellent, I want to know something, for the selection of casinos what criteria do you take into account? I imagine that apart from the reputation also the history? I mean, the age of the casino.

There are a number of casinos that are relatively young, some are nascent, but have built a great community and give a lot to talk about, I think you can imagine what casinos can be, in fact in the forum they have a lot of good Ann in the game area of chance. I have seen reviews of other sites and if they have any divergence, but they are small, some take it as very significant, but in the end I think that to give a final verdict they take into account the age.

Well, generally speaking, I wanna have as many sites listed as possible.
In terms of the ratings themselves, I generally judge on as many factors as possible.

I understand, as I have seen in the forum some sites that are also dedicated to making this type of reviews, how is it different from the others? Some are quite radical in what they think and some users do not have any kind of tact to say things, in fact some are quite strong.

If I have the professional opinion that you establish and if I compare it with another site, why should I trust yours more than that of direct competition? I know that some factors to consider should have an impact on its availability for all countries, although the licenses give more confidence to the sites to the players, they can leave out many that really show talent.

What I hope to do eventually is offer way more information than other sites. Currently, I think I am on-pair or slightly above, but it can still get improved.
Another thing would be mentioning stuff that normal gamblers may not know.

I don't consider availability a real factor in reviews. All restricted countries is mentioned on the reviews, but it shouldn't affect the actual rank. You can easily get restricted from a bunch of countries just by getting a Curacao license and a few payment processors.

I think that at the time of making a review, the fact of those casinos that does not give access to players from prohibited countries should also weigh a lot, in that case what factors influence? Because since players from prohibited countries are more hungry to play and win, and they look for a way to enter through VPN, in addition, players who enter with VPN can have a lot of risk when withdrawing their winnings, since casinos they can demand KYC and problems can form, in fact cases of that style have already occurred and it causes some sites to be compromised even because of their reputation.

Fair point.
Generally speaking, I will say that trustworthy casinos will still pay out winnings from people that use VPNs, but it can of course be a tough one to guess on.
I have directly heard Stake saying in their advertisement that they allow people to use VPNs, which is pretty contradicting to their license, but I guess it does make them a safe place for people from restricted countries(Especially the U.S., France and the Netherlands that are usually blocked elsewhere).

[DNL]

Factors to determine;

-Fees
-HE
-UI/UX
-Support
-Perks and bonuses

Although you have mentioned most of the points that you should look for while playing or reviewing any casino but I would also like to add some more to your list:

- Cryptocurrencies accepted as deposit
- Types of games they are offering like slot games,sportsbook
- Security like 2FA enabled or not
-KYC related issues

So they all jointly make a legit casino and players trust over that particular casino.Rest it all depends on you what you are looking for.

I generally list most of these.
I could go into details about the KYC related issues, but the main issue there is that there is a big difference between the KYC rules in the ToS and the actual KYC that is being enforced currently, which is subject to change at any point as well.

[LUCKMCFLY]

According to how I see the ratings in OP they are not bad at all, really the sites you have are excellent, I want to know something, for the selection of casinos what criteria do you take into account? I imagine that apart from the reputation also the history? I mean, the age of the casino.

There are a number of casinos that are relatively young, some are nascent, but have built a great community and give a lot to talk about, I think you can imagine what casinos can be, in fact in the forum they have a lot of good Ann in the game area of chance. I have seen reviews of other sites and if they have any divergence, but they are small, some take it as very significant, but in the end I think that to give a final verdict they take into account the age.

Well, generally speaking, I wanna have as many sites listed as possible.
In terms of the ratings themselves, I generally judge on as many factors as possible.

I understand, as I have seen in the forum some sites that are also dedicated to making this type of reviews, how is it different from the others? Some are quite radical in what they think and some users do not have any kind of tact to say things, in fact some are quite strong.

If I have the professional opinion that you establish and if I compare it with another site, why should I trust yours more than that of direct competition? I know that some factors to consider should have an impact on its availability for all countries, although the licenses give more confidence to the sites to the players, they can leave out many that really show talent.

What I hope to do eventually is offer way more information than other sites. Currently, I think I am on-pair or slightly above, but it can still get improved.
Another thing would be mentioning stuff that normal gamblers may not know.

I don't consider availability a real factor in reviews. All restricted countries is mentioned on the reviews, but it shouldn't affect the actual rank. You can easily get restricted from a bunch of countries just by getting a Curacao license and a few payment processors.

I think that at the time of making a review, the fact of those casinos that does not give access to players from prohibited countries should also weigh a lot, in that case what factors influence? Because since players from prohibited countries are more hungry to play and win, and they look for a way to enter through VPN, in addition, players who enter with VPN can have a lot of risk when withdrawing their winnings, since casinos they can demand KYC and problems can form, in fact cases of that style have already occurred and it causes some sites to be compromised even because of their reputation.

Fair point.
Generally speaking, I will say that trustworthy casinos will still pay out winnings from people that use VPNs, but it can of course be a tough one to guess on.
I have directly heard Stake saying in their advertisement that they allow people to use VPNs, which is pretty contradicting to their license, but I guess it does make them a safe place for people from restricted countries(Especially the U.S., France and the Netherlands that are usually blocked elsewhere).

Well, in fact, one of the things that I like about stake.com is that they understand global situations in terms of prohibitions, may have originally lived in a non-prohibited country, but may have arisen the action that has moved to live in A prohibited country, which is a unfortunate but possible fact (hypothetical case), there I think it is a discussion that is an ancient customer, but now it is in those conditions, which is a case that can enter as "special" . Similarly, these criteria that you consider are excellent because you speak that the analysis you do is deep and from there a review is well reliable.

[DNL]

According to how I see the ratings in OP they are not bad at all, really the sites you have are excellent, I want to know something, for the selection of casinos what criteria do you take into account? I imagine that apart from the reputation also the history? I mean, the age of the casino.

There are a number of casinos that are relatively young, some are nascent, but have built a great community and give a lot to talk about, I think you can imagine what casinos can be, in fact in the forum they have a lot of good Ann in the game area of chance. I have seen reviews of other sites and if they have any divergence, but they are small, some take it as very significant, but in the end I think that to give a final verdict they take into account the age.

Well, generally speaking, I wanna have as many sites listed as possible.
In terms of the ratings themselves, I generally judge on as many factors as possible.

I understand, as I have seen in the forum some sites that are also dedicated to making this type of reviews, how is it different from the others? Some are quite radical in what they think and some users do not have any kind of tact to say things, in fact some are quite strong.

If I have the professional opinion that you establish and if I compare it with another site, why should I trust yours more than that of direct competition? I know that some factors to consider should have an impact on its availability for all countries, although the licenses give more confidence to the sites to the players, they can leave out many that really show talent.

What I hope to do eventually is offer way more information than other sites. Currently, I think I am on-pair or slightly above, but it can still get improved.
Another thing would be mentioning stuff that normal gamblers may not know.

I don't consider availability a real factor in reviews. All restricted countries is mentioned on the reviews, but it shouldn't affect the actual rank. You can easily get restricted from a bunch of countries just by getting a Curacao license and a few payment processors.

I think that at the time of making a review, the fact of those casinos that does not give access to players from prohibited countries should also weigh a lot, in that case what factors influence? Because since players from prohibited countries are more hungry to play and win, and they look for a way to enter through VPN, in addition, players who enter with VPN can have a lot of risk when withdrawing their winnings, since casinos they can demand KYC and problems can form, in fact cases of that style have already occurred and it causes some sites to be compromised even because of their reputation.

Fair point.
Generally speaking, I will say that trustworthy casinos will still pay out winnings from people that use VPNs, but it can of course be a tough one to guess on.
I have directly heard Stake saying in their advertisement that they allow people to use VPNs, which is pretty contradicting to their license, but I guess it does make them a safe place for people from restricted countries(Especially the U.S., France and the Netherlands that are usually blocked elsewhere).

Well, in fact, one of the things that I like about stake.com is that they understand global situations in terms of prohibitions, may have originally lived in a non-prohibited country, but may have arisen the action that has moved to live in A prohibited country, which is a unfortunate but possible fact (hypothetical case), there I think it is a discussion that is an ancient customer, but now it is in those conditions, which is a case that can enter as "special" . Similarly, these criteria that you consider are excellent because you speak that the analysis you do is deep and from there a review is well reliable.

I mean. Legally speaking, it is the country of which you reside, so there is not much of special cases there.

[DNL]

New wolf.bet review has been launched
https://crypto-gambling.net/casino/wolf-bet/

[Mahdirakib]

New wolf.bet review has been launched ~

Short review with some wrong information! They have only 3 games (dice, hilo, limbo) which are operated by themselves. But you said “they have a lot of....”. Moreover, in essential details you said that



But in reality they don't have any live, slots or video poker game yet. You haven't provided some important information as well. Aa example: Setting 2FA is mandatory for making withdrawals from wolf.bet. I think it should be in the essential details. Hope you will give a deeper look into the casino and update everything correctly.

[DNL]

New wolf.bet review has been launched ~

Short review with some wrong information! They have only 3 games (dice, hilo, limbo) which are operated by themselves. But you said “they have a lot of....”. Moreover, in essential details you said that



But in reality they don't have any live, slots or video poker game yet. You haven't provided some important information as well. Aa example: Setting 2FA is mandatory for making withdrawals from wolf.bet. I think it should be in the essential details. Hope you will give a deeper look into the casino and update everything correctly.

Ah yeah. I fixed that line. I had written a lot more about slots and live games before I realized they didn't have such offerings.
They do have 4 games now though. They launched sportsbetting a few weeks ago.

I think most casinos have the requirement of setting up 2FA as well. I don't really consider it important info. 2FA is a standard all over the internet these days, especially in the crypto field.

[LUCKMCFLY]

New wolf.bet review has been launched
https://crypto-gambling.net/casino/wolf-bet/

Thank you very much for the update, Wolfbet, they have a great reputation and the fact that they have released new games like Limbo is excellent, DICE is a scenario that I had not considered for this casino, but nevertheless I understand that Wolfbet want to implement it because of their history. throughout the gambling.
For me DICE represents one of the traditional games with the highest rate of player demand, in fact with that game I got to know the crypto world, first with Freebitco.in, and then with Stake.com, then already many casinos, I have not been active on Wolfbet, but it's about time to do it, again thanks for the update.

[DNL]

New wolf.bet review has been launched
https://crypto-gambling.net/casino/wolf-bet/

Thank you very much for the update, Wolfbet, they have a great reputation and the fact that they have released new games like Limbo is excellent, DICE is a scenario that I had not considered for this casino, but nevertheless I understand that Wolfbet want to implement it because of their history. throughout the gambling.
For me DICE represents one of the traditional games with the highest rate of player demand, in fact with that game I got to know the crypto world, first with Freebitco.in, and then with Stake.com, then already many casinos, I have not been active on Wolfbet, but it's about time to do it, again thanks for the update.

No problem. I'm glad to hear that you like it

[Mahdirakib]

They do have 4 games now though. They launched sportsbetting a few weeks ago.
I think most casinos have the requirement of setting up 2FA as well. I don't really consider it important info. 2FA is a standard all over the internet these days, especially in the crypto field.

Sports betting is different than the casino games. And without sports betting they have 3 casino games only. “Wide variety of game modes” isn't a suitable statement for having only three games. You should include it in Pros when wolf.bet will add more casino game or slots game at their platform.

You are right, every casino have 2FA option available for their user. But there is difference between having it as optional and mandatory. I have played at so many crypto casino but never seen any other casino where 2FA is mandatory like wolf.bet.

[DNL]

They do have 4 games now though. They launched sportsbetting a few weeks ago.
I think most casinos have the requirement of setting up 2FA as well. I don't really consider it important info. 2FA is a standard all over the internet these days, especially in the crypto field.

Sports betting is different than the casino games. And without sports betting they have 3 casino games only. “Wide variety of game modes” isn't a suitable statement for having only three games. You should include it in Pros when wolf.bet will add more casino game or slots game at their platform.

You are right, every casino have 2FA option available for their user. But there is difference between having it as optional and mandatory. I have played at so many crypto casino but never seen any other casino where 2FA is mandatory like wolf.bet.

I mean, sure. I guess wide variety may have been an over statement in here.

And it is more common these days. It's a requirement on at least a couple of the other sites that are also on the list.