mRNA vaccines: A New Hope

[Cnut237]

https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/mrna_vaccine.png

[1715547794]

1715547794

[1715547794]

1715547794

[1715547794]

1715547794

[1715547794]

1715547794

[BADecker]

But you know what? The promising research of David Sinclair could add as much as a hundred years to all our lives. Yet the killers in Big Pharma and the CDC don't seem to want to send any funds to him.

Meet Dr. David Sinclair, Harvard’s Anti-Aging & Longevity Expert


Forget what you’ve been told about the inevitability of aging. In fact, the rate at which we age has a lot more to do with the small choices we make every single day. To learn more, we reached out to Dr. David Sinclair, PhD, a leading researcher in anti-aging and longevity at Harvard Medical School. In his lab, they don’t just research how to slow down aging, but also how they can reverse it.

Here are our five biggest takeaways on increasing longevity and wellbeing as we age. For more learnings, be sure to check out Dr. David Sinclair’s new book Lifespan: Why We Age and Why We Don’t Have To.

5 Lessons In Longevity with Dr. David Sinclair

1. We have more control over aging than we think

But isn’t longevity hereditary? While our lifespan is partially influenced by our genetics, it’s really only a small part. “Only 20 percent of our lifespan is determined by our parents,” Dr. Sinclair tells us. “The rest is up to us.”

Consider, for instance, that life expectancy in the US has increased by almost twenty years just in the last fifty years. Our genes haven’t changed, but our lifestyles and environments have. Indeed, advances in modern medicine have come a long way in eradicating deaths from diseases. Dr. Sinclair’s lab works on how we can improve longevity even after you remove diseases from the equation.

“Even if we stopped cancer and heart disease individually today, we would only live another couple of years because we come up against aging itself. The only way to make meaningful gains in health and longevity is to address the root causes of these diseases, which is aging itself.” To do so, Dr. Sinclair’s lab investigates how our genes can best express themselves for optimal longevity

2. Longevity is not just about living longer, it’s about living better

3. A little bit of deprivation can actually be a good thing

4. Eat more plants… and drink red wine

5. It’s never too late to implement preventative measures for aging

...

Or you could search on his name in Youtube, and get the nitty-gritty about the things he and his people have found that can actually reverse aging a little. If Big Pharma spent as much money with David Sinclair as they do on vaccines, people would be living for 300 years by now.

[JohnBitCo]

[Cnut237]

The promising research of David Sinclair could add as much as a hundred years to all our lives. Yet the killers in Big Pharma and the CDC don't seem to want to send any funds to him.

I don't know anything about that particular person, but longevity research is a serious scientific endeavour, and is yielding results, yes. The field is being funded - generally anything where there is potentially a vast quantity of money to be made is funded.

Has the Star Wars analogy I posted changed your opinion on vaccines at all? I assume not, but it's a nice way of explaining the process.

~

It's weird coming out of lockdown. I'm definitely having to make a bit of an effort to remember how to function in normal society again, and interact with people. I mean, as much as I ever did...

[Natsuu]

I'm not really into starwars cause of the arcs and the animations in the first episodes in which I can't seem to take and watch longer than 1 hour.

Anyway, I have seen that somewhere in reddit or twitter, and it is really informative based on the comments I've read before. Though before I've seen that, I've already know how the vaccine works so it is nice seeing people change their perspective based on a well known movie comics.

[franky1]

doctor sinclair.. 51yo.. uses hair dye... nothing more needs to be said

[philipma1957]

doctor sinclair.. 51yo.. uses hair dye... nothing more needs to be said

Hmm I found out via diet and exercise that you can darken your hair color and actually thicken your hair some what.

I was an undiscovered diabetic 2.

Basically too much bread and pasta.

I ate 150 to 200 grams of carbs in my daily diet.

my a1c was 12.1 which = you will die if you do not change this.

my a1c is 6.8 no drugs just diet and exercise.

I was losing my hair and going grayish white.

My weight has dropped from 222 to 192
My a1c has dropped from 12.1 to 6.8
my hair is thicker and fuller and darker.

How did I do it? keto diet and 20-30 minutes of exercise after each meal.

Mostly stationary bike and very small dumbells.
I also use my ipad and do postings here when I do the stationary bike.

will I live to 300 dont know but at 64 I feel and look better than at 60.

[BADecker]

mRNA vaccines: A New Hope


Will kill off a large number of Dems so that Trump will most certainly win in 2024, and Reps will be in control for close to 100 years - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5311122.msg57189541#msg57189541.

[Cnut237]

mRNA vaccines: A New Hope


Will kill off a large number of Dems so that Trump will most certainly win in 2024, and Reps will be in control for close to 100 years - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5311122.msg57189541#msg57189541.

I wouldn't be surprised if proportionally more Dems than Reps were taking the vaccine. The main issue with your conclusion is obviously about the effects of the vaccine. If the vaccine protects, as the data indicate quite overwhelmingly, then you might expect statistically more Reps than Dems to contract Covid and suffer severe effects.

The 100 years bit is quite a wild extrapolation, too. Can anyone really say with even the slightest degree of confidence who will be in charge in 2121?

[BADecker]

mRNA vaccines: A New Hope


Will kill off a large number of Dems so that Trump will most certainly win in 2024, and Reps will be in control for close to 100 years - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5311122.msg57189541#msg57189541.

I wouldn't be surprised if proportionally more Dems than Reps were taking the vaccine. The main issue with your conclusion is obviously about the effects of the vaccine. If the vaccine protects, as the data indicate quite overwhelmingly, then you might expect statistically more Reps than Dems to contract Covid and suffer severe effects.

The 100 years bit is quite a wild extrapolation, too. Can anyone really say with even the slightest degree of confidence who will be in charge in 2121?

By this time, Reps have seen the stupidity in there even being a Covid pandemic. They have cured themselves from getting a bad case of Covid with nutrition and supplements. Dems simply go along with the Fauci blab, which is designed to tell them nothing that has anything to do with curing Covid, and maybe even designed to kill them.

BTW, that was a past 100 years, and we all know there were people talking about viruses even 150 years ago.