📝[Discussion topic] Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns📝

[dragonvslinux]

I otherwise think bonuses for most merited participants would be an interesting dynamic, rather than those who max out the campaign getting paid the most, in order to encourage quality of posting not just quantity.

Relying on most merited alone can get boring and sometimes unfair.

That's not what I was suggesting. I was suggesting a bonus for most merited participants. This could be a user who only posted 10-20 times in a week, and even with a bonus would be rewarded less than a participant who made 50 posts per week. So it wouldn't be relying on most merited to be rewarded the most what so ever, it would be equally rewarding quality not just quantity.

[1714595293]

1714595293

[1714595293]

1714595293

[1714595293]

1714595293

[1714595293]

1714595293

[1714595293]

1714595293

[1714595293]

1714595293

[helloinox]

I otherwise think bonuses for most merited participants would be an interesting dynamic, rather than those who max out the campaign getting paid the most, in order to encourage quality of posting not just quantity.

Relying on most merited alone can get boring and sometimes unfair.

That's not what I was suggesting. I was suggesting a bonus for most merited participants. This could be a user who only posted 10-20 times in a week, and even with a bonus would be rewarded less than a participant who made 50 posts per week. So it wouldn't be relying on most merited to be rewarded the most what so ever, it would be equally rewarding quality not just quantity.

This seems like a good idea, promo participants to focus on the quality instead of quantity, just to meet the quota. But this also makes it unfair since if the participant has a better merit circle, where he knows most of the people, he can easily get merited for some simple posts. We all know how the merit works in bitcointalk, it doesn't mean the absolute quality gets merited but also has other factors in. A guy talks on his local board, with some of his local friends, where both enjoy the contents of the others, and exchange merited to each other. This doesn't mean they are abusing the merit system. Because it stayed true to the spirit 'your post is worthy in my view so it can receive a token of goodwill'. So I think merit should be counted as a bonus only, not precedence the quote or posts per week.

[icopress]

Looks like the bear market has reached the signature campaigns as well. 

[joker_josue]

Looks like the bear market has reached the signature campaigns as well. 

Then why?
Fewer new campaigns coming up, or less forum activity?

[dragonvslinux]

Looks like the bear market has reached the signature campaigns as well. 

Then why?
Fewer new campaigns coming up, or less forum activity?

Same shit different year I imagine:

Less $ value available for signature campaigns
Less advertising in a bear market generally
Less activity in a bear market (ad hits)

[snipie]

Looks like the bear market has reached the signature campaigns as well. 

It is periodic. There is times where you find many signature campaigns popping up at the same time, and there is times where things are quite boring.
In bear market, you find many people holding, others afraid and others cashing out so it is normal to see that coincidence.

[icopress]

Guys I have a question... is 1 mBTC a normal offer for renting an avatar?

Let's say it's a long-term partnership. Now it's only $21 but when Bitcoin returns to its previous rate, rent will cost $40-50 per week.

[ABCbits]

Guys I have a question... is 1 mBTC a normal offer for renting an avatar?

Let's say it's a long-term partnership. Now it's only $21 but when Bitcoin returns to its previous rate, rent will cost $40-50 per week.

1 mBTC/week? I'd say it's good offer for those who want stability. But i don't expect many active user available since,
1. Many signature campaign also require avatar usage.
2. The avatar might conflict with signature.

[dkbit98]

Guys I have a question... is 1 mBTC a normal offer for renting an avatar?

Do you mean 1 mBTC per week for renting avatar or something else?
It all depends what service is being advertised and if there are any special conditions or not, but I would say 1 mBTC is minimum, and sure BTC can go up but it could also go down.
I think that gold bitcoin standard for renting avatars is Foxpup's Merit Cycling Club, but you can't get into this club unless you are really intimate with LoyceV and you need make a blood sacrifice

[yhiaali3]

Guys I have a question... is 1 mBTC a normal offer for renting an avatar?

Let's say it's a long-term partnership. Now it's only $21 but when Bitcoin returns to its previous rate, rent will cost $40-50 per week.

In my opinion 1 mBTC is very suitable for renting an avatar, especially if it is in the long-term, firstly bitcoin is on the rise and secondly wearing an avatar does not cost any extra effort. This is an acceptable additional income especially if the member is not participating in a campaign.
But this varies from person to person, some may say that this amount is low and their avatar is worth more than that. In addition, some campaigns require the use of avatars.

[icopress]

Yes, 1 mBTC per week without any obligation.

[snipie]

Guys I have a question... is 1 mBTC a normal offer for renting an avatar?

Let's say it's a long-term partnership. Now it's only $21 but when Bitcoin returns to its previous rate, rent will cost $40-50 per week.

It is whether both parts consider 1 mBTC = 1 mBTC and accept the fluctuations on the BTC/USD pair or just fix the amount on USD and convert it to BTC at the exact time of payment regardless of the fluctuations, just like most signature campaign is doing right now.
Personally, I find the price good for the moment in USD and a little exaggerated at $40-50 per week, especially if already enrolled in signature campaign that doesn't require an avatar.

[tranthidung]

Looks like the bear market has reached the signature campaigns as well.  

Snowball effect is coming but if you look at signature campaigns on the forum in the last bear market, worst has yet come (possibly)

• Worst might be around if we assume the crypto industry including signature campaign industry has grown after the last bull run.
• Worst has yet come if we assume the worst should be something like in past bear market
  
  • 30 Jan 2019
  • 28 June 2019

Guys I have a question... is 1 mBTC a normal offer for renting an avatar?

Let's say it's a long-term partnership.

Good enough I think but very few members are available for it. You can also check the rate from Crypto.Games that offer $40 per 4 weeks for both avatar + personal text.

[examplens]

Guys I have a question... is 1 mBTC a normal offer for renting an avatar?

Let's say it's a long-term partnership. Now it's only $21 but when Bitcoin returns to its previous rate, rent will cost $40-50 per week.

this is more than good. don't forget that some members don't even have that much for signatures together with an avatar.
I would say that it is an overpaid amount because I doubt that the avatar has any special marketing potential.

as for everything else, if you can hold that amount and wait for a better time, then it will certainly sound much better.

[JeromeTash]

This

Let's say it's a long-term partnership. Now it's only $21 but when Bitcoin returns to its previous rate, rent will cost $40-50 per week.

And this?

Yes, 1 mBTC per week without any obligation.

I say that would be a hell of a good deal 
Not so many campaigns even pay that well for lower ranks or give the participants any hope that the campaign is long term.

[joker_josue]

Guys I have a question... is 1 mBTC a normal offer for renting an avatar?

Let's say it's a long-term partnership. Now it's only $21 but when Bitcoin returns to its previous rate, rent will cost $40-50 per week.

I think it's an interesting value.
You just have to take into account that if it's a campaign that also has a subscription, users who use both avatar+subscription receive a fair value, so those who use only avatar will earn more.

[KingsDen]

About the avatar rent, is there any kind of posting conditions attached to it, such that if you don't meet up, you won't get paid. If there is no such rule, how about a user who barely visits the forum or makes posts.
If there are not strict rules, 1mBTC is nice, especially when BTC is not in big bear as at this time.

I think that gold bitcoin standard for renting avatars is Foxpup's Merit Cycling Club, but you can't get into this club unless you are really intimate with LoyceV and you need make a blood sacrifice

The blood sacrifice is available for only Chipmixer participants. Ordinary user of the forum would need to sacrifice oneself then.

[LTU_btc]

Guys I have a question... is 1 mBTC a normal offer for renting an avatar?

Let's say it's a long-term partnership. Now it's only $21 but when Bitcoin returns to its previous rate, rent will cost $40-50 per week.

I think that even at current rates it would be good deal. After all, in average it's like 50% of what most campaigns paying for waring signature (and in many cases avatar at the same time). $40-$50/week just for wearing avatar without any big requirements would be great offer.
BTW, I remember that 7-6 years ago avatar campaigns werequite frequent thing here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1087042.0
Only later most signature campaigns started to require to wear their avatar and users weren't able to earn extra money by promoting other service in their avatar.

[icopress]

Hey! Fun fact... 63 forum users think that Hhampuz continues the dynasty of managers. 

[joker_josue]

Hey! Fun fact... 63 forum users think that Hhampuz continues the dynasty of managers. 

Was this data collected based on the statistics you are doing?

I hope they compile this data soon, as it will be very interesting to analyze it.