Let me share my perspective on this.
The Bitz team introduced a new manager to me a couple of weeks ago, and my previous contact person is no longer with them. The current contact person was not familiar with the forum. I was talking to them just a few days ago and told them about my forum situation, and they said, 'No worries!' They refilled the escrow wallet twice already.
They asked me how they could reach other managers, and I forwarded them to the service board. When I noticed another campaign on the service section, I reached out to my contact and asked if I should pause mine and return the escrowed funds. They said that my campaigns have nothing to do with others, so I should not pause the campaign. I don't find it disrespectful, but kinda competitive, which should be a good thing.
It's great to hear this from a manager, this clarifies the possible doubts of most participants, both from the current campaign and the other manager's, yeah, they refilled the escrow wallet for the first campaign.
We don't know the brand's strategy of diversifying marketing campaigns with more than one manager, remembering that BC.Game did something similar this year with a more aggressive investment than usual in the third campaign, which for some reason didn't work out very well for them or perhaps it had a defined duration.
If everything is ok for the managers, the brand, and the participants, that's the fundamental point. Of course, not everyone will see this in a positive light and will question it, as it's the first, second or third time we're witnessing this diversification of managers on the forum, so it's normal for questions to arise.
