REQUEST FOR ATTENTION OF: All 1xbit Signature Campaign Participants

[logfiles]

They seem to have changed their mode of application for the signature campaign, but little do they know that signatures of the participants can still be seen.

we still looking for new members can add but need good account with neutral trust and posting thanks! you can send applicate in private message if not wanting public.

I have just tagged 3 new participants I saw in the gambling board
1. tulusikhlas
2. izsara
3. maju69

[1714690545]

1714690545

[1714690545]

1714690545

[1714690545]

1714690545

[1714690545]

1714690545

[Kittygalore]

~

@Kittygalore they don't care, to them it's just a job. They might not like the boss or the job, but for that kind of money in a lot of places in the world it's a enough to have a very very nice life. The accounts were already burned because of Adkinsbet so they don't care.

-Dave

I guess there's no difference to real dirty work I guess, you get paid even if you are frowned by many for what you're doing. Yeah, I have heard that some of them are supporter or sock puppet of Adkinsbet from someone in a different thread I think.

[Tronx]

Need Your Attention here please.

It look like some members are added recently (directly) without applying in the main    
1xbit.com signature campaign (open) thread. They don't care about the community and advertising scam gambling site. They should be tag like all others.

Members:
sikke  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=211177)  Week 16 No 34

sovie  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=328196) Week 16 No 35


Spreadsheet Link:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jd9RqLTK10kQJ20CjT0xQfLbYFyQxPW0VYUJ2CFtg4Y/edit#gid=0

[JollyGood]

I have been tagging any and all accounts that have had promoted or applied to promote the 1xbit scammers.

I continue to request all participants in the 1xbit signature campaign to kindly stop promoting a scam. Thank you.

[iv4n]

I have been tagging any and all accounts that have had promoted or applied to promote the 1xbit scammers.

I continue to request all participants in the 1xbit signature campaign to kindly stop promoting a scam. Thank you.

So you tagged me for this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5339885.msg57089619#msg57089619

It's not fair Jolly!

[icopress]

So you tagged me for this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5339885.msg57089619#msg57089619

It's not fair Jolly!

I am also interested in what is the reason for applying the tag to this user, because the link attached to the tag does not contain any archives but leads to this thread. Not that it bothered me, but from time to time I see this guy's ^[iv4n] messages in the various sections of the message and I do not remember that he would have carried the 1xbit signature, (although I do not exclude that I could overlook something). 


I found a mention ... As it turned out, the tag is related to the review, but I think the tag is a bit biased, at least I see that you did not red tag other users participating in that discussion. In addition, iv4n did not say anything that significantly differs from the words of other users, he did not say "I recommend" but at the same time publicly expressed concerns and clarified that (I highlighted some thoughts in red).

Interesting site 1xbit! I never played there, and I am not sure should I start now... Too many unsolved accusations on your account, of course!

But I like easy registration, and I like the list of the coins you accept! Amazing! Also, the list of available games is awesome, I am looking around the site and to be honest I like what I see! I am tempted to deposit some amount and test you... but maybe I will get $30 for this "the-first-look-review"?!

Here is my 1xbit deposit address: bc1qxepaj5xp7klsv797ndgm2xgs98er9ydj0rt625

If I get the coins I will play and I will be able to say something more about 1xbit casino! Cheers!

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

[efialtis]

Tagging Ivan for that is absolutely ridiculous and goes to show how messed this forum and its users have become. Jolly, you better reconsider this if you want to keep your image of being the objective forum gambling police man.

Ivan is actually one of the absolute best and knowledgeable posters when it comes to gambling on bitcointalk, a totally honest and fair guy. Tagging him (for that, lol) is a farce really.

(... I know why I have stopped participating in that forum bs besides updating my own thread every once in a while).

Conclusion. Remove that tag asap - alternatively, you will have fully deserved me taking action.

[Csmiami]

---

I have to say I'm with you on this one, Ivan.

For starters, giving a negative in September for something that happened in May... it's a bit off from my personal point of view.

To continue, the thread the comment was made into was a Review thread. Reviews can be both good and bad, and since no review was actually made in the end, the whole information from the tag is off. A little bit above Ivans' post, we can also see examplens making this exact point:

I RECOMMEND NOBODY TO JOIN HERE
PEOPLE WHO WANT TO JOIN THE CAMPAIGN WILL BE NEGATIVE TAGGED BY DT MEMBERS PROBABLY
STAY WAY FROM THIS SCAM ORGANISATION

I don't think so. He wants to pay for a review here on the Bitcointalk forum, why not? If someone makes an honest negative review, you think he should be negative trust punished by DT members?
He said honest review, not shill. I guess they will pay for this job, even if the review does not present them with a positive feeling.

As a side note, I don't think this is a right use of the trust system. I see a distrust on your personal trust list more fitting for this situation, but that may just be my own personal observation.

TLDR; there was no review (negative or positive) so this is just a wild goose chase

[JollyGood]

For those wishing to give their views about the tag given to iv4n please post in this newly created thread specifically for that issue: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5361695

[thesmallgod]

For those wishing to give their views about the tag given to iv4n please post in this newly created thread specifically for that issue: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5361695

Dear JollyGood, can you honestly refer me to where I participated in 1xbit signature campaign ?. 1xbit open a thread for both negative and positive reviews of their website which I also review based on my experience (evidence also provided) I never join the signature campaign of 1xbit so why did you give me a red tag ?. I believe DT members are selected to protect the intellectual of this platform but it will not be a good idea if any DT member intentionally does this without any proof.

I urge you to remove the tag

If this is the reason why you tag me, I believe it is your duty to do a rigorous check on my profile before red-tagging me because my password and email changed. I respect you a lot for your contribution to BTT but it won't be a great thing if we keep misjudging each other. Have a great day

Why post a message here when you already sent a PM? The PM had a very different tone to the one you used here in the thread but anyway as mentioned in my reply in the PM, I have removed the tag on the basis of the link provided.

$2 is a tiny amount, even back in 2017. What is clear the original creator of this account is no longer using it, most probably been sold more than once.

Please somebody help me with  2 USD. I lost my BTC to exchagers
this is my wallet address:
 1Cug98uWYXTJrbtKzFTFKM2Ug9JvLr767m
thank you

Dear JollyGood, kindly remove your tag. I am the owner and I ask you to always do research well before wrongly tagging someone account
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5356797.msg57794883#msg57794883

[icopress]

Well, how's it going with iv4n's negative tag? I ask about this here because a specially created thread was blocked ... and I get the impression that the thread was blocked so that no longer listen to those who are against this tag.

I will not be scattered with words, but I also think that the list of mistrust of 3000 names is also 99% meaningless, (except for slowing down pages with bpip logs).

[JollyGood]

You are mistaken, the impression you were under is misguided I did not lock the thread to avoid reading views against the tag.

Thread unlocked for the time being: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5361695.0

Well, how's it going with iv4n's negative tag? I ask about this here because a specially created thread was blocked ... and I get the impression that the thread was blocked so that no longer listen to those who are against this tag.

I will not be scattered with words, but I also think that the list of mistrust of 3000 names is also 99% meaningless, (except for slowing down pages with bpip logs).

[shasan]

Dear JollyGood, can you honestly refer me to where I participated in 1xbit signature campaign ?

Why you are wanting to promote a scam site? Do you not think that promoting a scam site is equal to helping a scammer and also acting as a scammer? As promoting a scam site refer to a scammer, you  will be considered as scammer if you promote a scam site (1xbit).

[thesmallgod]

Dear JollyGood, can you honestly refer me to where I participated in 1xbit signature campaign ?

Why you are wanting to promote a scam site? Do you not think that promoting a scam site is equal to helping a scammer and also acting as a scammer? As promoting a scam site refer to a scammer, you  will be considered as scammer if you promote a scam site (1xbit).

I suppose you have gone the post I made on review of 1xbit and tell me where I was wrong. 1xbit made both signature campaign and review thread and I chose not to join their signature campaign because of the controversies supporting betting platform generally. If you check internet you will understand no single betting platform have not witnessed scam accusations in the past. 1xbit review post receive both Negative and Positive review and it was welcome by them because that was what the 1xbit want.

[examplens]

I suppose you have gone the post I made on review of 1xbit and tell me where I was wrong. 1xbit made both signature campaign and review thread and I chose not to join their signature campaign because of the controversies supporting betting platform generally. If you check internet you will understand no single betting platform have not witnessed scam accusations in the past. 1xbit review post receive both Negative and Positive review and it was welcome by them because that was what the 1xbit want.

I just read your 1xbit review. To be honest, it's not worth a cent. If they pay you for that, they can be considered deceived. It's not a review, it is more of a pure enumeration of what is on their site. if I don't know anything about them, what you wrote will certainly not convince me to use their service.
I would rather label you as someone who writes nonsense just for the sake of a monetary reward.

About your negative tag, Jolly wants to mark all paid 1xbit supporters. that is his right here. it wouldn't be a problem for you that he is not a DT member and that makes it difficult for you to participate in other campaigns, where you will write anything to make some money.
So, I guess, JollGood maybe it can just change the explanation in the feedback itself (in your case)

btw. about negative tag to all participants in 1xbit review, I think that's wrong. if there were a case where someone wrote really honestly and listed all their problems (which would turn out to be a negative review), whether such a person should also be marked as red?
if so, why? he wrote the truth
if not, why not? anyone who participates in their campaign should be marked negatively.

[DaveF]

And it's back: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5367666.0

I guess they feel that the first one worked well enough for them to do it again.

That or they enjoy watching @JollyGood scream.

Either way, looking at the people who applied it's just another group of people who don't care and are here for the BTC
I wonder how long this one will last.

-Dave

[dkbit98]

I guess they feel that the first one worked well enough for them to do it again.

This time it's with reduced payment rates compared to the previous time, but more members will be accepted... and I can already see Jolly point finger is ready on the trigger.


  

[Csmiami]

---

Actually, the more the better! It's not a matter of if they'll spam the forum badly, it's a matter of when they'll do it. And when that moment arrives... well, I'm sure we all remember the Yobit campaign way to much
So let them come spam, let them...

[virasog]

I guess they feel that the first one worked well enough for them to do it again.

This time it's with reduced payment rates compared to the previous time, but more members will be accepted... and I can already see Jolly point finger is ready on the trigger.

They have considerably reduced the rates and hopefully new people with clean accounts should not join this campaign. I am sure that old participants will be accepted again and they will only produce the spam.

Another thing to mentioned here that by lowering the payments and increasing the members, it wont help to reduce the spam anyways. Someone need to tell them the definition of spam.

We have updated our campaign rules to reduce spamming factor and allow more users to participate.

[JollyGood]

It is time to bump this thread to serve as a request to all 1xbit signature campaign participants and those applying to join. Please do not join or apply to join a known scam because the number of victims will grow.

The 1xbit scammers are still trying to hide their selective scamming techniques behind a wall of signature campaign participants but it will never stop forum members from posting about them seizing funds under the guise of their Terms and Conditions.

Please do not apply to join a signature campaign belonging to known scammers. Thank you.