@paxmao I salute, there is always a topic to discuss in gambling.
Honestly about the La Liga big investment thread, I can't comment much for now, because yesterday I saw Madrid and Barcelona vehemently oppose this investment, in the deal of around 2.7 billion euros, there are still pros and cons in this matter, there are various options arising at this time for investors the general reason is post-pandemic, So there is no real certainty about the changes that will occur in the European Championships in the future. Another reason is that there are some unanswered questions, Barcelona's response could be detrimental on their part especially the club.
So, further review or development is needed in this investment issue related to CVC.
the reason barca refused this was because Barca considered the operation that had been announced had not been sufficiently discussed with the club (TV broadcasting rights owner). The amount does not match the duration of the year and the agreement affects a share of the audiovisual rights of all clubs for the next 50 years.
In addition, Real Madrid said that they were not informed about the investment agreement at all, even though they said that some of the agreements also violated the law.
and they say on the club's official website that negotiations are conducted in a non-competitive manner, CVC will also get a refund of 20 percent per year. This method has previously been tried in Italy and Germany, but failed
and this is the reason why both teams rejected the investment and considered it to be non-transparent.
but on the other hand the Executive Committee of the Spanish football league, which includes the bosses of Atletico Madrid and Sevilla, has approved a deal between La Liga and CVC.
La Liga currently seems to be under pressure, not only reaping the pros and cons of the CVC investment plan, they are also expected to relax the rules on player salaries and club expenses, the latter of which forced Lionel Messi to cancel his additional tenure at Camp Nou.