Stop trying to discredit those who allege that you're a plagiarist.
The most delusional thing that can be said about this. What does this have to do with it?
I got the same impression. The
feedback you left airfinex doesn't help either: this looks more like a personal attack than anything based on facts:
When I read feedback like this, it makes whoever wrote it look bad, not whoever received it.
More than 8 months have passed between these cases, where is the connection?
Just last week,
airfinex posted in "Ratimov plagiarizer and now trust abuser", which you responded to several times. The 8 months are irrelevant, you posted this just half an hour before you created this topic:
That's exactly what the big buzz is. But the big hype does not add to the righteousness of those who organized it. If airfinex really found some kind of plagiarism on me, then I would go to the place where okapoka124 or the recently rehabilitated Mpamaegbu is now sitting. But that did not happen. Because there was no plagiarism. There is a copy-paste with links at the end of each article. There are google translations from Russian to English with links at the end. I do not refuse this. But since when did we start calling copy-paste with links plagiarism? It is only in the fantasy of nullius, airfinex and the like that is considered plagiarism. But let them think so as much as they like, I am not obliged to correspond to their subjective convictions. The forum requires me to confirm any copy-paste with a link. There is no regulation where this link should be, at the beginning or at the end. But it has to be. I fully complied with these requirements and therefore they did not give me any ban.
As for his accusation, if I wanted some kind of revenge, I would put him a negative trust.
That would be very obvious Trust abuse.
I guess you'll just have to spend the next week going through my blockchain history.
Wait 8 months
You are incapable of defending yourself, which is why you attack those who accuse you of plagiarism.
Stop deflecting, address your problems head on. It's the only way to resolve them.
To me it seems like a weakness to try to defame the person who made some valid arguments. I still think the plagiarism rules should be adjusted,
this shouldn't be allowed (see
my reasons why).
Big surprise:
the guy who
first posted about Ratimov's plagiarism received negative feedback the next day:
I can't help but think Ratimov was angry when he tagged those users. Here's another "
brain-dead fucker". I don't know why Ratimov left them negative feedback in English, because I can't read the Russian Reference links. I see one very strong connection though: they've criticized Ratimov, so he tags them.
And then you wonder why people use alt accounts?
Allow me to quote myself:
Be the bigger man!With great power comes great responsibility (
source unknown). Especially when you're on DefaultTrust (or if you want to be on DefaultTrust in the future), you shouldn't (ab)use that power by leaving (negative) feedback when someone does something you don't like. Your Sent feedback is what others use to judge your judgement.
If someone on the internet is mean to you:
boo fucking hoo! Use the Ignore button, and forget about them.
I wonder what is the interval in DireWolfM14's head at which he will not think that accusatory topics can be created not only because of mutual claims?
I wonder why you're attacking DireWolfM14's character, instead of responding to what he says.
Strange, I thought there was a freedom of speech forum where everyone can share their thoughts, especially if they are justified. But DireWolfM14 comes and starts ranting about the topic that if a person once said something against you, now you have no right to say anything in his direction. Free Speech Rules by DireWolfM14.
You can't have freedom of speech without DireWolfM14 having it too.
They may be alts, but does it really matter? I've long given up on trying to find "cheaters" amongst bounty spammers, it's pretty obvious many of them must use dozens of accounts. Let them spam Twitter and Facebook as much as they want, let Jack and Mark deal with it.
make me think that this guy is not an idiot and added this ETH address just for a diversion.
He could indeed just as well have added theymos' Bitcoin address. I don't think he's expecting any donations, so the address in his profile has no value.
