Disadvantages of non detectable early Plagiarism

[LoyceV]

are you saying that someone who is writing an article about bitcoin mining and draft out like half of the article by itself and the completion of the work happened to be four lines stanza from someone's work that has be done initial or previously without adding the reference source, is not a plagarism?

I'm not sure what exactly you're asking, but it's quite simple: if you copy something, make sure the reader understands you took it from someone else.

How much time can each guilty user ^[plagiarism] be given before being reported to a moderator?

If you think it was a mistake, notify the user instead of reporting it.

I got someone doing paraphrasing plagiarism yesterday but didn't report it because just wanted to give him a chance to correct the post with the source link.

If you didn't tell them, I don't expect them to review yesterday's posts to fix it.

If there wasn't a time limit, maybe someone could still reason that they forgot to attach the source

I can already tell you that's the case if you find plagiarism in any of my posts, even if I posted it years ago.

something being allowed but then discouraged

It's allowed by the forum, but you might receive negative feedback. Kinda the same as scamming, that's allowed even though many users disapprove.

How do you allow something and then discourage it at the same time. Why not make it either acceptable or discourage it outrightly?

Allow me:

18. Having multiple accounts and account sales are allowed, but account sales are discouraged.

This rule has no meaning! If it would be removed, nothing would change because anything that isn't in the rules is allowed. The "discouraging" comes from users, not from Mods. So I consider it a clarification and warning instead of a rule.

[1715198083]

1715198083

[1715198083]

1715198083

[UserU]

This rule has no meaning! If it would be removed, nothing would change because anything that isn't in the rules is allowed. The "discouraging" comes from users, not from Mods. So I consider it a clarification and warning instead of a rule.

Agree, I feel its more or less caveat emptor. Not like those involved would be banned anyway.

[GeorgeJohn]

As a newbie in this forum of course it will be very difficult for me to post quality things without reading a lot and increasing knowledge. Without the two things above, it is very possible for us to be involved in plagiarism, whether detected or not.

you can read from anywhere depending your research and understanding before putting it in writing for the community, but the major concern is that read and provide the source, and don't act as the original source while is already existing work done for period of time.

Of course this is very detrimental and also never recommended even though basically we just want to contribute. I've heard a lot of advice on how to do it well, but I know it's hard, but I'm sure it will pay off and eventually we can feel that it will never be in vain.

It's obvious that to secure knowledge or master a specific something it will surely undergoes strees and other difficult things to make it to come to reality, nothing comes so easily, it's hard work that makes impossibility to become possible.