Spartacus Letter

[B1tUnl0ck3r]

I am Spartacus. I can answer any questions you may have.
~

...Proof of identity?

Any random weasel on this forum can register an account with "Spartacus" in it.

The dude's last post to this thread, which shows a basic command of the scientific principles replete with copious use of the same class of links that the Spartacus docs used, is actually pretty strong evidence that he is not a 'random weasel.'  And even if he is, the information he is bringing is gold.

remember assange leaks? to pass cia code into russian code? we aren't in kansas 1920 anymore...

edit : didn't we saw our fair share of satoshi's here to at least ask for a little more, than... hehehe.

[1714990045]

1714990045

[1714990045]

1714990045

[1714990045]

1714990045

[1714990045]

1714990045

[1714990045]

1714990045

[BobLawblaw]

...Proof of identity?

 I will say this. If he's not Spartacus, this is the most intelligent and well executed LARP I've ever personally witnessed.

 The preponderance of evidence, knowledge, and writing style give me an eerie sense we're not dealing with a "John Titor" situation here.

[B1tUnl0ck3r]

...Proof of identity?

 I will say this. If he's not Spartacus, this is the most intelligent and well executed LARP I've ever personally witnessed.

 The preponderance of evidence, knowledge, and writing style give me an eerie sense we're not dealing with a "John Titor" situation here.

who is this guy? johny titor? me say AI could fake it so easy...

scenario at WHO/big pharma ... they write the text they want, then pass it to the AI, get it like the other dude, then gain "our" trust, then fuck us again... classic.

but who knows... you are back on ignore, moron.

[BobLawblaw]

you are back on ignore, moron.

Right, kick ass. Well, don't want to sound like a dick or nothin', but, ah... it says on your chart that you're fucked up. Ah, you talk like a fag, and your shit's all retarded. What I'd do, is just like... like... you know, like, you know what I mean, like..

[Cryptotourist]

...Proof of identity?

You are special. Really special, to ask questions like that.
Maybe you’d like his proof of vaccination too?

[ICENI_Spartacus]

I am Spartacus. I can answer any questions you may have.
~

...Proof of identity?

Any random weasel on this forum can register an account with "Spartacus" in it.

I will provide it, soon. I have to get some things in order. Someone is trying to impersonate me, unfortunately. They're claiming that they've got me for an interview. They do not. I never agreed to do any interview or stream or podcast or anything.

I am compiling a lot of documents and files on the pandemic, the response, and the big players in all this, but it's going to take time. I am a voracious reader, but there is still so much research to be done.

Just to set the tone, I'm going to share a passage from James Giordano's textbook, Neurotechnology in National Security and Defense - Practical Considerations, Neuroethical Concerns, which I have in hardcover.

This volume and book series address and reveal the reality that neuroscience and neurotechnology (neuro S/T) have become powerful forces that influence society, and are influenced by various social forces, and incur a host of ethico-legal and social issues. Recent governmental and commercial investments in brain science and neuroengineering reflect growing interest and enthuse advancement(s) in neuro S/T and the information, products, and potential power these disciplines may yield. A dimension of this power is derived from the prospect of using neuro S/T to define - and affect - human nature.

Until rather recently, most efforts toward global relations, as well as national and international security and defense, have focused upon social factors influencing human behaviors, including hostility and patterned violence. Given that these behaviors are devised and articulated by human factors, and humans are most accurately defined as biopsychosocial organisms that are embedded within and responsive to geocultural environments, it is important to address and discern those (neuro)biological factors that are affected by and interact with psychosocial variables to dispose and instigate hostility and violence. Neuro S/T provides techniques and tools that are designed to assess, access, and target these neurological substrates, which could be employed to affect the putative cognitive, emotional, and behavioral bases of human aggression, conflict, and warfare.

Let me translate that for you.

They are going to pacify (that is, "cyber-socialize") every human being on the planet completely. They are going to do this by injecting nanoparticles into people that cross the blood-brain barrier, which are activated by external transceivers and precisely stimulate regions in the brain involving mood, reward, anxiety, hostility, et cetera. This is why Blackrock and Vanguard and the like are buying up rural and suburban properties. They are herding people into cities because the infrastructure for mind control has to be concentrated there. It's too expensive to try and cover all of bumfuck Wyoming with phased-array antennas.

In World War III, the aggressors are governments and the targets are citizens. There is no actual conflict with China or anyone else. That's all pretend. If that war ever went hot, then the purpose would simply be to dispose of excess people. Our leaders all attended summits where they all agreed upon this. Not only would the population be reduced, but the remainder would be lobotomized with nanotech.

People thought that I was poisoning the well, or that this was some kind of limited hangout thing, by including those passages about mind control. They don't understand how far along the technology is, at all.

[mindrust]

This is why Blackrock and Vanguard and the like are buying up rural and suburban properties. They are herding people into cities because the infrastructure for mind control has to be concentrated there. It's too expensive to try and cover all of bumfuck Wyoming with phased-array antennas.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-09-24/why-is-zillow-buying-up-houses-viral-tiktok-criticizes-firm-for-price-jump

Zillow Group Inc. became the latest company to get enmeshed in internet drama when Sean Gotcher — a real estate agent in Las Vegas — posted a TikTok video that said an unnamed company was pulling off a convoluted scheme to manipulate housing prices in his home market.

There are news lately saying that Zillow is offering the sellers a lot more than the original asking price of the houses. Might be related. Guess who is the second biggest shareholder of Zillow...

Hint:

[suchmoon]

Let me translate that for you.

That's not a "translation", that's speculation, loosely (if at all) related to the quote.

Here is another James Giordano quote for you, since you seem to be very fond of him:

The physicians, the CDC, the public health service comes back and says "no, no, that's not what's going on". I get back on the internet and I say "don't you listen to that,  that's fake, that's false, your government knows what's going on, they can't do anything about it, they can't treat you, they're gonna end up quarantining you." How many people would I need to affect? We modeled it. Somewhere between 12 and 240. What would be the effect? In 41-45 days we would crash the United States public health system.

Seems like you got your 12+ here, good job. Using your own standard of evidence "someone mentioned it in a lecture so if we pick the right cherries we can claim that this thing exists and we're living it", that's definitive proof right here that you work for the Chinese government in furthering their bioweapon attack (which of course is also definitely real based on the same standard of evidence).

Or maybe you're full of shit like all conspiratards, albeit more capable to overwhelm your audience with big words and irrelevant links and quotes.

[ICENI_Spartacus]

Let me translate that for you.

That's not a "translation", that's speculation, loosely (if at all) related to the quote.

Here is another James Giordano quote for you, since you seem to be very fond of him:

The physicians, the CDC, the public health service comes back and says "no, no, that's not what's going on". I get back on the internet and I say "don't you listen to that,  that's fake, that's false, your government knows what's going on, they can't do anything about it, they can't treat you, they're gonna end up quarantining you." How many people would I need to affect? We modeled it. Somewhere between 12 and 240. What would be the effect? In 41-45 days we would crash the United States public health system.

Seems like you got your 12+ here, good job. Using your own standard of evidence "someone mentioned it in a lecture so if we pick the right cherries we can claim that this thing exists and we're living it", that's definitive proof right here that you work for the Chinese government in furthering their bioweapon attack (which of course is also definitely real based on the same standard of evidence).

Or maybe you're full of shit like all conspiratards, albeit more capable to overwhelm your audience with big words and irrelevant links and quotes.

Again, for the people in the back.

Moderna was co-founded by Robert Langer.

Robert Langer was a colleague of Charles Lieber and worked with him on a paper on artificial cyborg tissue scaffolds for human hearts that could be used to assess heart health, among other things.

Charles Lieber was arrested for his undisclosed ties to the Wuhan University of Technology.

Charles Lieber's papers explicitly describe the use of nanotech to make brain-computer interfaces.

Charles Lieber had grants from DARPA, among other military think tanks.

DARPA are intensely researching BCI tech.

Policy experts linked to DARPA are describing the use of BCI tech to forcibly civilize people, to alter their mood and behavior, not just enhance the capabilities of soldiers.

This is not Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon. They're all directly linked in a manner that is highly suspicious.

[suchmoon]

Again, for the people in the back.

Moderna was co-founded by Robert Langer.

Oh, so we just skip over the whole "does this tech actually exist" and go straight to insinuating that some people knowing other people definitely means they're conspiring? Does that mean the Pfizer vaccine is safe or is Pfizer founder's niece linked to someone in Wuhan too?

BCI tech is in its infancy even with electrodes physically implanted in one's head. AFAIK the whole nano particle shtick would require a helmet just to read brain activity. OTOH we already have drugs that affect "mood and behavior" so why not just put those in everyone's beer and don't bother with the complicated virus-vax conspiracy.

None of this proves that remote mind control exists, can be covertly delivered via injection to billions of people, and that this actually happened.

I wouldn't think for a second that you really believe that gibberish you're posting, so I'm quite intrigued how far you're going to take this.

[tvbcof]

...
Let me translate that for you.

They are going to pacify (that is, "cyber-socialize") every human being on the planet completely. They are going to do this by injecting nanoparticles into people that cross the blood-brain barrier, which are activated by external transceivers and precisely stimulate regions in the brain involving mood, reward, anxiety, hostility, et cetera. ...

I've been hypothesizing such things on this board going back to a point many years before the plandemic.  Some of the hypotheses have been quite similar to the above assertion in fact.  It's simply a fairly robust explanation for such mysteries as the first-day vitamin K (with detergent and 25,000 times normal levels of the vitamin) + Hep-B (with Merck's AAHSA nano-particles) insistence.  In this example, the medical necessity explanation is not.

So, using these assertions/hypotheses as a hypothetical starting point for further projections:

 - Is it really going to be that hard for hackers to reverse engineer the signaling used to animate these structures?  Especially in light of the probability of technical engineering data leaking.  I mean, with a $20 dongle one can capture some bandwidth up to about 8Ghz for analysis, and obtainable equipment can go way higher than that.

 - Or just using the injected and distributed material as a general purpose antenna to exploit in the construction of a variety of 'services' which may or may not resemble the protocols and specs resulting from the work of those originally commissioned by DARPA/Blackrock/whoever.

[ICENI_Spartacus]

Again, for the people in the back.

Moderna was co-founded by Robert Langer.

Oh, so we just skip over the whole "does this tech actually exist" and go straight to insinuating that some people knowing other people definitely means they're conspiring? Does that mean the Pfizer vaccine is safe or is Pfizer founder's niece linked to someone in Wuhan too?

BCI tech is in its infancy even with electrodes physically implanted in one's head. AFAIK the whole nano particle shtick would require a helmet just to read brain activity. OTOH we already have drugs that affect "mood and behavior" so why not just put those in everyone's beer and don't bother with the complicated virus-vax conspiracy.

None of this proves that remote mind control exists, can be covertly delivered via injection to billions of people, and that this actually happened.

I wouldn't think for a second that you really believe that gibberish you're posting, so I'm quite intrigued how far you're going to take this.

Not gibberish. There are entirely plausible ways of doing this. Not sure about read/write at a high resolution, but at the very least, they might be able to emulate deep brain stimulation, which, at sufficient power levels, makes people feel incredibly blissful and satisfied all the time, like Soma from Brave New World, or a Droud from Larry Niven's Ringworld. They use DBS to treat refractory alcoholism. Basically, it stimulates the reward response in the Nucleus Accumbens.

https://www.ninds.nih.gov/Disorders/Clinical-Trials/Deep-Brain-Stimulation-Refractory-Alcoholism

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2018/03/pleasure-shock-deep-brain-stimulation-happiness/556043/

The two began with a single volt. Not much happened. The patient’s well-being or “happiness level” was down around two, while his anxiety was up at eight. With another volt, his happiness level crawled up to three, and his anxiety fell to six. That was better but still nothing to write home about. At four volts, on the other hand, the picture was entirely different. The patient now described a feeling of happiness all the way up to the maximum of 10 and a total absence of anxiety.

“It’s like being high on drugs,” he told Synofzik. The neurologist turned up the voltage one more notch for the sake of the experiment, but at five volts the patient said that the feeling was “fantastic but a bit too much.” He had a feeling of ecstasy that was almost out of control, which made his sense of anxiety shoot up to seven.

Okay, so you want to put electrodes in the brain. How do you power them if there are no wires? Simple. You use nanoparticles that self-assemble into antennas and circuits capable of harvesting RF and outputting a mild electric current.

How do you titrate the dosage to each person's brain? Simple. You use a source that can steer different beams of different dosages to different people's brains. 5G base stations are phased-array antennas with beamforming and MIMO. Problem solved.

But wait a minute, how do you localize the nanoparticles in the reward center of the brain? Simple! You look at the ratios of protein expression in different regions of the brain, and then you use a designer protein that opens the blood-brain barrier right at that specific point.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8154547/

In brain tissue, the ACE2 mRNA is expressed in the following order of abundance: nucleus accumbens of ventral striatum > posterior hypothalamus > anterior hypothalamus > cortex > hippocampus > cerebellum > spinal cord > medulla oblongata (Harmer et al. 2002).

None of this stuff is technologically infeasible. At all. They're basically turning people's brains into Wacom pens, with a 5G base station in place of the tablet.

[eddie13]

“ Disabling parts of the brain with magnets can weaken faith in God and change attitudes to immigrants, study finds”

magnetic pulses to the brain can temporarily change people's feelings on a variety of subjects - from their belief in God, to their attitude to immigration.
...

by targeting the part of the brain that deals with threats, they can temporarily change people's beliefs and views.
...

shut down their posterior medial frontal cortex (pMFC), a part of the brain that "plays a key role in both detecting discrepancies between desired and current conditions and adjusting subsequent behaviour to resolve such conflicts."
...
receiving a dose capable of severely lessening activity in the threat-processing centre of the brain. ... And 25.8 per cent more of those who had received TMS had a more positive response to the immigrant who had written a negative letter about their country.

In other words, those given the magnetic treatment were found to have decreased beliefs in God and more positive views towards immigrants
...

When we disrupted the brain region that usually helps detect and respond to threats, we saw a less negative, less ideologically motivated reaction

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/news/brain-magnets-decrease-faith-god-religion-immigrants-a6695291.html%3famp



They HAVE been working on such things, and it DOES work..

EXACTLY what they want, is to throw away our faith, morals, and principles, and love immigrants, and become more apathetic to all other threats to our traditions and principles/traditional principles..


We aren’t good enough sheep... Yet..


Not saying I “believe” they are using vaccines to make people controllable through 5G or whatever, but I’ll keep my mind open to just about anything, because I do completely believe that if they could they would..

[tvbcof]

Just as a point of reference vis-a-vis power available in the environment, I keep my TES-593 running in max mode all the time just for the fun of it.

Within several days I typically see in excess of 1 watt/m^2.  Somewhat over 3 watt/m^2 is the record which I got recently.

The device is behind at least two concrete walls in all directions, and under a steel roof, and I it's in a place where wi-fi devices or cell phones never get near it.  Generally in average mode it will run about 2 or 3 micro-watt/m^2 and it is showing that as I type this, but sometimes it will go a lot higher.  Outdoors in line-of-sight from a massive cell tower it is vastly higher of course.

[Tash]

The paid shills will correct what the magnets missed
https://ibb.co/JRxztvh

[o_e_l_e_o]

What I don't get is why we aren't seeing any results for many of these antioxidant trials.

We see this kind of thing not infrequently in medicine, and even more so in critical care. Drugs or treatments which show promising results in vitro, show promising results in rodent models, maybe even show promising results in healthy volunteers, but when we apply them to critically ill patients, they either don't work or even make things worse.

Take colloids for example. They were going to be the next big thing and replace crystalloids for treating septic shock. They provided a bigger increase in blood pressure than crystalloids, and this increase lasted longer. They stayed in the intravascular space longer, they caused less peripheral and pulmonary edema and fewer third space losses. They allowed us to wean vasopressors more quickly. They made all our numbers and parameters better. And then the studies came out which showed that actually they were pro-inflammatory, they were bad for the kidneys, and they worsened mortality. So we are back with crystalloids except in very specific cases.

Take ventilation for example. When we first ventilated patients, we used large tidal volumes and high respiratory rates to help clear CO₂. We did this to get their PaCO₂ down to a physiological level, which helped to correct the acidosis associated with sepsis and bring their pH back to a normal level, which definitely improved things in the short term, stabilized the patient, reduced the requirement for inotropes and vasopressors, etc. And then the studies likes ARDSnet came out which showed we were causing volutrauma and barotrauma and allowing what we call "permissive hypercapnia" with lower tidal volumes improved mortality.

So then we get a treatment like antioxidants, which logically should work, and which give good looking data in rodents or healthy volunteers, but when applied to a critically ill population, simply don't work.

Micronutrient deficiency is endemic throughout the developed world. Given that 40% of Americans are Vitamin D deficient, some critically so (this gets worse the darker your skin is, with as many as 60% of Hispanics and 80% of African-Americans being Vitamin D deficient), there's no way that one Vitamin D pill a day could hurt. It could only help. Vitamin D helps lower anxiety, too.

I don't disagree at all, and have said as much myself before:

The evidence I have seen seems to suggest that a deficiency in vitamin D can make COVID worse, rather than extra vitamin D being protective against COVID, but I haven't spent a huge amount of time reading around this topic. Regardless, the majority of Americans are deficient in vitamin D, especially those in more northern states, and should be taking a vitamin D supplement anyway.

88% of the people intubated in New York died.

https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20200422/most-covid-19-patients-placed-on-ventilators-died-new-york-study-shows#1

During that outbreak, Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell vocally expressed concerns that they were using the wrong treatment.

https://z3news.com/w/dr-cameron-kylesidell-treating-wrong-disease-change/

Another study shows that 45% of patients intubated are dying.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7781141/

Granted, this is an intervention that is mostly reserved for critical cases that would otherwise have a fatal outcome. I recognize that. However, there has to be some manner of adjunct therapy that can protect the tissues from damage.

Emphasis mine. These people would have had a near 100% mortality rate without intubation. I've intubated a lot of people with COVID, and in every single one they were critically hypoxic and, at most, a couple of hours from dying without intervention. It's also worth noting that the article with a mortality rate of 88% was published in April 2020, during the first wave, when we had no specific treatments for this disease. Less than a year later and the mortality rate is now down at 45% precisely because we have evidence showing us which "adjunct therapy", as you put it, is effective. As time goes on, and with other treatments being studied and widespread vaccination, that number will reduce further.

What frustrates me is the lack of mainstream media coverage of the deeper complexities of COVID-19's pathology.

The public don't care. What can they do with knowledge that COVID causes severe DIC or pericarditis? They want to know when they can go on vacation again or go to a concert.

A good friend of mine died on one of those ventilators. I hadn't seen him in a few years and I was hoping to meet up with him. This is kind of personal for me, and I may have gotten a little heated up.

My condolences, sincerely. It's personal for a lot of us.

Why do I keep seeing studies showing a benefit, then?

Mostly low quality evidence. Cohort studies or self selecting studies, low number of patients, confounding factors, etc. One of those studies you linked even found that physical activity was a risk factor for COVID. If you take high quality meta-analyses which only include high quality RTCs, such as the one I linked previously or this one - https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD015017.pub2 - we generally find very sporadic and inconclusive evidence. I'm not saying there definitely isn't something there, but there is no good quality evidence to support it at present.


Almost all anti-vaxxers deliberately just turn a blind eye to published data and trials. I'm curious as to how you can understand how trials like these are the only way to reach firm conclusions and build an evidence base, but then simultaneously choose to ignore the evidence that the vaccine is reducing symptoms, reducing critical care admissions, and saving lives.

[eddie13]

The paid shills will correct what the magnets missed
https://ibb.co/JRxztvh

That’s not the only one..
This is also shareblue and others..
Maybe you should start another thread on this and I’ll help to dig out the applicable redpills..

[tvbcof]

...
Almost all anti-vaxxers deliberately just turn a blind eye to published data and trials. I'm curious as to how you can understand how trials like these are the only way to reach firm conclusions and build an evidence base, but then simultaneously choose to ignore the evidence that the vaccine is reducing symptoms, reducing critical care admissions, and saving lives.

The trouble is that the publishers are owned lock/stock/barrel by the perps pushing a lot of the eugenics stuff and they clearly have a license to flat-out lie if it serves the project.  We saw this first-hand throughout this scamdemic with very well established journals having to pull blatantly fraudulent studies which pretended to be getting high-quality tight granularity data from rural hospitals in Africa.  Turns out the the 'scientists' performing the research were just fraudsters.  I don't remember the exact details, but there were a number of examples.

Similar problems afflict the organizations who can realistically host a lot of the potentially valuable research.  Scientists and academics know what they can and cannot find if they want to remain in the field.  And they know what findings will pay well.

I'm not saying that all research is wrong or there is nothing to be learned from even crappy research.  Indeed, when you read some of these papers, you can white-out the 'summary' and a sentence or two which the authors put in to cover their asses, and the rest is sometimes both valuable and in some cases quite damning to those who commissioned it.  The thing is, there is so much fraud and corruption that it's not really worth the bother to read it carefully because the uncertainty degrades it's value immensely.  In the task of understanding the world in a realistic way, it is simply much more productive to spend one's time elsewhere.

[suchmoon]

Okay, so you want to put electrodes in the brain. How do you power them if there are no wires? Simple. You use nanoparticles that self-assemble into antennas and circuits capable of harvesting RF and outputting a mild electric current.

How do you titrate the dosage to each person's brain? Simple. You use a source that can steer different beams of different dosages to different people's brains. 5G base stations are phased-array antennas with beamforming and MIMO. Problem solved.

Antenna size is directly correlated to wavelength. Minimum antenna size for 5G signal is ~3mm. AFAIK there are some tricks to reduce that slightly, perhaps to 2mm. That's still 4-5 orders of magnitude beyond what is considered nanotechnology. Not gonna fit through the needle either.

None of this stuff is technologically infeasible. At all.

Yeah... it is technologically infeasible. The fact that you talk a lot about remote mind control via nanoparticles but provide links to much more limited experiments with electrodes should be a hint that you're not exactly honest with that statement.

Then there is another huge leap between technological feasibility and the ability to do it covertly at scale.

[hornetsnest]

I had my last post deleted but to remain on topic and within my remit but I will say that it is too late to stop what is about to be rolled out soooooooon but you do have a choice. Participate and live a reasonably comfortable life albeit subject to your benevolent academic overlords and central planners or refuse to participate and life will become difficult. I would personally choose the latter. Life is not too bad as an outcast