Spartacus Letter

[hornetsnest]

I heard many unvaccinated people living with vaccinated people are also turning up at hospitals suffering from myocarditis and pericarditis. 

[mindrust]

I heard many unvaccinated people living with vaccinated people are also turning up at hospitals suffering from myocarditis and pericarditis. 

It don't make much sense to me. How is that even possible? Sounds more like a conspiracy theory. Do you have a source for these rumors? Otherwise I'll call this one bullshit. In a year or two, I expect everything will be resolved anyway. We just need to survive a couple of three hundred days.

[Cryptotourist]

It don't make much sense to me. How is that even possible? Sounds more like a conspiracy theory.

Well, we’ve all been infected, whether we like it or not.

Do you have a source for these rumors? Otherwise I'll call this one bullshit.

Not so fast.
There is little known about this matter.

In a year or two, I expect everything will be resolved anyway. We just need to survive a couple of three hundred days.

And on you jump to the new mainstream narrative.
What happened to: “two weeks to flatten the curve, yo”?

[hornetsnest]

I heard many unvaccinated people living with vaccinated people are also turning up at hospitals suffering from myocarditis and pericarditis.  

It don't make much sense to me. How is that even possible? Sounds more like a conspiracy theory. Do you have a source for these rumors? Otherwise I'll call this one bullshit. In a year or two, I expect everything will be resolved anyway. We just need to survive a couple of three hundred days.

Yeah it could be just a coincidence I suppose. I don't have a publicly available source so can't post the info I saw on an open thread/forum. No I don't think the use of "emergency legislation" and public health crisis management is going away anytime soon although there might be a tactical retreat and regroup by TPTP if there's enough genuine pushback to the vax pass regime. The global health code mechanism will NOT be going away. The "need" for booster shots will NOT be going away. All these things are just a precursor for the main event which will be a full spectrum digital global ID on a new internet with a cashless society and incentive based system for social compliance. Future significant dates will could be 2025,2027,2030.

Could be just one of those conspiracies though

[Cryptotourist]

Flattening the curve - reminds me of Flat Earth’ers.
Two years - remind me of two weeks.

An absolute scam, just to gain time. Time necessary to embed.
Forex scam tactics, include doubling down on the initial investment - because that’s the maximum the investor can handle.
[he can’t really, but that’s how they squeeze the maximum out of their prey]

Same here. Two years behind, two to go.


Someone deleted my late post.
I’ll try it again without the personal remarks:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-021-01082-4

The article is recent and behind a paywall.
Here is (what I assume) the (edited) Greek version of it.

The title reads: “New treatments against COVID-19 and new antivirus drugs based on nanotechnology.”
I’d love to read the original of course.

#smart.vaccine

[hornetsnest]

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-021-01082-4

The article is recent and behind a paywall.
Here is (what I assume) the (edited) Greek version of it.

The title reads: “New treatments against COVID-19 and new antivirus drugs based on nanotechnology.”
I’d love to read the original of course.

#smart.vaccine

New treatments against COVID-19 and new antiviral drugs based on nanotechnology

In a recent (7-10-2021) review article published in Nature Biotechnology, Vol. 39, October 2021, 1169-1175, the authors discuss the advances that nanotechnology offers in the field of treatment and protection of humans against viruses - including SARS-CoV-2. The research and development of nanodevices, with universities and research institutions collaborating with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, are raising expectations for new treatments against infectious agents such as viruses. The use of safe and effective biomaterials, such as polymers and lipids, to make nanodevices and 'cleanse' the human body of infectious viruses is the subject of an article published in the prestigious scientific journal Nature Biotechnology.  

Konstantinos Demetzos, Professor of the Department of Pharmacy of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (demetzos@pharm.uoa.gr) presents the main points of this article.

Lipid nanoparticles, which have been used as structural components of vaccines against SARS-CoV-, have been confirmed to be safe and effective, not only by clinical studies, but also by their administration in billions of doses worldwide, for protection against COVID-19. Research is evolving every day and new pioneering studies are being published and the prospects for the development and future approval of new antiviral therapies based on nanotechnology are becoming evident. The need to develop new antiviral drugs with targeted action, with reduced adverse effects and with maximum efficacy is also related to the prospect of new pandemic or endemic conditions that may be due to the evolutionary process and mutations of pathogens such as viruses.  

The article initially refers to the use of nanobiomaterials that will create nanodevices with specific functionality, such as the 'cleansing' of the organism from infectious agents and also from SARS-CoV-2. Interestingly, these nanodevices with lipid and/or polymer building blocks are biocompatible and biodegradable by the human body and are eliminated through normal human functions. These nanodevices, recognising the structural characteristics of viruses, will bind to and destroy them. An important element here is the notion of recognisability of the causative agent, i.e. the virus. The biological 'flags' present on the surface of viruses (e.g., surface proteins) are used as recognition marks. Scientists use this knowledge and with appropriate structural modifications to the surface of the nanodevices they can attack and destroy viruses. It is also important that the article mentions the creation of nanodevices with multiple functionalities. The development of multi-functional nanodevices is aimed at using them to tackle many different viruses, which, however, have common structural features, i.e. common biological 'flags', which are recognised by the nanodevices. The development of this technology offers advantages and increases the effectiveness of nanotechnology-based antiviral therapy so that the therapeutic approach is - for many different pathogenic viruses - the same.

The article discusses the mechanism by which we can prepare nanodevices that recognise structural regions of SARS-CoV-2 virus and also common structural regions with other infectious viruses, and also discusses different mechanisms by which different nanodevices work both therapeutically and protectively. Different types of nanodevices are described as well as research efforts to develop them, with the aim of making 'smart', multi-functional safe and effective nanodevices against infectious agents.  

But how can we create such nanodevices and how do we choose the 'biological guardians' of our health to be placed on the surface of these nanodevices? Biology, Molecular Genetics and Biotechnology over the years have provided us with knowledge that we can use. The article states that viruses have glycoproteins on their surface to bind to human host cells. Nanodevices that would mimic (i.e., bio-mimetic nanodevices) the virus's binding sites to cells could be used so that when the virus tries to bind to the target cells, it does not find free binding sites to infect the human body.

Thus, nanodevices called "nanosponges" are being studied for their effectiveness, developed and evaluated, with the aim of producing nanodevices that mimic the behaviour of biological membranes. The article states that isolating membranes from macrophage and erythrocyte cells and breaking these membranes into small particles and then incorporating them into polymer-based nanosponges creates innovative nanodevices that carry on their surface the 'biological guards', i.e. proteins present in the membranes of macrophages and erythrocytes. In this way, they bind to infectious viruses, neutralise them and prevent them from infecting the human body, mimicking the behaviour of our macrophage cells. Biotechnology companies and pharmaceutical companies in the US, as the article reports, are using macrophage cell membranes to develop nanosponges with antiviral properties. The article also states that last year nanosponges technology, coated with membranes derived from human lung epithelial type II cells or macrophage membranes, was found to prevent cell infection by the SARS-CoV-2 virus in in vitro experiments. The design of the nanosponges is also related to the ACE2 enzyme and the CD147 protein, through which the SARS-CoV-2 virus binds and induces infection. The preclinical studies are related to the dengue virus, SARS-CoV 2 and other viruses.

A biotechnology company in Australia is developing polymers of the dendrimer class, which are 4th generation polyclad polymers, designated SPL 7013, and which are already used as medical devices and as nano-devices for protection against sexually transmitted infectious agents. Officials at the Australian Biotechnology Company say they are working in this direction so that the dendrimer technology - which are polymeric nanoparticles - can be used as a therapeutic or even prophylactic agent in future pandemics. The size of this class of nanodevices is 4-5 nm (1 nm = 1 billionth of a metre), dozens of times smaller than lipid nanoparticles and with greater repeatability in their production, since they are synthetic nanotechnology products. Studies are in the pre-clinical stage for HIV, herpes virus and SARS-CoV-2, and the company's nanotechnology-based products are already on the market.

Also mentioned in the article are silicon nanoparticles that can and do encapsulate viruses by binding to them via 'spikes' of 5-10 nm in size that they carry on their surface and which recognise the binding sites on the surface of the viruses. In this way they bind to them through the glycoproteins present on their surface and do not allow the infection of human cells. This is how so-called 'biomimetic' nanodevices with 'spikes' consisting of sugars with sialic acid are developed, their connectivity with the virus is increased and they thus destroy it. In vitro experiments against the influenza virus have shown encouraging results and the researchers believe that they will also have positive results against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This research activity is funded together with other research projects with a total budget of €1.8 million.





Research efforts and pre-clinical studies are ongoing, as the article reports on the development of asteroidal nanostructures, which have been developed at the nanoscale in the US and which can bind to surface areas of the dengue virus and are also being studied against the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Other research teams, also based on the logic of making asteroidal nanoparticles, have created "envelopes or shells" that can and do trap viruses before they can infect human cells. The researchers report that the so-called nanoshells can reduce the viral load after infection by destroying the virus after it is encapsulated in these nanoshells. The dimensions of the nanoshells are 90-300 nm. This research study (ViroFight) is involved in a total funding of €9.9 million which started in June 2020 and the funding comes from the European Commission to develop nanocells to encapsulate and thus eliminate the infectious activity of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.



The application of micelle-type nanostructures is also a research effort mentioned in the article and researchers in the US (Seldon Connecticut) are working to develop innovative nanostructures that will achieve viral capsid dissolution and virus destruction. Nanomicelles act as 'scavengers' due to their surfactant properties by dissolving the viral phospholipid membrane which they recognise due to the 'sensors' on their surface which belong to the peptide class. These 'sensors' bind to the glycoproteins of SARS-CoV-2, resulting in the destruction of the virus. The researchers also published in March 2021 in vivo studies using two nano-micelle structures against the SARS-CoV-2 virus, with very positive results. One of the two nanomicellular structures had also encapsulated the antiviral drug remdesivir.  The company which is developing the nanomicelles as antiviral surfactants intends to proceed with clinical trials based on the announcements.

Antiviral peptides are also being used in the development of new antiviral drugs with a mechanism to create holes in the virus membrane, resulting in its destruction before it infects human cells. The results of the nanotechnology platform with 'molecular drill' type peptides has shown positive results against Zika virus (Zika virus) in in vivo experiments.

It seems that all these technologies are quite early but promising and in the near future will lead to the development of new and innovative nanotechnological drugs against future pandemics. It is important, based on the article, that we should not dismiss any research effort today that may help to eradicate the pandemic, but also because the SARS-CoV-2 virus and its mutations are constantly evolving.

The article comes to interesting conclusions concerning the therapeutic use of innovative antiviral nanotechnology drugs in the near future and many believe that clinical studies on nanotechnological devices to "cleanse" the body of infectious agents will soon be initiated.

In addition to scientific advances, it should be noted that the prospects of strong funding are significant and this funding will be used in research to potentially prevent the devastating consequences of a new pandemic. Research into the development of new nanotechnology-based therapeutic products also appears to be a priority, not only for antiviral treatments, but also for cancer, neurodegenerative diseases and other serious diseases.

[ICENI_Spartacus]

We've written follow-ons to the Spartacus Letter that can be read for free at our Substack:

https://iceni.substack.com/

Andrew Huff, former VP of EcoHealth Alliance turned whistleblower (who claims Peter Daszak was a CIA asset) endorsed our version of the events:

https://twitter.com/AGHuff/status/1496471923261415426

It looks like severe oxidative stress injury was a central phenomenon in COVID-19 after all:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/01/220103121754.htm

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/11/1/50

[Cryptotourist]

It looks like severe oxidative stress injury was a central phenomenon in COVID-19 after all:

Who would have thought, that supplementing your diet with petty antioxidants, would render COV obsolete.
Oh wait, you did.

Kindly drop by more often.

[eddie13]

Don’t let them slide the researches and revelations!

[tvbcof]

Hi Spartacus,

I used to read http://vaccinepapers.org pretty regularly, and I'm guessing that you (or some of you) did as well.  VP kinda went dark/silent about the time they kicked off the scamdemic.  Good reference data on the site at least.

There is so much BS floating around these days, and a fair bit of it seems to be psychological operations of one flavor or another.  ICENI is similar to VP in terms of technical level and I appreciate it.  It would be kind of nice to get your input on other sources which identify and evaluate papers at a similar level, rigor, and skepticism.  And, or course, are not afraid to cross over into 'crime think' when it comes to rationally hypothesizing about the players and motives behind some of the observations.

[ICENI_Spartacus]

We have a couple more articles out, now.

https://iceni.substack.com/p/covid-19-deep-dive-part-v-human-traffickers

https://iceni.substack.com/p/covid-19-deep-dive-part-vi-technocracy-787

This rabbit hole keeps getting darker and darker, the deeper we dig. Not only were the Ukraine labs real, and indeed, DTRA-funded, Metabiota and EcoHealth Alliance are directly connected to each other. However, they aren't the only DTRA-funded labs. There's also the Lugar Center in T'bilisi, Georgia, as well as labs scattered all over the globe:

https://silview.media/2021/06/03/us-ran-grewsome-bioweapon-research-in-over-25-countries-wuhan-tip-of-an-iceberg-ecohealth-alliance-implicated-again/

Hi Spartacus,

I used to read http://vaccinepapers.org pretty regularly, and I'm guessing that you (or some of you) did as well.  VP kinda went dark/silent about the time they kicked off the scamdemic.  Good reference data on the site at least.

There is so much BS floating around these days, and a fair bit of it seems to be psychological operations of one flavor or another.  ICENI is similar to VP in terms of technical level and I appreciate it.  It would be kind of nice to get your input on other sources which identify and evaluate papers at a similar level, rigor, and skepticism.  And, or course, are not afraid to cross over into 'crime think' when it comes to rationally hypothesizing about the players and motives behind some of the observations.

There are many possible mechanisms of injury with these COVID-19 vaccines, particularly the mRNA vaccines.

• The lipid nanoparticles, themselves, can cause rare extreme allergic reactions/anaphylaxis.
• The lipid nanoparticles don't actually stay in the shoulder muscle; leaked biodistribution studies from Japan show that they accumulate all over the body.
• Unlike the virus, which mostly infects cells expressing ACE2 proteins, these lipid nanoparticles have the ability to transfect ANY cell line they encounter with mRNA for SARS-CoV-2 Spike.
• The nucleoside-modified (pseudouridylated) mRNA evades detection by toll-like receptors of the 7 and 8 types, but it may actually be blocking them, inhibiting their normal function (toll-like receptors are used by the body to detect signs of damage and respond with inflammation).
• Nucleoside-modified mRNA is resistant to breakdown by nucleases and may persist in the body for an extended period of time.
• The synthetic caps of the mRNA may be toxic to mitochondria, triggering cytochrome C oxidase deficiency and mitochondrial deafness.
• The mRNA encoding the Spike may be integrated into the genome by endogenous reverse transcription.
• The Spike in the vaccine is supposedly made inert by the insertion of prolines on the S2 side of the S1/S2 cleavage site. However, human membrane-bound proteases are still cleaving the Spike, causing the S1 subunit to float away into the bloodstream. It's not inert.
• SARS-CoV-2 Spike S1 subunits can, on their own, even without the rest of the Spike, penetrate the blood-brain barrier by permeabilizing the vascular endothelium.
• The SARS-CoV-2 S1 receptor binding domain has a heparin-binding motif that can aggregate amyloid. Amyloid plaques are typical in neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's.
• SARS-CoV-2 Spike has a region with superantigenic properties.
• SARS-CoV-2 Spike can localize in cell nuclei and inhibit V(D)J recombination. If this happened in T and B cell precursors, it would cause T and B lymphopenia and immunodeficiency.

We have refs for all this, too:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4849378/

https://www.docdroid.net/xq0Z8B0/pfizer-report-japanese-government-pdf

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2020.589959/full

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.03.21256520v1

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2021.789427/full

https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6453560/

https://archive.ph/P7FNZ

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34670143/

https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73/htm

https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/74/4/715/6279075?login=false

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33328624/

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X2100499X?via%3Dihub

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7568239/

https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/10/2056

[tvbcof]

Since this is on the more technical side, I'll post it here.  Been meaning to post it somewhere since the 'Swedish paper' first came out a while ago but didn't get around to it.  First, the for-public-consumption clip:

  Pfizer fake 'vaccine' revers transcribe and install DNA into the human genome
  https://www.bitchute.com/video/DsVkGIeEYUHX/

Here is another presentation which someone I missed until just now and it is quite a bit more detailed for those who are interested in this sort of thing:

  DETAILS - Pfizer Vaccine Becomes DNA in The Human Liver Cells Huh7. (In-vitro Swedish Study)
  https://www.bitchute.com/video/DEmSIw0AiFaZ/

It is pretty clear that Pfizer, or more accurately the 'Turkish' BioNTech folks, managed to come up with a pretty sophisticated, and admittedly quite clever, means of achieving a DNA modification result.  Early on Pfizer was described as 'self amplifying' sometimes and not self-amplifying in other docs.  In the case of all of these genetic therapy so-called 'vaccines' the string 'DNA' was studiously deprecated.  Even those such as Astra-Zeneca, J&J, etc which used DNA insertion more directly.

Naturally social media influencers such as fake-doctor OILEO and his lacky fakey1 shouted 'conspiracy theory' over and over again.  Even more so when there was any mention of reverse transcriptase.  Actually fake-doctor OILEO was one of the few who has a basic understanding of genetics so he was (and still is) put on the case when things get at all technical.  Fakey1 doesn't even know what a 'gene' is, or at least he did not until I educated him on it.

Another thing which occurs to me is that 'law enforcement' has a technique called 'parallel construction'.  When they obtain information on a 'crime' from illegal or sensitive means (e.g., illegal monitoring or monitoring through secret channels) they know how the crime went down so they figure out ways that they can 'prove' the crime using methods which are ostensibly legal.  From when I read the paper a few months ago, it occurred to me that the researchers had a pretty good idea of how BioNTech's method worked when designing the study protocol.  Unfortunately for us, the lag between having and idea of how the criminals are operating and proving it is years, and this is especially true because doing such research is very dangerous to a career, and in some cases to a life.  More in some countries than in others.