NO KYC Sportbooks?

[Johnyz]

What are some sportbooks that will NEVER ask for KYC

Stake are the best options for me but seriously, there’s no such thing NEVER because those gambling site might require you to fill up KYC especially if your account is suspicious, better to read the Terms of service first so you can be more aware about the rules and prevent any suspicious transactions later on.

[TimeTeller]

well I do betting in sportsbet.io since many years and it has never asked any kyc documents . I made many successful deposits and withdrawals on this site, both using cryptos as well as my fiat currency , no problem happened what so ever, so I would recommend you to try this site if you are looking for a no kyc sportsbook.

Glad to see even though you are promoting a scam via your signature, at least you are recommending the trusted ones . And yeah I agree that I have never been asked for documents from any sportsbook either apart from the documents some ask as a mandatory rule, but that has nothing to do with sports betting specifically.

You may try bitsler, stake, sportsbet and even wolf bet nowadays as they have added sportsbook and none of them ask for KYC from what I know.

I thought if you are dealing with your fiat currency, usually casino will ask KYC.
Just learned that sportsbet is not asking KYC even if you are dealing with fiat.
But I think, everyone should check the ToS every once in a while because they may change their protocols.
As they may adopt some changes owed to changing government regulations towards online casinos.

[samcrypto]

What are some sportbooks that will NEVER ask for KYC

1. Sportsbet.ioo
2. Nitrogen
3. Stake
4. Bitdice.me
5. Playbetr

Trusted sportsbooks are already on this list, they didn’t ask KYC if you’re just a small time gambler but if you will
Put your big money there, I think that’s a different situation where a gambling site needs to know your source of money because they also follow AMLA rules to prevent any money from fraud, so expect KYC if your purpose is like this, hopefully not.

[Oilacris]

What are some sportbooks that will NEVER ask for KYC

Stake are the best options for me but seriously, there’s no such thing NEVER because those gambling site might require you to fill up KYC especially if your account is suspicious, better to read the Terms of service first so you can be more aware about the rules and prevent any suspicious transactions later on.

Actually most websites/platforms at the moment does really have that possible KYC requirement if ever you had violated something against their TOS which is really very common and you should really be that common.

For now on current market on which most sports book doesnt ask out kyc aside if there are some possible issues that you are facing then
you could possibly able to experience it.

You can choose and those list had already been given by most members here.

[crzy]

No KYC only works for small gamblers I guess because there’s a restrictions and guidelines that you need to understand and if you put big money on that casinos without having any history of playing that could be alarming also you can’t withdraw it easily that will be the start of investigation so understand the consequences if you’re planning to put big money and don’t want to give any personal information to the gambling site. Stakes and other sportsbook have the same rules, KYC can still be asked.

[Silberman]

Wondering how a player can cheat? All I can come up is multi-accounts for bonus hunting, but this is hardly the case for most ordinary players. And you correctly noted that there may be other conditions for whale players - hardly any bookmaker will like a player who makes big bets and wins. It is very important how they behave in such a situation.

I wonder the same thing?! All I know I picked up from reading stuff across the internet, and mostly it's connected with money laundering, abusing bonuses and promotions... when you get into reading about this stuff you can find many crazy things! I can't even claim that half of that is true!

Ordinary player, I include myself in that group, will just go along with the rules of the house! Of course, if we are comfortable with those rules, if not we will look for another place!

I don't like KYC, I done it many times and I will probably do it here and there again, but I will try to avoid it as much as I can! Exchange or a casino, it doesn't matter, when KYC becomes mandatory I already have a replacement!

I think that most of these stories about successful gamblers who beat casinos are written by the casinos themselves (by the way, as well as various winning strategies)  All this is done for the purpose of advertising and to exploit the feeling of greed in people to lure them into this area. I do not welcome this, gambling should be entertainment, not a way to make money.

It is not really necessary for casinos to do that as the games themselves do that on their own, it is obvious that over the long term the odds do not favor us but someone is bound to win once in a while, look at lotteries, we know the odds to win are incredibly small and yet every single day someone wins the lottery around the world, this creates those successful stories that the majority want to replicate, and of course it is impossible to replicate a success like that unless you have luck on your side.

[Alisha-k]

No KYC only works for small gamblers I guess because there’s a restrictions and guidelines that you need to understand and if you put big money on that casinos without having any history of playing that could be alarming also you can’t withdraw it easily that will be the start of investigation so understand the consequences if you’re planning to put big money and don’t want to give any personal information to the gambling site. Stakes and other sportsbook have the same rules, KYC can still be asked.

I think they can be a way to withdraw without the KYC, most atimes they are some T/C that follows consecutively and it's always 30% in favour of the customers,then 70% in favour of the company.
KYC's are needed specifically when huge money is deposited in the wallet and needs confirmation of identity when cashing out payments or retrieving funds from the accounts and these is not done officially by every site as you said though

[timerland]

No KYC only works for small gamblers I guess because there’s a restrictions and guidelines that you need to understand and if you put big money on that casinos without having any history of playing that could be alarming also you can’t withdraw it easily that will be the start of investigation so understand the consequences if you’re planning to put big money and don’t want to give any personal information to the gambling site. Stakes and other sportsbook have the same rules, KYC can still be asked.

Exactly.

People have to realize that just because it hasn't been done in the past, doesn't mean that KYC can't be used in the future according to the existing T&Cs on the company.

And no company will ever leave themselves exposed by having a clause in the T&Cs explicitly saying that there will be no KYC policy regardless of regulatory pressure. Even the reputable ones like Stake.

[ralle14]

KYC's are needed specifically when huge money is deposited in the wallet and needs confirmation of identity when cashing out payments or retrieving funds from the accounts and these is not done officially by every site as you said though

The bad part is that some casinos only enforce KYC once their player starts to request for a withdraw and not the other way around.

No KYC only works for small gamblers I guess because there’s a restrictions and guidelines that you need to understand and if you put big money on that casinos without having any history of playing that could be alarming also you can’t withdraw it easily that will be the start of investigation so understand the consequences if you’re planning to put big money and don’t want to give any personal information to the gambling site. Stakes and other sportsbook have the same rules, KYC can still be asked.

Depends on what you mean by small gambler because you could still get away without any KYC while risking thousand dollars per bet on certain casinos but it's always better to spread your bankroll between different casinos.

[Vaculin]

KYC's are needed specifically when huge money is deposited in the wallet and needs confirmation of identity when cashing out payments or retrieving funds from the accounts and these is not done officially by every site as you said though

The bad part is that some casinos only enforce KYC once their player starts to request for a withdraw and not the other way around.

That's true, and it's really unfair because if they are honest with their service, they should have required KYC from the very beginning. I read some of the cases in scam accusation board on some gamblers unable to withdraw their money as they are suspected of cheating, and as part of the requirement, they are forced to submit documents proving they are the person, I think the essence of anonymous betting is gone and they are used to cheat the bettors.

[sportbettor]

What are some sportbooks that will NEVER ask for KYC

You can find the List of the best non-KYC sportsbooks (with some exceptions only) here: http://100bookies.com/best-cryptocurrencies-sportsbooks-eng/

[Eureka_07]

KYC's are needed specifically when huge money is deposited in the wallet and needs confirmation of identity when cashing out payments or retrieving funds from the accounts and these is not done officially by every site as you said though

The bad part is that some casinos only enforce KYC once their player starts to request for a withdraw and not the other way around.

That's true, and it's really unfair because if they are honest with their service, they should have required KYC from the very beginning. I read some of the cases in scam accusation board on some gamblers unable to withdraw their money as they are suspected of cheating, and as part of the requirement, they are forced to submit documents proving they are the person, I think the essence of anonymous betting is gone and they are used to cheat the bettors.

It is actually a bad part. It is just most casino are being regulated by their own government and supports the fight on money laundering. Though the essence of being anonymous in cryptocurrenct when it comes to gambling is gone, it still helps to identify which account is laundering money and which are not. Some casinos though abuse this KYC implementation for them to snatch money from their own users. That's the bad part of it.

[seleme]

What are some sportbooks that will NEVER ask for KYC

Stake are the best options for me but seriously, there’s no such thing NEVER because those gambling site might require you to fill up KYC especially if your account is suspicious, better to read the Terms of service first so you can be more aware about the rules and prevent any suspicious transactions later on.

Stake is an average bookie and so much slippery, cashout availability problems, etc. I have seen so many cases about the sudden KYC requirement by the Stake team and they refuse to pay if the user doesn't want to pass KYC. So I doubt the OP will be interested to bet on Stake, there are better alternatives if the criteria is KYC-free sports bookies.

[harizen]

What are some sportbooks that will NEVER ask for KYC

Stake are the best options for me but seriously, there’s no such thing NEVER because those gambling site might require you to fill up KYC especially if your account is suspicious, better to read the Terms of service first so you can be more aware about the rules and prevent any suspicious transactions later on.

Stake is an average bookie and so much slippery, cashout availability problems, etc. I have seen so many cases about the sudden KYC requirement by the Stake team and they refuse to pay if the user doesn't want to pass KYC. So I doubt the OP will be interested to bet on Stake, there are better alternatives if the criteria is KYC-free sports bookies.

The question is not about KYC-free sports bookies but the assurance that sports betting websites will not ask for KYC in the future.

All crypto-bettings sites have a chance to break their terms about no-KYC in the future that's why instead of suggesting to OP some crypto-sites, better give advice that be ready when KYC will be asked.

Even the most popular and reputable sports betting sites can't give an assurance that they will keep their no-KYC policy for long.

[chaser15]

What are some sportbooks that will NEVER ask for KYC

Stake are the best options for me but seriously, there’s no such thing NEVER because those gambling site might require you to fill up KYC especially if your account is suspicious, better to read the Terms of service first so you can be more aware about the rules and prevent any suspicious transactions later on.

I have to agree with you. Stake does have a feature now of submitting personal information although not mandatory. The same goes for other top sportsbooks here in which there's a chance that someday they will require a mandatory KYC too. These sites have no choice after all. They know that gamblers don't like KYC so why they will add it? But because, they are forced to do it, in the near future, we have to comply.

[agustina2]

well I do betting in sportsbet.io since many years and it has never asked any kyc documents . I made many successful deposits and withdrawals on this site, both using cryptos as well as my fiat currency , no problem happened what so ever, so I would recommend you to try this site if you are looking for a no kyc sportsbook.

Glad to see even though you are promoting a scam via your signature, at least you are recommending the trusted ones . And yeah I agree that I have never been asked for documents from any sportsbook either apart from the documents some ask as a mandatory rule, but that has nothing to do with sports betting specifically.

You may try bitsler, stake, sportsbet and even wolf bet nowadays as they have added sportsbook and none of them ask for KYC from what I know.

I thought if you are dealing with your fiat currency, usually casino will ask KYC.
Just learned that sportsbet is not asking KYC even if you are dealing with fiat.
But I think, everyone should check the ToS every once in a while because they may change their protocols.
As they may adopt some changes owed to changing government regulations towards online casinos.

Not that every time users have to check Terms of Service but make it a habit.

If there's a possible change like KYC is now a requirement, I'm sure that sports betting sites will give notifications to their users.

For new users, that should now be placed on the registration page for awareness.

[Silberman]

No KYC only works for small gamblers I guess because there’s a restrictions and guidelines that you need to understand and if you put big money on that casinos without having any history of playing that could be alarming also you can’t withdraw it easily that will be the start of investigation so understand the consequences if you’re planning to put big money and don’t want to give any personal information to the gambling site. Stakes and other sportsbook have the same rules, KYC can still be asked.

Exactly.

People have to realize that just because it hasn't been done in the past, doesn't mean that KYC can't be used in the future according to the existing T&Cs on the company.

And no company will ever leave themselves exposed by having a clause in the T&Cs explicitly saying that there will be no KYC policy regardless of regulatory pressure. Even the reputable ones like Stake.

And even if a casino went as far as stating on their TOS that they are not going to ask for KYC if the casino becomes big enough they are going to be pressured by the authorities to change their policies and this will eventually be reflected on their TOS, then they will send you an email stating that by keeping your account and still gamble at the casino you are accepting their new terms which means they can hit you with KYC at any time they want, so unfortunately the dream of the OP of a casino with no KYC no matter the circumstances is simply not possible.

[Hamphser]

No KYC only works for small gamblers I guess because there’s a restrictions and guidelines that you need to understand and if you put big money on that casinos without having any history of playing that could be alarming also you can’t withdraw it easily that will be the start of investigation so understand the consequences if you’re planning to put big money and don’t want to give any personal information to the gambling site. Stakes and other sportsbook have the same rules, KYC can still be asked.

Exactly.

People have to realize that just because it hasn't been done in the past, doesn't mean that KYC can't be used in the future according to the existing T&Cs on the company.

And no company will ever leave themselves exposed by having a clause in the T&Cs explicitly saying that there will be no KYC policy regardless of regulatory pressure. Even the reputable ones like Stake.

And even if a casino went as far as stating on their TOS that they are not going to ask for KYC if the casino becomes big enough they are going to be pressured by the authorities to change their policies and this will eventually be reflected on their TOS, then they will send you an email stating that by keeping your account and still gamble at the casino you are accepting their new terms which means they can hit you with KYC at any time they want, so unfortunately the dream of the OP of a casino with no KYC no matter the circumstances is simply not possible.

Everything becomes big will really make out some noise which would really result into sudden changes whenever the government take involvement but for now most gambling sports book doesnt require KYC

other than those fiat typical bookies but for crypto sportsbook then they arent asking everything but as mentioned whenever they do see some violation of tos then thats the time for them to ask out some

identity verification which you wouldnt have any choice because you had checked off the user agreement when you do register.

[24Kt]

No KYC only works for small gamblers I guess because there’s a restrictions and guidelines that you need to understand and if you put big money on that casinos without having any history of playing that could be alarming also you can’t withdraw it easily that will be the start of investigation so understand the consequences if you’re planning to put big money and don’t want to give any personal information to the gambling site. Stakes and other sportsbook have the same rules, KYC can still be asked.

Exactly.

People have to realize that just because it hasn't been done in the past, doesn't mean that KYC can't be used in the future according to the existing T&Cs on the company.

And no company will ever leave themselves exposed by having a clause in the T&Cs explicitly saying that there will be no KYC policy regardless of regulatory pressure. Even the reputable ones like Stake.

And even if a casino went as far as stating on their TOS that they are not going to ask for KYC if the casino becomes big enough they are going to be pressured by the authorities to change their policies and this will eventually be reflected on their TOS, then they will send you an email stating that by keeping your account and still gamble at the casino you are accepting their new terms which means they can hit you with KYC at any time they want, so unfortunately the dream of the OP of a casino with no KYC no matter the circumstances is simply not possible.

Everything becomes big will really make out some noise which would really result into sudden changes whenever the government take involvement but for now most gambling sports book doesnt require KYC

other than those fiat typical bookies but for crypto sportsbook then they arent asking everything but as mentioned whenever they do see some violation of tos then thats the time for them to ask out some

identity verification which you wouldnt have any choice because you had checked off the user agreement when you do register.

So the question of the OP is not to be taken to have a defined answer as it depends on circumstances. Even if we say, the casino is not asking KYC, but if in case you violate their ToS or you are guilty of some suspicious activities, definitely, they may ask you to submit KYC. Or if they see that you may be guilty of possible money laundering, even if from your end you are not, they have the privilege to ask KYC as from their end, you may be guilty of that conduct. In this case, we can't say never because we don't know what other circumstances you will face while you are playing in the casino. But it is advisable to play on reputable casinos here so you can easily ask for help if you need one.

[michellee]

So the question of the OP is not to be taken to have a defined answer as it depends on circumstances. Even if we say, the casino is not asking KYC, but if in case you violate their ToS or you are guilty of some suspicious activities, definitely, they may ask you to submit KYC. Or if they see that you may be guilty of possible money laundering, even if from your end you are not, they have the privilege to ask KYC as from their end, you may be guilty of that conduct. In this case, we can't say never because we don't know what other circumstances you will face while you are playing in the casino. But it is advisable to play on reputable casinos here so you can easily ask for help if you need one.

So, in the end, KYC will be asked for their members, especially for those who are doing suspicious activities, because the casino wants to make sure that their members will not do something that can break their rules. It is how about we can be responsible for our account and not make them ask for the KYC. Playing on reputable casinos will always be recommended for every gambler but we should care for ourselves and not try to make a problem.

If the withdrawal amount is not too big, the casino will let the process and not ask about the KYC. It will be different if members want to withdraw big money because the casino can ask for KYC.