NO KYC Sportbooks?

[YinShuiSiYuan]

To be honest, I believe for a huge casino platform such as stake.com, they wouldn't perform KYC requirements to its users who play at hundreds of dollar range for each session.

Some users reported that there is the personal information needed before anything else. It means slowly but surely, we can now expect that KYC will be implemented at most casinos not just on Stake.

Perhaps those users are high rollers? Thats why the casino asked for some personal information to those users in the first place. As a small gambler like me who play with tens of dollar as starting balances, I have never faced such kind of thing.

Unfortunately, governments in many countries are pushing hard to regulate cryptocurrency casinos. One of the requirements is absolute KYC verification of all users. If the casino wants to operate legally in a given country, it will have to adapt or move to a country where such regulations do not yet exist.

We can expect that soon most cryptocurrency casinos will simply have to require KYC verification from all users.

[1715262335]

1715262335

[1715262335]

1715262335

[1715262335]

1715262335

[1715262335]

1715262335

[1715262335]

1715262335

[Fortify]

What are some sportbooks that will NEVER ask for KYC

One thing that is worth questioning is - if this company does not ask their customers for the very basics, which is an expectation in almost every country in the world to prevent money laundering, then what other elements might they be trying to skimp or take shortcuts on? Now asking for KYC is not some bullet proof defence that makes a company impenetrable and it could also be abused by all sorts of sketchy people, but looking at the wider picture you should want a company that has basic standards like this. It might just save you from waking up one day and them saying "all your money is gone because we couldn't be bothered to pay for proper security personnel" or "the government of our country seized all funds because we weren't compliant and had no idea what we were doing".

[blockman]

Unfortunately, governments in many countries are pushing hard to regulate cryptocurrency casinos. One of the requirements is absolute KYC verification of all users. If the casino wants to operate legally in a given country, it will have to adapt or move to a country where such regulations do not yet exist.

We can expect that soon most cryptocurrency casinos will simply have to require KYC verification from all users.

We can but hopefully not and they'll only be asking KYC if something's wrong with the user's account and they've found any malicious activity. As long as it's followed like that, there's no need for anyone to worry about passing on KYC. But if they're also aware that they did wrong on their accounts, the user has no choice but to follow and he's aware of it upon reading the rules that have been shown before signing up. A gambler that enjoys playing to a casino won't look at this matter though.

[harizen]

We trust a casino based on their reputation and I think they don't need to acquire a license in order to operate as long as there's no legal risk on their side. What I'm trying to say is that, if all of them will get the license, that means they'll be regulated and therefore KYC will become mandatory, so what happen to anonymous gambling then?

Since they are running a business, it's really mandatory that their company should have a license to make everything legit. Maybe that statement of yours can be applied to those people that have already been in crypto for long but gambling sites also target new users to their site. Making their business a complete legit service if they will undergo and comply with the regulation is one of the factors that most new users preferred.

However, no need to think of it now as somehow, we can bet that a mandatory KYC will not happen, at least for now.

[romero121]

We can't get to a conclusion finding a gambling platform that'll never ask for kyc. With time there'll be changes in the terms. Based on the same the platforms will request to fulfill the kyc. Even today we've got a new addition of cryptocurrency accepted gambling platform to our forum with no KYC. The same doesn't assure with the service to continue without kyc forever.

Nowadays most of the gambling platforms request to fulfill KYC. This is mainly done to restrict people's participation from certain countries that'll affect the functioning of the gambling platforms.

[goinmerry]

To be honest, I believe for a huge casino platform such as stake.com, they wouldn't perform KYC requirements to its users who play at hundreds of dollar range for each session.

Some users reported that there is the personal information needed before anything else. It means slowly but surely, we can now expect that KYC will be implemented at most casinos not just on Stake.

Perhaps those users are high rollers? Thats why the casino asked for some personal information to those users in the first place. As a small gambler like me who play with tens of dollar as starting balances, I have never faced such kind of thing.

Unfortunately, governments in many countries are pushing hard to regulate cryptocurrency casinos. One of the requirements is absolute KYC verification of all users. If the casino wants to operate legally in a given country, it will have to adapt or move to a country where such regulations do not yet exist.

We can expect that soon most cryptocurrency casinos will simply have to require KYC verification from all users.

They are regulating cryptos because they can't track the transactions in crypto-fraud. Even the gambling site owners themselves can't do anything if one of their customers complain about hacks and will just say sorry to the customer. In the case of KYC, they will somehow know where the funds will end up as everything is under monitor.

[nfl nerd]

Stake is good for me for nfl and parlays

Nitro is legit and wont jack you

Never played with sportsbet but they have a big following, really dont think they do the kyc

[rodskee]

To be honest, I believe for a huge casino platform such as stake.com, they wouldn't perform KYC requirements to its users who play at hundreds of dollar range for each session.

Some users reported that there is the personal information needed before anything else. It means slowly but surely, we can now expect that KYC will be implemented at most casinos not just on Stake.

Perhaps those users are high rollers? Thats why the casino asked for some personal information to those users in the first place. As a small gambler like me who play with tens of dollar as starting balances, I have never faced such kind of thing.

Unfortunately, governments in many countries are pushing hard to regulate cryptocurrency casinos. One of the requirements is absolute KYC verification of all users. If the casino wants to operate legally in a given country, it will have to adapt or move to a country where such regulations do not yet exist.

We can expect that soon most cryptocurrency casinos will simply have to require KYC verification from all users.

Because casino sites had been used in the past and even now as terminal to take and spread money around the world in which a clear behavior of Money Laundering .

We are just being hurt because we as legit gambler and does not act in any illegal matter are also being affected by this regulations in which taking our ways and reason why we are here in crypto to Hide and protect our characters .

Now this KYC obligatory is making us normal in dealings like every place where we need to fill up about our personality.

But admit it or not, in the next months or Years all crypto casinos will be having this Requirements and no one will scape from that.

[Natalim]

Stake is good for me for nfl and parlays

Nitro is legit and wont jack you

Never played with sportsbet but they have a big following, really dont think they do the kyc

All the sportsbooks you've mentioned are good based on my experience.

My first sportsbook was Nitrogensports, then sportsbet, and stake., I'm actively playing with these two sites along with some of my favorites, and thus far, I'm never bothered by any KYC requirement even though I won a decent amount sometimes.

[KTChampions]

Casino don't get a license just to boost there reputation. It's just happened that people will trust more the Casino it's compliant to the law before they operate. Licence is a requirements for there business permit. They are not allowed to operate on various country if they don't acquire it and they might face lawsuit once the country that they are operating know this. If you want to run a business smoothly as possible, You will need to abide the law and follow there guidelines so that you can freely operate without worries for your business. That's the usual thinking of a legit casino. A shady or not serious casino usually doesn't think about legal matters and leave to the consumers if they trust them or not. Like a mutual trust system only and no string attached.

This is debatable. If a casino has a license from some normal jurisdiction, and not from banana islands, then this indicates that it operates in the legal field of some serious country and this is a very significant plus to the reputation. For example, if a casino has a license from the United States, then I will treat it with increased confidence because it is a harsh jurisdiction and hardly anyone wants to break the laws in it.

[blockman]

Stake is good for me for nfl and parlays

Nitro is legit and wont jack you

Never played with sportsbet but they have a big following, really dont think they do the kyc

All the sportsbooks you've mentioned are good based on my experience.

My first sportsbook was Nitrogensports, then sportsbet, and stake., I'm actively playing with these two sites along with some of my favorites, and thus far, I'm never bothered by any KYC requirement even though I won a decent amount sometimes.

On the other hand, there are some bad reviews about nitrogensports if you'll look at their trust rating. That has lessened their popularity but before, they're really popular.
As long as you do good and there's no other thing that you do that violates them with your account, you're up and nothing to worry about such.

[South Park]

To be honest, I believe for a huge casino platform such as stake.com, they wouldn't perform KYC requirements to its users who play at hundreds of dollar range for each session.

Some users reported that there is the personal information needed before anything else. It means slowly but surely, we can now expect that KYC will be implemented at most casinos not just on Stake.

Perhaps those users are high rollers? Thats why the casino asked for some personal information to those users in the first place. As a small gambler like me who play with tens of dollar as starting balances, I have never faced such kind of thing.

Unfortunately, governments in many countries are pushing hard to regulate cryptocurrency casinos. One of the requirements is absolute KYC verification of all users. If the casino wants to operate legally in a given country, it will have to adapt or move to a country where such regulations do not yet exist.

We can expect that soon most cryptocurrency casinos will simply have to require KYC verification from all users.

We know this is something that governments want to do however we are bound to see innovation in that field as well, after all the concept of decentralization can be applied to casinos as well and while they are not that popular now I am sure that as those regulations keep advancing many casino owners will decide to implement a decentralized casino as the desire of many users to gamble and do so without going through KYC will still be big enough to justify creating a casino like that.

[paxmao]

Respect, trust and good feeling about books come from either being legally regulated entities which are supervised and quite obliged to have records etc, and that comes with requirements such as KYC or from many years working successfully and without complaints from customers. There must be good reasons why you want a no KYC but that is going to come with strings attached in the jurisdiction, reputation or trust in the company.

[stomachgrowls]

What are some sportbooks that will NEVER ask for KYC

Dont know if the list was updated or not then you could take a look and made out some consideration.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5040737.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5319144.0

For me based up on my experience then.

Sportsbet.io
Playbetr
Stake

These are the bookies that i do have experience on playing on for
several years of doing gambling.

[hello_good_sir]

Unfortunately, governments in many countries are pushing hard to regulate cryptocurrency casinos. One of the requirements is absolute KYC verification of all users. If the casino wants to operate legally in a given country, it will have to adapt or move to a country where such regulations do not yet exist.

We can expect that soon most cryptocurrency casinos will simply have to require KYC verification from all users.

I don't think so.

There will always be unregulated casinos that are operating that will attract more attention from players which makes them survive. Until they grow out of the phase where they can just get away with having no KYC.

If you play at sportsbooks like Stake though, they have demonstrated a history of KYC which is dangerous if you can't commit to it.

[alegotardo]

Unfortunately, governments in many countries are pushing hard to regulate cryptocurrency casinos. One of the requirements is absolute KYC verification of all users. If the casino wants to operate legally in a given country, it will have to adapt or move to a country where such regulations do not yet exist.

We can expect that soon most cryptocurrency casinos will simply have to require KYC verification from all users.

I doubt all the good casinos are demanding KYC on account of compliance with government laws.
We are talking about a niche market that operates 100% in the digital environment and using cryptocurrencies, what are the reasons that prevent a casino from moving from one country to another?
If a certain country creates very strict laws that make it difficult to do business, they will certainly change to one that has more lenient laws.
That simple

[ralle14]

I doubt all the good casinos are demanding KYC on account of compliance with government laws.
We are talking about a niche market that operates 100% in the digital environment and using cryptocurrencies, what are the reasons that prevent a casino from moving from one country to another?
If a certain country creates very strict laws that make it difficult to do business, they will certainly change to one that has more lenient laws.
That simple

It's possible but unlikely for now since most of the crypto casinos are based on Curacao and they have one of the least strict rules when it comes to KYC. Even if they are strict they can still make bank as most of the good casinos we know usually have a big player base it just depends on how their community would react to it as other fiat casinos are thriving regardless of their KYC registration. They could move if they want to but it's going to be a hassle on their part though.

[coinism]

Typically, most sports bookies do not require KYC unless you do something wrong or shady, such as suspected cheating or money laundering... But, regardless of KYC, you should always choose gambling websites that have a good reputation.

Those who don't ask for kyc are themselves shaddy and can rip you from your money. Bookies that have good reputation always or in majority of cases ask for KYC. I personally don't like sport's book that don't do kyc. How can they be certain about the user?

[KTChampions]

Respect, trust and good feeling about books come from either being legally regulated entities which are supervised and quite obliged to have records etc, and that comes with requirements such as KYC or from many years working successfully and without complaints from customers. There must be good reasons why you want a no KYC but that is going to come with strings attached in the jurisdiction, reputation or trust in the company.

There are basically two reasons to avoid KYC:
1.) Taxes. Some gamblers do not want to pay them in principle, and some run away from the laws of their countries with insane tax rates. I understand both of these positions.
2.) Bypassing the bans of states that think they know better than you what you can and cannot. In many places gambling is prohibited, so people from such jurisdictions are looking for ways to satisfy their desires.

[kingangel]

I would suspect any book that does not really as you a few questions, since something that sit outside regulations means that other legal matters, such as paying you or letting you withdraw money may also be taken as a ad-hoc rather than something you can take for granted. I am of course speaking about the money laundering regulations and such. Only a book that has been around for years could do the trick by replacing guarantees with reputation.