|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
cmg777
|
|
November 22, 2021, 10:37:12 AM |
|
So the reason why this wasn't covered is because the Kyle Rittenhouse trial was scheduled at the same time. Coincidence? I think not. Additionally, the obvious from what you posted is that those indicted defendants are huge media companies that would like this information suppressed. So there is an interesting paradigm forming here: the Rittenhouse trial was about the potential of taking more of our constitutional rights whereas the Ghislaine trial is about taking back the human liberties and getting real justice for the child sacrifices they've made to their false gods. Another interesting factor is was the Rittenhouse trial even real? Or just a rights grab/scare: https://www.bitchute.com/video/PWc3oVMS6Wfr/
|
|
|
|
Tash (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 305
Pro financial, medical liberty
|
|
November 22, 2021, 02:08:16 PM Last edit: November 22, 2021, 07:09:12 PM by Tash |
|
How many criminal trails you know where the accused is right behind the judge without (or with) shackles? https://www.dailywire.com/news/photos-of-unusual-proximity-between-rittenhouse-and-judge-spark-commentary-tells-you-everything-you-need-to-knowI know very little, next to nothing about the case. Seen the odd photo or story and could not be bothered to read any, too many irregularis. To me it was always just a distraction just like when you read someone with a suitcase of heroin was apprehended. All it means an other containerload made it into the country. Noob police is happy they got a "big" guy(s) and makes them feel good and worthy of the job, media is happy they have a story, tv goofers are happy thy see some value for money on tax bucks and obviously the crew with the big pay day is happyest of all. Green screen mishaps are more frequent this days either there is so many or rushed. Some time ago was this beauty, folder changing color https://youtu.be/YyHfzcItoFsAt this stage it still seems red, maybe the tree spooked it? The coat of arms or what ever it is at center is red at end it should not be. Missing foot seems the new normal Maxwell trial yes there is some big names listed as co-defenders. Will she make it to the end or name names? David Boies (#22) is the head of Boies Schiller Flexner law firm one of the Democratic party law firms. Also Clintons, Jeff Bezos, Ira Kleiman (Florida trail), Harvey Weinstein and big Oil, big Bank, Tabacco, Insurance, Health.... https://www.bsfllp.com/about-us/overview.html
|
|
|
|
Cnut237
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1277
|
|
November 22, 2021, 02:15:33 PM Last edit: November 22, 2021, 02:48:14 PM by Cnut237 |
|
Will she make it to the end or name names?
Wonder how often the name 'Prince Andrew' will come up in this trial? Not after an exact figure, just to the nearest hundred.
|
|
|
|
cmg777
|
|
November 22, 2021, 10:57:06 PM Last edit: November 23, 2021, 12:13:32 AM by cmg777 |
|
Will she make it to the end or name names?
Wonder how often the name 'Prince Andrew' will come up in this trial? Not after an exact figure, just to the nearest hundred. Prince Andrew's name probably won't come up as the media will run cover for him like they always do. Sure it was a slight story for awhile but he is probably one of the John Does or Corporate Does (what the fuck is that never heard that term before...). I'm surprised they named Lil Wayne (by his real name), Beyonce, R. Kelly (by his full real name) and others in this. Total bombshell, Tash.
|
|
|
|
|
franky1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 4475
|
|
November 24, 2021, 03:33:11 AM |
|
her defence seems to be about not being involved in sex trafficking. meaning not being involved in any act prince andrew done. so she wont admit their crimes as thats simply admitting her own crimes.
so dont expect her to call out the other famous people as it hurts her defence
that said. lets hope the prosecution can trap her in her lies and get a guilty verdict
the only way to get her to name the elitists is if she wants to plead guilty and then reduce her sentance by naming other people
|
I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER. Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
|
|
|
Tash (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 305
Pro financial, medical liberty
|
|
November 24, 2021, 06:46:05 PM |
|
Ghislaine Maxwell is fighting to prevent jurors from seeing a copy of Jeffrey Epstein's 'little black book' at her criminal trial Jeffrey Epstein's "Little Black Book" 95 pages 1971 names https://epsteinsblackbook.com/all-namesMick Jagger, page 28.
|
|
|
|
Gyfts
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2758
Merit: 1512
|
|
November 24, 2021, 08:20:56 PM |
|
her defence seems to be about not being involved in sex trafficking. meaning not being involved in any act prince andrew done. so she wont admit their crimes as thats simply admitting her own crimes.
so dont expect her to call out the other famous people as it hurts her defence
that said. lets hope the prosecution can trap her in her lies and get a guilty verdict
the only way to get her to name the elitists is if she wants to plead guilty and then reduce her sentance by naming other people
The prosecution has to have a mountain of evidence against this person, should be a quick and easy case. In fact, her defense team was arguing that jurors could not be neutral because they would have disdain and bias against Maxwell because she's rich....funny, because you would think someone would have that sort of bias because she is involved in trafficking of children. But sure, I guess it's because she's rich.
|
|
|
|
Tash (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 305
Pro financial, medical liberty
|
|
November 25, 2021, 08:27:28 AM Last edit: November 25, 2021, 08:49:11 AM by Tash |
|
Anyone free to do the own fact checking. I am none the wiser, seems to add more questions. 2 Abrasions of left forearm (damage of the skin) 3 Cutaneous contusion of wrists (brusing of wrists) 4 Subcutaneous hemorrhage of left deltoid muscle (Bleeding beneath the skin on shoulder muscle) 5 Hypertensive and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disase (heart problem that is caused by hardening of arteries) Cardiac hypertrophic (abnormally thick heart muscle) Left ventricular hypertrophy (left pumping chamber that has thickened maybe inefficient pumping) Renal arteriolar sclerosis (Chronic kidney disease) Slight coronary atherosclerosis (buildup of plaque inside the artery walls) Slight to moderate aortic atherosclerosis (thickening and hardening of arteries) 6 Hepatic steatosis (Fatty liver disease) 7 Cervical lymphadenopathy (lymph nodes disease, abnormal large lymph nodes) 8 Remote fracture of right first rib (Dont know how common a broken rib is with hanging) 9 Remote appendectomy (appendix removed) https://www.thedailybeast.com/ghislaine-maxwell-chuckles-with-attorneys-at-jury-selection-for-her-sex-trafficking-trial
|
|
|
|
franky1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 4475
|
|
November 25, 2021, 08:33:39 AM |
|
Remote fracture of right first rib (Dont know how common a broken rib is with hanging)
resuscitation efforts... its common!
|
I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER. Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
|
|
|
|
Cnut237
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1277
|
|
November 29, 2021, 07:16:58 PM |
|
The prosecution has to have a mountain of evidence against this person, should be a quick and easy case. In fact, her defense team was arguing that jurors could not be neutral because they would have disdain and bias against Maxwell because she's rich....funny, because you would think someone would have that sort of bias because she is involved in trafficking of children. But sure, I guess it's because she's rich.
It's probably more that rich people are used to getting away with whatever they like, tax evasion is most common, but any other illegal activity, too. (Isn't that right, Prince Andrew?) So they view the prospect of a trial by jury to be unfair... because impartial is unfair, as it removes their inbuilt immunity. I think it's not so much that the jury would be biased against the rich, the objection is more that they aren't biased towards the rich.
|
|
|
|
Tash (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 305
Pro financial, medical liberty
|
|
November 30, 2021, 09:41:34 AM Last edit: November 30, 2021, 06:36:12 PM by Tash |
|
https://youtu.be/U5UU9KWwBWU 7/11/1991 two days after corrupt father 'The bouncing Czech' suicided (November 5) on the yacht "The Lady Ghislaine" Blackmail business is a lucrative endeavour It's only the first day.. Oh, ho
|
|
|
|
cmg777
|
|
November 30, 2021, 10:13:36 AM |
|
It's probably more that rich people are used to getting away with whatever they like, tax evasion is most common, but any other illegal activity, too. (Isn't that right, Prince Andrew?) So they view the prospect of a trial by jury to be unfair... because impartial is unfair, as it removes their inbuilt immunity.
I think it's not so much that the jury would be biased against the rich, the objection is more that they aren't biased towards the rich.
I would say the jury would be more or less biased against them because of the possible crimes they committed but like a judge, a jury is supposed to be impartial until they hear the facts that the prosecution and defense attorneys have brought to the table. It is a shame but judges can be bought and so can juries if they are somehow doxxed to their prospective rich buyers. However, it might be cheaper for the rich to hire someone to commit violence/threats against the judge and jury which is what seems to have happened to Epstein and now Maxwell's father.
|
|
|
|
Gyfts
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2758
Merit: 1512
|
|
November 30, 2021, 08:51:12 PM |
|
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10256453/Epsteins-relationship-Maxwell-personal-business-says-Lolita-Express-pilot.htmlEpstein pilot testifies in Maxwell trial, states former Presidents Bill Clinton and Donald Trump flew on private jet owned by Epstein. Bill Clinton flew multiple times in fact. Asked if he witnessed any sexual activity by the prosecution, pilot answered no, stating the cockpit door was always closed. This pilot made a lot of money from Epstein, had his children's tuition paid off, and even hosted his daughter's wedding at a property owned by Epstein. Does anyone really believe he is ignorant of any and all illegal activity of Epstein for years after being his personal pilot, and making millions off it?
|
|
|
|
|
Tash (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 305
Pro financial, medical liberty
|
|
December 03, 2021, 08:39:45 PM |
|
People with 10 flights or more flight logs Jeff Epstein 832 Ghislaine Maxwell 400 Sarah Kellen 311 Emmy Tayler 191 Nadia Marcinkova 125 Andrea Mitrovich 66 Teala Davies 50 Shelley Lewis 40 Cindy Lopez 37 Clare Hazell-Iveagh 32 Jean-Luc Brunel 29 Michael Liffman 28 Virginia Roberts 28 Banu Koluk-Koylu 26 Doug Band 26 Bill Clinton 25 David Mullen 23 Pete Rathgeb 22 Magale Blachou 20 Tiffany Gramza 20 Celina Dubin 18 Gwendolyn Beck 17 Jordan Dubin 17 Eva Dubin-Andersson 16 Sophie Biddle 15 Chauntae Davies 14 Adam PerryLang 13 Alberto Pinto 13 Valdson Cotrin 13 Alexia Wallert 12 Adrianna Muscinska 11 Chris Tucker 11 David Slang 11 Eric Nonacs 11 Glenn Dubin 11 Jim Kennez 11 Kevin Spacey 11 RGR ? 11 Rodey Swater 11 Susan Hamblin 11 Tatiana Kovylina 11 Casey Wasserman 10 Joel Pashcow 10 Laura Wasserman 10 Mandy Ellison 10 Patsy Rodgers 10 Nicole Junkermann 3 Interdasting analysis of flight logs https://web.archive.org/.../2019-07-06-Epstein-Flight... News related to trial follow on this Channel @GhislaineMaxwellTrial
|
|
|
|
Gyfts
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2758
Merit: 1512
|
|
December 03, 2021, 10:49:13 PM |
|
...
Hmm, good list. But Trump is not here? Must not have gotten logged. Anyway, the defense angle here has been that Maxwell must've been ignorant of all the sex trafficking that Epstein was doing, yet here she has 400 flight logs, the most of anyone. The pilot described Maxwell has being the next in the hagiarchy of Epstein's social apparatus. I guess she really must have liked the plane, surely has nothing to do with trafficking children the defense will argue
|
|
|
|
franky1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 4475
|
|
December 04, 2021, 11:56:46 PM |
|
maxwells latest defence is that one victim is NOW an actress and is crying crocodile tears which she has been trained to do due to being an actress..
also she has psychologists trying to spread doubt in witness/victims memory
the thing is. many of the victims(if you followed the epstein case) made police statements at the time of their assaults when they were teenagers and so before any even went to acting school or had time to forget what occured.
seems maxwell is not looking for proof of innocence, but instead just enough doubt in witness/victim testimony to get a 'reasonable doubt' verdict of not guilty. but i doubt it will work.
she is guilty. guilty. guilty. maybe better to plead guilty and name and shame for a reduced sentence deal.
the importance of the pilots evidence is not so much about any innappropriate acts happening on the plane in view of the pilot, but simply that maxwell and epstein brought the girls across state lines, thus ticking the first of 2 boxes about trafficking minors
|
I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER. Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
|
|
|
|