Ghislaine Noelle Marion Maxwell

[Tash]

It is time for a dedicated thread as the case will be with us for a little while. Limited news, no live feed and some big names as co defenders.
Ghislaine Maxwell's Lawyer Has Defended Terrorists, Murders and High Profile Ponzi Scheme Fraudsters
https://patriotone.substack.com/p/ghislaine-maxwells-lawyer-has-defended

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18196132/latham-v-the-1953-trust/?fbclid=IwAR2S1irhXPaBHWvXK64gfq6LUMRXsiFNOmSsMToVYGOgwufAymnRAnhgsZs

[1715323466]

1715323466

[1715323466]

1715323466

[1715323466]

1715323466

[1715323466]

1715323466

[1715323466]

1715323466

[cmg777]

It is time for a dedicated thread as the case will be with us for a little while. Limited news, no live feed and some big names as co defenders.
Ghislaine Maxwell's Lawyer Has Defended Terrorists, Murders and High Profile Ponzi Scheme Fraudsters
https://patriotone.substack.com/p/ghislaine-maxwells-lawyer-has-defended

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18196132/latham-v-the-1953-trust/?fbclid=IwAR2S1irhXPaBHWvXK64gfq6LUMRXsiFNOmSsMToVYGOgwufAymnRAnhgsZs

So the reason why this wasn't covered is because the Kyle Rittenhouse trial was scheduled at the same time. Coincidence? I think not. Additionally, the obvious from what you posted is that those indicted defendants are huge media companies that would like this information suppressed. So there is an interesting paradigm forming here: the Rittenhouse trial was about the potential of taking more of our constitutional rights whereas the Ghislaine trial is about taking back the human liberties and getting real justice for the child sacrifices they've made to their false gods. Another interesting factor is was the Rittenhouse trial even real? Or just a rights grab/scare:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/PWc3oVMS6Wfr/

[Tash]

...... Another interesting factor is was the Rittenhouse trial even real? Or just a rights grab/scare:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/PWc3oVMS6Wfr/

How many criminal trails you know where the accused is right behind the judge without (or with) shackles?
https://www.dailywire.com/news/photos-of-unusual-proximity-between-rittenhouse-and-judge-spark-commentary-tells-you-everything-you-need-to-know
I know very little, next to nothing about the case. Seen the odd photo or story and could not be bothered to read any, too many irregularis.
To me it was always just a distraction just like when you read someone with a suitcase of heroin was apprehended. All it means an other containerload made it into the country. Noob police is happy they got a "big" guy(s) and makes them feel good and worthy of the job, media is happy they have a story, tv goofers are happy thy see some value for money on tax bucks and obviously the crew with the big pay day is happyest of all.

Green screen mishaps are more frequent this days either there is so many or rushed.
Some time ago was this beauty, folder changing color
https://youtu.be/YyHfzcItoFs
At this stage it still seems red, maybe the tree spooked it? The coat of arms or what ever it is at center is red at end it should not be.


Missing foot seems the new normal


Maxwell trial yes there is some big names listed as co-defenders. Will she make it to the end or name names?
David Boies (#22) is the head of Boies Schiller Flexner law firm one of the Democratic party law firms.
Also Clintons, Jeff Bezos, Ira Kleiman (Florida trail), Harvey Weinstein and big Oil, big Bank, Tabacco, Insurance, Health....
https://www.bsfllp.com/about-us/overview.html

[Cnut237]

Will she make it to the end or name names?

Wonder how often the name 'Prince Andrew' will come up in this trial? Not after an exact figure, just to the nearest hundred.  

[cmg777]

Will she make it to the end or name names?

Wonder how often the name 'Prince Andrew' will come up in this trial? Not after an exact figure, just to the nearest hundred.  

Prince Andrew's name probably won't come up as the media will run cover for him like they always do. Sure it was a slight story for awhile but he is probably one of the John Does or Corporate Does (what the fuck is that never heard that term before...). I'm surprised they named Lil Wayne (by his real name), Beyonce, R. Kelly (by his full real name) and others in this. Total bombshell, Tash.

[Tash]

U.S. judge lets Ghislaine Maxwell call 'false memories' expert to testify at trial
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-judge-lets-ghislaine-maxwell-call-false-memories-expert-testify-trial-2021-11-22/

Ghislaine is/was also friends with the Nathan Wolfe aka"Virus Hunter" (book published 2011 about the coming pandemic)


All 26 Locations Bill Clinton Flew With Jeffrey Epstein On The Lolita Express
https://patriotone.substack.com/p/heres-all-26-locations-bill-clinton

[franky1]

her defence seems to be about not being involved in sex trafficking. meaning not being involved in any act prince andrew done.
so she wont admit their crimes as thats simply admitting her own crimes.

so dont expect her to call out the other famous people as it hurts her defence

that said. lets hope the prosecution can trap her in her lies and get a guilty verdict

the only way to get her to name the elitists is if she wants to plead guilty and then reduce her sentance by naming other people

[Tash]

Ghislaine Maxwell is fighting to prevent jurors from seeing a copy of Jeffrey Epstein's 'little black book' at her criminal trial
Jeffrey Epstein's "Little Black Book" 95 pages 1971 names  https://epsteinsblackbook.com/all-names
Mick Jagger, page 28.

[Gyfts]

her defence seems to be about not being involved in sex trafficking. meaning not being involved in any act prince andrew done.
so she wont admit their crimes as thats simply admitting her own crimes.

so dont expect her to call out the other famous people as it hurts her defence

that said. lets hope the prosecution can trap her in her lies and get a guilty verdict

the only way to get her to name the elitists is if she wants to plead guilty and then reduce her sentance by naming other people

The prosecution has to have a mountain of evidence against this person, should be a quick and easy case. In fact, her defense team was arguing that jurors could not be neutral because they would have disdain and bias against Maxwell because she's rich....funny, because you would think someone would have that sort of bias because she is involved in trafficking of children. But sure, I guess it's because she's rich.

[Tash]

Anyone free to do the own fact checking. I am none the wiser, seems to add more questions.

2 Abrasions of left forearm (damage of the skin)
3 Cutaneous contusion of wrists (brusing of wrists)
4 Subcutaneous hemorrhage of left deltoid muscle (Bleeding beneath the skin on shoulder muscle)
5 Hypertensive and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disase (heart problem that is caused by hardening of arteries)
   Cardiac hypertrophic (abnormally thick heart muscle)
   Left ventricular hypertrophy (left pumping chamber that has thickened maybe inefficient pumping)
   Renal arteriolar sclerosis (Chronic kidney disease)
   Slight coronary atherosclerosis (buildup of plaque inside the artery walls)
   Slight to moderate aortic atherosclerosis (thickening and hardening of arteries)
6 Hepatic steatosis (Fatty liver disease)
7 Cervical lymphadenopathy (lymph nodes disease, abnormal large lymph nodes)
8 Remote fracture of right first rib (Dont know how common a broken rib is with hanging)
9 Remote appendectomy (appendix removed)



https://www.thedailybeast.com/ghislaine-maxwell-chuckles-with-attorneys-at-jury-selection-for-her-sex-trafficking-trial

[franky1]

Remote fracture of right first rib (Dont know how common a broken rib is with hanging)

resuscitation efforts... its common!

[Tash]

The lead prosecutor in the Ghislaine Maxwell case is Maurene Comey, daughter of James Comey
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1465059290943737856



That be interesting fireworks if she sings like a bird.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10249945/Ghislaine-Maxwell-stand-save-life-amid-child-sex-trafficking-charges.html

Per Wikifakeia her birthday is Dec 25, 1961. well  12+25+1961 = 1998 1998/3 = 666
Per court documents (under oath) her birthday is Feb 12, 1961.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/1137/13/giuffre-v-maxwell/ (page 6)

[Cnut237]

The prosecution has to have a mountain of evidence against this person, should be a quick and easy case. In fact, her defense team was arguing that jurors could not be neutral because they would have disdain and bias against Maxwell because she's rich....funny, because you would think someone would have that sort of bias because she is involved in trafficking of children. But sure, I guess it's because she's rich.

It's probably more that rich people are used to getting away with whatever they like, tax evasion is most common, but any other illegal activity, too. (Isn't that right, Prince Andrew?)
So they view the prospect of a trial by jury to be unfair... because impartial is unfair, as it removes their inbuilt immunity.

I think it's not so much that the jury would be biased against the rich, the objection is more that they aren't biased towards the rich.

[Tash]

https://youtu.be/U5UU9KWwBWU   7/11/1991 two days after corrupt father 'The bouncing Czech' suicided (November 5) on the yacht "The Lady Ghislaine"


Blackmail business is a lucrative endeavour


It's only the first day..
 

Oh, ho

[cmg777]

It's probably more that rich people are used to getting away with whatever they like, tax evasion is most common, but any other illegal activity, too. (Isn't that right, Prince Andrew?)
So they view the prospect of a trial by jury to be unfair... because impartial is unfair, as it removes their inbuilt immunity.

I think it's not so much that the jury would be biased against the rich, the objection is more that they aren't biased towards the rich.

I would say the jury would be more or less biased against them because of the possible crimes they committed but like a judge, a jury is supposed to be impartial until they hear the facts that the prosecution and defense attorneys have brought to the table. It is a shame but judges can be bought and so can juries if they are somehow doxxed to their prospective rich buyers. However, it might be cheaper for the rich to hire someone to commit violence/threats against the judge and jury which is what seems to have happened to Epstein and now Maxwell's father.

[Gyfts]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10256453/Epsteins-relationship-Maxwell-personal-business-says-Lolita-Express-pilot.html

Epstein pilot testifies in Maxwell trial, states former Presidents Bill Clinton and Donald Trump flew on private jet owned by Epstein. Bill Clinton flew multiple times in fact. Asked if he witnessed any sexual activity by the prosecution, pilot answered no, stating the cockpit door was always closed.

This pilot made a lot of money from Epstein, had his children's tuition paid off, and even hosted his daughter's wedding at a property owned by Epstein. Does anyone really believe he is ignorant of any and all illegal activity of Epstein for years after being his personal pilot, and making millions off it?

[cmg777]

Hopefully, this link from National File and hell the whole site is back up again but...

https://nationalfile.com/fashion-designer-who-died-day-before-ghislaine-maxwell-trial-was-named-in-sex-trafficking-lawsuit-against-epsteins-brother/

"Virgil Abloh, the prolific black designer who worked with Louis Vuitton and was CEO of Off-White, died after he reportedly lost a “two-year battle with cardiac angiosarcoma, a rare cancer” at 41 years old on Sunday, just one day before the criminal trial of alleged sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell."

Also Geraldo is saying that Maxwell is the victim in this? I'd say he is one of those John Does or Corporate Does.

WATCH: Geraldo says accused trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell is a victim of the US government

https://thepostmillennial.com/watch-geraldo-says-accused-trafficker-ghislaine-maxwell-is-a-victim-of-the-us-government?utm_campaign=64487

[Tash]

People with 10 flights or more flight logs
Jeff Epstein 832
Ghislaine Maxwell 400
Sarah Kellen 311
Emmy Tayler 191
Nadia Marcinkova 125
Andrea Mitrovich 66
Teala Davies 50
Shelley Lewis 40
Cindy Lopez 37
Clare Hazell-Iveagh 32
Jean-Luc Brunel 29
Michael Liffman 28
Virginia Roberts 28
Banu Koluk-Koylu 26
Doug Band 26
Bill Clinton 25
David Mullen 23
Pete Rathgeb 22
Magale Blachou 20
Tiffany Gramza 20
Celina Dubin 18
Gwendolyn Beck 17
Jordan Dubin 17
Eva Dubin-Andersson 16
Sophie Biddle 15
Chauntae Davies 14
Adam PerryLang 13
Alberto Pinto 13
Valdson Cotrin 13
Alexia Wallert 12
Adrianna Muscinska 11
Chris Tucker 11
David Slang 11
Eric Nonacs 11
Glenn Dubin 11
Jim Kennez 11
Kevin Spacey 11
RGR ? 11
Rodey Swater 11
Susan Hamblin 11
Tatiana Kovylina 11
Casey Wasserman 10
Joel Pashcow 10
Laura Wasserman 10
Mandy Ellison 10
Patsy Rodgers 10
Nicole Junkermann 3

Interdasting analysis of flight logs https://web.archive.org/.../2019-07-06-Epstein-Flight...
News related to trial follow on this Channel
 @GhislaineMaxwellTrial

[Gyfts]

...

Hmm, good list. But Trump is not here? Must not have gotten logged.

Anyway, the defense angle here has been that Maxwell must've been ignorant of all the sex trafficking that Epstein was doing, yet here she has 400 flight logs, the most of anyone. The pilot described Maxwell has being the next in the hagiarchy of Epstein's social apparatus.

I guess she really must have liked the plane, surely has nothing to do with trafficking children the defense will argue 

[franky1]

maxwells latest defence is that one victim is NOW an actress and is crying crocodile tears which she has been trained to do due to being an actress..

also she has psychologists trying to spread doubt in witness/victims memory

the thing is. many of the victims(if you followed the epstein case) made police statements at the time of their assaults when they were teenagers and so before any even went to acting school or had time to forget what occured.

seems maxwell is not looking for proof of innocence, but instead just enough doubt in witness/victim testimony to get a 'reasonable doubt' verdict of not guilty. but i doubt it will work.

she is guilty. guilty. guilty. maybe better to plead guilty and name and shame for a reduced sentence deal.

the importance of the pilots evidence is not so much about any innappropriate acts happening on the plane in view of the pilot, but simply that maxwell and epstein brought the girls across state lines, thus ticking the first of 2 boxes about trafficking minors