Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2017, 11:05:04 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.14.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Bundling Bitcoin with Linux distros...  (Read 1789 times)
ineededausername
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784


bitcoin hundred-aire


View Profile
December 05, 2011, 04:50:32 AM
 #1

What would it take to get the major distros to include Bitcoin in their pre-installed software?  Bitcoin and the FOSS community share many values in common, so I suspect we could get some sympathy for including our open-source, decentralized currency in Linux distros.
Anyone else think this is a good idea?

(BFL)^2 < 0
1495839904
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1495839904

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1495839904
Reply with quote  #2

1495839904
Report to moderator
1495839904
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1495839904

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1495839904
Reply with quote  #2

1495839904
Report to moderator
Remember that Bitcoin is still beta software. Don't put all of your money into BTC!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1495839904
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1495839904

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1495839904
Reply with quote  #2

1495839904
Report to moderator
1495839904
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1495839904

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1495839904
Reply with quote  #2

1495839904
Report to moderator
1495839904
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1495839904

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1495839904
Reply with quote  #2

1495839904
Report to moderator
Crypt_Current
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686


Shame on everything; regret nothing.


View Profile
December 05, 2011, 04:55:39 AM
 #2

If it weren't for Linuxcoin, I'd know nothing about Linux...  Linuxcoin seems really buggy though.  At first, I couldn't tell if its regular crashings were just my ignorance or the OS being buggy.  The more I use it though, the more I think the latter...

I'm going to try Ubuntu soon.

10% off at CampBX for LIFE:  https://campbx.com/main.php?r=C9a5izBQ5vq  ----  Authorized BitVoucher MEGA reseller (& BTC donations appreciated):  https://bitvoucher.co/affl/1HkvK8o8WWDpCTSQGnek7DH9gT1LWeV5s3/
LTC:  LRL6vb6XBRrEEifB73DiEiYZ9vbRy99H41  NMC:  NGb2spdTGpWj8THCPyCainaXenwDhAW1ZT
RodeoX
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2282


The revolution will be monetized!


View Profile
December 05, 2011, 04:59:17 AM
 #3

I would like to at least see it in the standard Ubuntu repository, when we reach version 1.

The gospel according to Satoshi - https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

Free bitcoin in ICELAND - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1610684
ineededausername
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784


bitcoin hundred-aire


View Profile
December 05, 2011, 05:01:10 AM
 #4

I would like to at least see it in the standard Ubuntu repository, when we reach version 1.

Though we haven't reached version 1, the client is already stable and very usable by Linux users.  Remember, we aren't talking about grandmas when we talk about Linux Tongue

(BFL)^2 < 0
ThiagoCMC
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190

฿itcoin: Currency of Resistance!


View Profile
December 05, 2011, 07:50:24 PM
 #5

Hi!

 Please, check the following post:
 Point for Bitcoin! Point for Linux! And point for Ubuntu!!

Best!
Thiago
wareen
Millionaire
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742

bitcoin-austria.at


View Profile
December 06, 2011, 10:05:37 AM
 #6

I don't think it's a good approach to try and force Bitcoin upon anybody. Such methods are bound to spur negative reactions and honestly I don't think Bitcoin needs such questionable forms of advertising.

Make nice packages for all the flavors of Linux out there and improve the user experience of the client(s). While you're at it, see that the smartphone wallets get polished and are present in all the (alternative) appstores.

With something like Bitcoin where even tech-people are very quick to dismiss it as a scam, we really should not push it too much - especially given its beta status. Let's keep improving the infrastructure and the usability and Bitcoin's advantages will speak for itself.
markm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1876



View Profile WWW
December 06, 2011, 01:44:53 PM
 #7

I do not think it is ready until root can install it system-wide for each user to be able to use it without each having to have their own copy of the blockchain.

The blockchain(s) should go in /var/spool/blockchains or something like that, where all users can access it or each daemon (main net and test net even if not considering alternate blockchain-based applications) can get at it to provide each user an interface that doesn't involve having access to other users' accounts.

-MarkM-

Browser-launched Crossfire client now online (select CrossCiv server for Galactic  Milieu)
Free website hosting with PHP, MySQL etc: http://hosting.knotwork.com/
JeffK
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350


I never hashed for this...


View Profile
December 06, 2011, 03:49:31 PM
 #8

What would it take to get the major distros to include Bitcoin in their pre-installed software?  Bitcoin and the FOSS community share many values in common, so I suspect we could get some sympathy for including our open-source, decentralized currency in Linux distros.
Anyone else think this is a good idea?

There are extremely large amounts of politics that go into deciding not only what software should be included in the default installations, and I can tell you right now that Bitcoin will never be included in the default installation of CentOS/Debian/Ubuntu/Fedora/etc, and it never should be.

bitcoind is included in the repositories of many distributions by virtue of being open source, but you are vastly overestimating the overlap between Bitcoin and FOSS 'values', and underestimating the amount of work and politics that goes into package set selections.


also basically this:
I don't think it's a good approach to try and force Bitcoin upon anybody. Such methods are bound to spur negative reactions and honestly I don't think Bitcoin needs such questionable forms of advertising.

Make nice packages for all the flavors of Linux out there and improve the user experience of the client(s). While you're at it, see that the smartphone wallets get polished and are present in all the (alternative) appstores.

With something like Bitcoin where even tech-people are very quick to dismiss it as a scam, we really should not push it too much - especially given its beta status. Let's keep improving the infrastructure and the usability and Bitcoin's advantages will speak for itself.

I don't use Ubuntu any more because of some software they force into my system, even if I don't use it and/or disable it (Ubuntu One, Unity, Software Center). I would be livid if someone tried to hamfistedly wedge a bitcoin client into my Linux distribution, doubly so if they forced me to download the blockchain or something.

Distributions should include as few network service packages by default as possible. Anything more is a security risk/more trouble for admins to lock down or disable.
ineededausername
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784


bitcoin hundred-aire


View Profile
December 06, 2011, 04:52:50 PM
 #9

What would it take to get the major distros to include Bitcoin in their pre-installed software?  Bitcoin and the FOSS community share many values in common, so I suspect we could get some sympathy for including our open-source, decentralized currency in Linux distros.
Anyone else think this is a good idea?

There are extremely large amounts of politics that go into deciding not only what software should be included in the default installations, and I can tell you right now that Bitcoin will never be included in the default installation of CentOS/Debian/Ubuntu/Fedora/etc, and it never should be.

bitcoind is included in the repositories of many distributions by virtue of being open source, but you are vastly overestimating the overlap between Bitcoin and FOSS 'values', and underestimating the amount of work and politics that goes into package set selections.


also basically this:
I don't think it's a good approach to try and force Bitcoin upon anybody. Such methods are bound to spur negative reactions and honestly I don't think Bitcoin needs such questionable forms of advertising.

Make nice packages for all the flavors of Linux out there and improve the user experience of the client(s). While you're at it, see that the smartphone wallets get polished and are present in all the (alternative) appstores.

With something like Bitcoin where even tech-people are very quick to dismiss it as a scam, we really should not push it too much - especially given its beta status. Let's keep improving the infrastructure and the usability and Bitcoin's advantages will speak for itself.

I don't use Ubuntu any more because of some software they force into my system, even if I don't use it and/or disable it (Ubuntu One, Unity, Software Center). I would be livid if someone tried to hamfistedly wedge a bitcoin client into my Linux distribution, doubly so if they forced me to download the blockchain or something.

Distributions should include as few network service packages by default as possible. Anything more is a security risk/more trouble for admins to lock down or disable.

Yeah, my purpose in asking this question was to get opinions on the following:
1.  Is it a good idea? (Ethical to put Bitcoin in default package lists?)
2.  Is it plausible?

It seems that your answers are no to both.  However, for the first one, I personally think that as long as you aren't forcing people to download the blockchain or use the client, you aren't really "pushing Bitcoin" on them. 

(BFL)^2 < 0
Gabi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050


View Profile
December 06, 2011, 05:05:22 PM
 #10

mh... when i install a OS i expect to install only it and maybe some software to see photo/video, listen to audio and browse internet, nothing more...
ineededausername
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784


bitcoin hundred-aire


View Profile
December 06, 2011, 06:44:55 PM
 #11

mh... when i install a OS i expect to install only it and maybe some software to see photo/video, listen to audio and browse internet, nothing more...

But why should audio/video software be distinguished from payment software?  I don't see the fundamental difference... if Bitcoin, one day, were sufficiently useful (broad enough user base) that one could use it as a replacement for Paypal, I would support bundling it into Linux distros.

(BFL)^2 < 0
btc_artist
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154


Bitcoin!


View Profile WWW
December 06, 2011, 06:53:24 PM
 #12

I think a good first step would be to get bitcoin into the ubuntu software repository.

BTC: 1CDCLDBHbAzHyYUkk1wYHPYmrtDZNhk8zf
LTC: LMS7SqZJnqzxo76iDSEua33WCyYZdjaQoE
Gabi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050


View Profile
December 06, 2011, 08:10:07 PM
 #13

mh... when i install a OS i expect to install only it and maybe some software to see photo/video, listen to audio and browse internet, nothing more...

But why should audio/video software be distinguished from payment software?  I don't see the fundamental difference... if Bitcoin, one day, were sufficiently useful (broad enough user base) that one could use it as a replacement for Paypal, I would support bundling it into Linux distros.
Because being able to open and use files is a more basic need with an os
dunand
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 632



View Profile
December 06, 2011, 09:57:41 PM
 #14

Adding the bitcoin client in the Ubuntu repository would be awesome.

Matt Corallo maintain an untrusted PPA for ubuntu https://launchpad.net/~bitcoin. Maybe he is working to add is package to the universe repository for Ubuntu?
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!