But as to Bitcoin itself, the development and future, of course, Satoshi is now irrelevant.
As member of Bitcoin community, I would like to see identity of satoshi being anonymous forever. It is good and best for Bitcoin and for all.
I personally think Satoshi's identity is good the way it is now, anonymous and with no new leads and I also agree it's good and best for Bitcoin, but I still think regardless of what developments happen, it is entirely irrelevant. Look at CW right now celebrating his victory despite being asked to award damages. Even if some lawyer or some court believes he is satoshi, that is not relevant to Bitcoin.
Agree. In my opinion, Bitcoin's anonymous identity is the same as in the case of his identity. Because it is extremely difficult to track down or discover the person of interest, I believe he/she has put in a lot of effort to prepare. I believe this documentary will be interesting to watch to see who is the person of interest. I also believe it is safer to keep Satoshi's true identity hidden for security reasons, especially since this is the first time we have heard of him/her. I believe it is best to stick with the Satoshi being anonymous.
I've no idea what you're trying to say actually... but if I was to be interested in Satoshi I would have to read 100s of emails and documentaries and books. And be nowhere different in terms of what I know. As I said above, this is purely an interest for history and anthropology, but has zero impact on Bitcoin itself.