1XBIT campaign could be the next longest running campaign even with scam reports

[Baofeng]

They don't get that much customer in the forum since they are well known shady casino here. I don't know what's success of the campaign that OP mention on his statement but I think the campaign is a failure because there target is an audience here while nobody cares about them here. They are just burning money for nothing. Most of there new players are outside the forum. Eventually this scam shit campaign will just end when they realize that they are paying to bought account that shit posting for them in exchange for there money.

Well they have been running this signature campaigns for months now so for sure they are earning money maybe not from this forum but from other sources as well. Or maybe there are a few beginners in crypto gambling wherein they search and found out about 1XBit here in our community and then become their customers. So still a win-win situation for them to run campaigns here eventhough majority of us knows that they are a scam casinos.

[Doell]

when there any job that pay higher others than ,it is natural that people will take it but when it is associated with a "scam" there will be consequences for promoting fraud to other members which is not commendable at all for the community ! as a gambler, I'd rather lose because it's "fair" than to be caught lose in a "scam"
1xbit made a long campaign to restore reputation maybe but the fact is that all the smart people on this forum already know what they are doing campaign ,^{fortunately I'm here not only to make money but to seek insight and friendship} so i'm not interested

[lienfaye]

The reputation of 1XBIT casino here is not good so I doubt if they can attract gamblers to play on their site even they run their campaign much longer.

The pay rates might be tempting but knowing the risk (getting a red tag) for involving yourself to their casino is not worth it if you value your account.

"Negative trust for promoting 1xBit is allowed" like bruh. They're really pushing for the idea that any sort of advertisement is still an advertisement.

Indeed. For them it doesnt matter as long as they can achieve their goal to spread awareness regardless what people think about their casino. Those promoters are also taking advantage the chance to make money, its their only concern.

[Naficopa]

I don't know if you paid attention, but there are some DT members in the forum who are giving a red tag for very bland things .. Of course they have the right to do so, because they do it according to their opinion. However, as a consequence, the number of red tag accounts increases very quickly. In my opinion, signature campaigns which will accept accounts with neagtive trusts will start appearing soon, as it happens in bounty campaigns. So even if the 1xbit signature campaign ends, I am not afraid of finding a new campaign.

[Fundamentals Of]

It's a simple math that's working here. I think the 1xbit shills are not really caring whether the campaign would last long or not. They only care that they could earn a nice amount even if their accounts here are already considered untrustworthy or probably worthless because of red trusts. If somebody has his account lying around earning nothing, could not even be sold for a few bucks, then why not join a campaign even if it means losing the account's worth forever? Even a month's pay of $400 is probably enough for 1xbit shills to lose their accounts.

[Jawhead999]

To be honest they don't have any reputations, if you looked all of their participants you'll see they didn't even got at least 5 merits in last 120 days even though they're posting everyday. Also I doubt those accounts were actually his personal accounts, it's high chance a bought accounts because mostly have a long gap posting.

Actually the owner/team of 1xbit is the stupid, not the participants. They hire shitposter and keep paying them, while the campaign isn't benefit to them since most people in this forum already know how scammy 1xbit is.

[Naficopa]

It's a simple math that's working here. I think the 1xbit shills are not really caring whether the campaign would last long or not. They only care that they could earn a nice amount even if their accounts here are already considered untrustworthy or probably worthless because of red trusts. If somebody has his account lying around earning nothing, could not even be sold for a few bucks, then why not join a campaign even if it means losing the account's worth forever? Even a month's pay of $400 is probably enough for 1xbit shills to lose their accounts.

Correct. My account was worthless before I joined 1xBit signature campaign.
Im sure that for $400 you can buy clean Legendary account, or at least Hero.

To be honest they don't have any reputations, if you looked all of their participants you'll see they didn't even got at least 5 merits in last 120 days even though they're posting everyday. Also I doubt those accounts were actually his personal accounts, it's high chance a bought accounts because mostly have a long gap posting.

Actually the owner/team of 1xbit is the stupid, not the participants. They hire shitposter and keep paying them, while the campaign isn't benefit to them since most people in this forum already know how scammy 1xbit is.

I think that a 1xBit manager would like to be able to accept accounts that do not have a negative reputation in his signature campaign. He was just forced to accept red tagged accounts, because everyone who joined the campaign got it anyway. For me, it was a chance to earn money from a signature campaign in Bitcoin, not to participate in risky bounty campaigns. Simple as that.

[Oshosondy]

Correct. My account was worthless before I joined 1xBit signature campaign.
Im sure that for $400 you can buy clean Legendary account, or at least Hero.

Buying or not buying account, we should also be thinking of others, if anyone join 1xbit, won money and never get paid like others have been complaining. The people that advertise them make such people to get scammed. I have also heard 1xbet has connection with 1xbit, have you seen some acquisition against the betting site also. We should advertise those campaigns that have good reputation.

I think that a 1xBit manager would like to be able to accept accounts that do not have a negative reputation in his signature campaign. He was just forced to accept red tagged accounts, because everyone who joined the campaign got it anyway. For me, it was a chance to earn money from a signature campaign in Bitcoin, not to participate in risky bounty campaigns. Simple as that.

I noticed 1xbit is not accepting accounts with negative tag, but 1xbit is having numerous negative tag itself.

[Naficopa]

I think that a 1xBit manager would like to be able to accept accounts that do not have a negative reputation in his signature campaign. He was just forced to accept red tagged accounts, because everyone who joined the campaign got it anyway. For me, it was a chance to earn money from a signature campaign in Bitcoin, not to participate in risky bounty campaigns. Simple as that.

I noticed 1xbit is not accepting accounts with negative tag, but 1xbit is having numerous negative tag itself.

As I wrote earlier, at the moment the manager of neither one nor the other 1xBit signature campaign has no choice. There is a condition that only accounts that have received a negative trust for promoting 1xBit in the past can be accepted. But I saw that in the new 1xBit signature campaign there are also exceptions for accounts that received a red tag for little things.

[Oshosondy]

As I wrote earlier, at the moment the manager of neither one nor the other 1xBit signature campaign has no choice. There is a condition that only accounts that have received a negative trust for promoting 1xBit in the past can be accepted. But I saw that in the new 1xBit signature campaign there are also exceptions for accounts that received a red tag for little things.

I was only referring to this year first 1xbit campaign which they brought to this forum some months ago, like seven months ago or something. I noticed there has been other two or three campaigns that were later introduced with the previous ones disabled. My bad that I did not know much about how the campaign manager are accepting and rejecting accounts that applied for their campaign later. I did not know people with negative trust are now also accepted. That is how it should be, there are some red trust that does not worth it. But this does not mean I trust 1xbit though.

[Naficopa]

As I wrote earlier, at the moment the manager of neither one nor the other 1xBit signature campaign has no choice. There is a condition that only accounts that have received a negative trust for promoting 1xBit in the past can be accepted. But I saw that in the new 1xBit signature campaign there are also exceptions for accounts that received a red tag for little things.

I was only referring to this year first 1xbit campaign which they brought to this forum some months ago, like seven months ago or something. I noticed there has been other two or three campaigns that were later introduced with the previous ones disabled. My bad that I did not know much about how the campaign manager are accepting and rejecting accounts that applied for their campaign later. I did not know people with negative trust are now also accepted. That is how it should be, there are some red trust that does not worth it. But this does not mean I trust 1xbit though.

In fact, the rules of the campaign have not changed much. The community just does not like this campaign much, so there are slight inconveniences from time to time.  Simply managers (because at the moment, as far as I know, there are two different ones - one for each campaign, because at the moment two are running simultaneously.) adapt to the conditions they have.

[peter0425]

The majority of us here don't want this casino to have a campaign here, but the scam here is not moderated I'm surprised that they are already on their 7th month and they are still doing great,

I thin DOING GREAT is not necessary to mentioned because they are doing great in favor of their Paid shill participants and not about the forum content so Nope this is not great.

the rate is very tempting if you're in the campaign for 7 months and you are a high ranking member that's $400 a month and over $2000 for 7 months and counting.
This is not to hype 1XBIT but many members prefer to lose their reputation for money because they think it's going to be one of the longest-running campaigns.

actually this is very helpful specially all of the account involved are Red tagged accounts , they cannot even join any other bitcoin paying campaign if this is not for `1xbit.

What's your insight on 1XBIT campaign are they going to be one of the longest-running campaigns.

I don't think they will run long , for me it is only their PRIDE thats why they are still holding the campaign but the truth is? this does not add value in their business because Bitcointalk users are taking their distance from this obvious scam casino site.

It will all be okay once they clean up their mess. It's been 7 months, and still we see gamblers telling their experiences on how bad the service is.
I don't have anything against them but we all want our money to be in safe hands. We want to deposit and withdraw our money anytime we want it to with complete numbers.
It's not just about the signatures that we should look at, it's what's within. They can go 2 years running this campaign but what about the unsolved history regarding the service itself? Should it all be sugarcoat by on time payment in signature advertising?

Their signature campaigning is a sign that they are desperately needed this bitcointalk.org community to bring players in their site because of their willingness to spend thousands of dollars just to promote their site here even tough they are  facing bad impact , looking at their paid participants? do you really think this will bring positive outcome towards their gambling site?
no i don't think so because from so much big payments now they have adjusted (though still decent) yet they felt like spending funds without any returns.

and also look at this thread, the administration of 1xbit stops collaborating anymore here lol.

[Alisha-k]

It's a simple math that's working here. I think the 1xbit shills are not really caring whether the campaign would last long or not. They only care that they could earn a nice amount even if their accounts here are already considered untrustworthy or probably worthless because of red trusts. If somebody has his account lying around earning nothing, could not even be sold for a few bucks, then why not join a campaign even if it means losing the account's worth forever? Even a month's pay of $400 is probably enough for 1xbit shills to lose their accounts.

Everyone here desires to earn someday from a campaign signature and so far 1xbit has proven to be reliable to their signature participants and no week passes without each participant who has meet their weekly requirements getting their funds in their wallet. We all anticipate to have 1xbit last even longer than any other campaign on the forum and if they don't  they still deserve some accolades they have been reliable enough for so long now

[freedomgo]

Not sure how long they will continue their campaign, but it looks like they are happy with the result because until now the campaign is still active. They have enough participants to wear their signature, and these people look like they are regular employees as with the red-tagged they received, they might not be accepted again to another campaign.

[robelneo]

I don't think they will run long , for me it is only their PRIDE thats why they are still holding the campaign but the truth is? this does not add value in their business because Bitcointalk users are taking their distance from this obvious scam casino site.

It's very challenging for us members here in Bitcointalk, other forums will just ban 1XBIT and all their participants, majority of us here are annoyed on 1XBIT presence here but the admin has a rule that scams are not moderated here so it's a challenge for us here to tell the community and expose them, we keep on encouraging people to be wise and always do research on where to put money and practice diligence all because we have seen how 1XBIT is working to promote their casino to scam people.

[Naficopa]

Not sure how long they will continue their campaign, but it looks like they are happy with the result because until now the campaign is still active. They have enough participants to wear their signature, and these people look like they are regular employees as with the red-tagged they received, they might not be accepted again to another campaign.

I don't know the plans of the 1xBit marketing team, so I don't know if this campaign will last for long, but it looks like they are happy with the results so far as they decided to launch a second campaign:

1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5376183.0
2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5367666.0

Both are active and run simultaneously.

[goldkingcoiner]

I don't really see the point of not banning 1xbit from this entire forum. Why are they allowed to keep advertising even though they are a well documented scam? This seems to me as a gross negligence in part of the Bitcointalk moderators. I understand that some people are desperate to make some money, but I think in the long term, more people will lose money rather than make it.

[Slow death]

Not sure how long they will continue their campaign, but it looks like they are happy with the result because until now the campaign is still active. They have enough participants to wear their signature, and these people look like they are regular employees as with the red-tagged they received, they might not be accepted again to another campaign.

I don't know the plans of the 1xBit marketing team, so I don't know if this campaign will last for long, but it looks like they are happy with the results so far as they decided to launch a second campaign:

1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5376183.0
2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5367666.0

Both are active and run simultaneously.

I don't understand why they created two campaigns? I know you're not part of the management of this scam casino, but it's kind of weird that they have two high payout campaigns and they refuse to pay customers who deposited and won at the casino, so they're taking the customers' hard-earned money to pay campaign participants and legitimize the casino. Is strange that

[YOSHIE]

What's your insight on 1XBIT campaign are they going to be one of the longest-running campaigns.

As you know scammers are not moderated in this forum, that's the problem, can't do much for the 1xbit campaign, but we have done what we can but that doesn't mean they have to stop, their payouts to participants are high and they accept color marked members.

My view is of course there is, in my opinion the members in this forum don't care anymore about their 1xbit campaign and gambling site, unfortunately victims from outside the forum are increasing every day, over time they will stop themselves to promote their campaigns here, I'm sure it will happen, not last long.

[uneng]

The most shocking part is that they belong to the same group of 1xbet, a big and popular fiat casino which has already sponsored soccer teams like Chelsea and Liverpool, also appearing very often in online advertisements even though you aren't looking for gambling content on the internet. As far as I know they are the largest bookmaker in Europe nowadays. Nevertheless, they are involved with the scam casino 1xbit, but people seem to not bother with this, including the regulators. They keep playing at the site without caring for their money or keep promoting it without caring for their own reputation.