[edited out]
..... they can only be made to know that before going into investment in Bitcoin that nothing is guaranteed which is why I feel it’s important to get some basic knowledge and understanding about bitcoin before getting started.
Get the fuck out of here.
What are the pieces of supposed ba sic knowledge that bitcoin newbies need to acquire before getting started, especially once they have figured out that they have discretionary funds?
It seems that this vague and misleading idea of supposed "basic knowledge" that bitcoin beginners are supposedly in need of getting is repeated so often that guys might not even realize that they are engaged in such ongoing patronizing nonsense.
You, Alonso_, presume that you are more insightful than some other potentially newbie bitcoiner merely because you have been registered on this forum for slightly more than a year? For some reason, you think that you know something that potential newbie bitcoiners need to know before they can get started buying bitcoin?
I think that you (and other guys making similar vague and misleading proclamations about supposed basic knowledge that they believe bitcoin newbies need) are full of shit, and just making things up in order to try to sound smart about some supposed mystery information that bitcoin newbies need to acquire before they can get started based on their own judgement.
[edited out]
....Buying consistently and persistently with DCA till you have reach an over accumulation stage should be the focus before thinking of profit.
And? What is your definition of "overaccumulation stage?"
How is a guy going to know when he reached it or not?
Might there be some other stage that would be good enough or do you have some bright line that guys are going to know when they reach it?
The objective is profitable, but the amount of profit will be satisfactory if it is achieved by completing a complete process or completing a full cycle.
I don't think that after a full cycle an investor will get a good profit, because his bitcoin portfolio hasn't reached a significant size and I don't see four years as a long term investment for someone below 50 years. This is because the longer you are in the accumulation game the better for you. You still have enough time to stretch your bitcoin accumulation time frame to ten years or more in order for you to be able to grow a significant bitcoin stash for the future. Don't forget that the longer, you hodli, the more your bitcoin portfolio keep compounding in value for a better profit.
The logic of holding for a long time often teaches me a lot in investing. In the case of long-term investment, the investor has the opportunity to gradually increase the amount of Bitcoin without relying entirely on the price of one day. But if you hold it for a long time, assuming that the market price of that amount will increase on its own, it seems to be the same as the guarantee of profit.
Even if an investor buys Bitcoin regularly for ten years, his total result will depend on what price he bought it at and where the market price of Bitcoin will stand in the future. Even if you might be making a potentially fair point that seems to presume that the bitcoin price is ongoingly going higher, at the same time, your statement remains somewhat ambiguous in its implications that guys are going to have much, if any, ability to control the price that they had accumulated their bitcoin, when largely they would not have very much control over their average cost per BTC, since at any given time during their BTC accumulation, they likely would have had little to no ability to know if the BTC price was going to be going up, down or sideways, so in that regard, over the years of their bitcoin accumulation, they would have had largely been buying BTC at whatever the price happened to be at the time that their money came available for the buying of bitcoin.
Your proclamation that suggests abilities to control average BTC purchase price comes off as arrogant, at best, when the BTC accumulator likely had very little control over the BTC price, even though he did have control over his own chosen level of whimpiness or aggressiveness within the confines of his budget.
Of course, a long time can give him the opportunity to buy more. But it does not add a fixed rate of profit every year. So in my opinion, which is suitable between 4-10 years or more should be considered not only by age, but also when the money may be needed and whether he has the ability to maintain the plan if the price drops.
These assertions are also vague. What do you believe that the bitcoin accumulator is going to do once he reaches his investment timeline? From your perspective, the bitcoin accumulator is going to sell all his bitcoin once he reaches his timeline because he "needs it?"
Bitcoin has rewarded investors that held in the past, but we still have to be careful not to have too much expectations. Put in mind too there’s possibility it may not come as expected and you could lose your investment.
Profit is not guaranteed, so the focus should be on accumulating within your means, so you don’t put too much pressure on yourself while building portfolio over time. If Bitcoin(maybe) performs well again in the future, you will surely be in a better position than those that gambled away their bitcoin chasing short term profits.
Bitcoin has now become a store of value, so due to its huge size, Bitcoin is not able to give hundreds of times the profit it used to.
When did bitcoin suddenly become a store of value? Someone told you about that? Bitcoin had not been a store of value since the beginning, or someone had to proclaim it to be a "store of value"?
Therefore, we should not have high expectations from Bitcoin based on the previous market, but rather expect that your money is protected from inflation and you will get some profit from long-term investment, which of course you can expect to be higher than bank interest.
Profit from Bitcoin investment is not guaranteed, but if you are successful in long-term investment, the probability of profit is high, which is like a kind of guarantee.
You make close to
zero sense. Largely what you seem to be proclaiming is: "Even though bitcoin is not guaranteed, it is guaranteed." How ridiculous is that proclamation?
Losing funds is a different matter, but the probability of the market harming you is very low.
More deep insight from @Jewan420. You seem to be saying: "The bitcoin market could hurt you, but it won't." hahahahaha... How dumb.
The risk of hacks or fraud or scams is higher in Bitcoin than the risk related to the market.
This statement is about as clear as mud with your suggestion (or is it a proclamation?) that bitcoin has more hacks, frauds, scams than other aspects of "the market" to the extent that you are not just making shit up, which seems quite likely.
In short-term investments, market volatility can cause you to lose money or unexpected sales can harm you.
Some of us consider short term investing as trading, yet maybe whether you are further muddying the waters might depend upon what your own definition of "short-term" might be? Does "short-term" have an actual timeline or are you just leaving the idea open to interpretation?
If you are successful in the long term in your goals, the probability of loss is very low, which is almost non-existent.
Yes. Back to your idea of guaranteed profits.. and perhaps guarantees of "no losses" too, right?
You should write a book about all of your areas of high level "wisdom." You just have to flesh out some of your ideas a bit better in order to have separate chapters for each of your break through perspectives about bitcoin and related topics.