What is your opinions about simulated reality games?

[rhomelmabini]

What is your opinion?

It's still on the speculation side if I'll be asked. As the abbreviation implies it's still a simulation wherein players are just being simulated on how the play will goes though we never know how the play would went well. It's still not worth it compare to your own instinct of trusting what could be right when you provide that bet.

[mrongoz_imut]

Ever have some one success got winning on simulated reality games? So far we have discuss about how running system with simulated reality games and many gambler ever stuck on this sport betting, will have possibility or chance winning on simulated reality game? I try several time actually played few minutes only but always failed to win and looks controlling by system what they want. I just play on several minutes before games ended but keep failure for winning.

[Fatunad]

What is your opinion?

It's still on the speculation side if I'll be asked. As the abbreviation implies it's still a simulation wherein players are just being simulated on how the play will goes though we never know how the play would went well. It's still not worth it compare to your own instinct of trusting what could be right when you provide that bet.

Just watch it out https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2FcKhI1W9r0
This is simulation games to learn up real world skills which is something to be more useful rather than on focusing on applying it on gambling.
When it comes to interest then there are indeed some gamblers who do really love on dealing with simulated reality games
although having that sports betting is much more interesting imho.

[bitbollo]

@Fatunad
I am referring to simulated games managed by bookmakers / betting sites, not so much to generic games.
anyway thank you for the video, I've never seen games like this

[michellee]

Ever have some one success got winning on simulated reality games? So far we have discuss about how running system with simulated reality games and many gambler ever stuck on this sport betting, will have possibility or chance winning on simulated reality game? I try several time actually played few minutes only but always failed to win and looks controlling by system what they want. I just play on several minutes before games ended but keep failure for winning.

We never know who has won in simulated reality games because maybe not many people use this type of game for various reasons. But if after you give it a try and find that the game looks like the system controls it, I don't think that there's going to be that many people who want to play in that game because if the system controls it, then that could be unfair because they can control every game. I've never tried it and seeing as you have, I don't seem interested in trying it.

[adzino]

I frequently see these "simulated reality" games (SRI) listed together with conventional matches. 
As gambler I can think of a lot of questions...

Are these trusted services? Is the result already foreseen before a match or is it managed according to the bets?
Is there a single provider of these encounters or are there multiple services that provide this series of matches?

What is your opinion?

There is no way you could verify those games are trusted or not. They are simulated games. They can be rigged any moment to favor the casino/provider. So, yeah, they are NOT trusted services. So if you want to play, you will have to trust them blindly.
Why do you have to bet on those simulated games when there are real live games/matches available? Or if you want to gamble,  just play on normal casino with normal games where you can verify all bets individually (provably fair).

[ralle14]

Ever have some one success got winning on simulated reality games? So far we have discuss about how running system with simulated reality games and many gambler ever stuck on this sport betting, will have possibility or chance winning on simulated reality game? I try several time actually played few minutes only but always failed to win and looks controlling by system what they want. I just play on several minutes before games ended but keep failure for winning.

I've seen others share their winning SRI bets on Stake but I never bothered asking their strategy since it's tough to come out on top or get an edge unlike with sports betting.

Imo there's no point in discussing the winning chances since it's a worse version of sports betting at the same time think of it as casino games and in casino games the longer you play the more you lose. It only becomes worth it when there's a promotion in place or there's more to it than just betting on the match.

[Wexnident]

There is no way you could verify those games are trusted or not. They are simulated games. They can be rigged any moment to favor the casino/provider. So, yeah, they are NOT trusted services. So if you want to play, you will have to trust them blindly.
Why do you have to bet on those simulated games when there are real live games/matches available? Or if you want to gamble,  just play on normal casino with normal games where you can verify all bets individually (provably fair).

I mean, it's just like how sports works, you can't exactly say for sure whether a game is rigged or not, so I guess we can give them the benefit of the doubt, though I do agree with just betting on live games instead if you really want to bet on sports games. Simulated games are just numbers fighting against each other, nothing more nothing else. Though if that's what you want, then go for it. I think it's more friendly in terms of actually relying on data when trying to predict the outcome.

[delfastTions]

I think that in recent times, more and more casinos are starting to report their use of provable fairness algorithms. 
And this is where the question arises of how honest and unpredictable the evidence they use is. 
Maybe someone has already figured out how to prove honesty when the author of the proof himself knows that some subtleties are embedded in the algorithm, such that it seems to be 90% honest and 10%, as it were, not quite honest.   
I dare to suggest that people are working on this topic, they also want to receive a guaranteed profit.

[delfastTions]

snip

Maybe the simulation can be useful for those who are still in the stage of learning to analyze because, in the system, they can know how to process data from various sources. And if it doesn't use money, I think it's worth trying because, at the very least, it can increase our knowledge in learning to analyze. But even if it uses money, it's better if we only use a little money because we don't know how it will turn out.

In addition to your remarks, I note that when you try to play something - On the stock exchange or in a casino or somewhere else, and there they offer and provide options for demo versions, as if for training.  You should never play demo versions without real money stakes. 
Anyone who has practiced with demos when entering a real game immediately realizes that demos do not provide anything useful for practice when playing with real money. 
This should be taken into account for beginners.  Even if the bet is a few dollars.  But it must be real money, and not some kind of "candy wrappers"

[ipanks]

snip

Well, that's it. Using a demo account can provide a gaming experience to learn to know the system first before using real money. It is important for gamblers who want to dive into that game because it is different from what they have done in real sports betting.

By learning from using a demo account, it is hoped that gamblers who want to try placing bets on this type of bet can know the steps they must take before betting. Even though it's only a demo, if we study hard, I'm sure when we use a real account, we only need a moment to get used to placing bets on that type of bet.

[uneng]

On this aspect, fantasy sports games are better than simulated games, because they follow the performance of each player in real life to find results for the virtual matches, so there is some unavoidable logic there making the games harder or not possible to be rigged.

Since both are based in virtual experience, fantasy sports are preferable when compared to the simulated ones category.

[TheGreatPython]

There is no way you could verify those games are trusted or not. They are simulated games. They can be rigged any moment to favor the casino/provider. So, yeah, they are NOT trusted services. So if you want to play, you will have to trust them blindly.
Why do you have to bet on those simulated games when there are real live games/matches available? Or if you want to gamble,  just play on normal casino with normal games where you can verify all bets individually (provably fair).

I mean, it's just like how sports works, you can't exactly say for sure whether a game is rigged or not, so I guess we can give them the benefit of the doubt, though I do agree with just betting on live games instead if you really want to bet on sports games. Simulated games are just numbers fighting against each other, nothing more nothing else. Though if that's what you want, then go for it. I think it's more friendly in terms of actually relying on data when trying to predict the outcome.

You can tell because the movement of the player are weird but that can rarely happen and till now lots of people still have a trust on sports/betting. I know nothing about sri but it looks boring based on how you described it. This game is not for me but I will enjoy the games with real action.

I think if there are no other choices, people will play a game like sri and I think sri is already a thing before the sports betting came out? But, the moment sports betting came out, people then move to it, leaving sri behind, that's why we rarely hear an update with it. It wasn't bad at all because if your lucky you can still win and a sportbetting can also depend on luck sometimes.

[OgNasty]

I’m not interested in watching simulated reality games, but I am interested in the outcome. I know the NBA2K has become a popular franchise to simulate fantasy matchups or even current matchups or playoff possibilities. It’s always interesting to see who has a big game or which team wins. I’m not sure I could sit through watching it, but I am fascinated with the possibilities. Maybe someday virtual reality will be good enough that you’ll be able to sit courtside and watch your favorite players throughout history on the court together. Then I might be able to take part in spectating a game.

[joeperry]

Maybe someday virtual reality will be good enough that you’ll be able to sit courtside and watch your favorite players throughout history on the court together. Then I might be able to take part in spectating a game.

No doubt about that, with the Metaverse and the VR I think it is possible to watch the live game even if you are at home. About the simulated games, yes I see a lot of them and place bet on some of them when there's no live match available but I have doubts about it since we cannot verify how the game really works or they can manipulate the game.

[madnessteat]

This simulated reality game can be rigged or not depends on the provider of the game. All game providers needs to comply on a game audit before they can get license to selll it on the Casino so rigging it will gonna cost them there business. This is somehow same to the AI matches on games like 2k22 NBA that AI has its own stats and chance rate that affects the result of the game. So if you trust the Casino offering it, There's no need to question its integrity because it was surely yndergo in an audit before they release it in the public.

As practice shows audits are not a hundred percent guarantee that everything will work as planned. This is well demonstrated by hacking smart contracts that have been successfully audited by several fairly well-known auditing companies.

And in my opinion, entrusting funds to the artificial intelligence is quite a reckless act.   

[AicecreaME]

Even though there are Reality Simulation Games, I think most gamblers still choose sports betting as they have done before because it can give them the real experience of seeing their teams or players compete. In addition, reality simulation games can be structured in such a way by developers to approach what they want and of course, this will be different from the real game. But I think some gamblers choose this game and find their own fun in playing this game and I think it depends on how gamblers can enjoy it. Maybe we can't enjoy it well but other gamblers can find something different in the game.

This just really depends on the gambler himself. People have different perspective and taste on things. Some people prefer to gamble in a physical casino itself or online because they can enjoy it much better. The thrill and excitement in playing is on another level to some whenever they play in actual form. While other people might prefer to gamble in simulation scenarios because it is convenient and more accessible to them. Although sometimes, simulated games are rigged and controlled. I guess this also depends on the operator and provider. Hence, the player must do a background check first.

I suggest if someone would want to try simulated games, pick an operator and provider that are reputable so they won't have their money wasted.

[Cling18]

Even though there are Reality Simulation Games, I think most gamblers still choose sports betting as they have done before because it can give them the real experience of seeing their teams or players compete. In addition, reality simulation games can be structured in such a way by developers to approach what they want and of course, this will be different from the real game. But I think some gamblers choose this game and find their own fun in playing this game and I think it depends on how gamblers can enjoy it. Maybe we can't enjoy it well but other gamblers can find something different in the game.

This just really depends on the gambler himself. People have different perspectives and tastes on things. Some people prefer to gamble in a physical casino itself or online because they can enjoy it much better. The thrill and excitement in playing are on another level to some whenever they play in actual form. While other people might prefer to gamble in simulation scenarios because it is convenient and more accessible to them. Although sometimes, simulated games are rigged and controlled. I guess this also depends on the operator and provider. Hence, the player must do a background check first.

I suggest if someone would want to try simulated games, pick an operator and provider that are reputable so they won't have their money wasted.

People pick the form of gambling that they would enjoy but as for me, it would be better to do a series of research first, especially in trying simulated games. It's better to look for legit and reputable providers especially for big-time bettors. Manipulated and controlled games would be unfair on our part so we should look for transparency.

[wxa7115]

These games are way too easily rigged or manipulated from the side of the operator, and I don't think that it is good for anyone to pursue them as a player.

I don't think game providers will just throw dirt on their names by rigging those games. It's a game-changing environment and it doesn't mean they are totally non-sense or not worth trying. There's no difference when playing on supposed live casino games.

I will definitely try that. Who else doesn't want it?

But we have to understand that gambling is gambling. The risks of losing money are the same as usual gambling games.

Trusted casino operators will think like that but the risk is simply too high for us, after all it does not seems as if there is a way to verify the results and you will have to trust the casino operator is not scamming you, and at least to me that is simply unacceptable.

Even if I only gamble in trusted casinos sometimes I take the time to verify my bets to see if everything is fine and so far I have yet to find anything fishy going on, but it is important to keep your eyes open and keep verifying the results once in a while so your trust is renewed each time you do an exercise like this one.

[Viscore]

I was once offered to play a simulation game by a friend of mine, the game is the most realistic, he often plays Farming Simulator 17 and SimCity 4, honestly a simulation game, a little confusing for me, maybe I have never tried and played, but in the game Farming Simulator 17, I see my friend can become a successful farmer, he optimizes very well, just like in the real world, the game concept is sophisticated and perfect, I see a glimpse of it is good and worth a try.

In my opinion, simulation games are a means and a new version reality, to add new sensations and insights in the game, obviously my response simulation game is an interactive new version to be enjoyed.

It still depends on individual's preference. You may find it more lively and interactive but for some, its a lot way different compared to the real game with real players. But its more of an innovation really. I had witnessed a simulation game once or twice, and you will learn to love it more if you let yourself involved in it. Just like in the real game, the excitement is still there, but you know in the end you are still playing just a simulation, not the original players.