What is your opinions about simulated reality games?

[fullhdpixel]

It looks like majority of us do not trust this kind of game and it is very nice since it only shows that we improved and not easy to believe just like before. We are now looking at things carefully and looking to verify it and if we can't verify it then we stay away on it for good.

Maybe we don't believe in this kind of game because we can't imagine what it's like to play using aids such as glasses or something else. But if the technology can continue to develop and more companies try to introduce it to the public, I think people will be curious and want to try it. It may take some time for people to accept this kind of game and if it really appeals to them, this trend will replace the old one.

I don't like what perla said there, that sounds like a disrespect to this game. The reason why most don't like it is because it is not as popular as the classic games that we saw on gambling sites but if more people have been exposed to it maybe they will also play this game and they can potentially like it but we can't say that it will then replace the other games, no that's not gonna happen because there are features that can only be found on other games but not on this one.

This game is real so why will someone won't believe on it? Or they don't believe that they can win on this type of game? well how will they know if they will just comment and not trying it?

[delfastTions]

It totally contrasts with the achievements of crypto gambling industry for gamblers, which is heavily backed by the provably fair feature, raising transparency on this environment to a new level never seen before at land based casinos.

I've recently begun to question the honesty of algorithms that we're told are based on the principles of provable fairness.  I now think that some ingenious developer has already created such algorithms that are, as it were, provably fair, and as soon as their execution begins, they seem to become not too fair.  Provable fair is increasingly becoming a trademark and a marketing ploy to generate additional income, in my opinion.

[Boristhecat]

^

So your words have a rational basis, but most bettors will choose to bet on real games in which the outcome of the match can be more accurately predicted because we can observe in real time the athletic form of players, injuries, reshuffles, etc. I could be wrong but it seems to me that in simulated reality games, probability has a greater role and therefore it is an increased risk.

Of course, most real bettors choose to bet on real sporting events, as they place bets based not on the numbers that bookmakers draw, but on the information they collect about teams and analyze. But some bettors who are actually gamblers will bet on anything, even simulation of real games. But the question under discussion is different - how similar is the simulation to reality? I cannot give any specific answer to this question, since here we need to analyze a large amount of data from simulations that have already happened.

[RyanSmith23421]

I feel like its not worth it... its just an easy way to continue with a sample game

[iv4n]

I feel like its not worth it... its just an easy way to continue with a sample game

Maybe you and I like the real game more than a simulation, but simulation games have their audience. They have more than that, TV shows, commentators, a lot of people are behind all that! So I wouldn’t say it’s not worth it, maybe it’s not big yet, but I think it has the potential to grow in the future! Simply people like simulations, there are many simulation games around, and I guess with technology these games will be better and more wanted!

[JohnBitCo]

I feel like its not worth it... its just an easy way to continue with a sample game

Maybe you and I like the real game more than a simulation, but simulation games have their audience. They have more than that, TV shows, commentators, a lot of people are behind all that! So I wouldn’t say it’s not worth it, maybe it’s not big yet, but I think it has the potential to grow in the future! Simply people like simulations, there are many simulation games around, and I guess with technology these games will be better and more wanted!

Although Simulation games are not so popular but still they are liked by many people.

Since we are discussing this from the gambling point of view, do we have any bets on simulated games?  I haven't heard of any.

[dothebeats]

I feel like its not worth it... its just an easy way to continue with a sample game

Maybe you and I like the real game more than a simulation, but simulation games have their audience. They have more than that, TV shows, commentators, a lot of people are behind all that! So I wouldn’t say it’s not worth it, maybe it’s not big yet, but I think it has the potential to grow in the future! Simply people like simulations, there are many simulation games around, and I guess with technology these games will be better and more wanted!

Although Simulation games are not so popular but still they are liked by many people.

Since we are discussing this from the gambling point of view, do we have any bets on simulated games?  I haven't heard of any.

What do you mean by any bets on simulated games? There are some platforms that offer these events on their lineups, though the events in which you can bet on is very limited. I myself have never seen such a line on Pinnacle or Nitrogensports that I can bet on. Most of the time, that section of the platform is empty. On rare occasions that it ever gets bet on, I only see the results on betslips that people are sharing and that's it.

[madnessteat]

^

So your words have a rational basis, but most bettors will choose to bet on real games in which the outcome of the match can be more accurately predicted because we can observe in real time the athletic form of players, injuries, reshuffles, etc. I could be wrong but it seems to me that in simulated reality games, probability has a greater role and therefore it is an increased risk.

Of course, most real bettors choose to bet on real sporting events, as they place bets based not on the numbers that bookmakers draw, but on the information they collect about teams and analyze. But some bettors who are actually gamblers will bet on anything, even simulation of real games. But the question under discussion is different - how similar is the simulation to reality? I cannot give any specific answer to this question, since here we need to analyze a large amount of data from simulations that have already happened.

It is difficult to answer this question. I never bet on simulated reality games because my gut tells me that I can be easily cheated and I won't even get a negative experience with it. That's why I prefer to bet on the real game and even in case of losing I will be sure that nobody cheated me and I analyzed the outcome of the match incorrectly myself.   

[KTChampions]

I feel like its not worth it... its just an easy way to continue with a sample game

Maybe you and I like the real game more than a simulation, but simulation games have their audience. They have more than that, TV shows, commentators, a lot of people are behind all that! So I wouldn’t say it’s not worth it, maybe it’s not big yet, but I think it has the potential to grow in the future! Simply people like simulations, there are many simulation games around, and I guess with technology these games will be better and more wanted!

It would be interesting to test this audience for addiction and compare the percentage of addicts with the percentage of addicts among regular betters. I have a lot of confidence that among the fans of simulated games, the percentage of addicts will be much higher - after all, they go to simulated games simply because they cannot wait for the next regular game to start.