[solved] hZti changed hands or not?

[Charles-Tim]

I proofed the ownership to the recovery team

It is believed you are the owner of the account but know as lovesmayfamilis has already mentioned, that each campaign has rules and requirements. For you not to have read the rules and requirements but applied indicates that you are novice to a lot of things on this forum. But with how this thread as been so far, we can assume you are the owner of the account and that you were just not on this forum when there were some changes.

You are welcome, do not see anyone hostile at all, it is all discussion and opinion to achieve best conclusion and to learn. Merit system started four years ago which reduced spam and shit posts on this forum, especially on bitcoin boards, and helped many users to improve the way they are posting.

Signature campaign managers do have it in the campaign rules for anyone that want to apply to have certain number of merits in the last 120 days. Even if some campaign managers do not have such rules, they still look into an active and a quality posters' account which will definitely have as many as possible merits in the last 120 days before they are selected. Which means even if you are able to prove the ownership of your account, you are still not fit to be in a campaign. Be active, make quality posts and prove yourself worthy to the campaign managers for one of them to select to join a campaign.

Lastly and very important, read campaign rules and requirements, it is there in the OP (opening post). Although, this forum is mostly about learning from one another, my response is just based on the fact that you wish to join a campaign.

[dkbit98]

This is probably true. At least, I can guess that he dealt with the recovery team. In the seclog, we can see:

Thank you Halab for confirming this.

I really appreciate the effort from people that try to keep the forum clean of scammers. But it is kind of frustrating if you are being accused of hacking or buying an account simply because you apply for a signature campaign after you have not used your account for a long time.

You have to understand that things changed a lot since you were last active in forum.
We now have a lot of hacked and sold account that try to participate in campaigns or they are sending private message to other members to try and hack them.
You did exactly the same things that triggered my red alert, you send me private messages and you directly signed up for campaigns after long hibernation.

In my opinion it would be very helpful to first contact someone via PM and not call them out as a scammer everywhere before knowing anything.

Who exactly called you a scammer?
I didn't accused you of anything, all I did is I wrote NEUTRAL feedback stating my suspicions, and I created this topic to ask other members and staff what they think about this case.
After all, look it from the bright side, your account name should be clear now and campaign managers will notice this for sure.
Try to be active in forum and good luck.

Since I wanted to be more active here i figured i could also make some extra BTC for posting. thats why I applied for the campaigns.

Welcome back to bitcointalk forum.
I removed neutral feedback from your profile.

[1miau]

hZti seems to be speaking german indeed, I can confirm that his posts are written in fluent german.
A proof of a signed message would still be nice to have a public confirmation for everyone.

Hi Guys,

I really appreciate the effort from people that try to keep the forum clean of scammers. But it is kind of frustrating if you are being accused of hacking or buying an account simply because you apply for a signature campaign after you have not used your account for a long time.

What do you expect after being inactive for years but suddenly you are starting to apply for a campaign and shitpost out of nowhere?
Your posts are at best sub-par, don't make sense and you are needlessly bumping old threads. Some of it are necroposting and therefore a very clear shitpost according to relnarien.
So, when you start shitposting out of nowhere, it's completely normal that you'll see the reaction that has happened here.

In my opinion it would be very helpful to first contact someone via PM and not call them out as a scammer everywhere before knowing anything.

Because PMing scammers will achieve what?

Since I wanted to be more active here i figured i could also make some extra BTC for posting. thats why I applied for the campaigns.

More active is nice but if more active means dozens of shitposts per day, I'm out...

I think it should also be part of a good communication in a forum to be able to accept that the accusation was wrong, but it seems that nobody is really willing to do that.

Why should we take a probably risky bet if signing from an old address should not be a problem?
Bitcointalk is a Bitcoin forum, so it shouldn't be a problem to sign from an old address. At least if you are the original owner of the account.

It would be a public proof for everyone.
Why are you refusing to do it?

PS
Help from German speaking members is appreaciated.

I'm very confident that he's a native german speaker.
Unfortunately, most of his posts are outright shitposts and I don't see any sign it will change, so I'm not sure if I want to give him the benefit of doubt.

I'm not adding a trust for now but considering the accused account is aged, was inactive for years, is now jumping directly into signature campaigns and the account is currently on a hard shitposting spree, I would like to see a proof signed from one of your old addresses.
His reaction to refuse signing from an old address is not beneficial to get my support.

[hZti]

It would be a public proof for everyone.
Why are you refusing to do it?

As it was pointed out earlier in this thread the 3 addresses i used in the past were posted here more then 8 years ago and have no balance or transactions since then. I don't own the private keys to them and I think that is not very suspicious. If you are a german speaker you probably have an account at Computerbase so I can verify there. Also I already addressed the way the account was verified in posts earlier this thread.

Also if you think I do only shitposts, then please go ahead and ignore my account. It is and will also be sadly not possible in the future to do such quality post like you do.


For future reference I will leave this adress here: 1SECURED7jkosn6fv9uUaV8prHgNpC1A2

In my opinion it would be very helpful to first contact someone via PM and not call them out as a scammer everywhere before knowing anything.

Who exactly called you a scammer?
I didn't accused you of anything, all I did is I wrote NEUTRAL feedback stating my suspicions, and I created this topic to ask other members and staff what they think about this case.
After all, look it from the bright side, your account name should be clear now and campaign managers will notice this for sure.
Try to be active in forum and good luck.

Maybe my reaction was over the top, but indeed it is frustrating to come back to a forum and be greeted like that. Especially after I spent weeks verifying my ownership with the account recovery team over various methods. But I guess steps like this are indeed necessary but I can only say that I hope everyone is a little more respectful in the future with possible hacked accounts.

[1miau]

As it was pointed out earlier in this thread the 3 addresses i used in the past were posted here more then 8 years ago and have no balance or transactions since then. I don't own the private keys to them and I think that is not very suspicious.

That's bad...

A list of reasons why an irreversable disposal of old addresses and their private keys, seed words or similar may be an action, you might regret later:

• If your address was used to create a signature, for example for your Bitcointalk account, you would also lose all possibilities to verify your ownership by creating a new signature from your address. All signatures generated from your address would be very useless.
  In general, you could no longer prove ownership of your address.

Also if you think I do only shitposts, then please go ahead and ignore my account.

Ignoring shitposts is a very bad idea because it will make the forum a complete mess, will decrease posting quality and cause spam and scam. Even in the past, many incentives against shitposting were launched and it didn't get better until Merit arrived in 2018. Shitposting is still a problem today but it's not as bad as 4 or 5 years ago.

It is and will also be sadly not possible in the future to do such quality post like you do.

Then, why did you apply for a ChipMixer and BestChange spot?
Improving posts should be easy and in everyone's best interest.
I'm sure you can improve your posts.
Otherwise, it will be hard to get into a decent camapign if that's what you are here for.

For future reference I will leave this adress here: 1SECURED7jkosn6fv9uUaV8prHgNpC1A2

You can stake it here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.0

[hZti]

Thanks for the tip with the staking.

For the rest I won't really comment but as a german you should know the saying "Eigenlob stinkt" in regards to your post quality compared to mine.

[1miau]

For the rest I won't really comment but as a german you should know the saying "Eigenlob stinkt [self-praise smells]" in regards to your post quality compared to mine.

I've praised nothing about my posting quality or did we read a different post? I've encouraged to post quality content, to quit shitposting (because excessive shitposting is bad for the forum) and I've lined out that getting into a good campaign requires at least frequently some decent posts.
Almost everyone can write decent posts but some are far too lazy. 
Only a small fraction of people is too dumb to write good posts.

[hZti]

To all those that said the profile changed hands because first thing I did was sign up for a signature campaign, this sums up perfectly how bitcointalk has changed 



Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5232907.msg58391494#msg58391494