USA Bans the right to abortion

[OgNasty]

There is a point that I would like to mention, which is that despite the existence of legislation prohibiting abortion in almost most societies, including the most open societies, reports speak of large numbers of abortions that take place outside legal frameworks and may not be in appropriate health conditions at all, in addition to cases that the statistics could not include, which I think are much larger. Is it not the duty of lawmakers to take this factor into account as well?

People will always break the law and take risks.  I don't think this "we need to make it safe for them to break the law" argument is valid.  It's the same argument that liberals use to hand out clean needles to drug addicts to make sure they aren't spreading disease.  Instead, you walk the streets of San Fransisco and have to dodge needles and piles of shit on the sidewalk.  Rules exist for a reason.  It isn't up to anybody to make sure the rulebreakers are safe if that means putting in place policies like handing out clean needles to drug addicts.  If there's one thing I could get across to liberals, it's that natural selection is a thing that has propelled our species to the dominant position on this planet and ignoring it will lead to our peril.

[1715029926]

1715029926

[1715029926]

1715029926

[1715029926]

1715029926

[1715029926]

1715029926

[BADecker]

^^^ God's patience and allowance doesn't mean He wants us to break His laws. It's for our own benefit that He gave these laws. He is waiting for repentance, not for making abortions a formal, enduring law. In fact, the troubles that America is going through right now, in general, are part of Gods reprimands. Let's hope it is only reprimands, and not the start of complete destruction.

[edgycorner]

Abortion is almost similar to killing an ingrown infant because as from the knowledge I have the process is something like taking the baby into pieces which we call it as an abortion, anyway women have the rights to decide what they can but I don't know whether its okay for us to take a baby into pieces? Probably we should need more advancement to abort the child which isn't that much brutal as of now.

Or maybe keep it legal till 5 weeks of pregnancy, and illegal thereafter(except for when the mother's life is in danger). That's when a fetus develops a heartbeat. In my country it's 20 weeks, which is sickening.

I came here after watching this pic on Reddit. If she's pro-life, then she makes a very compelling argument.

[jrrsparkles]

Abortion is almost similar to killing an ingrown infant because as from the knowledge I have the process is something like taking the baby into pieces which we call it as an abortion, anyway women have the rights to decide what they can but I don't know whether its okay for us to take a baby into pieces? Probably we should need more advancement to abort the child which isn't that much brutal as of now.

Or maybe keep it legal till 5 weeks of pregnancy, and illegal thereafter(except for when the mother's life is in danger). That's when a fetus develops a heartbeat. In my country it's 20 weeks, which is sickening.

I can agree with this, the government can keep the abortion as legal until certain period eithers its 5 or 10 whatever it can be but the one who is an expert in medicine can debate about that. I am not supporting the government either because its also looks like we are taking the rights of an individual woman and also it is getting viral on social media and most of the voices are against the law so I guess maybe there will be some changes in it for sure.

[BADecker]

Abortion is almost similar to killing an ingrown infant because as from the knowledge I have the process is something like taking the baby into pieces which we call it as an abortion, anyway women have the rights to decide what they can but I don't know whether its okay for us to take a baby into pieces? Probably we should need more advancement to abort the child which isn't that much brutal as of now.

Or maybe keep it legal till 5 weeks of pregnancy, and illegal thereafter(except for when the mother's life is in danger). That's when a fetus develops a heartbeat. In my country it's 20 weeks, which is sickening.

I came here after watching this pic on Reddit. If she's pro-life, then she makes a very compelling argument.

Probably written on her forehead, too, covered by her hair.

[edgycorner]

Probably written on her forehead, too, covered by her hair.

there won't be any need
the whole world knows her now lol

“I am very pregnant – I am due tomorrow,”
https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/human-body/heavily-pregnant-woman-writes-not-yet-a-human-across-her-belly-to-protest-supreme-court-decision/news-story/aff5ed48a10ba409bb7a46e42d7a27c1

“I have a child. This is a person, this is a person with will, this is a person who has decision-making power, and this is me.”

She said the Supreme Court decision was “awful, I mean it’s horrible”.

“I don’t know what parts this baby is going to have but if he or she does not have the options they need to make bodily choices around what they can do with their own life, I don’t know how to protect them in the world,”

if we go by her philosophy, then nobody is human until they are 12 or 13

She reminds me of a cynical doctor in a movie, for whom the line between an android and children got blurred too much

[onecall123]

Abortion is almost similar to killing an ingrown infant because as from the knowledge I have the process is something like taking the baby into pieces which we call it as an abortion, anyway women have the rights to decide what they can but I don't know whether its okay for us to take a baby into pieces? Probably we should need more advancement to abort the child which isn't that much brutal as of now.

Or maybe keep it legal till 5 weeks of pregnancy, and illegal thereafter(except for when the mother's life is in danger). That's when a fetus develops a heartbeat. In my country it's 20 weeks, which is sickening.

I can agree with this, the government can keep the abortion as legal until certain period eithers its 5 or 10 whatever it can be but the one who is an expert in medicine can debate about that. I am not supporting the government either because its also looks like we are taking the rights of an individual woman and also it is getting viral on social media and most of the voices are against the law so I guess maybe there will be some changes in it for sure.

An abortion rights group in the US is fighting for restrictions on medication abortion at the state level. Despite the fact that many young women regret killing their children, I know of a few who do not regret it. Several people moved on with their lives without any regrets. There is no right or wrong way to tell women what they can and cannot do with their bodies. This is not at all surprising. My personal opinion is that all of this is nuts and is going to backfire.

[edgycorner]

An abortion rights group in the US is fighting for restrictions on medication abortion at the state level.

Meth is illegal, but you can still get it without a sweat(and a few OD when it's cut with a bad substance/additive).
Lawful restrictions on procuring these medicine will put women at so much risk. There's always a blackmarket for those who dreadfully want it(it will mostly be pregnant teens who don't know any better) and you can never regulate it. Some will end up with fake medicines(this is certain), which will definitely lead to medical complications.

Things are going to get very ugly in a few red states.

[tvbcof]

I suspect that the joke may be on the 'pro-life' side on this one.  They may find out that the 'vaxxed' have had Jeff Epstein and his creepy friends 'run a train' on them resulting in the equivalent of multiple fathers.  Epstein's breeder ranch in New Mexico was all about his ideas to 'seed future humanity' with his and his friends own genetics.  Look it up.

Now, in a turn of events that I predicted years ago, we have a situation where the gene therapy corporations can change the genetics package to anything they want any time they want and it won't be re-tested or need re-authorization by any authorities.  You can bet money that the FDA and other U.S. regulators will pass this with no questions asked.  Sky's the limit on 'gene drives' at that point.

Anyway, don't want some freak baby with black eyes, horns, and a pointy tail like daddy?  Tough shit.  Try to find someone to adopt it.

[BADecker]

Here's the answer that could have taken care of the whole thing from the start, long before Roe v. Wade.

But she IS kinda cute, isn't she?


Sex Strike!

Your terms are acceptable.

[short video]

[edgycorner]

I suspect that the joke may be on the 'pro-life' side on this one.  They may find out that the 'vaxxed' have had Jeff Epstein and his creepy friends 'run a train' on them resulting in the equivalent of multiple fathers.  Epstein's breeder ranch in New Mexico was all about his ideas to 'seed future humanity' with his and his friends own genetics.  Look it up.

wdym, he wanted to be another Genghis Khan?

Here's the answer that could have taken care of the whole thing from the start, long before Roe v. Wade.

But she IS kinda cute, isn't she?


Sex Strike!

Your terms are acceptable.

[short video]

Zoom into her eyes.
She looks like Walmart version of Anya Taylor

[dataispower]

Abortion is almost similar to killing an ingrown infant because as from the knowledge I have the process is something like taking the baby into pieces which we call it as an abortion, anyway women have the rights to decide what they can but I don't know whether its okay for us to take a baby into pieces? Probably we should need more advancement to abort the child which isn't that much brutal as of now.

yes I can agree with you not good enough life baby this fiscally it's also the same thing as have an abortion of a pregnancy because if someone can have the mind to abort the same person will also Howard college too early eliminate any living baby. So abortion is supposed to be stopped generally so that at least they will be existing  newborn babies in the societies. Owner of bang is supposed to take place especially for medical practitioners who easily terminate or abort pregnancy

[Doan9269]

What is not good isn't good and should be discouraged by all means, abortion is not a good thing that should be allowed in the society, either US places ban or not it's what we should all voice out for it ban, the only justification for abortion to take place is in the case of rape and parental abuse with full evidence and it's approvals by the constituted authority, but an ordinary sex worker (whore), or flirting adulescent that got pregnant by chance of a mistake should not be allowed to carry out an abortion because that's the consequence of their flirting around else every lady will also want to do such thereby encouraging fornication in the society.

[yazher]

Maybe right now they realized more harm to legalizing it than banning it. Of course, people will gonna have a sex spree when he knows all of these things is possible and they can get away from the responsibility in case of an accident, By just aborting the poor baby from the mother's womb. If people ponder upon this, they will realize the more they avoid the law of the universe, the more they harm themselves with their stupidity. In our country, it's never legal, and when I first hear this law was really existing in the other country, I was shocked and hoped it won't be happening in our country because of the harm that it brings to the teens and to the women's health.

[DooMAD]

What is not good isn't good and should be discouraged by all means, abortion is not a good thing

No one is suggesting abortion is a wonderful thing, but it can easily be the lesser of two evils in many instances.  You can certainly pretend it's as clear-cut as "all abortions = bad", but for those of us who aren't religious and who don't believe your so-called moral values need to be inflicted on everyone else, it makes you appear more than a little antiquated in your world view. 

that's the consequence of their flirting around else every lady will also want to do such thereby encouraging fornication in the society.

Honestly can't decide which response to go with here:

a)  Spoken like a true misogynist.

or

b)  Because males traditionally need so much encouragement.   

[ibminer]

I'd prefer if the governments (on all levels) leave the decision to the individual carrying the baby, regardless of what the 14th amendment says. IMO, it is their right as a human being. If you believe a life born cannot take care of itself, then the individual(s) ultimately responsible for it, and potentially their God, should bear this decision.

Would the majority of people I see protesting against abortions be jumping in line to adopt all the babies that will [apparently] be born [likely into bad situations] because of this?

I don't think much will change myself, my wife on the other hand is ready to take to the streets in protest!
Maybe it's because I'm not female?..  I just assume people will find ways to travel to states that allow it. She says nobody can afford it and brings up hanger abortions.. I can't argue.

Why it's a big deal?

No clue.. they can change whatever they want these days with the right people in office...

[BADecker]

Government hasn't gone nearly far enough by repealing Roe v. Wade. What they really need to do is formally call abortion murder, and try in court, and sentence everyone involved in abortion or attempted abortion to prison for a long time, or to execution.

But if a State upholds abortions, they need to do the same to all the governing people who uphold the abortion idea.

[DooMAD]

Government hasn't gone nearly far enough by repealing Roe v. Wade. What they really need to do is formally call abortion murder, and try in court, and sentence everyone involved in abortion or attempted abortion to prison for a long time, or to execution.

Would you still be saying that if "everyone involved" included the father?  After all, it's partly their genetic material.  Are you ready to potentially face the death penalty if you get anyone pregnant?

[ibminer]

Why would you be OK with a government/court having the power to kill another human being.. but not be willing to give the same power to a person growing their own offspring inside of them?

[BADecker]

Why would you be OK with a government/court having the power to kill another human being.. but not be willing to give the same power to a person growing their own offspring inside of them?

No murder or attempted murder, nothing to worry about.

Government and court have the authority to punish for murder and attempted murder. They do it all the time. Mostly doesn't involve the execution of the murderer, although some States DO have execution as punishment for some murders.

The point is to stop the murders, not kill people. If the mother and her doctor don't kill the new life inside her, there is no murder. No murder means no governmental punishment for the mother and doctor.