The Russian Federation may be about to make a "Corralito"

[Sithara007]

If you think that Ukrainians are killed by Putin, you are greatly mistaken! Kills, rapes, marauders, destroys everything that the Ukrainians created - namely the Russian people! It was he who created such an idol for himself as Putin, it is they who do not want to build a good life for themselves, but want to prevent others from living better than them. Well, or try to get hold of a little at the expense of the occupied territories! You have no idea how many ordinary Russians stole and took out of Ukraine to impoverished Russia, toilet bowls (for them, this is apparently a deficit or an inaccessible luxury), washing machines, electric kettles (although they stole, as a rule, without a stand, because they don’t know how it works electric kettle), TVs and even used delicate linen! It seems that this cannot be the case in the 21st century, but this is a fact, and hundreds and thousands of similar stories have been recorded in reality. So the problem is not in Putin ...

It is strange that you refuse to answer one of my questions despite me repeating it many times. All the time you are blaming Russia. But what about the Ukrainian citizens, who are fighting on the other side? At this point, more than half of the casualties on the "Russian" side comprise of Ukrainian (or former Ukrainian citizens). You have never mentioned about them. According to conservative estimates, Russians have lost some 8,000 men. This may be an undercount, but from the available data more than 50% of these deaths come from the national militias of Donestk and Lugansk Republics. Russian citizens comprise less than half of the deaths on the "Russian" side. What if I claim that the war is between two factions within Ukraine, with external parties supporting either of the sides (Russia and Belarus supporting the rebels, and NATO supporting Kiev)?

[1715076694]

1715076694

[DrBeer]

The suffering of the Russians increases and with them the suffering of the world because of this stupid war on Ukraine. The Russian leaders insist on their stubbornness and continue in this war that has brought ruin and destruction to all. The economic sanctions imposed by the West cause suffering to the Russians. In return, the Ukrainian war causes suffering to the rest of the world, who are suffering in the first place People, not governments, so turning to Bitcoin may be the solution to get rid of these new restrictions that are being imposed and are increasing every day.

If you think that Ukrainians are killed by Putin, you are greatly mistaken! Kills, rapes, marauders, destroys everything that the Ukrainians created - namely the Russian people! It was he who created such an idol for himself as Putin, it is they who do not want to build a good life for themselves, but want to prevent others from living better than them. Well, or try to get hold of a little at the expense of the occupied territories! You have no idea how many ordinary Russians stole and took out of Ukraine to impoverished Russia, toilet bowls (for them, this is apparently a deficit or an inaccessible luxury), washing machines, electric kettles (although they stole, as a rule, without a stand, because they don’t know how it works electric kettle), TVs and even used delicate linen! It seems that this cannot be the case in the 21st century, but this is a fact, and hundreds and thousands of similar stories have been recorded in reality. So the problem is not in Putin ...

This is a clear example of custom articles and the opinion that is formed after reading.
Have you opened the world map?
A toilet in Russia costs from 30 to 150 dollars, my toilet costs about 100 dollars. To send this product to another region, the transport services may increase the cost of the goods.
https://www.pulscen.ru/price/440608-unitaz?page=2
And Europeans or American people believe in these nonsense.

In Russia, the state language is Russian, but in many regions there are national languages that are taught in schools, people communicate. In Chechnya, this is the Chechen language, in Chuvashia the Chuvash language, in Tatarstan - the Tatar language, I won’t bore you with enumerations. There are English, German, French schools, it is not forbidden.
And in other countries people are forbidden to speak Russian.

I love to communicate with russians
Let's start with the last one - is it forbidden to communicate in Russian somewhere? Are you just intentionally misrepresenting the essence?
Tell me - in Moscow, can I demand that the cashier serve me in Ukrainian? And Kazakh in Kazakh? And nokhchi in Chechen? I will answer - NO! Or maybe there is a Ukrainian school or library in Moscow? Also no ! Moreover, they were closed immediately after the start of aggression against Ukraine. This is a fact and can be verified. But in Ukraine there are libraries with Russian books, and schools where all education is conducted in Russian. There is no ban on the Russian language in Ukraine, there is a state language, but this is not a synonym for "banning the Russian language in Ukraine." No need to lie primitively

Regarding systemic theft and looting. I am not going to give you links to photos/videos/recordings of calls from Russian looters. It is extremely easy to find - in addition to the fact that they themselves, due to innate stupidity, film it all and post it on social networks, there is also a video from the Belarusian and Russian branches of postal companies, where martinets of the Russian Federation massively send household appliances, things, toys to their homes. Looting is one of the pillars of the Russian world. Remember when Russian terrorists shot down MH17? The very next day, local scum were selling the things of the dead - clothes, toys, perfumes ... Stolen from the dead people. This is the Russian world. So shut up about fakes, you won’t look so idiotic!

[zasad@]

You will be served in Moscow in Ukrainian, Georgian and Chechen if you go to national cafes, for example. In Russia, Ukrainian books and Ukrainian schools are also not banned.
I thought that crimes have no nationality, but because of your hatred, you will blame the Russians for all the problems.

[DrBeer]

It is strange that you refuse to answer one of my questions despite me repeating it many times. All the time you are blaming Russia. But what about the Ukrainian citizens, who are fighting on the other side? At this point, more than half of the casualties on the "Russian" side comprise of Ukrainian (or former Ukrainian citizens). You have never mentioned about them. According to conservative estimates, Russians have lost some 8,000 men. This may be an undercount, but from the available data more than 50% of these deaths come from the national militias of Donestk and Lugansk Republics. Russian citizens comprise less than half of the deaths on the "Russian" side. What if I claim that the war is between two factions within Ukraine, with external parties supporting either of the sides (Russia and Belarus supporting the rebels, and NATO supporting Kiev)?

Answered more than once. Ok, I will answer again - in detail, with examples, and extremely accurately!

Let me bring you back to reality first. Today, the losses of the Russian army are about 37,000 soldiers. About the wounded, crippled - I won’t tell you, there are standard statistics, how many incapacitated people per 1 killed, read it, count it!
About local separatists - no one considers them Russia does not need these garbage. Why ? As they say in the FSB - the one who betrayed once will betray the second, so the separatists of the DPR / LPR are expendable.
Yes - and there are no Luhansk and Donetsk republics - there are sewers temporarily occupied by the Rashists, but this is temporary! I am very glad that the whole adequate world - the USA, Britain, Poland, and many dozens of other countries - is helping us in the fight against the world terrorist!

Concerning "some citizens of Ukraine".
Let's go back a little to the past. Around the middle of the 19th century. At a time when Britain, in a sense, carried out a peacekeeping mission, and helped some part of the inhabitants of India, to defend their rights to self-determination, from a government that did not want to hear their voice and demands!

Then many Indians fought on the side of Britain! Do you want to talk about these? Yes, we have those too!
There were still such people in the days of Nazi Germany - both the French, and the Belgians, and the Hungarians and Romanians and Russians in huge numbers. Everywhere there are such "lovers of the other side." They are called separatists, or softly - collaborators. But in fact, these are traitors and helpers of terrorists and killer invaders. And everywhere such individuals are scorned, exiled, and often they are simply destroyed as enemies. Or do you treat them differently?

By the way - why, after Britain finished saving India from unrest, and gave freedom to the saved territory, the part that became India did not return all the "historical lands" to Pakistan? Or is it another story?

I hope I fully and accurately answered the question that interested you so much? Everything became clear, no questions left?

[Sithara007]

^^^ Still not going to agree with the casualty figures provided (37,000 for Russia?). The US estimate for Russian losses is around 16,000 killed (and this includes PMC Wagner and the Ukrainian rebels). Other sources such as IStories, BBC News Russian and Meduza have given figures of around 4,000-5,000 dead Russian citizens. I think that the figure provided by US agencies is closer to the truth and half of that number may be from the Russian armed forces. So total of 16,000 deaths from their side, with half of it among the Ukrainian rebels and Wagner.

[zasad@]

Concerning "some citizens of Ukraine".
Let's go back a little to the past. Around the middle of the 19th century. At a time when Britain, in a sense, carried out a peacekeeping mission, and helped some part of the inhabitants of India, to defend their rights to self-determination, from a government that did not want to hear their voice and demands!

You have a history problem. Britain, France, Portugal and other countries plundered Africa, India and other islands and achieved all preferences by force. After the resettlement of Europeans in America, millions of indigenous people were destroyed there. If someone helps you, it does not mean that he wishes you well.

[dezoel]

This isn't a joke, they are really trying to make their economy as great as it gets. This means that if they hurt a few people along the way, even Russians, they are fine with it. Realize that Russian ruble is literally more valuable right now than before the war, that should tell you all you need to know. Of course, this is not a free market and even with a better and bigger economy, they are losing their freedom, so people do question if that is better or not.

Some communism lovers would prefer to have less freedom but better economy, whereas some liberals would say better to have freedom and poverty. This is why its never an answer we can ever agree 100% all together.

[zasad@]

This isn't a joke, they are really trying to make their economy as great as it gets. This means that if they hurt a few people along the way, even Russians, they are fine with it. Realize that Russian ruble is literally more valuable right now than before the war, that should tell you all you need to know. Of course, this is not a free market and even with a better and bigger economy, they are losing their freedom, so people do question if that is better or not.

Some communism lovers would prefer to have less freedom but better economy, whereas some liberals would say better to have freedom and poverty. This is why its never an answer we can ever agree 100% all together.

What is communism? It was not even built in the USSR.
Already 30 years have passed since the collapse of the USSR, the younger generation does not know what it is.
In Russia, most of the population does not live richly, but there are a lot of freedoms. And do not read the press, there are many isolated cases.

[Sithara007]

What is communism? It was not even built in the USSR.
Already 30 years have passed since the collapse of the USSR, the younger generation does not know what it is.
In Russia, most of the population does not live richly, but there are a lot of freedoms. And do not read the press, there are many isolated cases.

If Russia is a communist country, then so should be Germany and Poland. East Germany and Poland were under communist regimes until 1990. True communism now exists only in pariah states such as DPRK and Cuba. Even these countries are now attempting to move away. China and Vietnam are communist in name only. Apart from their authoritarian regime structure, the economic system is 100% capitalist. They have realized that the Socialist/Communist economic system is not simply sustainable.

Margaret Thatcher:

“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.”

[DrBeer]

Concerning "some citizens of Ukraine".
Let's go back a little to the past. Around the middle of the 19th century. At a time when Britain, in a sense, carried out a peacekeeping mission, and helped some part of the inhabitants of India, to defend their rights to self-determination, from a government that did not want to hear their voice and demands!

You have a history problem. Britain, France, Portugal and other countries plundered Africa, India and other islands and achieved all preferences by force. After the resettlement of Europeans in America, millions of indigenous people were destroyed there. If someone helps you, it does not mean that he wishes you well.

Well, what are you talking about!? They only helped them! They wanted to save the fraternal peoples of India, China, Africa from their raging juntas! They were forbidden to speak English, French and Portuguese! Yes, that's right - they were peacekeeping missions! And all that was destroyed or killed there was the Chinese, Indians and Africans themselves!
And in general, these territories historically belonged to the USA, France, Portugal!

You will be served in Moscow in Ukrainian, Georgian and Chechen if you go to national cafes, for example. In Russia, Ukrainian books and Ukrainian schools are also not banned.
I thought that crimes have no nationality, but because of your hatred, you will blame the Russians for all the problems.

The problem is that you offer to speak other languages ​​in authentic restaurants, and Ukraine was forced to accept some second national language, and its support and promotion wherever possible.
You can come to a Russian restaurant - and there speak Russian as much as you like - no infringement on the rights of Russian speakers! Any restaurant of Russian cuisine is exclusively for them


Stop stop stop!!! Isn't it Russia, UNDER HISTORY, supposedly saving the so-called "Russian-speakers" (as it turned out in reality - they meant outcasts who speak obscenities and do not know the literary Russian language ), and saved them from the fact that the Russian language was allegedly banned in Ukraine ? They say Russian is banned in Ukraine, they kill, persecute, etc. for speaking Russian. All propagandists fought with these slogans in hysterics! But in Ukraine there is NO ban on the Russian language!
In this case, you are absolutely right - the criminals are not Russians by nationality, but a concept that struck the brain of the inhabitants and citizens of Russia, called the "Russian world" ...


PS. call me:
- addresses of schools in Moscow where teaching is conducted entirely in Ukrainian.
- tell us where is the working Ukrainian library located in Moscow?
- tell me - what Ukrainian channels, programs, films, shows are on TV, of course in Ukrainian?
 
Now let's check who really hates whom

[Sithara007]

The problem is that you offer to speak other languages ​​in authentic restaurants, and Ukraine was forced to accept some second national language, and its support and promotion wherever possible.
You can come to a Russian restaurant - and there speak Russian as much as you like - no infringement on the rights of Russian speakers! Any restaurant of Russian cuisine is exclusively for them

That is not a proper comparison. Before the regime change of 2004, it was estimated that around 95% of the Ukrainians are fluent in Russian. At the same time, less than 40% claimed to have such an ability in Ukrainian. Without any argument, Russian is the most popular language in Ukraine and this was the reason why Russophones demanded to make it the national language. What the Yushchenko regime did was to impose an alien language over people who had Russian as the mother tongue in East and South Ukraine.

In Russia, Russian is the most popular language and in most of the Republics they have regional languages with official status.

[DrBeer]

The problem is that you offer to speak other languages ​​in authentic restaurants, and Ukraine was forced to accept some second national language, and its support and promotion wherever possible.
You can come to a Russian restaurant - and there speak Russian as much as you like - no infringement on the rights of Russian speakers! Any restaurant of Russian cuisine is exclusively for them

That is not a proper comparison. Before the regime change of 2004, it was estimated that around 95% of the Ukrainians are fluent in Russian. At the same time, less than 40% claimed to have such an ability in Ukrainian. Without any argument, Russian is the most popular language in Ukraine and this was the reason why Russophones demanded to make it the national language. What the Yushchenko regime did was to impose an alien language over people who had Russian as the mother tongue in East and South Ukraine.

In Russia, Russian is the most popular language and in most of the Republics they have regional languages with official status.

The main thing is that Russian statistics always lie. 95% understand the interlocutor who speaks Russian. And there are no regions with a pure Russian-speaking population at all. There are regions where Russian prevails. And it's not 95% at all!

Regarding statistics on the language - so we have 30+% of the population speaks English - should we make it the state language?
Ukraine, an independent republic, with its own history, culture and ... yes, language. And the state language must be Ukrainian. Ukraine is a multinational country, but we do not have a ban on languages, we have the status of a state! We have schools where children study in Ukrainian (most of the schools), in Russian, in Hungarian, yes, imagine - no one forbids languages! Moreover, the Ukrainian media are also multilingual. So don't tell me from your apartment from another country how things are in my apartment, in my country!
By the way, I am Russian by origin, though I was lucky that my parents moved to Ukraine a long time ago. I am fluent in Russian, Ukrainian, acceptable in Polish, and even a little in the Transcarpathian dialect (a very interesting dialect, I worked in Transcarpathia for half a year, and learned it). But I believe that the state language should be a single language that unites the nation. And so it is in most countries! The fact that Ukraine has been under the occupation of the Moscow Ulus / USSR / Russia for several centuries does not give the Russian language the right to be the state language here.
And after the terrorist war unleashed by Russia, and the statements of their miserable Fuhrer that "Russia is where the Russian language is", I am increasingly becoming a supporter of a real ban on the Russian language in Ukraine.

PS So you told me so beautifully about the "problem of the Russian language in Ukraine", but tell me - what is the state language in Russia? And tell me - why is the state only Russian, and for example not Tatar or Ukrainian (the 2 largest ethnic groups in Russia after the Russians)?
But in the Krasnodar Territory (by the way, the former territory of Ukraine - the Kuban, also stolen through the efforts of the USSR), most of the population of the villages speak "balachka" - this is 95% Ukrainian. Why doesn't this question bother you? Moreover, in the far east of Russia there was such a republic "Green Wedge", ethnic Ukrainians lived there, who were deported from the eastern regions of Ukraine (where they later overcame the marginalized from Rostov and other outbacks of Russia). Official information on the Green Wedge, even in Russian sources, is this - "Green Wedge or Zakitayshchyna is the historical resettlement name of the southern territory of the Far East of the Russian Empire and the Russian Federation, sometimes still used in documents of Russian associations of Ukrainians as "Ukrainians of the Green Wedge." There are Ukrainian schools, the official status of Ukrainian? Let's solve problems where they really are.
By the way - in Moscow and St. Petersburg, more than 20% of the population more or less freely communicate in English - should the United States or Britain return them under their control?

[be.open]

By the way, I am Russian by origin, though I was lucky that my parents moved to Ukraine a long time ago. I am fluent in Russian, Ukrainian, acceptable in Polish, and even a little in the Transcarpathian dialect (a very interesting dialect, I worked in Transcarpathia for half a year, and learned it). But I believe that the state language should be a single language that unites the nation. And so it is in most countries!

You're just a narrow-minded fascist. If you had a little brains, you would understand that the bilingualism of Ukraine is not a punishment, but a gift that must be appreciated and protected, and not tried to be eradicated. By the way, in Russia there is one national language (Russian) and 37 languages have the status of a state language.

[DrBeer]

By the way, I am Russian by origin, though I was lucky that my parents moved to Ukraine a long time ago. I am fluent in Russian, Ukrainian, acceptable in Polish, and even a little in the Transcarpathian dialect (a very interesting dialect, I worked in Transcarpathia for half a year, and learned it). But I believe that the state language should be a single language that unites the nation. And so it is in most countries!

You're just a narrow-minded fascist. If you had a little brains, you would understand that the bilingualism of Ukraine is not a punishment, but a gift that must be appreciated and protected, and not tried to be eradicated. By the way, in Russia there is one national language (Russian) and 37 languages have the status of a state language.

Yes, I see that you are a classic, real Russian Stupid, embittered, primitive. Who has primitive insults instead of arguments, and all reality is fakes and stupid lies, in which you yourself don’t really believe, but you are afraid to admit reality

About your fakes about 37 state languages ​​- you couldn't show me 1 Ukrainian school and 1 Ukrainian library, you tell such fairy tales

If you are not in the know, then the Russian Federation is a FEDERATION, which means that it is bewildering, it consists of many INDEPENDENT state entities. With its history, land, culture and languages.

Ukraine is a UNITARY REPUBLIC, divided into regions. I hope you understand the difference. I recommend to count the Constitution, and make sure that the regional languages ​​in Ukraine have the right to exist.


Threat, let's check it out - give arguments that I'm a fascist? Tell me what is fascism? And what is the connection, logical, and not fake, familiar to Russians? And everyone will be able to watch this show

[Argoo]

By the way, I am Russian by origin, though I was lucky that my parents moved to Ukraine a long time ago. I am fluent in Russian, Ukrainian, acceptable in Polish, and even a little in the Transcarpathian dialect (a very interesting dialect, I worked in Transcarpathia for half a year, and learned it). But I believe that the state language should be a single language that unites the nation. And so it is in most countries!

You're just a narrow-minded fascist. If you had a little brains, you would understand that the bilingualism of Ukraine is not a punishment, but a gift that must be appreciated and protected, and not tried to be eradicated. By the way, in Russia there is one national language (Russian) and 37 languages have the status of a state language.

Before the large-scale military invasion of Ukraine by the Russian army, in Ukraine itself, people in everyday life spoke Russian or Ukrainian, as they wanted, and there was no problem in this. After, when we saw what atrocities the Russians were doing in the occupied territories of Ukraine, I see that many began to switch only to the Ukrainian language. The same is done at the national level by the government.
From the very beginning, Russia invaded Ukraine under the pretext of protecting Russian speakers in Ukraine. True, now in the Donbass the occupiers kill most of all the Russian-speaking civilian population, and the Russians have already forgotten that they came to Ukraine to "liberate" them. In order to exclude such pretexts for attacks in the future, it will be absolutely correct if everything Russian is banned in Ukraine, with the exception of communication in everyday life. This will be a logical response to the perennial planting of the "Russian world" in Ukraine and to the mass crimes that the Russians are now committing in Ukraine.

[DrBeer]

You're just a narrow-minded fascist. If you had a little brains, you would understand that the bilingualism of Ukraine is not a punishment, but a gift that must be appreciated and protected, and not tried to be eradicated. By the way, in Russia there is one national language (Russian) and 37 languages have the status of a state language.

Before the large-scale military invasion of Ukraine by the Russian army, in Ukraine itself, people in everyday life spoke Russian or Ukrainian, as they wanted, and there was no problem in this. After, when we saw what atrocities the Russians were doing in the occupied territories of Ukraine, I see that many began to switch only to the Ukrainian language. The same is done at the national level by the government.
From the very beginning, Russia invaded Ukraine under the pretext of protecting Russian speakers in Ukraine. True, now in the Donbass the occupiers kill most of all the Russian-speaking civilian population, and the Russians have already forgotten that they came to Ukraine to "liberate" them. In order to exclude such pretexts for attacks in the future, it will be absolutely correct if everything Russian is banned in Ukraine, with the exception of communication in everyday life. This will be a logical response to the perennial planting of the "Russian world" in Ukraine and to the mass crimes that the Russians are now committing in Ukraine.

As a resident of Ukraine, I will tell you more: there are regions in Ukraine with different historical and cultural heritage.
There are regions where the heirs of Hungarian tribes/settlements live, as well as Polish, Belarusian, Slovak, Romanian, Russian, Tatar, Jewish, and many others. And people freely, preserving traditions, use their native language in everyday life. No one has ever had problems and could not be, because. Ukraine, although it has the main ethnic group - Ukrainians, has always been loyal and friendly to many others! There has never been an infringement of the rights of people on the basis of language. Although I'm lying - in the days of the Moscow ulus / USSR - in fact, all republican languages ​​faded into the background, and priority was given only to the Russian language (from training to industrial documentation).
And after gaining independence, Ukraine retained its peaceful and reasonable attitude towards the culture of the peoples inhabiting it. I have said more than once - I am an ethnic Russian, born in the USSR, in the Siberia region. But almost since childhood I have been living in Ukraine. Yes, I was lucky to leave Russia
And here I calmly communicate in Russian, not only in Kyiv, but also in the west of Ukraine in Lvov, Uzhgorod, Mukachevo, Chernivtsi, Transcarpathian villages. Never had any problems!

It has always been a mystery to me - why only the heirs of those resettled from the depressive regions of the RSFSR, to the east and south of Ukraine, could not learn the classical Slavic Ukrainian language for 70 years - do they have some kind of hereditary defect in development?

This problem was invented by the Nazi propaganda of the Kremlin, which has always tried to destroy the peoples' language, culture, identity and ethnicity itself. There is a whole ocean of historical facts confirming this!

[Argoo]

If you think that Ukrainians are killed by Putin, you are greatly mistaken! Kills, rapes, marauders, destroys everything that the Ukrainians created - namely the Russian people! It was he who created such an idol for himself as Putin, it is they who do not want to build a good life for themselves, but want to prevent others from living better than them. Well, or try to get hold of a little at the expense of the occupied territories! You have no idea how many ordinary Russians stole and took out of Ukraine to impoverished Russia, toilet bowls (for them, this is apparently a deficit or an inaccessible luxury), washing machines, electric kettles (although they stole, as a rule, without a stand, because they don’t know how it works electric kettle), TVs and even used delicate linen! It seems that this cannot be the case in the 21st century, but this is a fact, and hundreds and thousands of similar stories have been recorded in reality. So the problem is not in Putin ...

It is strange that you refuse to answer one of my questions despite me repeating it many times. All the time you are blaming Russia. But what about the Ukrainian citizens, who are fighting on the other side? At this point, more than half of the casualties on the "Russian" side comprise of Ukrainian (or former Ukrainian citizens). You have never mentioned about them. According to conservative estimates, Russians have lost some 8,000 men. This may be an undercount, but from the available data more than 50% of these deaths come from the national militias of Donestk and Lugansk Republics. Russian citizens comprise less than half of the deaths on the "Russian" side. What if I claim that the war is between two factions within Ukraine, with external parties supporting either of the sides (Russia and Belarus supporting the rebels, and NATO supporting Kiev)?

Yes, 8,000 dead Russians, these figures are too low. Such Russian losses were only in the first week of their attack on Ukraine. According to the latest intra-staff report of the Russian Ministry of Defense, which is not made public, the losses alone by dead russiass military  amount to about 74,200 people. About 100,000 Ukrainians were also mobilized on the territory of the DPR and LPR, most of them were caught on the streets, in public transport, door-to-door, and without training and proper equipment were thrown to the front line ahead of the Russian military. Therefore, the losses there are also significant - about 23,000 people. For the most part, having no military experience, they could not even surrender, because both the Ukrainians, defending their front, and the Russians fired when they saw those who surrendered.
Now the Russians are also trying to do the same in part of the occupied territories of the Kherson and Zaporozhye regions. By bribery and threats, they try to force men to obtain a Russian passport and mobilize them into their army. The Nazis didn't think of that. Many interesting things will be made public in the international tribunal when Putin's criminal regime is tried.

[DrBeer]

If you think that Ukrainians are killed by Putin, you are greatly mistaken! Kills, rapes, marauders, destroys everything that the Ukrainians created - namely the Russian people! It was he who created such an idol for himself as Putin, it is they who do not want to build a good life for themselves, but want to prevent others from living better than them. Well, or try to get hold of a little at the expense of the occupied territories! You have no idea how many ordinary Russians stole and took out of Ukraine to impoverished Russia, toilet bowls (for them, this is apparently a deficit or an inaccessible luxury), washing machines, electric kettles (although they stole, as a rule, without a stand, because they don’t know how it works electric kettle), TVs and even used delicate linen! It seems that this cannot be the case in the 21st century, but this is a fact, and hundreds and thousands of similar stories have been recorded in reality. So the problem is not in Putin ...

It is strange that you refuse to answer one of my questions despite me repeating it many times. All the time you are blaming Russia. But what about the Ukrainian citizens, who are fighting on the other side? At this point, more than half of the casualties on the "Russian" side comprise of Ukrainian (or former Ukrainian citizens). You have never mentioned about them. According to conservative estimates, Russians have lost some 8,000 men. This may be an undercount, but from the available data more than 50% of these deaths come from the national militias of Donestk and Lugansk Republics. Russian citizens comprise less than half of the deaths on the "Russian" side. What if I claim that the war is between two factions within Ukraine, with external parties supporting either of the sides (Russia and Belarus supporting the rebels, and NATO supporting Kiev)?

Yes, 8,000 dead Russians, these figures are too low. Such Russian losses were only in the first week of their attack on Ukraine. According to the latest intra-staff report of the Russian Ministry of Defense, which is not made public, the losses alone by dead russiass military  amount to about 74,200 people. About 100,000 Ukrainians were also mobilized on the territory of the DPR and LPR, most of them were caught on the streets, in public transport, door-to-door, and without training and proper equipment were thrown to the front line ahead of the Russian military. Therefore, the losses there are also significant - about 23,000 people. For the most part, having no military experience, they could not even surrender, because both the Ukrainians, defending their front, and the Russians fired when they saw those who surrendered.
Now the Russians are also trying to do the same in part of the occupied territories of the Kherson and Zaporozhye regions. By bribery and threats, they try to force men to obtain a Russian passport and mobilize them into their army. The Nazis didn't think of that. Many interesting things will be made public in the international tribunal when Putin's criminal regime is tried.

A very subtle problem is the identification of the remains of Russian terrorists, after, for example, getting a Jewel or Nlow into an armored vehicle! You can’t imagine what remains there, for example, after the detonation of ammunition, or a direct hit on the side of an armored personnel carrier / BRDM / Armored car, etc.
You can’t even understand how many bodies there were before the hit! And after the advent of HIMARS, an exact count becomes unrealistic in general. I personally examined the remains of the Russian T-72B3, which was easily destroyed by 1 shot from Jevelin. Well, there were some biological traces there, but to say it was 1 person or the entire crew of 3 people. Similarly, an armored personnel carrier in which 3 people are crewed and up to 7 transported terrorists. After hitting the same Jewelin, it resembles a jar from which the carcass was taken out, but there are still pieces of meat on the walls
Well, the most important thing
- in Ukraine, in gray and disputed areas, a bunch of corpses of Russian terrorists are lying around. Our side does not remove them because of the risks (no one will risk our soldiers for the sake of the corpse of a terrorist), Russia does not take them away so as not to spoil the propaganda statistics, and not to pay payments - no corpse = no payments!
- in Ukraine there are several stations where a huge number of corpses of Russian terrorists are stored. They are stored in railway refrigerators, these are huge trains, and we keep them under normal conditions at low temperatures, but again, Russia refuses to take them.

[VKcams.com]

"In the second quarter, private investors became the main buyers of currency from exporters on the exchange, according to the Central Bank (Central Bank of Russia) review of the activities of professional participants. Moreover, citizens set a record by buying foreign money, mostly euros, for 439 billion rubles, Izvestia learned."

https://iz.ru/1391645/2022-09-07/rossiiane-vyveli-za-rubezh-1-trln-rublei-i-ustanovili-rekord-po-pokupke-valiuty-na-birzhe

[Sithara007]

"In the second quarter, private investors became the main buyers of currency from exporters on the exchange, according to the Central Bank (Central Bank of Russia) review of the activities of professional participants. Moreover, citizens set a record by buying foreign money, mostly euros, for 439 billion rubles, Izvestia learned."

https://iz.ru/1391645/2022-09-07/rossiiane-vyveli-za-rubezh-1-trln-rublei-i-ustanovili-rekord-po-pokupke-valiuty-na-birzhe

How easy is it for the private investors to purchase foreign currency, especially Euros and Dollars within Russia. I heard that banks have stopped selling foreign currency. So they should be getting this from informal sources, at inflated exchange rates. Right now one Euro is trading at around 60 Rubles. I guess the informal exchange rate will be much higher than that. A more easier option would be to invest in gold or platinum. But then it always attracts unwanted attention. At this point, none of the other investments are safe from inflation.