Maybe he wanted to ask theymos to look for commonalities in the logs? So whether a few new users have a connection with each other or with other existing users? Possibly it would be but Unknown01 can certainly better than I say what he meant.
No idea but from a ban or report to get rid of him I can see nothing.
But that is exactly what is discussed here for pages.
That's right, I write a list of all suspicious accounts, you never know what will come in the future and theymos can certainly carry out a comparison using IP addresses or other data to find abnormalities, but I'm no expert and would only have tried to support with the list. However, the list does not mean that everyone on it must have done something wrong (apart from offending others which is only punished for very bad offenses).
It will probably still be allowed to write down user names, right?
And only those who actually did something wrong need to feel threatened and no one else, since Kamix claims not to have done anything wrong, he needn´t have any fears either - if that's true. The same applies to the others and they are also free to report my account to theymos and he can compare my data with pleasure.
I would be honored if theymos would look at my data, nothing to worry about on my part.
But of all, I wonder what a newbie is afraid of, even if I was able to ban the account, he can instantly create an account again (sure it's stupid and I would never block an account without sufficient reason anyway). Of course, the situation would be different if other accounts were linked to the account - then I would also be afraid that my worked up accounts would also be banned - but that's not the case, is it?
By the way, I haven't reported anything yet, what do you think I should do? I just think that theymos is busy anyway and I don't like to bother him unless I have to.
Still open questions?edit: But you can see right away that as soon as someone has the opposite opinion, the persons are automatically attacked, such as mole now, who is even a moderator. Even if he would testifie completely against me, I would never presume to accuse him of anything, like I did with Lafu.
The funniest thing is that Nestade & 1miau kept accusing me of being to blame for everything. I definitely admit that I am partly to blame, because I could have abstained from the start and therefore would not have had any trouble, but wouldn't that be censorship? I wouldn't have dared to speak my mind because otherwise a few others could riot (which happened too) but I don't let people oppress me like the Nazis or Putin are doing. And now mole explains his point of view and blames us and them as much and now I would be very interested to know whether they can also admit the guilt or whether they will now withdraw their statements and
trust entries, since it is obviously not true?edit 2: Negative Feedback: User Date Reference Comments
Kamix 2022-06-29 Reference Spreading lies about my person; threatening me with being banned from the forum
I have nothing to say, where did I threaten him again?
Am I maybe schizophrenic and don't realize that I'm threatening others? Please enlighten me or tell me 
