Which one do you think its more healthy for a project

[uneng]

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

There isn't such thing as following roadmap slowly. Or you follow it and respect the promised timing or you don't. There isn't middle term. If the project doesn't respect its own roadmap timing you can expect there is something really wrong going behind the curtains, so be careful when investing. In this case red flags are welcome, so naive investors will be alerted to be careful regards the project.

On the other hand, I wouldn't bother giving a second chance to the project if developers apologize with investors and present consistent arguments to justify the reasons behind the delays.

[Silberman]

I prefer a project following its roadmap, no matter how delayed it may be. Many projects just are just lazy or inept, and cannot fulfill their promises of certain milestones to investors. It bespoke of a redundant team and investors like me want no part of it. Investors run any business

Yeah that's right. Some project developers didn't even think to follow the roadmap and they were only doing what they wanna do with the money that being raised even some were gone with all of money. The developers will always put a huge promises on its roadmap. If the project developers can't do that and it will become a disaster for the project itself.

Which is why it is better to not invest at the early stages of a project and instead wait to see if the developers actually try to follow their roadmap, now a delay here and there is understandable as they could have encountered some issues that were difficult to deal with, however if the developers disregard the roadmap completely then you know they are not professional and that it will not be long before they could scam their investors and disappear with whatever money is left.

[TheUltraElite]

Developers must think twice before announcing a roadmap because it's really crusial, they must not put anything in the roadmap without having a clear plan to achieve it, investors always look at the roadmap as the miror of the developers and if they are serious in building their project or not

It is not crucial at all to the developers otherwise why would they change it every month and keep the investors in the dark that the project has been going down the rabbit hole?

It is the truth about any new project out there. Roadmaps are meant to be delayed and made a fool of. If you think the development is going as per their words then you are the one being fooled. Like I always say, 99% of altcoins are to be ditched and therefore dump them before you go into loss phase.

The ones which are really being developed don't give importance to maps but deliver results or stay strong in the market for years.

[Ureung jameun]

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

To develop a project, you must already have a roadmap that is in accordance with the basic objectives of making the project. but if they delay too long it will surely make people or investors feel bored. so it would be better if the project could run according to the road map that has been determined and it would be even better if the development could be faster, but it all depends on market conditions.

[bonyaserg]

For me personally, almost all projects fulfill their obligations. But it happens when projects postpone time and then regularly fulfill their obligations. So if you follow all the rules of the project, you can get an excellent reward.

[Russlenat]

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

I personally think that a slight delay was not a problem as long as the project developers can deliver what they have written in their roadmap. The thing might be different if they were giving a very long delay. that may make investors feel bad with it.
You must also know that if that was also a red flag to the project caused by the dev was not competence to continue its development.

To think that the project already shows a red flag from the start, then there’s no reason to trust it anymore and continue to invest. Except for those good projects who are really trying their best to meet the deadline and follow the roadmap, they deserve to be understood and should gained our trust. Other than that, projects that are only rich in their promises but seem to have less in action, I think they are not worth of our penny.

[Silberman]

An attractive roadmap can attract investors to enter, and it's true that if the roadmap takes a long time it will definitely make investors feel bored because they have to wait a long time. With so many new projects emerging, investors will definitely choose projects that are developing fairly quickly.
Maybe for big investors the process that takes quite a long time is not a big problem, because the capital they hold is also still possible to enter other projects. But for small investors, I think they will think twice about waiting that long.

The developers of new coins face a major issue, if they promise a fast development on their roadmap they run the risk of being unable to fulfill their promises and for their investors to get disappointed, but if they take a realistic approach and the roadmap seems to be too slow then they may fail to attract the interest of new investors as almost no one is interested in investing in a new coin for several years since they know new coins can disappear extremely quickly, so how to solve this? I have no idea, I am just happy I do not have to deal with something like that.

[Rockstarguy]

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

There are no good results upon rushing. It was best to put everything is well-prepared and must be working. In fact, there is no reason why these new projects have to be in hurry aside from their evil intention (scam). If we are going to invest be sure that the project is already finished, it was an ideal and a big factor to consider as this will be the basis that this project will become successful. That is why research must be done before investing, a wrong choice of project to invest ended up nothing but losses.

Investing in a project that has not been  completed is a big risk because anything can happen. Some completed project sometimes have complicated issues then talk more of a project that has not been completed. Investors should take a proper check on new projects because some eventually turn up to be scam project,  no need to take a rush on new projects.

[BuNga_cute]

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

I personally think that a slight delay was not a problem as long as the project developers can deliver what they have written in their roadmap. The thing might be different if they were giving a very long delay. that may make investors feel bad with it.
You must also know that if that was also a red flag to the project caused by the dev was not competence to continue its development.

To think that the project already shows a red flag from the start, then there’s no reason to trust it anymore and continue to invest. Except for those good projects who are really trying their best to meet the deadline and follow the roadmap, they deserve to be understood and should gained our trust. Other than that, projects that are only rich in their promises but seem to have less in action, I think they are not worth of our penny.

Why do we take the risk of investing in new projects that have been marked with a red flag, meaning that projects should be avoided. In contrast
to new projects that experience delays and do not follow the time according to the roadmap schedule, but the development team can give
a clear reason, it's still tolerable. But still it would be much better to choose projects that always follow the roadmap. Because these projects mean
to prepare carefully and more professionally, so it really deserves the trust of investors. Because of healthy projects, the team of developers is always
active in providing regular developments according to the roadmap schedule, and have a good support service by answering all questions of
investors related to projects. We have to be careful investing in new projects right now, many new projects that have sprung up ended up being scams,
so do research and analysis in depth, so that we can choose projects that have real potential and have a bright future.

[CapGelatik]

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

There are no good results upon rushing. It was best to put everything is well-prepared and must be working. In fact, there is no reason why these new projects have to be in hurry aside from their evil intention (scam). If we are going to invest be sure that the project is already finished, it was an ideal and a big factor to consider as this will be the basis that this project will become successful. That is why research must be done before investing, a wrong choice of project to invest ended up nothing but losses.

Investing in a project that has not been  completed is a big risk because anything can happen. Some completed project sometimes have complicated issues then talk more of a project that has not been completed. Investors should take a proper check on new projects because some eventually turn up to be scam project,  no need to take a rush on new projects.

new projects are indeed very risky if you are really desperate to invest there, because my experience in several new projects also ended badly,
after listing on the market, the token fell by more than -80%, of course that's something I really regret, and I understand,
 that we have to wait and analyze it first if we want to invest in a new project.

[JayTrain]

most projects pull and extend their roadmap, and this hits the reputation of the project, if they did not have time, then somehow it is not necessary, for me it is important...respected projects must keep their promises.

[AnonBitCoiner]

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

I think it's better to do gradually all and follow road map slowly. Many projects did all big things in rush and then they had nothing to convince community further. Recently we seen Stepn project that they have did all things very fast and then everyone can see results. Gsthas down from 7$ to 0.045$ and they have nothing to attract new buyers . They are losing attention and very soon project will stopped. So slowly and gradually work is better than rushing all things.

[Fatunad]

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

Whenever a project hadnt showed up any progress or development or simply following their roadmap then this is something indeed a red flag but for  those projects who do still show up some progress despite of being
late then it would really be still that considerable which at least the team do really make out some movement or progress or trying out to achieve on what they had stated on their roadmap.
Whenever you do see zero progress then it is safe to presume that this project is shitty and never worth on making investment out of it.
So choose which you do see that it does have potential but well this sounds simple but cant really be that easy.

[Stable090]

Sometimes projects don’t follow there road map, there is always delay in some road map but that those not implies that the project is a scam project or should not be trusted, some are just putting things in place to make the project a better one. In crypto market which we are, new project entering the market most of them just want to steal, if am recommending to anybody to invest, I will recommend a old project and not new one.

[minairia3]

most projects pull and extend their roadmap, and this hits the reputation of the project, if they did not have time, then somehow it is not necessary, for me it is important...respected projects must keep their promises.

That delay is something no one wants. A roadmap will be given before the project starts, but in the process of working and developing there will be certain difficulties so they often need more time to complete. I think that's acceptable as long as they keep investors informed and don't delay unduly. If the project is developed too quickly without ensuring quality, the project will quickly collapse.

[NewRanger]

most projects pull and extend their roadmap, and this hits the reputation of the project, if they did not have time, then somehow it is not necessary, for me it is important...respected projects must keep their promises.

progress on project developtment will influence their reputation and also trust from investors. alot dev team didnt care with their progress and as if it move slowly, without  good communication investors will leave them and also selling their coins to move to other project that give good communication and progress developtment. start for now , we must keep give them critics to roadmap could be done immediately,

[bhooscream]

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

In my opinion, it will be more effective if we have effective roadmaps that are realized step on the step, systematically and always on progress. Then we have very great roadmaps but we have nothing to do with the process. May projects cannot step on their first roadmap, many of them are running too far away from the first roadmap. and some of them are fail to fulfill roadmpa. In this case, all elements really influence how the project will run on. It needs a great unity on the roadmap, continuity, team, promotion, in and out come, and otehrs

[dunfida]

Most especially new projects do you think its healthy to rush things up or take a lot of time and gradually release updates and follow roadmaps slowly? There are some complains that most projects aren't following the exact timing on their roadmap and some even takes this is Red Flag.

Whenever a project hadnt showed up any progress or development or simply following their roadmap then this is something indeed a red flag but for  those projects who do still show up some progress despite of being
late then it would really be still that considerable which at least the team do really make out some movement or progress or trying out to achieve on what they had stated on their roadmap.
Whenever you do see zero progress then it is safe to presume that this project is shitty and never worth on making investment out of it.
So choose which you do see that it does have potential but well this sounds simple but cant really be that easy.

Better late than never eh? Its always good to see whenever a project do really make out some developments or progress on tending to follow on whats been stated on the roadmap although the success or probability

chance is less and something that cant really be known or everything would really be just random because it would entirely be depending on the project owner or the developer whether they would be using up those accumulated funding to develop the project or they wouldnt really mind and just focusing on the money that they do made out directly.?

Healthy means that they are still minding on developing  the project despite of the market condition that we are facing.

[CPNpr]

Better late than never eh? Its always good to see whenever a project do really make out some developments or progress on tending to follow on whats been stated on the roadmap although the success or probability

chance is less and something that cant really be known or everything would really be just random because it would entirely be depending on the project owner or the developer whether they would be using up those accumulated funding to develop the project or they wouldnt really mind and just focusing on the money that they do made out directly.?

Healthy means that they are still minding on developing  the project despite of the market condition that we are facing.

But there is always a time for everything. Its better to be late than never.
And also there is time for everything. Sometimes we realize late in our life where we are heading towards but that too is fine.

Yes everything has a certain time when it is best to do it but not everyone can do it so no one can do anything if we can do the right thing at the right time then it is good for us but we have to choose it and at the right time.  To think about doing the right thing

[bonyaserg]

This time I can say that all projects initially promise big profits. But since the project needs investments in order for the project to develop. And when there is not enough investment in the project, there are big changes in the project, because for big development, more capital investments are needed. And hence it follows that such projects do not last long and, accordingly, the participants lose their funds.