[SCAM WARNING] QI Blockchain Plagiarized Whitepaper and Website Content

[FatFork]

What happened: QI Blockchain is yet another fake project with completely plagiarized whitepaper and website content from multiple sources.

Scammer Profile: Jawadu
Flag Type 1 (support/oppose): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3020

ANN Thread: [ANN] QI Blockchain - The only blockchain the world will ever need. [archived]
Other Threads: Signature Campaign, Bounty Campaign

Website: https://qiblockchain.online

176 days old
Created on 2022-02-21
Expires on 2023-02-21
Updated on 2022-04-14

Whitepaper: https://qiblockchain.online/images/QI-blockchain_whitepaper.pdf [archived]






Original Source: https://www.multichain.com/download/MultiChain-White-Paper.pdf

Most of the content is plagiarized from the MultiChain Whitepaper, but some other sources were also used, for example:


Source: https://www.amcollege.edu/blog/qi-in-traditional-chinese-medicine


Source: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/decentralized-applications-dapps.asp



Source: https://www.investopedia.com/tech/bitcoin-lightning-network-problems/

[1714677425]

1714677425

[1714677425]

1714677425

[1714677425]

1714677425

[Jawadu]

I don't know why you reported us, but this is not fair! Now all our campaigns have a warning message and we are not scammers.

We are promoting the real QI blockchain, and you can see all the detail on social media, website, or you can follow our TG group and meet the owner there cause we added him to track his campaign.

I wonder what you will say when QIE coin goes live (because soon you will see it in big exchanges) time will tell bro, let's wait and see.

Good day, buddy

[Dorjoy Khan]

I suggest you to stop putting red alert on bounty management team or to a project. You are doing this and this has no value because your report can do nothing with the project. We talked with the project team already , they have shared with us already all the information regarding this project.

Why don't you join their telegram group and ask this thing before putting reg alert? Stop doing this shit thing

[FatFork]

I don't know why you reported us, but this is not fair! Now all our campaigns have a warning message and we are not scammers.

I tagged your account because you posted their ANN and you are the only one on the forum representing this fake project as far as I know. If there is an official representative of the QI project in this community, please let me know so I can tag him as well. It is also not the first time your account has been used to promote scam projects without due diligence.

We are promoting the real QI blockchain, and you can see all the detail on social media, website, or you can follow our TG group and meet the owner there cause we added him to track his campaign.

I'm not interested in what goes on in other social networks or telegram groups, all I care about is what's going on in this community.

I wonder what you will say when QIE coin goes live (because soon you will see it in big exchanges) time will tell bro, let's wait and see.

This doesn't change the facts. I would still report it for plagiarism in the whitepaper and on the website even if it was on big exchanges right now!

Even the announcement you created and posted is composed of plagiarized content. For example, here's just an excerpt you copied from the Avalanche project (you even stupidly forgot to remove the word Avalanche in a few instances):


Original source: https://docs.avax.network/

[Dorjoy Khan]

I don't know why you reported us, but this is not fair! Now all our campaigns have a warning message and we are not scammers.

I tagged your account because you posted their ANN and you are the only one on the forum representing this fake project as far as I know. If there is an official representative of the QI project in this community, please let me know so I can tag him as well. It is also not the first time your account has been used to promote scam projects without due diligence.

[

This doesn't change the facts. I would still report it for plagiarism in the whitepaper and on the website even if it was on big exchanges right now!

Even the announcement you created and posted is composed of plagiarized content. For example, here's just an excerpt you copied from the Avalanche project (you even stupidly forgot to remove the word Avalanche in a few instances):

https://i.imgur.com/rVlq2BA.jpg https://i.imgur.com/E7klPpq.png
Original source: https://docs.avax.network/

You just mentioned the avalance words but the truth is this is editor mistake, how you can take it seriously ?

I don't know why you reported us, but this is not fair! Now all our campaigns have a warning message and we are not scammers.

I tagged your account because you posted their ANN and you are the only one on the forum representing this fake project as far as I know. If there is an official representative of the QI project in this community, please let me know so I can tag him as well. It is also not the first time your account has been used to promote scam projects without due diligence.
/

https://ibb.co/DCkNYB5 have a look on this screenshot , this is the real docs . That is just editor mistake. Please try to understand this simple thing

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

[GxSTxV]

Unfortunately most of these new projects are all looking the same, they are so lazy to create their own whitepaper page and plans so all they do is copying from bigger projects and change the name and some details. But QI blockchain is yet to confirm if it’s a scam or not, surely it’s not a professional project but we don’t know their attentions yet. And warning users about it is the right thing to do for now until the prove it wrong
Plus they are running promoting campaigns here and with a non trusted promoter so it’s kind of suspicious. Time will show us everything

[JoyMarsha]

I don't know why you reported us, but this is not fair! Now all our campaigns have a warning message and we are not scammers.

We are promoting the real QI blockchain, and you can see all the detail on social media, website, or you can follow our TG group and meet the owner there cause we added him to track his campaign.

I wonder what you will say when QIE coin goes live (because soon you will see it in big exchanges) time will tell bro, let's wait and see.

Good day, buddy

What's the originality of a project if it has to be plagiarized? A project is supposed not to have a plagiarized whitepaper. It is supposed to have a unique concept of what it offers than copying other whitepapers.
Scamming, deceiving and lying to people in crypto is it fair?

Social media, websites and telegram groups are not enough reasons to believe a project is legit. Those accounts can be put down by their owner at any given time and that's the end of the project

[Jawadu]

I don't know why you reported us, but this is not fair! Now all our campaigns have a warning message and we are not scammers.

I tagged your account because you posted their ANN and you are the only one on the forum representing this fake project as far as I know. If there is an official representative of the QI project in this community, please let me know so I can tag him as well. It is also not the first time your account has been used to promote scam projects without due diligence.

If this is a fake project then please share the real one here! At least you would read the whitepaper yourself without using plagiarism software because it's obvious some words can be the same with other words on the internet.

And, we are not the only managers to get scammed by projects! We are bounty managers, brother! Tell me which bounty manager has never posted a scam project? Who bro?

Like the Partyland project was posted by +4 managers, but we are the only ones who got reported! People only look at our profile and they just report us without even checking us on detail, why is no one talking about the good projects that we already managed and distributed like ExcelDefi, PayRue, PlayTreks, BikPot, DafriBank, ASHIB, Cowboys, Spume, and our active campaigns which are all escrowed and genuine like Entice, NEKI Club, PanKUKU, Mars Mission, QI blockchain, Rice Protocol... why we only get reported like we are scammers?

Perhaps these messages can change how people think about us (a convo about Fox in the Alladin bounty group);

https://prnt.sc/x_o0kxtBke7C
https://prnt.sc/scuLFp_Tyh5D
https://prnt.sc/MAANkAL4A2zL
https://prnt.sc/DSJ6fp5oBWS-
https://prnt.sc/LhmbGeekmmFL
https://prnt.sc/imTmfKfneYuw
https://prnt.sc/T5HW1FjPeeYy

Sometimes you just have to find more details for yourself, don't just report. But it's okay!

I don't know why you reported us, but this is not fair! Now all our campaigns have a warning message and we are not scammers.

We are promoting the real QI blockchain, and you can see all the detail on social media, website, or you can follow our TG group and meet the owner there cause we added him to track his campaign.

I wonder what you will say when QIE coin goes live (because soon you will see it in big exchanges) time will tell bro, let's wait and see.

Good day, buddy

What's the originality of a project if it has to be plagiarized? A project is supposed not to have a plagiarized whitepaper. It is supposed to have a unique concept of what it offers than copying other whitepapers.
Scamming, deceiving and lying to people in crypto is it fair?

Social media, websites and telegram groups are not enough reasons to believe a project is legit. Those accounts can be put down by their owner at any given time and that's the end of the project

Don't use plagiarism software, read the whitepaper for yourself or use different plagiarism and you'll see if those tools are safe 100%

You guys don't just blame, just share here the real project if you think we are promoting the fake one.

[virasog]

I wonder what you will say when QIE coin goes live (because soon you will see it in big exchanges) time will tell bro, let's wait and see.

Scam projects can come on exchanges too, what's a big deal about it. Scammer make more money by listing on exchanges and then rug pulling everything. The question is that if the project is good why the white paper is Plagiarized ?

And, we are not the only managers to get scammed by projects! We are bounty managers, brother! Tell me which bounty manager has never posted a scam project? Who bro?

Lol, are you giving this excuse to promote a scam project ?

[JohnBitCo]

I don't know why you reported us, but this is not fair! Now all our campaigns have a warning message and we are not scammers.

We are promoting the real QI blockchain, and you can see all the detail on social media, website, or you can follow our TG group and meet the owner there cause we added him to track his campaign.

I wonder what you will say when QIE coin goes live (because soon you will see it in big exchanges) time will tell bro, let's wait and see.

Good day, buddy

What's the originality of a project if it has to be plagiarized? A project is supposed not to have a plagiarized whitepaper. It is supposed to have a unique concept of what it offers than copying other whitepapers.
Scamming, deceiving and lying to people in crypto is it fair?

Social media, websites and telegram groups are not enough reasons to believe a project is legit. Those accounts can be put down by their owner at any given time and that's the end of the project

Don't use plagiarism software, read the whitepaper for yourself or use different plagiarism and you'll see if those tools are safe 100%

You guys don't just blame, just share here the real project if you think we are promoting the fake one.

What are you trying to say that this plagiarism software showed the wrong result and using the other one will not detect this plagiarism?
No one is blaming, we are showing the reality of this project. Stop scamming the people. 

[Jawadu]

Scam projects can come on exchanges too, what's a big deal about it. Scammer make more money by listing on exchanges and then rug pulling everything. The question is that if the project is good why the white paper is Plagiarized ?

Is that the only proof that this project is fake? I have just asked for one question from the OP, if what I am promoting it's fake then kindly he can share the real project here with us. Don't just check one thing, we need strong proof of what he wrote.

Lol, are you giving this excuse to promote a scam project ?

What am trying to say is that many people report us like we are the only ones who got scammed by fake projects in our services which is not true. I hope you got me now, am just speaking the truth but not excuses.

[Jawadu]

What are you trying to say that this plagiarism software showed the wrong result and using the other one will not detect this plagiarism?
No one is blaming, we are showing the reality of this project. Stop scamming the people. 

Bro, am not blaming but what am saying is that these tools are not to be trusted 100%. I'm a BM and I have used them mostly in checking articles, one tool will give you different results compared to the other (why now?).

Also, you can't just come and say STOP SCAMMING PEOPLE. I have scammed who? and when? Don't just write. You need to have strong proof that this project is fake, commenting here just saying stop scamming without strong proof is nothing! That's the truth.

If the OP will come with proof of the real project that he claimed to be copied by the one we promote, then I will agree with him! But I will never agree with him since he used a plagiarism tool to check the whitepaper and says the project is scam.

If scam was to be checked like that, then a lot of projects would be tagged as scam!

[KingsDen]

What happened: QI Blockchain is yet another fake project with completely plagiarized whitepaper and website content from multiple sources.

You might be correct that the whitepaper of the project is plagiarised, but you might be wrong calling the manager of the project a scammer or the project a scam. You provided evidences of plagiarism instead of that of scam. To the best of my knowledge, plagiarism is not equal to scam. You can report the account for plagiarism(which I'm not sure whitepaper plagiarism is among the forum rules). If the evidences are compelling, the account could get banned.
Meanwhile, you lack tangible evidence that the project is a scam, this is because majority of the projects these days doesn't engage professionally whitepaper writers, they go about paraphrasing multiple whitepapers to come out with their own version of garbage.
So, you could reconsider, because I know how frustrating it is for a genuine project struggling to see the light being faced with scam accusations without proves.

[Issa56]

but you might be wrong calling the manager of the project a scammer or the project a scam.

I don’t think anything good can come out of the project than scamming investors at the end, a project that can not write their whitepaper on their own, I think they are not really ready for anything serious, a serious project will write their whitepaper theirself, and they won’t plagiarize any project.
@jawadu, you keep on saying that the project have not scammed before, you might be right, but what’s the probability that they won’t scam people later in the future? A project that can copy other projects whitepaper can definitely scam people. I think it will be better if you pause the campaign for now and clear the issue of whitepaper plagiarism.

[Dorjoy Khan]

I wonder what you will say when QIE coin goes live (because soon you will see it in big exchanges) time will tell bro, let's wait and see.

And, we are not the only managers to get scammed by projects! We are bounty managers, brother! Tell me which bounty manager has never posted a scam project? Who bro?

Lol, are you giving this excuse to promote a scam project ?

He meant nothing like this. He just trying to say that with whitepaper plagiarism proof from a plagiarism checker is not enough to tag a project scam. And there is no proof that this is a scam project except the website plagiarism checker . Yes, he is not giving excuse but he is telling the truth because this thread creator already tagged him as scammer , what does it mean? He still unable to proof this is a scam project but already tagged as scamming ? Did he use his sense ?

[FatFork]

Bro, am not blaming but what am saying is that these tools are not to be trusted 100%. I'm a BM and I have used them mostly in checking articles, one tool will give you different results compared to the other (why now?).

I don't use plagiarism detection tools, I don't know where you got that idea from. This is the text compare tool you see in the screenshots, and as you can see, it works perfectly. Learn something about it if you want.

You need to have strong proof that this project is fake, commenting here just saying stop scamming without strong proof is nothing! That's the truth.

A project that steals content from other projects, even something so simple like content on a website, or even the whole whitepaper, which should be the most important document for any new project, is a fake project. You can find all the evidence in the OP.

If the OP will come with proof of the real project that he claimed to be copied by the one we promote, then I will agree with him! But I will never agree with him since he used a plagiarism tool to check the whitepaper and says the project is scam.

Again, I didn't use any plagiarism detection tools, and I don't care if you agree with me or not. That's up to the community to decide. As for the "real project", you can find all the information in the OP. I don't understand what more you want me to prove.

If scam was to be checked like that, then a lot of projects would be tagged as scam!

That may actually be true.

What happened: QI Blockchain is yet another fake project with completely plagiarized whitepaper and website content from multiple sources.

You might be correct that the whitepaper of the project is plagiarised, but you might be wrong calling the manager of the project a scammer or the project a scam. You provided evidences of plagiarism instead of that of scam. To the best of my knowledge, plagiarism is not equal to scam. You can report the account for plagiarism(which I'm not sure whitepaper plagiarism is among the forum rules). If the evidences are compelling, the account could get banned.
Meanwhile, you lack tangible evidence that the project is a scam, this is because majority of the projects these days doesn't engage professionally whitepaper writers, they go about paraphrasing multiple whitepapers to come out with their own version of garbage.
So, you could reconsider, because I know how frustrating it is for a genuine project struggling to see the light being faced with scam accusations without proves.

First of all, I'm surprised with your stance. As a senior member of this community, I think you should know better by now. You say, I might be correct about plagiarism? Please review the evidence first and let me know if I'm wrong about that. I welcome the opportunity to listen to and consider new information and opposing viewpoints, and admit when I am wrong.

Second, we seem to disagree on semantics, so let's get some facts straight. Plagiarizing other people's work without permission or attribution is a deceptive and fraudulent act that is not only detrimental to the community, but it is also illegal, and according to the English dictionary:

scam noun
\ ˈskam  \
: a fraudulent or deceptive act or operation

scam noun
\ ˈskam  \
: a dishonest scheme; a fraud.

So, can you explain to me, in which sense you can call a fraudulent project that steals ideas and content from someone else's work a "genuine" one?

It's not a genuine project. It just copies another project, and tries to fool people into thinking it's something new and innovative when in fact it is neither. Therefore, it's just a scam. And I find it odd that you think this practice is acceptable. It's not. Plagiarism is stealing, and theft is wrong.

[Rikafip]

I'm a BM and I have used them mostly in checking articles, one tool will give you different results compared to the other (why now?).

If you bothered to do check whitepaper with a simple Google search you would find the plagiarism that @FatFork discovered. After all, tools used are irrelevant here as everything is obvious from those screenshots.

If scam was to be checked like that, then a lot of projects would be tagged as scam!

Welcome to crypto buddy, majority of projects ARE scam.

Meanwhile, you lack tangible evidence that the project is a scam, this is because majority of the projects these days doesn't engage professionally whitepaper writers, they go about paraphrasing multiple whitepapers to come out with their own version of garbage.

An obvious plagiarism is not "tangible" enough for you? Beside, what do you think will happen with a project where team is not capable of writing their own whitepaper and instead they have to copy/paste from someone else's?

This sentence from their whitepaper will show you how mindless team behind QiBlockchain is when they didn't even adjust the BTC price lol and instead they just copy/pasted text. Anyone remembers last time BTC was  at ~$250?

The standard fee per bitcoin transaction is currently BTC 0.0001 (2.5 cents at $250/bitcoin) and is collected by the miner of the block in which that transaction is
confirmed.

Flag supported and nice find FatFork!

[virasog]

Scam projects can come on exchanges too, what's a big deal about it. Scammer make more money by listing on exchanges and then rug pulling everything. The question is that if the project is good why the white paper is Plagiarized ?

Is that the only proof that this project is fake? I have just asked for one question from the OP, if what I am promoting it's fake then kindly he can share the real project here with us. Don't just check one thing, we need strong proof of what he wrote.

You are constantly asking that if this is a fake project then tell you which is the real project. I think you fail to understand.
To clear things I mean to say that QI Blockchain is the only project and it is a scam. There is no other QI Blockchain project. I hope now it is clear.
Also, if you ask for proof, then there are 99% of projects who have Plagiarized whitepaper, they were scams. Tell me any project which had a Plagiarized white paper and it was a trusted good project?

[KingsDen]

First of all, I'm surprised with your stance. As a senior member of this community, I think you should know better by now. You say, I might be correct about plagiarism? Please review the evidence first and let me know if I'm wrong about that. I welcome the opportunity to listen to and consider new information and opposing viewpoints, and admit when I am wrong.

Second, we seem to disagree on semantics, so let's get some facts straight. Plagiarizing other people's work without permission or attribution is a deceptive and fraudulent act that is not only detrimental to the community, but it is also illegal, and according to the English dictionary:

You don't have to be surprised at my stance on this unless you don't get me right.
What I'm saying in essence is that a plagerist is not a scammer and these are two different crimes in the forum. Ironically you would even see a scammer tolling the forum with some few red tags while a plagiarist wouldn't be that lucky. Plagiarism is an offence whose consequence is permanent ban.
My stance on this is; instead of alleging a scam that hasn't even happen and which might not happen, why not project plagiarism and then the account might be banned outrightly.

I see that Jawadu is a bounty manager who might have promoted a scam project before in the forum, so that is not enough to conclude that the QI Blockchain is a scam project, unless you have some reserved evidences which you may want to show the community.

Report in the thread for plagiarism, Report to moderators and then the account might not survive it.

An obvious plagiarism is not "tangible" enough for you? Beside, what do you think will happen with a project where team is not capable of writing their own whitepaper and instead they have to copy/paste from someone else's?

An obvious plagiarism of whitepaper is surely a red flag. A scam project is always hasty to get their project running and hence uses any available tools to set up their platform as fast as possible.

[Dorjoy Khan]

Hi, just talked with the dev and team. They are sorry for this mistake because they paid third party team to prepare the whitepaper but they did not knew this thing become so messy . They are preparing the new whitepaper and I will update it as soon as possible .

Thank you everyone.