Casino games plebs like us must play

[dezoel]

I don't think there is even the slightest similar characteristic of gambling or trading.
Even though it is true, I admit that from gambling or trading, each has its own risks, whether big or small.
It's just that in gambling there are also actions to minimize the risk of losing money, for example in a roulette game a gambler can place a bet by risking 2 columns at once on a column that has a larger proportion for the ball stopping. With the same amount of bets, the win will be 3x of the number of bets and it can be concluded that you get a profit of 1 from the amount of capital used to bet

What's great about the Roulette game is that there are so many ways to place a bet. You already give one example. It minimizes our risk in exchange for a smaller reward. On some games like Keno and Plinko.

There is also an option to choose a risk. They are low medium and high. Low risks are great if our goal is to wager bigger and high risk are great if we want to earn a better profit.

My response on the argument above if which between gambling and trading can provide more entertainment, I think the obvious answer for this would be gambling because there are different games on them and then they have a catchy graphics and sound. Trading is solely built for someone who possibly wants to earn a profit because this is more of a strategy and skill based.

[1715624591]

1715624591

[1715624591]

1715624591

[Hamphser]

I don't think there is even the slightest similar characteristic of gambling or trading.
Even though it is true, I admit that from gambling or trading, each has its own risks, whether big or small.
It's just that in gambling there are also actions to minimize the risk of losing money, for example in a roulette game a gambler can place a bet by risking 2 columns at once on a column that has a larger proportion for the ball stopping. With the same amount of bets, the win will be 3x of the number of bets and it can be concluded that you get a profit of 1 from the amount of capital used to bet

What's great about the Roulette game is that there are so many ways to place a bet. You already give one example. It minimizes our risk in exchange for a smaller reward. On some games like Keno and Plinko.

There is also an option to choose a risk. They are low medium and high. Low risks are great if our goal is to wager bigger and high risk are great if we want to earn a better profit.

My response on the argument above if which between gambling and trading can provide more entertainment, I think the obvious answer for this would be gambling because there are different games on them and then they have a catchy graphics and sound. Trading is solely built for someone who possibly wants to earn a profit because this is more of a strategy and skill based.

There's no fun when you do make out some trades and its totally different when we are pertaining about trading and gambling which is totally different kind of things.Its never been the same and people shouldnt

really be thinking off that way because if they do make out some in relation about trading and gambling then you are totally trying out to remove their true essence.Trading is for long term and something
could be considered to be a business or investment and gambling is really just for the sake for fun and entertainment.

You shouldnt really go beyond those line or border so that you wont really be ending up on having those different impressions towards things because if you do then
you would really be committing out those kind of mistakes.

[lienfaye]

Remember that in gambling, luck is the majority factor that can either make or break your day. A person with no skill at all can still win tons of money in gambling if he has the luck for the day. But a person who does not have any prior experience nor skill in trading is most likely to fail and to experience losses.

I agree. Trading is not entirely relying on luck because skills and knowledge are necessary to have a chances to gain and succeed as a trader. While in gambling you can't apply any strategy as proven to be working since it's more on luck, unless you're not playing a chance based game wherein having a knowledge is an edge like in sports betting. Therefore these two are different, although they're both risky. Anyway, regardless of your choice to make money, remember to take time gaining knowledge and know what you're getting into to be aware of the consequences and be prepared. Don't gamble if you can't handle losing your money, same goes if you decided to become a trader.

[delfastTions]

Remember that in gambling, luck is the majority factor that can either make or break your day. A person with no skill at all can still win tons of money in gambling if he has the luck for the day. But a person who does not have any prior experience nor skill in trading is most likely to fail and to experience losses.

I agree. Trading is not entirely relying on luck because skills and knowledge are necessary to have a chances to gain and succeed as a trader. While in gambling you can't apply any strategy as proven to be working since it's more on luck, unless you're not playing a chance based game wherein having a knowledge is an edge like in sports betting. Therefore these two are different, although they're both risky. Anyway, regardless of your choice to make money, remember to take time gaining knowledge and know what you're getting into to be aware of the consequences and be prepared. Don't gamble if you can't handle losing your money, same goes if you decided to become a trader.

I would like to add some of my thoughts. 
If we compare just gambling based on random processes and trading, then I see that the probability of winning is still much greater in gambling.  Trading is an occupation for professionals and an amateur in matters of trading, such as cryptocurrencies, or forex, always loses.  Because his money is the income of professional traders.  And one out of 100 of those who tried to trade on the stock exchange can become a professional in trading.  And then you need to have knowledge, skills and, possibly, insider information.  So it's better to just gamble. 
So the player, I think, just has a much greater chance of winning, even if it's a small amount of money.

[ethereumhunter]

Remember that in gambling, luck is the majority factor that can either make or break your day. A person with no skill at all can still win tons of money in gambling if he has the luck for the day. But a person who does not have any prior experience nor skill in trading is most likely to fail and to experience losses.

I agree. Trading is not entirely relying on luck because skills and knowledge are necessary to have a chances to gain and succeed as a trader. While in gambling you can't apply any strategy as proven to be working since it's more on luck, unless you're not playing a chance based game wherein having a knowledge is an edge like in sports betting. Therefore these two are different, although they're both risky. Anyway, regardless of your choice to make money, remember to take time gaining knowledge and know what you're getting into to be aware of the consequences and be prepared. Don't gamble if you can't handle losing your money, same goes if you decided to become a trader.

And if you know that gambling won't make you money if you're unlucky, you better not try hard. Trading will suit you better because you can learn how to make a profit from trading. Although each comes with a risk, in trading, if you don't sell your coin when the price goes down, you still have a chance to make a profit when the price goes up again. But in gambling, once you lose, it means you have lost money and it will be difficult to recover those losses because gambling is all about winning and losing.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Remember that in gambling, luck is the majority factor that can either make or break your day. A person with no skill at all can still win tons of money in gambling if he has the luck for the day. But a person who does not have any prior experience nor skill in trading is most likely to fail and to experience losses.

I agree. Trading is not entirely relying on luck because skills and knowledge are necessary to have a chances to gain and succeed as a trader. While in gambling you can't apply any strategy as proven to be working since it's more on luck, unless you're not playing a chance based game wherein having a knowledge is an edge like in sports betting. Therefore these two are different, although they're both risky. Anyway, regardless of your choice to make money, remember to take time gaining knowledge and know what you're getting into to be aware of the consequences and be prepared. Don't gamble if you can't handle losing your money, same goes if you decided to become a trader.

And if you know that gambling won't make you money if you're unlucky, you better not try hard. Trading will suit you better because you can learn how to make a profit from trading. Although each comes with a risk, in trading, if you don't sell your coin when the price goes down, you still have a chance to make a profit when the price goes up again. But in gambling, once you lose, it means you have lost money and it will be difficult to recover those losses because gambling is all about winning and losing.

Yeah, you are right about gambling being all about winning or losing, its like a penalty shootout in football, in gambling, the team is you and the casino. you either win and the casino loses or you lose and the casino wins, there is score as 0:0 here  .

But also talking about trading and gambling, like i pointed out in my previous comment, futures trading, which is the core of trading does not give a trader the chance to hold and make profit later, in futures trading, you are either losing or gaining, so personally, i would say that this arm of trading can indeed be likened to gambling, since even doing futures trading blindly is the same as gambling.

[ethereumhunter]

Remember that in gambling, luck is the majority factor that can either make or break your day. A person with no skill at all can still win tons of money in gambling if he has the luck for the day. But a person who does not have any prior experience nor skill in trading is most likely to fail and to experience losses.

I agree. Trading is not entirely relying on luck because skills and knowledge are necessary to have a chances to gain and succeed as a trader. While in gambling you can't apply any strategy as proven to be working since it's more on luck, unless you're not playing a chance based game wherein having a knowledge is an edge like in sports betting. Therefore these two are different, although they're both risky. Anyway, regardless of your choice to make money, remember to take time gaining knowledge and know what you're getting into to be aware of the consequences and be prepared. Don't gamble if you can't handle losing your money, same goes if you decided to become a trader.

And if you know that gambling won't make you money if you're unlucky, you better not try hard. Trading will suit you better because you can learn how to make a profit from trading. Although each comes with a risk, in trading, if you don't sell your coin when the price goes down, you still have a chance to make a profit when the price goes up again. But in gambling, once you lose, it means you have lost money and it will be difficult to recover those losses because gambling is all about winning and losing.

Yeah, you are right about gambling being all about winning or losing, its like a penalty shootout in football, in gambling, the team is you and the casino. you either win and the casino loses or you lose and the casino wins, there is score as 0:0 here  .

But also talking about trading and gambling, like i pointed out in my previous comment, futures trading, which is the core of trading does not give a trader the chance to hold and make profit later, in futures trading, you are either losing or gaining, so personally, i would say that this arm of trading can indeed be likened to gambling, since even doing futures trading blindly is the same as gambling.

No matter how hard it is, we still won't be able to get a big win from the casino because, as the owner of the place, it's the casino that will get the big win. Even though we can win from the casino, the amount will not be as big as what the casino will get, so this should make us think that we can gamble, but it must be within the limits that we can accept.

Indeed, there are many types of trading, and it is our job to find the type of trading that suits us so that the trading we do will not be like gambling. But sadly, many people make the mistake of just following what others write about when to buy and sell, so they never learn more to find the trade that suits them. If that's what they did, it would be the same as gambling, and they wouldn't be able to make a profit.

[klidex]

I don't think there is even the slightest similar characteristic of gambling or trading.
Even though it is true, I admit that from gambling or trading, each has its own risks, whether big or small.
It's just that in gambling there are also actions to minimize the risk of losing money, for example in a roulette game a gambler can place a bet by risking 2 columns at once on a column that has a larger proportion for the ball stopping. With the same amount of bets, the win will be 3x of the number of bets and it can be concluded that you get a profit of 1 from the amount of capital used to bet

What's great about the Roulette game is that there are so many ways to place a bet. You already give one example. It minimizes our risk in exchange for a smaller reward. On some games like Keno and Plinko.

There is also an option to choose a risk. They are low medium and high. Low risks are great if our goal is to wager bigger and high risk are great if we want to earn a better profit.

My response on the argument above if which between gambling and trading can provide more entertainment, I think the obvious answer for this would be gambling because there are different games on them and then they have a catchy graphics and sound. Trading is solely built for someone who possibly wants to earn a profit because this is more of a strategy and skill based.

Indeed, there are many ways to place bets and there are many ways to minimize the small possibility of experiencing defeat.
I only give a small example about the game of roulette and how to play placing bets on roulette games to avoid losing.
I admit that I don't understand all the gambling games on the casino site, I only study games that I think are fun and can be played to be able to win them.
So please understand from my previous opinion that I can't give much explanation about how to bet on casino games.

[Wind_FURY]

I don't think there is even the slightest similar characteristic of gambling or trading.
Even though it is true, I admit that from gambling or trading, each has its own risks, whether big or small.
It's just that in gambling there are also actions to minimize the risk of losing money, for example in a roulette game a gambler can place a bet by risking 2 columns at once on a column that has a larger proportion for the ball stopping. With the same amount of bets, the win will be 3x of the number of bets and it can be concluded that you get a profit of 1 from the amount of capital used to bet

What's great about the Roulette game is that there are so many ways to place a bet. You already give one example. It minimizes our risk in exchange for a smaller reward. On some games like Keno and Plinko.

There is also an option to choose a risk. They are low medium and high. Low risks are great if our goal is to wager bigger and high risk are great if we want to earn a better profit.

Roulette has a house edge from 2.70% to 5.26%. I believe 2.70% is OK, but you can find lower house edge in other games, and also be "entertained" too during the moment. My recommendation is Craps!

My response on the argument above if which between gambling and trading can provide more entertainment, I think the obvious answer for this would be gambling because there are different games on them and then they have a catchy graphics and sound. Trading is solely built for someone who possibly wants to earn a profit because this is more of a strategy and skill based.

But skill and strategy-based casino games can be "entertaining" too. It's a the different kind of entertainment, but a kind of entertainment that can also win the user some money, and keep himself/herself longer than the person who plays the slot machine with minimum house edge of 5%.

[AbuBhakar]

Roulette has a house edge from 2.70% to 5.26%. I believe 2.70% is OK, but you can find lower house edge in other games, and also be "entertained" too during the moment. My recommendation is Craps!

Yeah, Craps is the best gambling game for a low house edge percentage category since it only has 1.41% percentage while it pays more than x2 in every single bet. I wonder how craps is not yet popular despite its design is less risky and higher payout compared to typical games like dice, roulette and blackjack.

I’m playing craps for a long time with good profit until now because I can control my bets and limit to few numbers that I know that hot for that round. Betting on hardways gives a sweet profit too.

[danadc]

So technically you are saying that gambling can be more ideal as a stress reliever than making a trade?. well it depends in trading if you have knowledge regarding the position you would like to do is you make the right time and proper preparation at the same time, if you execute the trade properly its good but if not you have a mistakes every thing right there has a lesson but in playing gambling is you just make a deposit, play and let the game you choose to decide if you are a winner or not, gambling is more stressful because you are just letting other people make your luck not yourself with your knowledge and skills.

IN my opinion gambling is much more stressful than day trading, I say this for the following reason: for example if a person takes 100$ and that person starts making sports bets, that person bets 10$, loses, bets others 10$ and loses again, bet on 10$ wins, but then goes back to bet on 10$ and loses again, this person will start to get stressed because he sees that his bankroll is reducing all the time, and he doesn't know how to reverse this situation, then panic starts to take over him, but when doing trade he will always put stop - loss and he can do hodl for some time until he has profit, then he will not have stress when doing trade

Well it depends on the person because we know that trading and gambling is in different aspects, in trading, you are aiming to make an open trade or position and those are based on your knowledge and skills, and one of the goals is to earn, in gambling your only goal is to win and get entertained you don't need to think about too much unless you are taking this thing seriously and like a source of income like other people that's the reason why they got frustrated in too much playing of gambling.

It depends on the what casino games/gambling games you play or have been playing. Because if you truly have a deep shower-thought about it, isn't trading also an act of risk-taking and also a form of "gambling"? In BlackJack, there is a skill involved that makes house edge smaller, in Poker it's another game of skill with some gambling features like BlackJack. In Craps it's also the same as the other two, it's not like SicBo wherein your destiny is made in one roll. There are some bets in Craps that require more than one roll, therefore it encourages skill and strategy.

Without a doubt both gambling and trading share some similar characteristics, and it is true that in both you are taking a risk, however the difference is that in trading you can more accurately control the risk you are willing to take.

For example on the roulette you can decide the bet you make, but you cannot change the underlying probabilities of the bet itself, however if you buy bitcoin it is completely different to do it at 60k than at 16k, on the first scenario people were buying near the ATH and this was too risky, while anyone that buys at 16k is doing so near the bottom, so the risk of a crash after you buy is lower.

I have not been able to do business because I do not have the bases to do it, what I have done is buy some tokens, and cryptocurrencies, I have a little bitcoin, but I have not reached 1 bitcoin yet, but excuse me but I do not know why they buy what trading has something to do with the game, just one day I entered a page where there was a game that was trading with a bear and a bull and one had to guess where the market was going if up or down, that's it what do you mean right? Because if that's the case, that's the way I see that it can be compared, on that page you earned a tkoen but it was difficult because sometimes the market went to the opposite side that I chose.

[Shamm]

Roulette has a house edge from 2.70% to 5.26%. I believe 2.70% is OK, but you can find lower house edge in other games, and also be "entertained" too during the moment. My recommendation is Craps!

Yeah, Craps is the best gambling game for a low house edge percentage category since it only has 1.41% percentage while it pays more than x2 in every single bet. I wonder how craps is not yet popular despite its design is less risky and higher payout compared to typical games like dice, roulette and blackjack.

I’m playing craps for a long time with good profit until now because I can control my bets and limit to a few numbers that I know that hot for that round. Betting on hard ways gives a sweet profit too.

Craps is a good one in every single bet when you win then you can earn double your bet because they double it. For me craps are one of The best games in casinos but still wondering why this is one is not a very popular one is big gamblers won't play this and I think because of the wagger or the game itself but for me this is a good one. In roulette it will base on the outcome and once you hit a lucky combination then you will be happy for your winning.

[paxmao]

Roulette has a house edge from 2.70% to 5.26%. I believe 2.70% is OK, but you can find lower house edge in other games, and also be "entertained" too during the moment. My recommendation is Craps!

Yeah, Craps is the best gambling game for a low house edge percentage category since it only has 1.41% percentage while it pays more than x2 in every single bet. I wonder how craps is not yet popular despite its design is less risky and higher payout compared to typical games like dice, roulette and blackjack.

I’m playing craps for a long time with good profit until now because I can control my bets and limit to a few numbers that I know that hot for that round. Betting on hard ways gives a sweet profit too.

Craps is a good one in every single bet when you win then you can earn double your bet because they double it. For me craps are one of The best games in casinos but still wondering why this is one is not a very popular one is big gamblers won't play this and I think because of the wagger or the game itself but for me this is a good one. In roulette it will base on the outcome and once you hit a lucky combination then you will be happy for your winning.

From a "pleb" perspective, gambling is either a low intensity thrill - like a small budget every week or so, or a kind of all or nothing stake. In the second case, roulette can be a reasonable option. You would need to hit like 10 successful red/black in a row or go for one or two numbers and hit a couple of times in a row. All quite difficult, but hey, it is plebs prerogative to dream 

[Wind_FURY]

Roulette has a house edge from 2.70% to 5.26%. I believe 2.70% is OK, but you can find lower house edge in other games, and also be "entertained" too during the moment. My recommendation is Craps!

Yeah, Craps is the best gambling game for a low house edge percentage category since it only has 1.41% percentage while it pays more than x2 in every single bet. I wonder how craps is not yet popular despite its design is less risky and higher payout compared to typical games like dice, roulette and blackjack.

I’m playing craps for a long time with good profit until now because I can control my bets and limit to few numbers that I know that hot for that round. Betting on hardways gives a sweet profit too.

I have always recommended Craps because it's the best casino game FOR ME that has rules that encourage strategy, not like Sic Bo, which the results of winning or losing is based on luck. It's an absolute gambling game. BUT the best FOR ME might not be the best FOR YOU.

BlackJack, Coin_trader's favorite, is also a casino game that has rules that encourage strategy, but it's not for me. It gives me stress, and when I'm stressed, I do Martingale Betting Strategy and lose all of my balance. Hahahaha.

[Slow death]

So technically you are saying that gambling can be more ideal as a stress reliever than making a trade?. well it depends in trading if you have knowledge regarding the position you would like to do is you make the right time and proper preparation at the same time, if you execute the trade properly its good but if not you have a mistakes every thing right there has a lesson but in playing gambling is you just make a deposit, play and let the game you choose to decide if you are a winner or not, gambling is more stressful because you are just letting other people make your luck not yourself with your knowledge and skills.

IN my opinion gambling is much more stressful than day trading, I say this for the following reason: for example if a person takes 100$ and that person starts making sports bets, that person bets 10$, loses, bets others 10$ and loses again, bet on 10$ wins, but then goes back to bet on 10$ and loses again, this person will start to get stressed because he sees that his bankroll is reducing all the time, and he doesn't know how to reverse this situation, then panic starts to take over him, but when doing trade he will always put stop - loss and he can do hodl for some time until he has profit, then he will not have stress when doing trade

I think that gambling can be more stressful than day trading.

Remember that in gambling, luck is the majority factor that can either make or break your day. A person with no skill at all can still win tons of money in gambling if he has the luck for the day. But a person who does not have any prior experience nor skill in trading is most likely to fail and to experience losses.

Though both have the element of luck present, you can at least lessen the chances of you losing if you have the knowledge and experience in trading.

When you talk about day trading, you should specify or mention the part or type of day trading, some trade in the spot market, while others trade in the futures/margin market-some call it derivatives.

Now, comparing this to gambling, I would say that gambling installs more anxiety to the body than day trading on spot market.

But in futures market, I can't really say the same, maybe this would depend on how experienced the trader is, many trade futures market blindly, they trade through guessing/predictions and hoping they are right, if in-experienced futures trading should be compared to gambling, I would tell you that Futures trading adds more anxiety to the body than gambling.
This is just my opinion/thoughts, I might be wrong.

if there is something in my opinion that is clear and that the no day trade the futures and margin market is something very similar to gambling particularly very similar to sports betting, I particularly avoid trading the futures and margin market because it is easy to lose everything money, even if the person is very good in technical analysis, this futures market is a very dangerous market where only exchanges are making a lot of money with it

a lot of people at first were posting videos on youtube of how they would be making a lot of money fast in the futures market, but after a while most of these people stopped posting videos and stopped talking about this subject, I suspect they must have lost a lot money in this market and for that reason they stopped talking about this subject, in games of chance, all games that depend on luck for the person to win bring many frustrations in addition to many losses, people can even pretend that they are having fun with the games but at the end of the day when they look at their portfolio they get frustrated, I even find it impressive that even so the next day they are playing even knowing that the purpose is to lose

[danadc]

Roulette has a house edge from 2.70% to 5.26%. I believe 2.70% is OK, but you can find lower house edge in other games, and also be "entertained" too during the moment. My recommendation is Craps!

Yeah, Craps is the best gambling game for a low house edge percentage category since it only has 1.41% percentage while it pays more than x2 in every single bet. I wonder how craps is not yet popular despite its design is less risky and higher payout compared to typical games like dice, roulette and blackjack.

I’m playing craps for a long time with good profit until now because I can control my bets and limit to a few numbers that I know that hot for that round. Betting on hard ways gives a sweet profit too.

Craps is a good one in every single bet when you win then you can earn double your bet because they double it. For me craps are one of The best games in casinos but still wondering why this is one is not a very popular one is big gamblers won't play this and I think because of the wagger or the game itself but for me this is a good one. In roulette it will base on the outcome and once you hit a lucky combination then you will be happy for your winning.

That sounds very good and even something easy to adapt for a conservative style of play, but from what I see it can easily fall into the martingale strategy, and that strategy has left many ugaodres bankrupt and in a short time, the I can see roulettes as slot machines, I have no luck in any of those games and no matter how hard I try to play I lose, what I think is that I have an idea about those games and maybe that's why I lose?

These things of believing that one is lucky or not is something of commoners too and it is a characteristic of being somewhat insufferable in a house where one cannot lose but rather win and that is impossible.

[Oilacris]

Roulette has a house edge from 2.70% to 5.26%. I believe 2.70% is OK, but you can find lower house edge in other games, and also be "entertained" too during the moment. My recommendation is Craps!

Yeah, Craps is the best gambling game for a low house edge percentage category since it only has 1.41% percentage while it pays more than x2 in every single bet. I wonder how craps is not yet popular despite its design is less risky and higher payout compared to typical games like dice, roulette and blackjack.

I’m playing craps for a long time with good profit until now because I can control my bets and limit to a few numbers that I know that hot for that round. Betting on hard ways gives a sweet profit too.

Craps is a good one in every single bet when you win then you can earn double your bet because they double it. For me craps are one of The best games in casinos but still wondering why this is one is not a very popular one is big gamblers won't play this and I think because of the wagger or the game itself but for me this is a good one. In roulette it will base on the outcome and once you hit a lucky combination then you will be happy for your winning.

That sounds very good and even something easy to adapt for a conservative style of play, but from what I see it can easily fall into the martingale strategy, and that strategy has left many ugaodres bankrupt and in a short time, the I can see roulettes as slot machines, I have no luck in any of those games and no matter how hard I try to play I lose, what I think is that I have an idea about those games and maybe that's why I lose?

These things of believing that one is lucky or not is something of commoners too and it is a characteristic of being somewhat insufferable in a house where one cannot lose but rather win and that is impossible.

Whether you are a whale or a commoner then there's no way that you could really able to avoid those random chance if we do speak about winning, the only differs here into those huge wagerers is that

they could really extent out their strategies on to some certain degree because they do have huge bankroll or capital which those commoners or small wagerers couldnt able to do so.

I dont stress out myself on why is that others do win often and just simply accepts that im not really lucky on that particular session or game time.

[traderethereum]

Whether you are a whale or a commoner then there's no way that you could really able to avoid those random chance if we do speak about winning, the only differs here into those huge wagerers is that

they could really extent out their strategies on to some certain degree because they do have huge bankroll or capital which those commoners or small wagerers couldnt able to do so.

I dont stress out myself on why is that others do win often and just simply accepts that im not really lucky on that particular session or game time.

There is no doubt that a whale could expand its strategy to a certain degree because the capital it used exceeded that of ordinary gamblers who only used small capital.
We can only think that small gamblers can win if they have great luck, so the wins will also be big, and this can happen in slot games.
But if you feel you have skills in skill-based gambling games, your win rate may be greater so you can win in large numbers.
But once again, the victory will not come easily and the loss will come easily to you.
So be wise in playing gambling.

[Wind_FURY]

Whether you are a whale or a commoner then there's no way that you could really able to avoid those random chance if we do speak about winning, the only differs here into those huge wagerers is that they could really extent out their strategies on to some certain degree because they do have huge bankroll or capital which those commoners or small wagerers couldnt able to do so.

I dont stress out myself on why is that others do win often and just simply accepts that im not really lucky on that particular session or game time.

There is no doubt that a whale could expand its strategy to a certain degree because the capital it used exceeded that of ordinary gamblers who only used small capital.

We can only think that small gamblers can win if they have great luck, so the wins will also be big, and this can happen in slot games.

But if you feel you have skills in skill-based gambling games, your win rate may be greater so you can win in large numbers.

But once again, the victory will not come easily and the loss will come easily to you.
So be wise in playing gambling.

If a small amount of capital is the problem, then the adjustment that plebs must do that makes good logical sense is, make your bets smaller.

Smaller amount of capital = smaller bets.

Don't believe those plebs like us who says that the Martingale System works because 100% of the time is, they're lying. Martingale System with a small/limited amount of capital, played in casino games with house edge low or high, is a quick path to ruin.

[Betwrong]

~ Don't believe those plebs like us who says that the Martingale System works because 100% of the time is, they're lying. Martingale System with a small/limited amount of capital, played in casino games with house edge low or high, is a quick path to ruin.

Indeed, if you want to make money through martingale, it's a shortcut to disaster. Even if your initial bet is as small as $0.20 you are doomed. However, you can still use martingale playing for your entertainment. I'm doing it all the time. But I'm starting really low, like a thousandth of a cent, and if my target is, say, 99x, I'm not doubling my bet each time, but rather every tenth time or so. And most of the time I hit it eventually, like today, for instance:



but considering what I have previously lost, my real winning is just around 10 cents. So, like I said, it's not a way of making money. Don't try to start from a higher amount to win more in the end. This may end very badly.