MODs, where art thou?

[Iroh]

Plagiarism

The said user is copy-pasting sports articles without giving credits to the sources used. Intentionally changing/paraphrasing a few words to avoid detection which doesn't make it less of an abuse. Posts are partially or fully plagiarized, in most cases, his posts consist of material stolen from multiple articles.

User: Mr.right85

Copy: #1

As Monaco have confirmed that midfielder Cesc Fabregas will leave the club at the end of th is month.

The former Arsenal, Barcelona and Chelsea star has been had though time battling injuries during the 2021-22 season, playing just two times in a Ligue 1 campaign in which Monaco finished third behind Marseille and champions Paris Saint-Germain.

A statement from Monaco on Saturday confirmed the former Spanish midfielder's  departure via their official Twitter account
The 35year old having played 830 career games has represented the likes of Spain.. Arsenal..Chelsea.. Barcelona and Monaco ...He is one of the all time too assisters in the premier League history
 Won the uefa champions League and LaLiga with Barcelona...the premier League with Chelsea..the world cup and European championship with Spain and his one of the youngest captains in arsenal's history

Original:

https://www.livescore.com/en/news/monaco-confirm-fabregas-contract-will-not-be-renewed-2022061810434300681/

Monaco have confirmed that midfielder Cesc Fabregas will leave the club at the end of this month.

The former Arsenal, Barcelona and Chelsea star has been troubled by injuries during the 2021-22 season, playing just twice in a Ligue 1 campaign in which Monaco finished third behind Marseille and champions Paris Saint-Germain.

A statement from Monaco on Saturday confirmed the 35-year-old's imminent departure.

"The midfielder with more than 830 career games, whose contract is coming to an end, leaves the principality club three and a half years after his arrival," the statement read.

(archive)

Copy: #2

Everton have picked out Watford Nigerian forward Emmanuel Dennis as their possible replacement  should Brazilian forward Richarlison leave the club this summer.

Brazilian striker Richarlison, 25, has been heavily involved with move to Tottenham leaving the Toffees searching for a ready-made replacement. Tottenham who are in for a total reinforcement next season have already signed three players.

The Nigerian forward, 24, scored 10 goals and provided six assists in the Hornets’ doomed Premier League campaign in which the Hertfordshire club finished 19th and was relegated to the English second division championship..
He most recently scored in the African cup of Nations qualifying match against Sao Tome where Nigeria won the game by a dominant 10:0 display scoring the last goal of the game from the spot kick

Original:

https://www.livescore.com/en/news/transfer-talk-june-18-2022-emmanuel-dennis-everton-richarlison-tottenham-2022061808373476072/

Everton have identified Watford forward Emmanuel Dennis as their primary transfer target should Richarlison leave the club this summer.

Brazilian striker Richarlison, 25, has been heavily linked with a move to Tottenham leaving the Toffees searching for a ready-made replacement.

Dennis, 24, scored 10 goals and provided six assists in the Hornets’ doomed Premier League campaign in which the Hertfordshire club finished 19th last term.

(archive)


Copy: #3

Spanish LaLiga chief Javier Tebas continued his displeasure with Paris Saint-Germain and Manchester City, stressing the complaint to UEFA over financial fair play was to protect the competition.

Manchester City were the of the first LaLiga complaint back in April, while the league made another against PSG on Wednesday regarding breaching financial fair play rulings.
The LaLiga chief is not happy about the way Manchester city and Paris Saint Germain have been allowed to go unpunished due to their role in breaching financial fair play in recent years ... This could be traced to Manchester city's acquisition of Top and expensive players such as John stones, Bernardo silva, jack Grealish and recently Erling Haaland.while Paris Saint Germain's acquisition of Neymar and kyrrian Mbappe is also put into consideration

Original:

https://www.livescore.com/en/news/we-want-the-competition-to-be-as-clean-as-possible-laliga-chief-tebas-defends-psg-man-city-complaint-2022061614504977270/

LaLiga chief Javier Tebas continued his feud with Paris Saint-Germain and Manchester City, explaining the complaint to UEFA over financial fair play was to defend competition.

City were the subject of the first LaLiga complaint back in April, while the league lodged another against PSG on Wednesday regarding breaching financial fair play rulings.

The latter complaint continued Tebas' most recent conflict with the Ligue 1 side, who managed to keep World Cup winner Kylian Mbappe in Paris despite persistent interest from Real Madrid.

(archive)


Copy: #4

Yves Bissouma is gearing up to fulfilling a childhood dream by playing in the UEFA Champions League next season, after landing a four-year contract with Tottenham.The Mali international spent spent four seasons with Brighton after sealing a deal from french side Lille in 2017...and has now becos the third spurs signing of the summer transfer window after the signing of Ivan Perisic from inter Milan...and Fraser Forster from Southampton.. having one year left on his contract with the south coast club.. Bissouma will have to fight for a starting spot in the Tottenham start line up next season with spurs challenging in the premier League...the champions League and the FA cup and league cup.. Tottenham Hotspur are still in the transfer market looking to make some additions to their defence and attacking ranks... Antonio Conte is expected to do a major rebuild to this Tottenham side

Original:

https://www.livescore.com/en/news/tottenham-sign-brighton-midfielder-yves-bissouma-2022061409222994537/

Yves Bissouma is looking forward to fulfilling a childhood dream by playing in the Champions League next season, after agreeing a four-year contract with Tottenham.

Spurs have signed the midfielder from Brighton for a reported initial fee of £25million, becoming the North Londoners' third acquisition of the summer transfer window alongside Ivan Perisic and Fraser Forster.

The Mali international spent four seasons on the South Coast after joining the Seagulls from Lille in 2017, making 124 appearances.

(archive)

Copy: #5

Mattia De Sciglio has signed a new contract to keep him at Juventus until June 2025.... The AC Milan academy graduate has extended his stay in Turin till at least 2025..he joined the old ladies in 2017 on a five year deal..
He has been restricted to the bench with wingbacks Alex Sandra and Juan Cuadrado preferred in that position..he some sent for a loan spell at Lyon in 2020 before his impressive season with the French club earned him a call back to the Italian giants.
The 29year old who can play both left and right wing back has made 91 appearances for Juventus scoring twice...

An ex player of Juventus have pleaded with the Turin club to sign former player Paul pogba.. the Frenchman who his contract with Manchester United is set to expire at the end of this month has been released my Manchester United and the ex Juventus player feels the Frenchman will be a Ideal recruitment for the old ladies of Turin..

Original:

https://www.sportsmax.tv/football/international/item/101038-de-sciglio-pens-new-three-year-juventus-contract

Mattia De Sciglio has signed a new contract to keep him at Juventus until June 2025.

The Italy international came through the Milan academy before joining Juve for €12million on a five-year contract in 2017.

De Sciglio has had to settle for a rotational role with the Bianconeri, with wing-back options Alex Sandro and Juan Cuadrado preferred on either flank.

The 29-year-old was sent to Lyon for the 2020-21 season and impressed before returning to Juve, who finished fourth in Serie A the following campaign with Massimiliano Allegri back at the helm.

De Sciglio has made 91 appearances for the Bianconeri, scoring twice and providing four assists, while also contributing to 30 clean sheets.

The versatile full-back was set to see his contract at the Allianz Stadium expire at the end of this month, but has agreed a three-year extension.

(archive)

Copy: #6

Chelsea have confirmed that  Andreas Christensen will leave the club at the end of this month amid Barcelona links... Christensen 26 made a total of 161 appearances lifting the Europa League...the champions League the super cup and the world club cup...
The Danish defender is been linked with Barcelona and he's expecting to join them as soon as possible...

Chelsea already without the services of Antonio Rudiga with the German joining Real Madrid will have to go all out in the transfer market to get possible replacements  to partner Thiago silver.
The new owners have alot of work to do and must build on the foundations of the previous owners in order to keep the club competing at the highest level. It will be a first somehow difficult season for them ..but I see them finish at least in the top three of next season's league table..

Original:

https://www.livescore.com/en/news/chelsea-release-andreas-christensen-barcelona-2022061014341475744/

Chelsea have confirmed Andreas Christensen will leave the club when his contract expires later this month.

The Danish defender, 26, is widely expected to join Barcelona on a free transfer.

Christensen made 161 appearances during a decade with the Blues, lifting the Champions League, Europa League, Club World Cup and Super Cup along the way.

(archive)

Copy: #7

Chile's appeal to disqualify Ecaudor from next year's world cup has been rejected by FIFA  an appeal made on the basis that Ecaudor fielded and ineligible player during the qualifying round...

A disciplinary proceedings was opened earlier when the football association of chile told FIFA that right back Byron Castillo was  Colombian and not From Ecuador... latest report now says football governing body FIFA has rejected the appeal..

During the world cup qualification round Byron Castillo made 8 appearances as Ecuador booked Thier place in the world cup in Qatar later this year...

Chile on the other hand didnt qualify for the world cup in Qatar as they finished in 7th place..while Ecaudor finished in fourth place...
 
Ecaudor is in group A with host country Qatar, African champions Senegal and 2010 world cup finalists the Netherlands...

Original:

https://www.livescore.com/en/news/ecuador-keep-place-at-qatar-world-cup-after-chile-appeal-rejected-2022061015262352964/, https://www.livescore.com/en/news/fifa-opens-disciplinary-proceedings-against-ecuador-over-ineligible-player-2022051116195350240/

Chile's appeal to have Ecuador disqualified from the World Cup in Qatar has been rejected by FIFA.

The appeal was made on the basis of Ecuador selecting an ineligible player during their qualifying campaign.

Football's world governing body opened disciplinary proceedings last month following allegations that right-back Byron Castillo is Colombian and not eligible to represent Ecuador.

Castillo made eight appearances for Ecuador in their South American qualifying campaign.

Chile, who failed to qualify for the World Cup, lodged a complaint, but FIFA confirmed on Friday that Ecuador will keep their place at the World Cup, which starts in November.

FIFA have opened disciplinary proceedings against Ecuador over the potential use of an ineligible player in their successful World Cup qualifying campaign.

Chile last week asked the world football governing body to investigate allegations that right-back Byron Castillo is actually Colombian and not eligible to represent Ecuador.

Castillo played eight times for Ecuador in South American qualifying, including a goalless draw with Chile in September and a 2-0 victory in November.

La Roja finished seventh, meaning they just missed out on a play-off spot, but believe Ecuador should be expelled from the quadrennial competition.

And FIFA have confirmed they are looking into the recent complaint made by the Federacion de Futbol de Chile.

An official statement said: "FIFA decided to open disciplinary proceedings in relation to Byron David Castillo Segura's possible breach of the call criteria for the indicated matches.

"In this context, the FEF and the Peruvian Football Federation have been invited to present their positions before the FIFA disciplinary committee."

Ecuador have already been drawn in Group A at the World Cup, alongside hosts Qatar, as well as Senegal and the Netherlands.

(archive)

One would think this is a clear, open and shut case of plagiarism but I guess the moderators would beg to differ. With the fierce stand against plagiarism on the forum, one would think there would certainly have been a repercussion of some sort  when someone commits the heinous crime of taking credit for someone else work.

Perhaps the mods are selective in who gets punished; I do not know. The post has been long deleted so I can safely assume that not all users on the forum gets the same treatment when found out for plagiarism

I’m not advocating for this user to get banned. I’m just curious if a low ranking member also does the same, would the user be given a pass as well?

Perhaps the pig in George Orwell’s Animal farm was right when he said; All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than the others.

[1714117053]

1714117053

[1714117053]

1714117053

[1714117053]

1714117053

[1714117053]

1714117053

[joeperry]

Please do post it here: Report plagiarism (copy/paste) here. Mods: please give temp or permban as needed

Ps. Mods doesn't choose who to ban or not. They ban all the users who was verified that plagiarized, if you think why they are not banned yet. Of course, they with a lot of people posting in the forum they wouldn't be able to filter it out that's why there's a board for that so some users who caught users plagiarizing content can report it.

It's my first time to see plagiarized deleted content, I'm not sure what's gonna be the decision.

[Little Mouse]

I’m not advocating for this user to get banned. I’m just curious if a low ranking member also does the same, would the user be given a pass as well?

I have not yet gone through the case and don't know the update but for sure, there should be exceptions always based on users' contributions toward the forum. Someone may make a mistake when they share a piece of news but getting banned for that doesn't make any sense in my opinion. Regarding low-ranking members? It should be the same. There are also users who didn't get the pass despite being a senior members or higher. I really hope it makes sense to you. There are cases where signature banned has been given and I believe this should be practiced more.

[logfiles]

Report the Profile to the mods again and wait for the result. If it is not banned, then it probably means that the mods were a little lenient to the user and there have been such cases in the past. Nothing new.
Low ranking members are likely to get instant bans because some accounts have minimal contributions in the forum except posting bounty reports or one liners.

[Crypt0S0ul]

I tried to check all the posts you refer to, but none of them are available on the forum anymore.
To get someone banned, The plagiarized post must be available on the forum. Moderators do not consider Post Scraping links like Loyce.club or Ninjastic. This is not my statement. One of the Mods said that, but I cannot find the Post now.

Mr. Right Deleted all those posts before any moderator saw the plagiarism report.
So, He is safe now and don't expect to get him banned if no new on-forum plagiarism is found.

[AB de Royse777]

Report the Profile to the mods again and wait for the result.

It's 4 to 5 months old. Why even should someone do that? I am curious about motivation of the OP.

[Sandra_hakeem]

I'd assume a user like 'right' to have known the rules of this community, if not all, atleast -- that plagiarism is something the whole community revert discreetly and that people barely got second chances when caught in this mischievous act.

Hey you, Op, move this to the proper thread as directed above.
It really baffles me; the why and the how a user should plagiarize his gambling post, isn't that really uncalled-for? Was it ever necessary? Of is this the OP's means to met up post quota for the week? Then why hesitate to add source links all through?
Look man, I just dunno how the mods will react on this cus I've known you not to be a troll but you've messed up. I just hope he pops-up to solicit for himself or maybe, mods would take actions accordingly but,damages should please be controlled.

Edit:

Mr. Right Deleted all those posts before any moderator saw the plagiarism report.
So, He is safe now and don't expect to get him banned if no new on-forum plagiarism is found.

AnotherAlt
That's true. Your points ain't disputed as those post aren't currently in his history but,how bout having it somewhere,
 Pending in here just so that references could be made with it? Isn't this type a kind of reference that fits the very fact that things were meant to be archived? ^{I dunno tbh. I'm just curious}
This also doesn't mean that I'm rekindling the whole issue. I just had to ask; leave him be.

Sandra 👩‍🦱

[Rikafip]

With the fierce stand against plagiarism on the forum, one would think there would certainly have been a repercussion of some sort  when someone commits the heinous crime of taking credit for someone else work.

Heinous crime? Plagiarism sucks and I reported my share of those, but lets not exaggerate here.

The post has been long deleted so I can safely assume that not all users on the forum gets the same treatment when found out for plagiarism

That's a known fact for a long time, nothing new here. And I see nothing wrong if someone who is net positive to this forum gets signature or temporary ban instead permanent one, unlike some shitposter who is probably an alt account of previously banned account.

Ps. Mods doesn't choose who to ban or not. They ban all the users who was verified that plagiarized, if you think why they are not banned yet. Of course, they with a lot of people posting in the forum they wouldn't be able to filter it out that's why there's a board for that so some users who caught users plagiarizing content can report it.

Situation is not so simple as you presented it. If mods ban all users who plagiarized, @Mr.right85 would have been banned already but as we can see, he still hasn't been banned so when it comes to plagiarism its case by case scenario.

To get someone banned, The plagiarized post must be available on the forum. Moderators do not consider Post Scraping links like Loyce.club or Ninjastic. This is not my statement. One of the Mods said that, but I cannot find the Post now.

First time I hear about this and honestly doesn't make much sense to me. Can you please (or anyone else) find the source of that claim?

[Lucius]

@joeperry, that post was also copied from the thread you suggest, don't you see the date above the quote?

Ps. Mods doesn't choose who to ban or not.

Who decides about it, maybe some secret forces that we don't know about? I don't think all mods have perma-ban authority, but global moderators and admins do.

Report the Profile to the mods again and wait for the result.

Report profile? So what does that have to do with plagiarism, you are not reporting a profile, but some kind of content that has to do with that profile. Given that the posts in question have been deleted, the only thing someone can do now is to find new plagiarized posts (if they exist) and then make a report.

[Crypt0S0ul]

That's true. Your points ain't disputed as those post aren't currently in his history but,how bout having it somewhere,

I don't think Moderators consider evidence from outside of the forum.

To get someone banned, The plagiarized post must be available on the forum. Moderators do not consider Post Scraping links like Loyce.club or Ninjastic. This is not my statement. One of the Mods said that, but I cannot find the Post now.

First time I hear about this and honestly doesn't make much sense to me. Can you please (or anyone else) find the source of that claim?

I knew I will get this question. So, I immediately started searching for the post. It takes 50 Minutes to find this post. Here it is,

Based on their own experience, global moderators do not consider links to posts from Ninjastic.space, as well as Loyce.club, as evidence. Posts that are used as evidence of any violation of the rules by users should be on the forum on a mandatory basis.

So, Based on that. I assume Mr. Right will not get banned because he already deleted those posts before moderators saw the report. So instead of reporting them on the Report Plagiarism thread, You can report to Moderators silently describing the reason. Of course, if you badly want to get him banned. Or maybe you can ask him to add source and follow the rules.

[Little Mouse]

To get someone banned, The plagiarized post must be available on the forum. Moderators do not consider Post Scraping links like Loyce.club or Ninjastic. This is not my statement. One of the Mods said that, but I cannot find the Post now.

First time I hear about this and honestly doesn't make much sense to me. Can you please (or anyone else) find the source of that claim?

I knew I will get this question. So, I immediately started searching for the post. It takes 50 Minutes to find this post. Here it is,

Based on their own experience, global moderators do not consider links to posts from Ninjastic.space, as well as Loyce.club, as evidence. Posts that are used as evidence of any violation of the rules by users should be on the forum on a mandatory basis.

This makes sense why wouldn't mods trust such an archiving links. It is possible that TryNinja and/or LoyceV can manipulate the content in their website since they have access to their website, though we know any of them would never do that. But still, mods have their responsibility to ensure everything. Maybe that's why they don't take action based on such proofs.

[Xal0lex]

I knew I will get this question. So, I immediately started searching for the post. It takes 50 Minutes to find this post. Here it is,

Based on their own experience, global moderators do not consider links to posts from Ninjastic.space, as well as Loyce.club, as evidence. Posts that are used as evidence of any violation of the rules by users should be on the forum on a mandatory basis.

So, Based on that. I assume Mr. Right will not get banned because he already deleted those posts before moderators saw the report. So instead of reporting them on the Report Plagiarism thread, You can report to Moderators silently describing the reason. Of course, if you badly want to get him banned. Or maybe you can ask him to add source and follow the rules.

Don't treat my comment as some sort of established rule on the forum. I merely wrote that I was based on my experience of submitting applications to global moderators. Such submissions have not been reviewed for rule violations. That's why I drew that conclusion. But that's not a statement, it's just my assumption. Only global moderators can give a definitive answer on this matter.

[Tutte]

Report the Profile to the mods again and wait for the result.

It's 4 to 5 months old. Why even should someone do that? I am curious about motivation of the OP.

Why am I not surprised Mr/Miss Royse777 at your meaningless reply!
The MODs clearly fail to do their job of giving the right punishment to a repetitive plagiarized content. Not even a few days ban as a warning doing something he/she has full knowledge of.

@iroh, don't waste your energy here, probably he has the big Boss in his corner.  Lol, what's good for the goose is good for the gander but it does not apply to Mr Plagiarism.  

Maybe I should do a text too......

[decodx]

So, Based on that. I assume Mr. Right will not get banned because he already deleted those posts before moderators saw the report. So instead of reporting them on the Report Plagiarism thread, You can report to Moderators silently describing the reason. Of course, if you badly want to get him banned. Or maybe you can ask him to add source and follow the rules.

Why do you assume that the user deleted his posts himself and not the moderators? Those reports are months old, so there was plenty of time for the moderators to react, which they probably did. Mr.right85's profile on bpip.org shows that 7 of his pots have been deleted by moderators. Second, if you read the OP's post more closely, you'll notice that he quoted reports from the Report plagiarism thread.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Report profile? So what does that have to do with plagiarism, you are not reporting a profile, but some kind of content that has to do with that profile. Given that the posts in question have been deleted, the only thing someone can do now is to find new plagiarized posts (if they exist) and then make a report.

I think he probably meant report one of the posts with a message to the mods to check the user's profile for other instances of plagiarism, although that's not the right way to go about it--or it could just be a misunderstanding due to language.  Either way, if the member in question hasn't been banned within maybe a month I'd probably report those posts again.  I don't think this is a case where "leniency" should come into play.

@iroh, don't waste your energy here, probably he has the big Boss in his corner.

If you're referring to Theymos there, I seriously doubt it.  The only member who might have Theymos in his corner is Coolcryptovator, or Cryptovator, or whatever his name got changed to.  Twice.  Sorry, I'm not bitter about being refused a change of username.  Not at all, not one bit.

[PowerGlove]

Wow, this one is quite puzzling! I mean, seven separate instances of plagiarism, and no repercussions at all?

What more could the reporter have done? They properly documented each instance and made sure to archive each post in case they were deleted!

Interestingly, the reporter actually used two different archiving methods, archive.ph for the first 3 posts and loyce.club for the last 4.

I get that some mods might prefer to rely on evidence that still exists on the forum, but surely between the two archiving methods that were used, and maybe a cross-check against TryNinja's archive, there's more than enough evidence to hand out a signature ban or something?

I don't know, depending on my mood, sometimes I'm like: "Who cares? Leave the poor guy alone, he probably already feels bad and has learned his lesson, so just go about your business and stop stirring up shit."

But then on other days I'm all like: "The rules must be applied evenly or not at all!"

[KingsDen]

Wow, this one is quite puzzling! I mean, seven separate instances of plagiarism, and no repercussions at all?

What more could the reporter have done? They properly documented each instance and made sure to archive each post in case they were deleted!

Interestingly, the reporter actually used two different archiving methods, archive.ph for the first 3 posts and loyce.club for the last 4.

I get that some mods might prefer to rely on evidence that still exists on the forum, but surely between the two archiving methods that were used, and maybe a cross-check against TryNinja's archive, there's more than enough evidence to hand out a signature ban or something?

I don't know, depending on my mood, sometimes I'm like: "Who cares? Leave the poor guy alone, he probably already feels bad and has learned his lesson, so just go about your business and stop stirring up shit."

But then on other days I'm all like: "The rules must be applied evenly or not at all!"

I knew when this case happened, the said user joined a campaign managed by Trofo before the plagiarism was discovered. I went through the profile of the user and he isn't a shit poster, and even till date the user is producing quality posts. I suspect that something unusual might have happened to the user that period of the plagiarism.

However, the plagiarist in question is a smart guy, it could be that he deleted all the plagiarised posts before a moderator was able to treat his case. Since the evidence was no longer available, it could be seen that he committed no plagiarism in the eyes of the moderators.
There's a clear difference when a dumb commits sin and when a wise man does. Swiftness is what I understood happened.  He should be regarded as one of the luckiest users in the forum and there's totally No Need of resurrecting this matter now, is it targeted to troll the mods?

[Crypt0S0ul]

So, Based on that. I assume Mr. Right will not get banned because he already deleted those posts before moderators saw the report. So instead of reporting them on the Report Plagiarism thread, You can report to Moderators silently describing the reason. Of course, if you badly want to get him banned. Or maybe you can ask him to add source and follow the rules.

Why do you assume that the user deleted his posts himself and not the moderators? Those reports are months old, so there was plenty of time for the moderators to react, which they probably did. Mr.right85's profile on bpip. org shows that 7 of his pots have been deleted by moderators. Second, if you read the OP's post more closely, you'll notice that he quoted reports from the Report plagiarism thread.

Why do you assume those 7 posts deleted by moderators were plagiarized posts? Maybe those 7 posts were something else like low-value posts or spam which is deleted by moderators. As far as I know, Moderators delete Plagiarism posts with their actions (Temp or perm ban). Yeah, I saw that he quoted it from the report plagiarism thread. No matter how old the reports are. If Mr. right uses the telegram bot, he was notified right after the report and he deleted those plagiarized posts. Suppose 1 hour later moderators saw the report but they found those posts were deleted. So, it does not depend on how old the report is. Use your brain.

[Iroh]

Wow, this one is quite puzzling! I mean, seven separate instances of plagiarism, and no repercussions at all?

What more could the reporter have done? They properly documented each instance and made sure to archive each post in case they were deleted!

Interestingly, the reporter actually used two different archiving methods, archive.ph for the first 3 posts and loyce.club for the last 4.

I get that some mods might prefer to rely on evidence that still exists on the forum, but surely between the two archiving methods that were used, and maybe a cross-check against TryNinja's archive, there's more than enough evidence to hand out a signature ban or something?

I don't know, depending on my mood, sometimes I'm like: "Who cares? Leave the poor guy alone, he probably already feels bad and has learned his lesson, so just go about your business and stop stirring up shit."

But then on other days I'm all like: "The rules must be applied evenly or not at all!"

I knew when this case happened, the said user joined a campaign managed by Trofo before the plagiarism was discovered. I went through the profile of the user and he isn't a shit poster, and even till date the user is producing quality posts. I suspect that something unusual might have happened to the user that period of the plagiarism.

However, the plagiarist in question is a smart guy, it could be that he deleted all the plagiarised posts before a moderator was able to treat his case. Since the evidence was no longer available, it could be seen that he committed no plagiarism in the eyes of the moderators.
There's a clear difference when a dumb commits sin and when a wise man does. Swiftness is what I understood happened.  He should be regarded as one of the luckiest users in the forum and there's totally No Need of resurrecting this matter now, is it targeted to troll the mods?

Following your logic, it’s real smart to knowingly plagiarize and hurriedly delete the said posts when found out. That’s good to know. 
Also, when a wise man commits a sin, it’s a “wise sin” and it’s a “dumb sin” when a supposedly dumb person does? Lol! I guess if it’s a wise sin, it’s alright.

Plagiarism is what I understood happened there and that crap about differences when a dumb man and a wise man commits a sin is bullshit. The wise man should be wise and not dumb to commit the sin. You sound ignorant or flat out biased.

[LoyceV]

To get someone banned, The plagiarized post must be available on the forum. Moderators do not consider Post Scraping links like Loyce.club or Ninjastic. This is not my statement. One of the Mods said that, but I cannot find the Post now.

First time I hear about this and honestly doesn't make much sense to me.

I'd say it makes a lot of sense: people shouldn't get banned if they corrected their own mistake.

This makes sense why wouldn't mods trust such an archiving links. It is possible that TryNinja and/or LoyceV can manipulate the content in their website since they have access to their website, though we know any of them would never do that.

You don't even have to trust me on it: I create checksums of all archived posts. See this post (and read a few posts before and after). Feel free to archive those checksums as often as you want, and feel free to check if I don't automatically alter any new posts.