STAKE SCAMMED $100K AND NOT REPLYING EMAILS FOR 6 MONTHS

[piebeyb]

too often threads like this accuse but don't include evidence, I was thinking maybe there are other gambling sites that want to drop stake sites, but I won't think much like that, the OP should have provided evidence before making threads not only with words, so far I've been playing there Stake processes deposits and withdrawals well without any problems as long as we follow the rules available there

[Daltonik]

The story is of course sad, it would be interesting to know how much the OP has blocked stake, it is strange of course that people do not read the rules or, knowing the rules, try to cheat and forgery of the documents provided.

[abel1337]

Wouldn't really trust someone who got a red trust with a valid reasons and it seems that the red trust you get is from cheating stake by match fixing and submitting fake id. I see no reason why they will reply to you given that you are caught red handed on the scam accusation you made against stake. There are some flaws about your scam accusation and even admitted that you used your family member for the KYC which is a red flag for most of casinos.

[fathafraink]

I think what you do, is an impolite act, it's better if you ask about your problem in the Stake thread on this forum, and then ask permission to do pm, then do pm him/her (manager of Stake). So if this problem has been solved, you can review or reply to the thread, and it can be important information for people, through your experience.

Here is Stake Thread : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2072589.0

[mak013]

Wouldn't really trust someone who got a red trust with a valid reasons and it seems that the red trust you get is from cheating stake by match fixing and submitting fake id. I see no reason why they will reply to you given that you are caught red handed on the scam accusation you made against stake. There are some flaws about your scam accusation and even admitted that you used your family member for the KYC which is a red flag for most of casinos.

You do understand that all his red trust is coming from this scam accusation, right?

So stake said he bet on fixed matches. Why do you believe that? Did stake provide evidence to this claim? No they did not and still ALL you stake signature people say it's true, amazing. If Stunna says the earth is flat everybody he wouldn't question is as well. 

Come on, give me a break!

Stake just needs to show 1 single evidence he bet on fixed matches and it's all good, but yet there is nothing.
Where is an official report?

Anyway in such situation the OP ought to give us some information and he is just crying. With such thread i don`t see any reason to believe him, the trust is just additional prove against the OP.
And the Stake doesn`t need to prove anything in such threads. Honestly, i have no time to search all threads of the OP and analyze his trust but in this thread he made nothing to prove his situation.

[worle1bm]

I think what you do, is a impolite act, it's better if you ask about your problem in the Stake thread on this forum, and then ask permission to do pm, then do pm him/her (manager of Stake). So if this problem has been solved, you can review or reply to the thread, and it can be important information for people, through your experience.

Here is Stake Thread : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2072589.0

More over if the proper evidence is provided and convince people that there's something wrong then they could intervene to help otherwise there are lot of such accusations against different casino and it's hard to tell who is genuine case or not.There have been some issues but with following rules and proof the players have their refund from casino but @OP is having a different approach which cannot help a lot.

[Jody.Drummer]

You have problem with your KYC and you save big money there? Am I too stupid to understand what you are going to do next lol
Regardless of anything even without clear evidence you swear very energetically about this but don't show any evidence with the account you have. I even doubt your account that has a lot of money is just fictitious Don't be offended we talk of course it must be based on facts and what you do by continuing to swear like this in the absence of this fact only makes you look worse.

[Beparanf]

You have problem with your KYC and you save big money there? Am I too stupid to understand what you are going to do next lol
Regardless of anything even without clear evidence you swear very energetically about this but don't show any evidence with the account you have. I even doubt your account that has a lot of money is just fictitious Don't be offended we talk of course it must be based on facts and what you do by continuing to swear like this in the absence of this fact only makes you look worse.

It will only take you a couple of minutes to browse his post history and see what’s the OP post history. His case of long review for his account case is legit and Stunna already acknowledged it. But the issue is already tagged as solve after Stake concluded base on there own judgement that OP is involved in match fixing due to his perfect betting history.

This topic is surely debatable because Stake has no proof but only just a personal assessment since match can’t be proven with physical or valid evidence. 

[Haunebu]

Constant scam accusations against Stake these days though most of them are pure crap while only a couple of them are legit. Tough to trust op here considering his past reputation which is reflected through his negative trust ratings.

I feel that op is fighting a pointless battle here since I don't really think Stake management will take his claims seriously unless he provides solid proof as some of the posters above mentioned.

[PX-Z]

Constant scam accusations against Stake these days though most of them are pure crap while only a couple of them are legit. Tough to trust op here considering his past reputation which is reflected through his negative trust ratings.

I feel that op is fighting a pointless battle here since I don't really think Stake management will take his claims seriously unless he provides solid proof as some of the posters above mentioned.

Having negative trust rating on this forum doesn't mean that all his actions outside this forum should be considered as not true, lie, etc. About proofs, check his post history, or thread posted its all over there.

People should stop defending a service if the accusation is true no matter how reputed it is, or the case were closed but with unreasonable solution. Despite the attacked of some or most people here to OP of submitting fake KYC, they just blindly believe Stake about the claim of match fixing without no strong evidence given. Lol.

Now, it looks like once a reputed service will always be reputed base on its supporter or whatever they call it, even though it's unreasonable already. Lmao.

[Jemzx00]

Having negative trust rating on this forum doesn't mean that all his actions outside this forum should be considered as not true, lie, etc. About proofs, check his post history, or thread posted its all over there.

No one had said that his actions outside this forum are not true as no one cared whatever he does outside the forum as well as outside his case against Stake. In regard to proofs, OP have not mentioned any proof as well other than his denial with the accusation on his match making issue with Stake.

People should stop defending a service if the accusation is true no matter how reputed it is, or the case were closed but with unreasonable solution. Despite the attacked of some or most people here to OP of submitting fake KYC, they just blindly believe Stake about the claim of match fixing without no strong evidence given. Lol.

It's not about defending the service or platform; it leans more on people who are likely to believe with Stake rather than someone that has not provided any solid proof that the accusation against him is false or not true. Also, just as Stake or Stunna previously said, the main issue is not about KYC issue (which is true and could be used as supporting evidence that OP is suspicious and likely to do shady things) but rather the match-fixing issue that has been addressed by Stunna and still in an on-going investigation within Stake.

Now, it looks like once a reputed service will always be reputed base on its supporter or whatever they call it, even though it's unreasonable already. Lmao.

Nope, if OP has substantial proofs or evidence, things could likely be the other way around and Stake's reputation could be ruined.

[PX-Z]

No one had said that his actions outside this forum are not true as no one cared whatever he does outside the forum as well as outside his case against Stake. In regard to proofs, OP have not mentioned any proof as well other than his denial with the accusation on his match making issue with Stake.

It's all over the thread, talking about his account's negative trust (faking KYC) in relation to his threads of Stake's claims without strong evidence for the "match fixing".

It's not about defending the service or platform; it leans more on people who are likely to believe with Stake rather than someone that has not provided any solid proof that the accusation against him is false or not true. Also, just as Stake or Stunna previously said, the main issue is not about KYC issue (which is true and could be used as supporting evidence that OP is suspicious and likely to do shady things) but rather the match-fixing issue that has been addressed by Stunna and still in an on-going investigation within Stake.

If the account suspension is related to faking KYC then i would believe Stake did the right thing, that's obviously illegal.

But suspending an account without any strong evidence? I will tell its unreasonable and how should i believe that. That's already how many months ago yet there's no final conclusion of this investigation.  That's why i said people keep blindly believing of a reputed site saying whatever it is because they are reputed.

Let's be clear, I'm not siding OP or saying he should get that thousands of dollars from his account's balance, his actions of faking KYC is illegal. But i don't understand of Stake giving such reasons of suspending account. Because if they can reason out things just like this, then probably this will not be the last.

[Peanutswar]

After having a red tag with your account related into scams and accusations I guess no more will courage with your words, also you can't even provide information regarding the issue. Also regarding your issues you are known with the use of fake accounts and information which is part of the identity theft of other people or just creating a new identity just to make abuse the system.

[Jemzx00]

It's all over the thread, talking about his account's negative trust (faking KYC) in relation to his threads of Stake's claims without strong evidence for the "match fixing".

I would also relate the KYC issue to his match-making issue as well, in terms of who's to believe in. Would you believe someone who will try to submit multiple different ID for the KYC? (suspicious and shady activity) Also, OP has no supporting documents or proofs to deny the match fixing issue other than his own denial.

If the account suspension is related to faking KYC then i would believe Stake did the right thing, that's obviously illegal.

Just as you've mentioned, Faking KYC is illegal already and could be used to suspend the account of OP however that's not what stake basing their decision to suspend OP's account but rather the match-fixing issue that they fully believe in.

But suspending an account without any strong evidence? I will tell its unreasonable and how should i believe that. That's already how many months ago yet there's no final conclusion of this investigation.  That's why i said people keep blindly believing of a reputed site saying whatever it is because they are reputed.

I agree on PX-Z stand here since no one care to user complaints if the casino being accused is reputable even though the user really suffer on long time of waiting for his account reviewed. I believe the SCAM part is really not true but the OP account is indeed lock for a long time.

I won't say that it's unreasonable as there are some suspicious connections that the OP has from a match fixer, based on the statement Stunna provided. Also, it's fairly common that the case could take months or even years to be investigated as the issue involves a lot of money and a criminal activity which is match fixing.

While I am having to greatly redact what I can share due to an ongoing investigation and not wanting to reveal our internal integrity measures. I will provide some insight into this situation. It is of our firm belief that user is engaged in match fixing and these concerns were echoed by our odds provider who independently warned us of your activity. On this thread you are witnessing some members of this match fixing ring all desperate to get their cut of this money.

OP found some information regarding fixed table tennis matches as he started taking maximum amount of profit from bets there where he never wagered before like that. His own XRP address had a transaction sent to a prior caught match fixer which looks like a payout for the information he got via him.

[Haunebu]

A red tag from people don't really shows that someone is bad, but the problem is the be person is tag the level of it's sincerity, like so many of us in 1xbit we have not scam somebody before and we heard so many negative tag with different different people and that doesn't mean that we won't bring a good information to the forum, tag is different from character of someone

Lol. A 1xbit shill like you isn't qualified to talk about right or wrong to be frank. Red tags in this forum are justified majority of the time and they are almost always justified in the case of 1xbit shills.

Also, you shills are wasting your time and effort trying to justify yourselves to other members of this forum in my opinion.

[Eternad]

A red tag from people don't really shows that someone is bad, but the problem is the be person is tag the level of it's sincerity, like so many of us in 1xbit we have not scam somebody before and we heard so many negative tag with different different people and that doesn't mean that we won't bring a good information to the forum, tag is different from character of someone

Lol. A 1xbit shill like you isn't qualified to talk about right or wrong to be frank. Red tags in this forum are justified majority of the time and they are almost always justified in the case of 1xbit shills.

Also, you shills are wasting your time and effort trying to justify yourselves to other members of this forum in my opinion.

It’s brutal to threat them that way but you have a point since they sold there reputation for a penny payment when they participate on 1xbit campaign knowing that it’s a scam and it will cost  them there reputation but he also has a valid point that there words sometimes can give contribution if the content is really informative. Tag is just a personal judgement by DT which not the official law of the forum.

FYI I’m not with them. I’m just tackling the contribution over reputation but I’m not making comment about his post quality because I didn’t review it. I’m speaking in general discussion.

[goaldigger]

A red tag from people don't really shows that someone is bad, but the problem is the be person is tag the level of it's sincerity, like so many of us in 1xbit we have not scam somebody before and we heard so many negative tag with different different people and that doesn't mean that we won't bring a good information to the forum, tag is different from character of someone

Lol. A 1xbit shill like you isn't qualified to talk about right or wrong to be frank. Red tags in this forum are justified majority of the time and they are almost always justified in the case of 1xbit shills.

Also, you shills are wasting your time and effort trying to justify yourselves to other members of this forum in my opinion.

This may be hard but on point, looks like they are already immune with the red tags and with OP, having an accusation like that without a proof or any evidence will be useless because you are trying to accused one of the best site to date, we won’t believe on this. Red tags can be invalidated though if you have a proof but since it’s none, this is just a waste of time and a normal scenario where newbies tried to ruin the reputation of a one site.

[HunnyFinance]

They wouldn't stop withdrawal for no good reasons. You must have done something suspicious that made them not letting you withdraw. I guess all you can do is to keep talking to their customer support to get it back

[livingfree]

That reasoning of people about the company's choice of advertiser is always the getaway and fault finding when they don't like the outcome of their own works and plays.

Honestly, this isn't just for casinos but I've seen in other companies that are into ecommerce and other businesses far from gambling that do blame the company's choice of advertiser as if they're the one paying and didn't enjoy the service offered and rendered to them.

[qwertyup23]

DO NOT PLAY AT STAKE, THEY ARE HOLDING MY MONEY FOR MORE THAN 6 MONTHS

NO REPLY TO EMAILS, NO REPLY TO FORUM MESSAGES AND LIVE SUPPORT IS NOT REPLYING EITHER

DRAKE PROMOS COSTED TOO MUCH MONEY AND STAKE IS SELECTIVE SCAMMING NOW, CAREFUL!

Again with these allegations- always substantiate your claim with evidence and proof claiming that a gambling website (Stake, in this example) scammed you. Accusing a reputable gambling website without any proof or anything whatsoever will hold no water against your claim. Worse, you are only putting yourself in a situation where people would accused you of defamation against this gambling website.

Let us all try to be civil and post all the necessary proof to support your claim. Without any, those are just empty words that will only draw attention against you, OP.