Sinbad.io Mixer - secure, fast and easy to use

[examplens]

Every now and then I use this mixer and I feel good, but there is one thing that bothers me a little. The link of the mixing session, disappears and becomes invalid as soon as he has finished the mixing work. For example, my mixing is finished a little while ago, and the session link no longer works, but I would have liked to check with my own eyes on the page.
24 hours have not yet passed.

How long do you want it to be?
Mixing Bitcoin as a service is thought to increase privacy, with as few links to the final owner of the coin as possible. A very important part of the whole process is the deletion of all logs and information about finished transactions.

[jack80]

Yes, what you say, technically it is right. Mine is just an old habit of the "destroy this session" button

[robelneo]

Just a reminder, August 12 is the deadline for participation in the Sinbad.io prediction contest. For a valid application, the guesses must be submitted in both periods.
thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5461992.0

Code:

Prediction 2: $xx,xxx.xx
bech32 address:

Done with my second prediction I also created a thread in my local board inviting my fellows to join to get more awareness of this contest.

Bitcoin Price Prediction

[yudi09]

Done with my second prediction I also created a thread in my local board inviting my fellows to join to get more awareness of this contest.

Bitcoin Price Prediction

I also did it on August 12th on a local board to let them know that sinbad.io is providing a bitcoin price challenge prediction for August, given that people's interest in speculating prices is very active on the forums. So I think it would be great if it was followed to test the level of luck in analyzing the price of bitcoin will end at what price level.

I did that shortly after examplens reminded me about the SINBAD.IO MIXER August Price Prediction Challenge in this thread.

Here he is, Bitcoin Price Prediction.

[examplens]

I did that shortly after examplens reminded me about the SINBAD.IO MIXER August Price Prediction Challenge in this thread.

So, if you win a prize, I can expect at least one beer from you 

[yudi09]

I did that shortly after examplens reminded me about the SINBAD.IO MIXER August Price Prediction Challenge in this thread.

So, if you win a prize, I can expect at least one beer from you 

If my prediction is right, I will be happy to accompany you to drink beer. But I don't drink
What if I give you something other than beer?

The price prediction that I sent here seems to have missed. But I'm sure with the price guess at the end of August

[bhadz]

Yes, what you say, technically it is right. Mine is just an old habit of the "destroy this session" button

Maybe that suggestion will be heard from you if you want it to be valid a little bit longer. But as explained, it has something to do with the users privacy and sinbad don't take those information as it's part of the mixing service. But let's see if that sounds good for the devs.

[Pmalek]

Have you guys checked out the designs that the Bitcointalk members created for the Sinbad avatar campaign that was brought to an end 2 days ago? There are many really good looking creations there, and picking a winner won't be easy.

Among the designs, I particularly liked bitmover's avatars. I also have my eyes on SamReomo's red-hat-wearing pirate from his second entry. cafter's third design from the third entry looks nice. 
Who do you think will win?

[holydarkness]

Yes, what you say, technically it is right. Mine is just an old habit of the "destroy this session" button

Maybe that suggestion will be heard from you if you want it to be valid a little bit longer. But as explained, it has something to do with the users privacy and sinbad don't take those information as it's part of the mixing service. But let's see if that sounds good for the devs.

I personally think it doesn't sound good [me and my own opinion, of course]. If a session needs a manual termination button, there's a chance someone forgot to click the button, and thus, one step backward from privacy [as explained by examplens and bhadz]. If dev wants to venture into an option to manually terminate a session, I think it'll be better to reverse the proposed idea; instead of having the manual termination button by default, dev add a check mark to allow people to keep the session longer or until they pressed the termination button. Otherwise, the sessions will end like always.

Not sure about the implications behind this, though. Wouldn't it mean sinbad has to keep a log [albeit selectively] to cater this idea? I can imagine some people will not welcome this idea.

Have you guys checked out the designs that the Bitcointalk members created for the Sinbad avatar campaign that was brought to an end 2 days ago? There are many really good looking creations there, and picking a winner won't be easy.

Among the designs, I particularly liked bitmover's avatars. I also have my eyes on SamReomo's red-hat-wearing pirate from his second entry. cafter's third design from the third entry looks nice. 
Who do you think will win?

I loved icalical's and PX-Z's first design, the pixelated ones, purely because it matched the current retro-pixelated theme of the site

[Z-tight]

Have you guys checked out the designs that the Bitcointalk members created for the Sinbad avatar campaign that was brought to an end 2 days ago? There are many really good looking creations there, and picking a winner won't be easy.

Yeah, i have been visiting that thread from time to time and i am impressed by the quality of the designs that have been created for the Avatar contest, it is going to be difficult for the Sinbad management to pick a winner, because even though we didn't get too many contestants; many of the submitted entries are very good.

Who do you think will win?

I like Woodie's first entry and also the design of PX-Z, but goodluck to everyone.

[examplens]

Have you guys checked out the designs that the Bitcointalk members created for the Sinbad avatar campaign that was brought to an end 2 days ago? There are many really good looking creations there, and picking a winner won't be easy.

Among the designs, I particularly liked bitmover's avatars. I also have my eyes on SamReomo's red-hat-wearing pirate from his second entry. cafter's third design from the third entry looks nice. 
Who do you think will win?

I always like avatars without a background, i.e. avatars that are not square. That's why my choice would be PX-Z or icalical pirate flag, or even cafter pirate hat.
However, if it is not insisted that the avatar is in accordance with the new website design, Woodie and bitmover entries look great and can certainly be a good choice.

Not sure about the implications behind this, though. Wouldn't it mean sinbad has to keep a log [albeit selectively] to cater this idea? I can imagine some people will not welcome this idea.

Again, leaving a log with any data is in complete contradiction to what the mixer offers and what is the basic purpose of such a service. It is certain that many would not be happy with such an idea. The good functionality of a service is reflected in its simplicity and the fact that the end user cannot make a mistake or overlook something. By introducing an additional action such as manually deleting the log, the matter is unnecessarily complicated. Plus, I believe that most users would not return to delete the log after the transaction is complete.

[Pmalek]

I always like avatars without a background, i.e. avatars that are not square. That's why my choice would be PX-Z or icalical pirate flag

The flag is very similar to the current avatar design. The skull looks identical and so does the Sinbad.io text. The background color is a bit darker. But the "protecting your privacy" part is too small for my old eyes and taste.

Again, leaving a log with any data is in complete contradiction to what the mixer offers and what is the basic purpose of such a service. It is certain that many would not be happy with such an idea. The good functionality of a service is reflected in its simplicity and the fact that the end user cannot make a mistake or overlook something. By introducing an additional action such as manually deleting the log, the matter is unnecessarily complicated. Plus, I believe that most users would not return to delete the log after the transaction is complete.

I completely agree with you here. As long as the session has finished, I don't mind if Sinbad deletes the entire history. I would welcome it. And I really hope they do and not that some logs are kept on a server somewhere that no one knows about.

[bhadz]

Yes, what you say, technically it is right. Mine is just an old habit of the "destroy this session" button

Maybe that suggestion will be heard from you if you want it to be valid a little bit longer. But as explained, it has something to do with the users privacy and sinbad don't take those information as it's part of the mixing service. But let's see if that sounds good for the devs.

I personally think it doesn't sound good [me and my own opinion, of course]. If a session needs a manual termination button, there's a chance someone forgot to click the button, and thus, one step backward from privacy [as explained by examplens and bhadz]. If dev wants to venture into an option to manually terminate a session, I think it'll be better to reverse the proposed idea; instead of having the manual termination button by default, dev add a check mark to allow people to keep the session longer or until they pressed the termination button. Otherwise, the sessions will end like always.

Not sure about the implications behind this, though. Wouldn't it mean sinbad has to keep a log [albeit selectively] to cater this idea? I can imagine some people will not welcome this idea.

Yes, that's a good idea by having that feature and it's just like an expiration if ever the user forgots to do that and the devs don't have anything to do with it. The session can be ended on an instant based on the user's discretion and if not, it is automatically gone based on the set period of time.

[holydarkness]

[...]
I personally think it doesn't sound good [me and my own opinion, of course]. If a session needs a manual termination button, there's a chance someone forgot to click the button, and thus, one step backward from privacy [as explained by examplens and bhadz]. If dev wants to venture into an option to manually terminate a session, I think it'll be better to reverse the proposed idea; instead of having the manual termination button by default, dev add a check mark to allow people to keep the session longer or until they pressed the termination button. Otherwise, the sessions will end like always.

Not sure about the implications behind this, though. Wouldn't it mean sinbad has to keep a log [albeit selectively] to cater this idea? I can imagine some people will not welcome this idea.

Yes, that's a good idea by having that feature and it's just like an expiration if ever the user forgots to do that and the devs don't have anything to do with it. The session can be ended on an instant based on the user's discretion and if not, it is automatically gone based on the set period of time.

I'll use this chance to re-emphasize that I personally think it's not a good idea. Having a possibility to manually terminate a session by preference implies that Sinbad keep a log of user's transaction. Be it due to the user's request and preference or not, it's a step back from the anonimity that supposed to be offered by a mixer. It'll be a very great assurance to anyone that the platform --any mixer platform-- does not keep a log longer than it needed to be [that is, until the transaction is finished].

[AB de Royse777]

In the avatar contest we were able to shortlisted 6 participants. We need to filter out and need to keep only two participants / two set of entries. We may consider your feedback in it too to filter it to two. Please let us know.

The shortlisted entries we are considering:
icalical : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5462254.msg62694351#msg62694351 (1 and 2, from the set: https://i.ibb.co/mcFM91X/1.png)
PX-Z: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5462254.msg62700517#msg62700517 (1, from the set: https://i.ibb.co/BCBXqNB/Screenshot-2.png)
xLays: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5462254.msg62701582#msg62701582
tjtonmoy: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5462254.msg62686891#msg62686891 (1st set)
SamReomo:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5462254.msg62666486#msg62666486 (https://i.ibb.co/kHbTFVh/SInbad-io-3.png)
cafter: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5462254.msg62680588#msg62680588 (https://i.ibb.co/gFPd8F9/Screenshot-1.png)

We will read carefully your opinion before picking up the final two.

Cheers,

[AB de Royse777]

While everyone is open for their opinion. I would like to seek attention from the signature campaigners too. In case you guys miss to read here you all go:

Code:

examplens
ETFbitcoin
CryptopreneurBrainboss
joker_josue
nc50lc
Trofo
Pmalek
DaveF
bitmover
Igebotz
holydarkness
Julien_Olynpic
Smartprofit
bullrun2020bro
Kryptowerk
Wind_FURY
shasan
robelneo
Z-tight
yudi09
Woodie
CryptoHeadlineNews
Crypto Library
michellee
tjtonmoy
tread93
Fiatless
AHOYBRAUSE
Nwada001
arabspaceship123
Turbartuluk
Latviand
Etranger
Negotiation
ZAINmalik75
Asuspawer09
Wend
Compromise me
jakdanyel
Bureau
bhadz
Renampun
totti67
Pulsar77

I did not dare to PM any of you because of the past experience LOL

[holydarkness]

In the avatar contest we were able to shortlisted 6 participants. We need to filter out and need to keep only two participants / two set of entries. We may consider your feedback in it too to filter it to two. Please let us know.

The shortlisted entries we are considering:

[...]

We will read carefully your opinion before picking up the final two.

Cheers,

So, two participants with two avatars for each of them? I am liking:

icalical's pirate flag and treasure map entry, and cafter's pirate hat from first and third image of entry number 1 PX-Z's flag for the reason that I shared with examplens, I liked and always think avatar without background [i.e. not square] is neat.

Edit: Sorry, I understand correctly that our votes are limited to the ones you mark in red square? Thus, cafter's avatar will be from his third entry? On that case, I am revising my vote to PX-Z's set number 1. Though if I may give my two cents without disrespecting your choice, cafter's hat is also nice

[Trofo]

In the avatar contest we were able to shortlisted 6 participants. We need to filter out and need to keep only two participants / two set of entries. We may consider your feedback in it too to filter it to two. Please let us know.

I am not really sold on any of them, I like simple yet striking avatars preferably without background. Maybe something like cafter pirate hat but that one is not in contention.

PX-Z flag is good but I would remove "protect your privacy" text and enlarge the actual picture on avatar. Seems way too cluttered as it is now.

[xLays]

Best of luck to the other 5 contestants! Creative work will surely stand out.

Anyway, I'm wearing one of my Avatar design since I'm not joining any avatar campaign right now. Just to showcase how it actually looks like when someone is wearing it.

[Pmalek]

I am personally not a big fan of avatars resembling flags. That, therefore, excludes some of the shortlisted participants.
From those that remain, I like the following two the most.

- The third entry by cafter.
- The second creation by xLays with one suggested modification. I would prefer if the skull & swords image would take central position. The horizontal line could be made smaller and moved further to the right.