Do online casinos disadvantage some locations from winning big

[minime0105]

Monitoring a particular account statement is part of keeping the country or a particular locality safe, due to the alarming news of online crises everywhere. I don't think this should call for the restriction of individuals from such a locality. When a locality performs KYC verification on its citizen, I believe every information needed about a particular transaction is gotten; as such, the citizen has no problem and this has nothing to do with the Casino. It is apparently inappropriate for a Casino to restrict its customer due to community terms.

I wnst you to know that not all KYC verification i a given platform is accurate, because, i believe that KYC verification of a platform can be man over by using another fake documentation, yes it's true that when done KYC verification with a platform it will likely show that information processed through upload of your details will indicates or identify the nation you came from,  why some people do use another nation information to verify their account without facial contact verification.

[Casdinyard]

Gamblers should stop and avoid looking for excuses to the failures for their winnings, there are no barriers be it small or big that can hinders a gambler from winning an online game henplayed, the ideology is simple, if you're good at doing it (gambling) there's high probabilities for you to win and if you jad problems with compliance to understand the ways it's been played, you may less have opportunities to win, location barrier should be in favour of those that are into offline gambling or casino house gamblings and not the online one.

Exactly. This is just it, no way around why people would think it's the house messing up with them and coveting their "well-deserved" wins from them. They make excuses for themselves and puts the blame on other people instead of taking accountability and owning up to their losses. Rookie mistake. Rule of thumb, if you gamble, don't gamble to win unless you're scarface or something. Gamble to have fun. Because gambling for profits will just disappoint you ten times over and may leave you addicted to getting that "one last clincher bet that will breakeven my losses"

[Fatunad]

Monitoring a particular account statement is part of keeping the country or a particular locality safe, due to the alarming news of online crises everywhere. I don't think this should call for the restriction of individuals from such a locality. When a locality performs KYC verification on its citizen, I believe every information needed about a particular transaction is gotten; as such, the citizen has no problem and this has nothing to do with the Casino. It is apparently inappropriate for a Casino to restrict its customer due to community terms.

I wnst you to know that not all KYC verification i a given platform is accurate, because, i believe that KYC verification of a platform can be man over by using another fake documentation, yes it's true that when done KYC verification with a platform it will likely show that information processed through upload of your details will indicates or identify the nation you came from,  why some people do use another nation information to verify their account without facial contact verification.

Its one of the bypass of these verification if ever they would be asking out, but we arent that dumb on not to know about its con's considering that on the time you would really be again verify
then this is where you do see yourself getting fucked up.Its just common sense that we dont really like for our identity on getting exposed on which it is really that understandable
that other people would really be using up others identity just to bypass into something and its impossible that they wouldnt really be able to know the possible risk
or problem that lies ahead.

[DoublerHunter]

Monitoring a particular account statement is part of keeping the country or a particular locality safe, due to the alarming news of online crises everywhere. I don't think this should call for the restriction of individuals from such a locality. When a locality performs KYC verification on its citizen, I believe every information needed about a particular transaction is gotten; as such, the citizen has no problem and this has nothing to do with the Casino. It is apparently inappropriate for a Casino to restrict its customer due to community terms.

I wnst you to know that not all KYC verification i a given platform is accurate, because, i believe that KYC verification of a platform can be man over by using another fake documentation, yes it's true that when done KYC verification with a platform it will likely show that information processed through upload of your details will indicates or identify the nation you came from,  why some people do use another nation information to verify their account without facial contact verification.

Yes, you can bypass the KYC verification but that is very risky when you get caught because there are too many factors that you get caught.
We know that the casino will ask to enhance verification when you will win big, if that is so, how you will continue to provide data knowing that you only bypass the verification, it sounds risky but you should know this from the start. The casino is designed to gain profit but not the gambler, the gambler's purpose is to have entertainment and that is the fact. So the location does not matter to me if you will win or not, it is expecting that the chances of winning is very small in gambling because gambling are here to make profit on us.

[Sandra_hakeem]

You know how casinos have set certain slots to only pay a certain amount to a winner, it it also possible that casinos are using an algorithm to limit how much it can payout for players coming from certain locations to avoid being dragged into legal disputes if a player is paid big money and the local authorities want to know the source and the alike?

Again, That's the same reason why every casino should get registered and licensed by the designated commissions in charge of that in their country. No one would drag anyone in a bid of creating an escalation to whether or not a casino paid them too much funds from their winnings; it's the casino that sets a barrier on that to avoid some certain abuse or a user going as much as wagering some hundreds and thousands on a single, sure odd -- hoping to get 'em tripled when it cuts -- yeah, most times it does so the casino would simply run bankrupt.... That's exactly the bone of contention here. The same reason why every casino don't let loose their options; I still remember when I worked as a cashier -- I realized that alot of options are opted out, that's actually in a bid to STOP LOSS.
They've also got T/C's right?? That's it.

Sandra 🧑‍🦰

[alegotardo]

Yes, you can bypass the KYC verification but that is very risky when you get caught because there are too many factors that you get caught.
We know that the casino will ask to enhance verification when you will win big, if that is so, how you will continue to provide data knowing that you only bypass the verification, it sounds risky but you should know this from the start. The casino is designed to gain profit but not the gambler, the gambler's purpose is to have entertainment and that is the fact. So the location does not matter to me if you will win or not, it is expecting that the chances of winning is very small in gambling because gambling are here to make profit on us.

I am sure that the casino will not be reluctant to block a large amount of money if the user has any pending KYC.
Properly regulated casinos are, in most countries, under a lot of pressure from governments and regulatory bodies, so KYC is a legal way for them to try to protect themselves from any criminal prosecution in this regard.

Everyone who enters a centralized and properly regulated casino knows that they are subject to KYC realization sooner or later, and should be sure that this is inevitable if they need to withdraw a large amount of money.

Just a piece of advice: Never use false data, because if this is discovered it is highly likely that you will never be able to recover the money that is blocked.

[traderethereum]

Gamblers should stop and avoid looking for excuses to the failures for their winnings, there are no barriers be it small or big that can hinders a gambler from winning an online game henplayed, the ideology is simple, if you're good at doing it (gambling) there's high probabilities for you to win and if you jad problems with compliance to understand the ways it's been played, you may less have opportunities to win, location barrier should be in favour of those that are into offline gambling or casino house gamblings and not the online one.

Exactly. This is just it, no way around why people would think it's the house messing up with them and coveting their "well-deserved" wins from them. They make excuses for themselves and puts the blame on other people instead of taking accountability and owning up to their losses. Rookie mistake. Rule of thumb, if you gamble, don't gamble to win unless you're scarface or something. Gamble to have fun. Because gambling for profits will just disappoint you ten times over and may leave you addicted to getting that "one last clincher bet that will breakeven my losses"

Gambling for fun will give us a pleasant feeling that doesn't think about how we can win from that gambling game.
We have to realize that when we lose, it's because we're unlucky and not because the casino is preventing us from winning, let alone changing its algorithm to prevent players from getting big wins.
And if we don't want to get disappointed from losing gambling, we should gamble with the money we can afford so that if we lose, we will accept the defeat and can leave the casino without feeling disappointed.
And don't say one last bet by placing an all-in bet because that won't give you good results either.

[uneng]

You know how casinos have set certain slots to only pay a certain amount to a winner, it it also possible that casinos are using an algorithm to limit how much it can payout for players coming from certain locations to avoid being dragged into legal disputes if a player is paid big money and the local authorities want to know the source and the alike?

I think something like this isn't impossible in informatics. If the programmer wants to add this rule to the code, he can. However, I think it's not interesting for the casino to do this. It doesn't make much sense to say the truth. If someone is going to have issues with authorities it's going to be the gambler, not the casino, because it's the gambler who has obligations with the local regulators when declaring how much money he is making in a yearly basis. Moreover, most slots games are provided by third party services to casinos' platforms, so casinos would need a partnership why such services in order to boycott players from determined countries, what is really unlikely and compromising for the services providers' reputation on the industry as a whole.

[Nrcewker]

You know how casinos have set certain slots to only pay a certain amount to a winner, it it also possible that casinos are using an algorithm to limit how much it can payout for players coming from certain locations to avoid being dragged into legal disputes if a player is paid big money and the local authorities want to know the source and the alike?

Many casinos have already restricted players from specific countries. So whenever you visit a gambling site or casino and if by chance they have blocked your country, then you won’t be able to visit the site only at first place. Moreover if anyhow you bypass it using VPN, then they gonna ask you for KYC and hence block your funds if you have violated their terms of conduct and services. This is what I know from my knowledge. I don’t know if they have country limit for specific users. Yes they have bet limits on new accounts, as to prevent cheating and fixbets scenes.

[LUCKMCFLY]

You know how casinos have set certain slots to only pay a certain amount to a winner, it it also possible that casinos are using an algorithm to limit how much it can payout for players coming from certain locations to avoid being dragged into legal disputes if a player is paid big money and the local authorities want to know the source and the alike?

Many casinos have already restricted players from specific countries. So whenever you visit a gambling site or casino and if by chance they have blocked your country, then you won’t be able to visit the site only at first place. Moreover if anyhow you bypass it using VPN, then they gonna ask you for KYC and hence block your funds if you have violated their terms of conduct and services. This is what I know from my knowledge. I don’t know if they have country limit for specific users. Yes they have bet limits on new accounts, as to prevent cheating and fixbets scenes.

There are some things here that don't make sense to me, why do they have to restrict people from certain countries from winning slots? or even in any game? I know from my own experience that people who are from the USA and Europe that the best business models are for them, all the facilities are for them, on the other hand, for a South American to have a business similar to the one they are looking for, it is very difficult, the amount of paperwork, the number of "buts" that are put, these things are not pleasant at all, and it is sad that every time you try to do something, certain countries find everything difficult, so in casinos that do something like that, at I would not recommend it at least to me, I have not come across casinos like this, but if I do, I would not hesitate to report it, it does not make sense that in casinos and issues that have to do with crypto they also have those things that do not make any sense.

[QueenVera]

I don't really think a casino will limit a particular location because of any law and remember that every country that accept gambling already have a regulatory body that is responsible to enforcing fairness and transparency between the casino and it's users.
Before signing a license and accepting to abide by it, it simply means that the casino has to do that consciously which implies that they already have a representative and a legal team who must have reviewed all if those agreements and I'm sure that they have a maximum pay out stated and as long as winnings above the agreed amount if there is any isn't triggered, there wouldn't be any call for alarm

[Gyfts]

I don't think that's possible and won't be done. What can happen is that they will cut the general terms and conditions. And if they do, they could start putting things in it that it's not allowed to win more than $25,000 a week in a casino or sports betting site. Then when you get over it, you will see them take your winnings away from you. But meanwhile they just let you gamble without any problems. There are several scam sites of this kind, most of which are licensed by the MGA. Which is also a wash nose nowadays.

Casinos won't cap your winnings -- they'll just ban you from playing if you're located in a jurisdiction that's prohibited from playing. If you circumvent this, they'll just KYC you if you try to withdraw a large amount of funds. That's generally how most of these casinos operate, but instead of legal ramifications, they just want to KYC so they can have an excuse not to pay out a large winning.

Not all casinos are like this, but they've been doing it for years so I consider it fair game at this point. I don't deposit at KYC casinos.

[noormcs5]

You know how casinos have set certain slots to only pay a certain amount to a winner, it it also possible that casinos are using an algorithm to limit how much it can payout for players coming from certain locations to avoid being dragged into legal disputes if a player is paid big money and the local authorities want to know the source and the alike?

I do not know if casino do this but if they do it, it is wrong practice.

There is one condition that if a casinos want to limit certain locations from winning big amount, they should announce it publicly. If they apply any algorithm hiddenly, it will come under scam and people will take legal action against such casino who do not disclose such information before.

[xSkylarx]

Gamblers should stop and avoid looking for excuses to the failures for their winnings, there are no barriers be it small or big that can hinders a gambler from winning an online game henplayed, the ideology is simple, if you're good at doing it (gambling) there's high probabilities for you to win and if you jad problems with compliance to understand the ways it's been played, you may less have opportunities to win, location barrier should be in favour of those that are into offline gambling or casino house gamblings and not the online one.

Exactly. This is just it, no way around why people would think it's the house messing up with them and coveting their "well-deserved" wins from them. They make excuses for themselves and puts the blame on other people instead of taking accountability and owning up to their losses. Rookie mistake. Rule of thumb, if you gamble, don't gamble to win unless you're scarface or something. Gamble to have fun. Because gambling for profits will just disappoint you ten times over and may leave you addicted to getting that "one last clincher bet that will breakeven my losses"

Gambling for fun will give us a pleasant feeling that doesn't think about how we can win from that gambling game.
We have to realize that when we lose, it's because we're unlucky and not because the casino is preventing us from winning, let alone changing its algorithm to prevent players from getting big wins.
And if we don't want to get disappointed from losing gambling, we should gamble with the money we can afford so that if we lose, we will accept the defeat and can leave the casino without feeling disappointed.
And don't say one last bet by placing an all-in bet because that won't give you good results either.

We can still believe that we are losing because of the algorithm, but this is only applicable to those online casinos that are not fair and can be easily predicted, but for the current status of the casino, they are not doing it, and I haven't read any information about it, so we simply lose because we are unlucky. That is why we don't always blame casinos for our losses; we just play to be entertained as loses are really part if we gamble

[GigaBit]

You know how casinos have set certain slots to only pay a certain amount to a winner, it it also possible that casinos are using an algorithm to limit how much it can payout for players coming from certain locations to avoid being dragged into legal disputes if a player is paid big money and the local authorities want to know the source and the alike?

No casino ever behaves in a private manner. It remains the same for everyone. There are some casinos that don't do anything illegal. As many casino sites have KYC mandatory so that the casino has a better idea about its clients. If those clients are in a restricted area, they will never be verified. In that case, location is important.

In another view there are also many casinos that only officially value KYC, but in reality it shows a different picture. They can manage the gambling beautifully from any location. It basically depends on the type or site of gambling you are doing. It is very important to wear their TOS thoroughly especially before the start of gambling.
”Online casinos make some locations suffer from big wins” in my perspective it is pointless to think something like that. Gambling companies will never do this kind of behavior.

[klidex]

I don't really think a casino will limit a particular location because of any law and remember that every country that accept gambling already have a regulatory body that is responsible to enforcing fairness and transparency between the casino and it's users.
Before signing a license and accepting to abide by it, it simply means that the casino has to do that consciously which implies that they already have a representative and a legal team who must have reviewed all if those agreements and I'm sure that they have a maximum pay out stated and as long as winnings above the agreed amount if there is any isn't triggered, there wouldn't be any call for alarm

What actually happened was that some casinos banned their sites from being accessed by citizens of certain countries. Maybe it's because that country has laws prohibiting gambling activities or there are other things I don't know.
There are several countries whose governments strictly prohibit gambling activities in any form. However, citizens still do this by using a VPN or changing the browser's DNS so that they are not detected when entering gambling sites.
Even though there are already many sites that do not allow customers to access using a VPN, I think a gambler will ignore this prohibition so they can still play or bet on gambling sites.

[Mahanton]

I don't really think a casino will limit a particular location because of any law and remember that every country that accept gambling already have a regulatory body that is responsible to enforcing fairness and transparency between the casino and it's users.
Before signing a license and accepting to abide by it, it simply means that the casino has to do that consciously which implies that they already have a representative and a legal team who must have reviewed all if those agreements and I'm sure that they have a maximum pay out stated and as long as winnings above the agreed amount if there is any isn't triggered, there wouldn't be any call for alarm

What actually happened was that some casinos banned their sites from being accessed by citizens of certain countries. Maybe it's because that country has laws prohibiting gambling activities or there are other things I don't know.
There are several countries whose governments strictly prohibit gambling activities in any form. However, citizens still do this by using a VPN or changing the browser's DNS so that they are not detected when entering gambling sites.
Even though there are already many sites that do not allow customers to access using a VPN, I think a gambler will ignore this prohibition so they can still play or bet on gambling sites.

You would really be having some question on your mind that after all of the gambling sites available online on where you could choose from, then why there a re people who are really that eager on accessing sites which
they are strictly prohibited due to some law or something like that.Is this pertaining on the games offered? or simply they are really just that stubborn on where they do just like to deal up with things on what
interest them.This is why people do love on accessing out sites via VPN even if they do know that they are really that been blocked but still still trying out to access.
On the time that they've been caught then they do usually whine the most and telling that they havent done something wrong. LOOOOOL.

[jostorres]

You would really be having some question on your mind that after all of the gambling sites available online on where you could choose from, then why there a re people who are really that eager on accessing sites which
they are strictly prohibited due to some law or something like that.Is this pertaining on the games offered? or simply they are really just that stubborn on where they do just like to deal up with things on what
interest them.This is why people do love on accessing out sites via VPN even if they do know that they are really that been blocked but still still trying out to access.
On the time that they've been caught then they do usually whine the most and telling that they havent done something wrong. LOOOOOL.

They forcefully access it because these people are heavily addicted to gambling already and I think they already know what will be the consequences about it once they get caught out. It's either their winnings will get forfeited or worse they will be arrested because there are also gambling sites who ask for our KYC. They are lucky if they will still get paid but I think the condition is that the winnings are only be reduced.

I don't know if there are people who are sincere that they don't about the restriction and they can be those people who whine up. This is why it's important to be always up to date on the news whether it is local or international.

[goldkingcoiner]

You know how casinos have set certain slots to only pay a certain amount to a winner, it it also possible that casinos are using an algorithm to limit how much it can payout for players coming from certain locations to avoid being dragged into legal disputes if a player is paid big money and the local authorities want to know the source and the alike?

I am sure that what you are describing is not only frowned upon by the authorities and casino regulators, but it is also quite illegal for casinos to do. I doubt any legitimate casino would try to risk their entire business over some extra profit. Especially when they are being controlled and hounded by people whos sole job it is to weed out bad actors in that particular business.

Don't get me wrong, I think casinos will try to do the sneakiest, dirtiest things to gain more profit but only when they are moving in a legal area. Rigging the games in such a way is undoubtedly not legal though.

[Silberman]

You would really be having some question on your mind that after all of the gambling sites available online on where you could choose from, then why there a re people who are really that eager on accessing sites which
they are strictly prohibited due to some law or something like that.Is this pertaining on the games offered? or simply they are really just that stubborn on where they do just like to deal up with things on what
interest them.This is why people do love on accessing out sites via VPN even if they do know that they are really that been blocked but still still trying out to access.
On the time that they've been caught then they do usually whine the most and telling that they havent done something wrong. LOOOOOL.

Another scenario that comes to mind about why people choose to play at casinos in which they have been forbidden to do so for some reason or another is that they have gambled at that casino before and lost, and now they want to recover that money as it has become a personal problem between them and the casino, and while it is understandable to get a little bit mad when you lose money it is incorrect to make this personal as the only one that will end up losing in such a quest for revenge is the gambler.