Ever tried Anti Martingale Strategy?

[maydna]

All strategies are risky, and if you want to avoid greater risks, you must reduce the bet amount and always use limits on bets so that if you lose, your loss is not as much as before. Whatever it is, if you double your bet when you win and halve your bet when you lose, it will not always work, especially when we play gambling, where the results always win and loses. But defeat is something we often face, which we must be aware of and avoid. I may have tried using it in my early days playing dice, but it also didn't work out well and resulted in a loss.

[seoincorporation]

I feel the Anti martingale has the same problem as a normal martingale, and this is: You will get busted in the long run.

In the past, I made a bot with this strategy, and sometimes it worked fine, but in others it doesn't. I have the code and some screenshots here: http://justdice.lucky.lat/bot.html

And my main problem with this method, is When to stop, or how many consecutive wins are enough? I read some people get 20 consecutive wins in dice at 50% chance to win. But you need a lot of bets for that. I would say it happens each 1 million bets or more.

[KTChampions]

In martingale, a gambler increases the bet size to double in the hope to recover the loss from the previous bet. I have tried it a few times & to be honest with you, I have never had a good return on my bets; I have lost most of the time.
On the other hand, the Anti martingale strategy is- to double the bet size when you are winning & halving the bet size when you are losing. In such a condition, when you are winning; you are doubling the size & you will lose from your winning. WEell, this strategy is more risky I guess though some have told it as less risky than martingale.
Have you ever tried ti? What's your opinion? Which one is more risky; Martingale or Anti Martingale?

There are many types of Martingale, but they all lead to the same result. The Martingale that you described leads to the fact that you never increase your initial deposit (after a series of winning bets, there will always be a loss of everything that you have won at that moment). Thus, you will have a gradual decrease in the deposit at the rate of the initial bet, which is constantly halved with each loss.