[ANN] [banned mixer] | Best Bitcoin Mixer | Low fees | Fully automated

[cryptotablet]

Hello,  tried to contact you through a ticket but did not receive an answer, in a strange way, there was a delay in 2 out of 3 transactions, I don't remember that I put it, could you remove it please? Thank you.

[1714277704]

1714277704

[1714277704]

1714277704

[1714277704]

1714277704

[1714277704]

1714277704

[logfiles]

Hello,  tried to contact you through a ticket but did not receive an answer, in a strange way, there was a delay in 2 out of 3 transactions, I don't remember that I put it, could you remove it please? Thank you.

Hey, where you sorted out?

[YoMix]

Hello,  tried to contact you through a ticket but did not receive an answer, in a strange way, there was a delay in 2 out of 3 transactions, I don't remember that I put it, could you remove it please? Thank you.

Hey, where you sorted out?

Yep. We answered in our anonymous ticket system.

[AB de Royse777]

Bump

An example

[Agbe]

I was about trading to use the YoMix Mixing service but they are asking of Mixing Code which I don't know how to get it. So I will want the YoMix company to tell me how to get the code so I can use their mixing to see how fast and effective it is.

And also what is the minimum amount for the service fee?

[nioctib_100]

I was about trading to use the YoMix Mixing service but they are asking of Mixing Code which I don't know how to get it. So I will want the YoMix company to tell me how to get the code so I can use their mixing to see how fast and effective it is.

And also what is the minimum amount for the service fee?

Your mixing code sort of like a receipt given after you mix your coins. If this is your first time, you don't need to put anything there. Later on if you mix a second time, if you want to totally ensure that you will not receive your old coins, you can enter your mixing code "receipt," and Yomix won't give you any of your original coins from your first time mixing.


The lowest service fee right now is .7%, although this may change. You can always check it on the slider right there on your mixing form.

[logfiles]

<...>

You could also make full use of the FAQ section. It always has most of the answers to your questions https://[banned mixer]/en/pages/faq


I have a question to @YoMix regarding the blog, particularly this/en/blog/post/best-bitcoin-mixers-2022-2023] article. Can't it be updated? I see chipmixer being listed as one of the best mixers, but we all know it's no more as of today

[YoMix]

<...>

You could also make full use of the FAQ section. It always has most of the answers to your questions https://[banned mixer]/en/pages/faq


I have a question to @YoMix regarding the blog, particularly this/en/blog/post/best-bitcoin-mixers-2022-2023] article. Can't it be updated? I see chipmixer being listed as one of the best mixers, but we all know it's no more as of today

This article mostly for seo purposes, bitcointalk has a good mixer list which we recommend to use to find suitable one.

[examplens]

This article mostly for seo purposes, bitcointalk has a good mixer list which we recommend to use to find suitable one.

An article update for SEO purposes is highly recommended, which, in addition to the accuracy of the information, is the reason for the update.

Also, the images in the opening post of this thread are hosted on Imgur, so they cannot be loaded. I suggest that you do an update there as well, as a recommendation it is better to use talkimg.org

[Agbe]

You could also make full use of the FAQ section. It always has most of the answers to your questions https://[banned mixer]/en/pages/faq

I have checked the FAQ article yet I didn't see any subtopic that is related to the question. FAQ did not even talk about the mixing code. And I believe that op can direct me how to get that mixing bcoew so I can also use the mix to mix coins

[NotATether]

You could also make full use of the FAQ section. It always has most of the answers to your questions https://[banned mixer]/en/pages/faq

I have checked the FAQ article yet I didn't see any subtopic that is related to the question. FAQ did not even talk about the mixing code. And I believe that op can direct me how to get that mixing bcoew so I can also use the mix to mix coins

The mixing code is autogenerated by YoMix after you perform a mix without specifying a code, specifically used so that you don't receive your own UTXOs back as an output (which would make the mix useless).

The description is inside the tooltip on the homepage:

After first mixing you will receive the mixing code, save it and use to avoid getting your own coins from previous mixings.

So basically it's not like some kind of session ID which allows you to continue accessing your coins, it's just a data entry to prevent you from getting your coins back (split up into whole units with 1 transaction of course).

[logfiles]

I have checked the FAQ article yet I didn't see any subtopic that is related to the question. FAQ did not even talk about the mixing code. And I believe that op can direct me how to get that mixing bcoew so I can also use the mix to mix coins

Look again carefully, the did talk about it in the FAQ, I suppose you missed it  

[coupable]

I've been searching the internet for some time now for articles and reviews about Yomix Mixer. Yesterday, by coincidence I found two articles published on the 22nd and 23rd of June, which contained a positive evaluation of the platform and a detailed description of the services it provides to users, along with the features that distinguish it from the rest of its competitors in the crypto market.
What caught my attention is that there is a mention of a person named Alexey Hlyncev as the contact representative for the platform.

Media Contact

Organization: YoMix
Contact Person: Alexey Hlyncev
Website: https://[banned mixer]/en
Email: adv@[banned mixer]
City: Washington
Country: United States

Link to bloomberg article published in 22-06-2023.
Link to benzinga article published in 23-06-2023.
I would like to know if this person is the real representative of the Yomix platform, with confirmation from its official representatives here on the forum. And assuming that it is, can this have an impact on the degree of user security and privacy of the service, as it is the first time that I find a full name of a person working in a crypto-Mixing service, who is supposed to work in complete anonymity afaik. Feel free to correct my view point if you find me wrong.

[logfiles]

I would like to know if this person is the real representative of the Yomix platform, with confirmation from its official representatives here on the forum. And assuming that it is, can this have an impact on the degree of user security and privacy of the service, as it is the first time that I find a full name of a person working in a crypto-Mixing service, who is supposed to work in complete anonymity afaik. Feel free to correct my view point if you find me wrong.

Key word is "Media Contact" 

Not YoMix representative or official name of the person working for Yomix. The name and location could be random... hehehe

Like;

Code:

Organization: YoMix
Contact Person: Juan Pablo
Website: https://[banned mixer]/en
Email: abcd@[banned mixer]
City: Guadalajara
Country: Mexico

I think the part of media contact is mandatory, probably for feedback from the readers and also communication from the media platform. The only parts that may be real are the email, organisation name and website

[coupable]

I think the part of media contact is mandatory, probably for feedback from the readers and also communication from the media platform. The only parts that may be real are the email, organisation name and website

So you can imagine what confusion this information can cause among readers, especially since it includes correct information about the name of the site and the official email. 
The two articles took the information from the same source in the quote I pasted, which is what makes its repetition contribute to proving its credibility. 
I was hoping that there would be a clarification of these details so that there would be no confusion, because including a name in this way within an official list of information may not be as clarifying as it causes confusion. 
Thank you for the clarification logfiles

[logfiles]

So you can imagine what confusion this information can cause among readers, especially since it includes correct information about the name of the site and the official email.

I am not saying the info is wrong, but this is a mixer which is meant to promote anonymity/privacy that we are talking about, so the location and name could just be pseudonymous to protect the owners as well.

I think you remember what happened to the innocent Dev of Tornado Cash.

The two articles took the information from the same source in the quote I pasted, which is what makes its repetition contribute to proving its credibility. 
I was hoping that there would be a clarification of these details so that there would be no confusion, because including a name in this way within an official list of information may not be as clarifying as it causes confusion. 

I think those articles are mostly for SEO purposes. I am not expert in that field, but that is most probably the reason they were put up. If you look keenly on the second article on Benzinga. At the top, next to the title, you will notice that the author is Accesswire. Then at the bottom there is “View source version on accesswire.com:”

But anyway, the team will give us an appropriate answer.

[YoMix]

I've been searching the internet for some time now for articles and reviews about Yomix Mixer. Yesterday, by coincidence I found two articles published on the 22nd and 23rd of June, which contained a positive evaluation of the platform and a detailed description of the services it provides to users, along with the features that distinguish it from the rest of its competitors in the crypto market.
What caught my attention is that there is a mention of a person named Alexey Hlyncev as the contact representative for the platform.

Media Contact

Organization: YoMix
Contact Person: Alexey Hlyncev
Website: https://[banned mixer]/en
Email: adv@[banned mixer]
City: Washington
Country: United States

Link to bloomberg article published in 22-06-2023.
Link to benzinga article published in 23-06-2023.
I would like to know if this person is the real representative of the Yomix platform, with confirmation from its official representatives here on the forum. And assuming that it is, can this have an impact on the degree of user security and privacy of the service, as it is the first time that I find a full name of a person working in a crypto-Mixing service, who is supposed to work in complete anonymity afaik. Feel free to correct my view point if you find me wrong.

tbh we even didn't know we have articles there  
We're working with several companies for promoting our mixer and yes, they can put any contact info they want.

[coupable]

So you can imagine what confusion this information can cause among readers, especially since it includes correct information about the name of the site and the official email.

I am not saying the info is wrong, but this is a mixer which is meant to promote anonymity/privacy that we are talking about, so the location and name could just be pseudonymous to protect the owners as well.

After searching for this name "Alexey Hlyncev" on the Internet, I did not find any mention of him except in one of the pdf files on a Russian site. The name may be used for SEO purposes because this is the only explanation for adding this information without even Yomix being aware of this.

tbh we even didn't know we have articles there  
We're working with several companies for promoting our mixer and yes, they can put any contact info they want.

Frankly, I do not find that they have the right to add any name they wish without indicating that it does not belong to the Mixer team. There is also a mention of the state where the company is in Washington, is it really in Washington?

I understood that it is not a serious matter in any case, and that Yomix is not responsible for the accuracy of the information published by some sites.

[Learn Bitcoin]

tbh we even didn't know we have articles there  
We're working with several companies for promoting our mixer and yes, they can put any contact info they want.

Frankly, I do not find that they have the right to add any name they wish without indicating that it does not belong to the Mixer team. There is also a mention of the state where the company is in Washington, is it really in Washington?

I understood that it is not a serious matter in any case, and that Yomix is not responsible for the accuracy of the information published by some sites.

If any website writes something about Yomix or any other mixer without contacting them, and the mixer is not paying for that, the mixer is not responsible for the accuracy of the information. Yes, writing random information is quite misleading unless they get permission from the mixer. Let's say different media started writing different addresses and country names, if someone notices the difference between articles, they might be confused about the legitimacy of the platform.

It's understandable that mixers don't want to share their accurate location. but, if they choose a location for any purpose, every media should use the same information. Or they can choose not to share any location as it's not a mandatory thing to share.

[coupable]

It's understandable that mixers don't want to share their accurate location. but, if they choose a location for any purpose, every media should use the same information. Or they can choose not to share any location as it's not a mandatory thing to share.

This is completely understandable.  Each platform has the right to publish the data they wish.  And I would not have asked the same question if it was related to another Mixer platform, but I know Yomix and I know that they do not share identifying information, and since the article is repeated in many sources, I was surprised that there is a reference to the state of the company’s location and the name of a person that suggests that he is from the platform’s team. 
The clarification from the representative of the platform here on the forum was a clarification that does not rise to doubt, but at the same time it puts the credibility of those sites into question because it makes no sense to add these private data.  Even if this is due to seo conditions, this does not give them the right to publish data with that degree of privacy.