Are there any possible ways that Bitcoin can be regulated without Nakamoto?
If you are living under governments, they will regulate things as much as they can including Bitcoin. With or without Satoshi Nakamoto, it is not a matter for governments.
I think only centralized exchanges will remain regulated and projects like Bitcoin can't be touched. What do you think?
Bitcoin will be regulated indirectly when people want to sell their bitcoins on centralized exchanges, use bitcoins in merchant platforms.
Fortunately, if people store their bitcoin in non custodial wallets, governments won't be able to touch it regardless of they have reasons to catch you as a crime.
Will banks and BTC forever remain enemies or something new will come up?
They compete with each other and force each other to improve but they will co exist. Banks and Bitcoin won't have their missions to kill the another one so I don't consider they are enemies.
I wish that more people will read
The bullish case for Bitcoin. It is helpful for them to build up their knowledge on Bitcoin and strengthen their belief in Bitcoin.
If they want to buy books. Check out
The bullish case for Bitcoin on AmazonLindy effect will become bigger with time and Bitcoin will be another gold.
Furthermore, the Lindy effect suggests that the longer Bitcoin remains in existence the greater society’s confidence that it will continue to exist long into the future. In other words, the societal trust of a new monetary good is asymptotic in nature, as is illustrated in the graph below: