Kryptogamers Hive No KYC Casino

[Apocollapse]

Maybe according to them asking for proof of age is not KYC because they think that KYC is personal identification information such as names and so on, but we don't know what the answer and the main reason is from asking for proof of age but they claim that it's not casino KYC.
This kind of thing will become a conversation and debate if he doesn't say and provide the right explanation.
In fact, if you only ask for proof of age without providing KYC or clear identity, I'm sure many users will manipulate it because even KYC, which is clear about identity, can still be manipulated, especially if this is just proof of age.

Proof of age is used to make sure the user isn't a minor, so the casino might not allow the user to play if he's not at least 18 years old. If he's lying, then it's his own risk to gambling and the casino doesn't responsible about that because they've done to make sure the gambler is a matured person.

Age is one of KYC, but it's just really generic and I don't think they will know you if you're just giving how old you're.

[Kryptogamers]

Please find below the answers to some of the common questions:

1) If a player wins big, will the casino ask for KYC ?
Ans: Since Kryptogamers is primarily a non-custodial casino on Hive blockchain (HIVE offers free and instant transactions), all player's non-custodial winnings are transferred instantly and free of cost to the player's Hive wallet without requiring any kind of KYC whatsoever. It is not possible for us to ever ask for KYC for the non-custodial section because we are not in control of your Hive blockchain account and therefore cannot suspend or do anything about it.

2) Why is proof of age required if casino does not require KYC ?
Ans: Apart from the non-custodial section, we also have a custodial section of games for custodial wallet players who prefer better user experience and instant gameplays as each non-custodial game-result takes approx 3 seconds (which is Hive block time) while custodial game results are instant (<1 second). However, if you are playing custodial games, the proof-of-age and other documents maybe required only if the law enforcement requests come in for your specific account. Uptill now (4+ years), we have received only 1 request to suspend a custodial Hive account and that person had 0 balance in his wallet. Having said that, we are a privacy friendly casino since 4+ years and have never asked for KYC nor do we intend to ask for KYC unless absolutely required by law.

Hope this answers your major questions. Feel free to ask if you have any more questions.

[piebeyb]

Please find below the answers to some of the common questions:

1) If a player wins big, will the casino ask for KYC ?
Ans: Since Kryptogamers is primarily a non-custodial casino on Hive blockchain (HIVE offers free and instant transactions), all player's non-custodial winnings are transferred instantly and free of cost to the player's Hive wallet without requiring any kind of KYC whatsoever. It is not possible for us to ever ask for KYC for the non-custodial section because we are not in control of your Hive blockchain account and therefore cannot suspend or do anything about it.

2) Why is proof of age required if casino does not require KYC ?
Ans: Apart from the non-custodial section, we also have a custodial section of games for custodial wallet players who prefer better user experience and instant gameplays as each non-custodial game-result takes approx 3 seconds (which is Hive block time) while custodial game results are instant (<1 second). However, if you are playing custodial games, the proof-of-age and other documents maybe required only if the law enforcement requests come in for your specific account. Uptill now (4+ years), we have received only 1 request to suspend a custodial Hive account and that person had 0 balance in his wallet. Having said that, we are a privacy friendly casino since 4+ years and have never asked for KYC nor do we intend to ask for KYC unless absolutely required by law.

Hope this answers your major questions. Feel free to ask if you have any more questions.

at least you giving an answer like this will clear up a lot of people's misunderstandings, I'm also happy to see your response to the questions the community has asked in this thread, hopefully it clears up the misunderstanding about KYC in your casino, I'd love to play there spending some HIVE on my old account 

[CryptSafe]

Please find below the answers to some of the common questions:

1) If a player wins big, will the casino ask for KYC ?
Ans: Since Kryptogamers is primarily a non-custodial casino on Hive blockchain (HIVE offers free and instant transactions), all player's non-custodial winnings are transferred instantly and free of cost to the player's Hive wallet without requiring any kind of KYC whatsoever. It is not possible for us to ever ask for KYC for the non-custodial section because we are not in control of your Hive blockchain account and therefore cannot suspend or do anything about it.

2) Why is proof of age required if casino does not require KYC ?
Ans: Apart from the non-custodial section, we also have a custodial section of games for custodial wallet players who prefer better user experience and instant gameplays as each non-custodial game-result takes approx 3 seconds (which is Hive block time) while custodial game results are instant (<1 second). However, if you are playing custodial games, the proof-of-age and other documents maybe required only if the law enforcement requests come in for your specific account. Uptill now (4+ years), we have received only 1 request to suspend a custodial Hive account and that person had 0 balance in his wallet. Having said that, we are a privacy friendly casino since 4+ years and have never asked for KYC nor do we intend to ask for KYC unless absolutely required by law.
Hope this answers your major questions. Feel free to ask if you have any more questions.

Your answers are direct and plain. These are what we want to see in a casino terms and conditions if the need be so that there would not be any issues with members in future. Most casino do not really do this they only wait for when a gamble wins bid then they come for kyc and the rest of the other documents to making sure they find fault on the gamblers account so they do not give out the winners award. This you have done is quite alright. You did well be stating it clear for better understanding. I hope there would not be any form of deviation from what you have just stated here.

[klidex]

Maybe according to them asking for proof of age is not KYC because they think that KYC is personal identification information such as names and so on, but we don't know what the answer and the main reason is from asking for proof of age but they claim that it's not casino KYC.
This kind of thing will become a conversation and debate if he doesn't say and provide the right explanation.
In fact, if you only ask for proof of age without providing KYC or clear identity, I'm sure many users will manipulate it because even KYC, which is clear about identity, can still be manipulated, especially if this is just proof of age.

Proof of age is used to make sure the user isn't a minor, so the casino might not allow the user to play if he's not at least 18 years old. If he's lying, then it's his own risk to gambling and the casino doesn't responsible about that because they've done to make sure the gambler is a matured person.

Age is one of KYC, but it's just really generic and I don't think they will know you if you're just giving how old you're.

But the truth is that many minors also start gambling and they use school pocket money to be able to play or bet.
The real problem is not that they are underage to manipulate age and then the casino will not be held responsible if something happens to them.
You can see and understand that any casino will not be responsible for what happens to any of its users, they do not know they are underage or mature, if something undesirable happens, it is clear that they are at their own risk and why do gambling if not want to risk losing everything.

[Mr. Magkaisa]

Please find below the answers to some of the common questions:

1) If a player wins big, will the casino ask for KYC ?
Ans: Since Kryptogamers is primarily a non-custodial casino on Hive blockchain (HIVE offers free and instant transactions), all player's non-custodial winnings are transferred instantly and free of cost to the player's Hive wallet without requiring any kind of KYC whatsoever. It is not possible for us to ever ask for KYC for the non-custodial section because we are not in control of your Hive blockchain account and therefore cannot suspend or do anything about it.

2) Why is proof of age required if casino does not require KYC ?
Ans: Apart from the non-custodial section, we also have a custodial section of games for custodial wallet players who prefer better user experience and instant gameplays as each non-custodial game-result takes approx 3 seconds (which is Hive block time) while custodial game results are instant (<1 second). However, if you are playing custodial games, the proof-of-age and other documents maybe required only if the law enforcement requests come in for your specific account. Uptill now (4+ years), we have received only 1 request to suspend a custodial Hive account and that person had 0 balance in his wallet. Having said that, we are a privacy friendly casino since 4+ years and have never asked for KYC nor do we intend to ask for KYC unless absolutely required by law.

Hope this answers your major questions. Feel free to ask if you have any more questions.

  -   This is the first time I have read that there is a non-custodial crypto casino under the hive blockchain. That's why it's not surprising that it doesn't require KYC for your players.

I was curious about Hive, that's why I researched and found out what it is, and I found through the link given by Op that it is also a forum platform where you have the opportunity to earn Hive tokens.

And at this point I like him and there is potential in the future as well, that's why I'm still aware of it until now before I start too.

[len01]

Please find below the answers to some of the common questions:

1) If a player wins big, will the casino ask for KYC ?
Ans: Since Kryptogamers is primarily a non-custodial casino on Hive blockchain (HIVE offers free and instant transactions), all player's non-custodial winnings are transferred instantly and free of cost to the player's Hive wallet without requiring any kind of KYC whatsoever. It is not possible for us to ever ask for KYC for the non-custodial section because we are not in control of your Hive blockchain account and therefore cannot suspend or do anything about it.

2) Why is proof of age required if casino does not require KYC ?
Ans: Apart from the non-custodial section, we also have a custodial section of games for custodial wallet players who prefer better user experience and instant gameplays as each non-custodial game-result takes approx 3 seconds (which is Hive block time) while custodial game results are instant (<1 second). However, if you are playing custodial games, the proof-of-age and other documents maybe required only if the law enforcement requests come in for your specific account. Uptill now (4+ years), we have received only 1 request to suspend a custodial Hive account and that person had 0 balance in his wallet. Having said that, we are a privacy friendly casino since 4+ years and have never asked for KYC nor do we intend to ask for KYC unless absolutely required by law.

Hope this answers your major questions. Feel free to ask if you have any more questions.

from these two answers I conclude that it is likely that this casino is right not asking for KYC for betting and when wanting to withdraw funds from the casino.
but if later there is a problem or the casino suspects unusual activity on the account KYC will be requested. is my statement true?

if it's true it has become a natural thing. because in other casinos that don't ask for KYC if there is any suspicious activity on a certain customer's account, they will usually ask for KYC to solve the problem.

but if my statement is wrong please let me know.

[libert19]

Please find below the answers to some of the common questions:

1) If a player wins big, will the casino ask for KYC ?
Ans: Since Kryptogamers is primarily a non-custodial casino on Hive blockchain (HIVE offers free and instant transactions), all player's non-custodial winnings are transferred instantly and free of cost to the player's Hive wallet without requiring any kind of KYC whatsoever. It is not possible for us to ever ask for KYC for the non-custodial section because we are not in control of your Hive blockchain account and therefore cannot suspend or do anything about it.

2) Why is proof of age required if casino does not require KYC ?
Ans: Apart from the non-custodial section, we also have a custodial section of games for custodial wallet players who prefer better user experience and instant gameplays as each non-custodial game-result takes approx 3 seconds (which is Hive block time) while custodial game results are instant (<1 second). However, if you are playing custodial games, the proof-of-age and other documents maybe required only if the law enforcement requests come in for your specific account. Uptill now (4+ years), we have received only 1 request to suspend a custodial Hive account and that person had 0 balance in his wallet. Having said that, we are a privacy friendly casino since 4+ years and have never asked for KYC nor do we intend to ask for KYC unless absolutely required by law.

Hope this answers your major questions. Feel free to ask if you have any more questions.

from these two answers I conclude that it is likely that this casino is right not asking for KYC for betting and when wanting to withdraw funds from the casino.
but if later there is a problem or the casino suspects unusual activity on the account KYC will be requested. is my statement true?

Untrue. Read the first statement.

As long as you use non-custodial betting there is no question of kyc since there is no middle-man to hold your funds and ask for kyc.

[logfiles]

Please find below the answers to some of the common questions:

1) If a player wins big, will the casino ask for KYC ?
Ans: Since Kryptogamers is primarily a non-custodial casino on Hive blockchain (HIVE offers free and instant transactions), all player's non-custodial winnings are transferred instantly and free of cost to the player's Hive wallet without requiring any kind of KYC whatsoever. It is not possible for us to ever ask for KYC for the non-custodial section because we are not in control of your Hive blockchain account and therefore cannot suspend or do anything about it.

2) Why is proof of age required if casino does not require KYC ?
Ans: Apart from the non-custodial section, we also have a custodial section of games for custodial wallet players who prefer better user experience and instant gameplays as each non-custodial game-result takes approx 3 seconds (which is Hive block time) while custodial game results are instant (<1 second). However, if you are playing custodial games, the proof-of-age and other documents maybe required only if the law enforcement requests come in for your specific account. Uptill now (4+ years), we have received only 1 request to suspend a custodial Hive account and that person had 0 balance in his wallet. Having said that, we are a privacy friendly casino since 4+ years and have never asked for KYC nor do we intend to ask for KYC unless absolutely required by law.

Hope this answers your major questions. Feel free to ask if you have any more questions.

Thanks for the clarification. So, in other words, the casino is 2 in 1. The custodial and the non-custodial section. I hope customers are made aware that once they use the custodial section, they may be subject to KYC on request by law enforcement otherwise it may lead to unending disputes

I also wanted to ask why you guys can't make this announcement thread a little bit more attractive with graphics, or is it not your official announcement thread?

[virasisog]

Please find below the answers to some of the common questions:

1) If a player wins big, will the casino ask for KYC ?
Ans: Since Kryptogamers is primarily a non-custodial casino on Hive blockchain (HIVE offers free and instant transactions), all player's non-custodial winnings are transferred instantly and free of cost to the player's Hive wallet without requiring any kind of KYC whatsoever. It is not possible for us to ever ask for KYC for the non-custodial section because we are not in control of your Hive blockchain account and therefore cannot suspend or do anything about it.

2) Why is proof of age required if casino does not require KYC ?
Ans: Apart from the non-custodial section, we also have a custodial section of games for custodial wallet players who prefer better user experience and instant gameplays as each non-custodial game-result takes approx 3 seconds (which is Hive block time) while custodial game results are instant (<1 second). However, if you are playing custodial games, the proof-of-age and other documents maybe required only if the law enforcement requests come in for your specific account. Uptill now (4+ years), we have received only 1 request to suspend a custodial Hive account and that person had 0 balance in his wallet. Having said that, we are a privacy friendly casino since 4+ years and have never asked for KYC nor do we intend to ask for KYC unless absolutely required by law.

Hope this answers your major questions. Feel free to ask if you have any more questions.

Thanks for the clarification. So, in other words, the casino is 2 in 1. The custodial and the non-custodial section. I hope customers are made aware that once they use the custodial section, they may be subject to KYC on request by law enforcement otherwise it may lead to unending disputes

I also wanted to ask why you guys can't make this announcement thread a little bit more attractive with graphics, or is it not your official announcement thread?

It should have been made formally with the right format as other ANN threads unless it isn't their offcial announcement thread yet.
Anyway, KYCs should also be expected because even casinos that announce that they won't require it will still ask for proof of address or age so the purpose would almost be the same so we can't avoid KYCs that easily. I guess we should just accept the fact that KYC is almost mandatory nowadays.

[Slow death]

we are a privacy friendly casino since 4+ years and have never asked for KYC nor do we intend to ask for KYC unless absolutely required by law.

with many governments campaigning against money laundering, casinos and banks and everyone who provides a service involving money are obliged to ask customers to do KYC, until 4 years ago casinos, exchanges and various things did not ask for KYC, it was a time when people had freedom, but this was a small market 4 years ago, it did not attract much attention from governments

today someone thinks that they will be in a casino and that they will not be asked for KYC, that person is very wrong, they are making a serious mistake, all people who use a casino must be prepared to eventually have to do KYC, so they should not be mistaken, the weather in which we had anonymity is ending unfortunately

[Hamphser]

we are a privacy friendly casino since 4+ years and have never asked for KYC nor do we intend to ask for KYC unless absolutely required by law.

with many governments campaigning against money laundering, casinos and banks and everyone who provides a service involving money are obliged to ask customers to do KYC, until 4 years ago casinos, exchanges and various things did not ask for KYC, it was a time when people had freedom, but this was a small market 4 years ago, it did not attract much attention from governments

today someone thinks that they will be in a casino and that they will not be asked for KYC, that person is very wrong, they are making a serious mistake, all people who use a casino must be prepared to eventually have to do KYC, so they should not be mistaken, the weather in which we had anonymity is ending unfortunately

Everything cant really escape on governments radar or simply into their eyes if we do speak about money or something that correlates to it.If things turns out to be big then it isnt something that they couldn't really

just let it pass or something that they wont really regulate.This is why expect the unexpected because they wouldnt really slip it away and its true that if we do tend to compare on what those things happen in the past.Then it is really gradually changing as of this moment on which regulation and restrictions becomes even more tighter.

If you are a business owner whose really that in connected about money or something like that then you would really be tangled up with these regulations which you dont really have any choice.

[paxmao]

Maybe according to them asking for proof of age is not KYC because they think that KYC is personal identification information such as names and so on, but we don't know what the answer and the main reason is from asking for proof of age but they claim that it's not casino KYC.
This kind of thing will become a conversation and debate if he doesn't say and provide the right explanation.
In fact, if you only ask for proof of age without providing KYC or clear identity, I'm sure many users will manipulate it because even KYC, which is clear about identity, can still be manipulated, especially if this is just proof of age.

Proof of age is used to make sure the user isn't a minor, so the casino might not allow the user to play if he's not at least 18 years old. If he's lying, then it's his own risk to gambling and the casino doesn't responsible about that because they've done to make sure the gambler is a matured person.

Age is one of KYC, but it's just really generic and I don't think they will know you if you're just giving how old you're.

KYC can be considered in two ways: it is weak like this one, it is clear that the company just wants to tick the box and comply with regulation but does not really expect trouble from that front. Strong KYC are a proof of people doing serious business in serious jurisdictions. It is not a great idea to join a site that does not make an effort to comply.

[libert19]

I also wanted to ask why you guys can't make this announcement thread a little bit more attractive with graphics, or is it not your official announcement thread?

No, it's not official ann.

Anyway, KYCs should also be expected because even casinos that announce that they won't require it will still ask for proof of address or age so the purpose would almost be the same so we can't avoid KYCs that easily. I guess we should just accept the fact that KYC is almost mandatory nowadays.

Stick to non-custodial section.

we are a privacy friendly casino since 4+ years and have never asked for KYC nor do we intend to ask for KYC unless absolutely required by law.

with many governments campaigning against money laundering, casinos and banks and everyone who provides a service involving money are obliged to ask customers to do KYC, until 4 years ago casinos, exchanges and various things did not ask for KYC, it was a time when people had freedom, but this was a small market 4 years ago, it did not attract much attention from governments

today someone thinks that they will be in a casino and that they will not be asked for KYC, that person is very wrong, they are making a serious mistake, all people who use a casino must be prepared to eventually have to do KYC, so they should not be mistaken, the weather in which we had anonymity is ending unfortunately

Brave of you to completely ignore non-custodial section where it's not possible for them to ask for kyc in first place.

KYC can be considered in two ways: it is weak like this one, it is clear that the company just wants to tick the box and comply with regulation but does not really expect trouble from that front. Strong KYC are a proof of people doing serious business in serious jurisdictions. It is not a great idea to join a site that does not make an effort to comply.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5434940.msg61770354#msg61770354

[libert19]

It's seriously concerning that youngins are out here blowing their allowance on gambling, and it's even more messed up that some folks don't think the casino should be held responsible for what goes down. As a community, we gotta step up and make sure our young bucks aren't getting caught up in dangerous activities like gambling, which can totally mess with their bodies and minds. We need to put better rules in place and keep an eye out for any underage gamblers. If they slip through the cracks, the casino gotta take responsibility for enabling them. Our kids deserve a safe and healthy place to learn and grow, so what's the plan to keep them away from the gambling scene and out of harm's way?

That's parent/guardian's responsibility.

[klidex]

Maybe according to them asking for proof of age is not KYC because they think that KYC is personal identification information such as names and so on, but we don't know what the answer and the main reason is from asking for proof of age but they claim that it's not casino KYC.
This kind of thing will become a conversation and debate if he doesn't say and provide the right explanation.
In fact, if you only ask for proof of age without providing KYC or clear identity, I'm sure many users will manipulate it because even KYC, which is clear about identity, can still be manipulated, especially if this is just proof of age.

Proof of age is used to make sure the user isn't a minor, so the casino might not allow the user to play if he's not at least 18 years old. If he's lying, then it's his own risk to gambling and the casino doesn't responsible about that because they've done to make sure the gambler is a matured person.

Age is one of KYC, but it's just really generic and I don't think they will know you if you're just giving how old you're.

But the truth is that many minors also start gambling and they use school pocket money to be able to play or bet.
The real problem is not that they are underage to manipulate age and then the casino will not be held responsible if something happens to them.
You can see and understand that any casino will not be responsible for what happens to any of its users, they do not know they are underage or mature, if something undesirable happens, it is clear that they are at their own risk and why do gambling if not want to risk losing everything.

It's seriously concerning that youngins are out here blowing their allowance on gambling, and it's even more messed up that some folks don't think the casino should be held responsible for what goes down. As a community, we gotta step up and make sure our young bucks aren't getting caught up in dangerous activities like gambling, which can totally mess with their bodies and minds. We need to put better rules in place and keep an eye out for any underage gamblers. If they slip through the cracks, the casino gotta take responsibility for enabling them. Our kids deserve a safe and healthy place to learn and grow, so what's the plan to keep them away from the gambling scene and out of harm's way?

Things like that have happened a lot, not only in my environment but also out there, there must have been a lot of underage children who started gambling. I don't know where they can understand gambling from. holding their own cellphone so they can find gambling information until they dare to try it.
Casinos are a business and they offer gambling venue services to anyone even minors who enter to play they cannot possibly limit and be responsible because after all that includes their customers.
This mistake did not come from the casino but from the insight of their parents because they could not supervise and limit their children when they did everything including gambling.
The best way to stop this is for parents to always pay attention to the overall activities of their children and provide positive things or activities so that they forget about gambling and don't return to gambling.

[tabas]

from these two answers I conclude that it is likely that this casino is right not asking for KYC for betting and when wanting to withdraw funds from the casino.
but if later there is a problem or the casino suspects unusual activity on the account KYC will be requested. is my statement true?

if it's true it has become a natural thing. because in other casinos that don't ask for KYC if there is any suspicious activity on a certain customer's account, they will usually ask for KYC to solve the problem.

but if my statement is wrong please let me know.

I think that it's already verified and cleared that they've answered that it's not possible for them to ask KYC. Only if some authorities that asks for specific detail of yours from their casino, they'll hand it over to them. But as said, they don't have much request from authorities and up to date, they only got one. Well, this is based on the answer that the owner/rep has said on the #2. It's interesting to see that they're a privacy friendly casino just as what the answers they have provided above.

[Cling18]

from these two answers I conclude that it is likely that this casino is right not asking for KYC for betting and when wanting to withdraw funds from the casino.
but if later there is a problem or the casino suspects unusual activity on the account KYC will be requested. is my statement true?

if it's true it has become a natural thing. because in other casinos that don't ask for KYC if there is any suspicious activity on a certain customer's account, they will usually ask for KYC to solve the problem.

but if my statement is wrong please let me know.

I think that it's already verified and cleared that they've answered that it's not possible for them to ask KYC. Only if some authorities that asks for specific detail of yours from their casino, they'll hand it over to them. But as said, they don't have much request from authorities and up to date, they only got one. Well, this is based on the answer that the owner/rep has said on the #2. It's interesting to see that they're a privacy friendly casino just as what the answers they have provided above.

It is a good move so they can also control illegal activities and fraud in their casino. Those who seek privacy and security can rely on their site because most casinos nowadays always require KYC even after anouncing that they will not require KYC. At least they are honest that there's still a possibility that they will require KYC in some cases.

[Daltonik]

Maybe according to them asking for proof of age is not KYC because they think that KYC is personal identification information such as names and so on, but we don't know what the answer and the main reason is from asking for proof of age but they claim that it's not casino KYC.
This kind of thing will become a conversation and debate if he doesn't say and provide the right explanation.
In fact, if you only ask for proof of age without providing KYC or clear identity, I'm sure many users will manipulate it because even KYC, which is clear about identity, can still be manipulated, especially if this is just proof of age.

Proof of age is used to make sure the user isn't a minor, so the casino might not allow the user to play if he's not at least 18 years old. If he's lying, then it's his own risk to gambling and the casino doesn't responsible about that because they've done to make sure the gambler is a matured person.

Age is one of KYC, but it's just really generic and I don't think they will know you if you're just giving how old you're.

KYC can be considered in two ways: it is weak like this one, it is clear that the company just wants to tick the box and comply with regulation but does not really expect trouble from that front. Strong KYC are a proof of people doing serious business in serious jurisdictions. It is not a great idea to join a site that does not make an effort to comply.

But still, people tend to risk their funds in exchange for relative anonymity, and yes, KYC on the one hand should seem to guarantee the security of players' funds, but on the other hand there are many examples of fraudulent online casinos with strict KYC, including.

[RILWAN]

This is cool and nice to stake on because of the rewards even though the rewards look unrealistic then since it's a no kyc casino members may try to use the services to enjoy other features aside from the staking due to risks.

But let me welcome you to the forum and wish you the best of luck as you journey through the forum.