Kryptogamers Hive No KYC Casino

[pungopete468]

Hi Kryptogamers, I actually do like your design and the games you are offering I was wondering what coins do you accept? Only Hive? I was interested in placing bet using Bitcoin, I would like to try and test all of your games but I would possibly stay on the Crash game, I would also think that a public games is a good idea like all people can place bet at the same time on the same round or something like that.

[1715556927]

1715556927

[1715556927]

1715556927

[1715556927]

1715556927

[1715556927]

1715556927

[1715556927]

1715556927

[libert19]

Hi Kryptogamers, I actually do like your design and the games you are offering I was wondering what coins do you accept? Only Hive? I was interested in placing bet using Bitcoin, I would like to try and test all of your games but I would possibly stay on the Crash game, I would also think that a public games is a good idea like all people can place bet at the same time on the same round or something like that.

It's mentioned in op, kryptogamers accepts Hive, Steem, Dec and gamer. They don't accept Bitcoin, even if they were to accept it, it would only be possible with pegged versions of btc since its Hive blockchain based casino.

[LUCKMCFLY]

KYC leak or sold aren't only because of submitting KYC on the casino, but if anyone ever submitted KYC on a centralized exchange, it also carry a same risk since both of them are online.

That's right friends, if you only think about fear about KYC leaks or sales, then not only casinos but centralized platforms such as crypto trading platforms also require KYC for each user so there is no need to blame casinos too much for abusing and selling KYC.
KYC is not a scary thing if you can have a sense of confidence and trust in a casino that has been given KYC verification, besides that casinos that implement KYC will always be the security of every data that has been provided by its users.
Gamblers who want to remain anonymous and don't want KYC I can understand and respect them but strangely there are some gamblers who have excessive thinking about KYC that makes them argue everything about KYC.

The kyc policies in the exchanges and the casinos are almost the same, I don't know if the casinos make temporary kycs, as in the case of the exchanges that when they are going to make large withdrawals they demand a kyc like making a 3-second video or a quick photo, that is something that can be taken into consideration, however, casinos and exchanges unless they are centralized will never require kyc, something that seems fine to me because in the first instance if you work with crypto you should not require kyc , but well, since it is such a long topic, there are already acceptance criteria.

[tusandii]

-snip-

-snip-

Money laundering, that classic hobby of crooked politicians and shadowy figures, am I right? But did you know crypto's the latest money laundering hotspot? Yup, forget those cash-stuffed briefcases, it's all about the digital dough now. So here's the deal: KYC? Pretty solid at fighting money laundering. But why do gamblers cringe at dropping their cloak of anonymity? Scared of getting busted? Or just digging that James Bond vibe when placing bets?

And I agree with you. If you're gambling with crypto, odds are you're buying and selling tokens on an exchange. What's with the double standards? Is KYC cool only when it suits you? Or are you hiding some dirty secrets? Listen, I feel you, nobody loves being bossed around. But money laundering's no joke, folks. We've all got a role to play in stopping it. So next time you're itching to dodge KYC, remember: you might be feeding a much larger beast.

It's no longer a secret, friends, that many people commit embezzlement of funds or corruption and then use crypto as a place for them to launder money so they can escape legal entanglement and suspicion of the criminal acts they have committed.
So far, KYC has actually been very useful for minimizing money laundering and almost all crypto exchanges have implemented KYC for investors or traders who will join there.
To be honest I never mind giving KYC to some of the casinos or crypto exchanges I use, after all this is also for the sake of keeping me from getting in trouble when I get big profits.
I entered into gambling and crypto exchanges by depositing some money so that I will do anything that can provide comfort and to avoid getting into trouble in the future, including KYC.

It seems that most gamblers are horrified and refuse KYC not only to remain anonymous but also to remain private when in the future they get a jackpot or big win because it also greatly affects their assets so that they can avoid being hacked more.

[Kryptogamers]

Hi Kryptogamers, I actually do like your design and the games you are offering I was wondering what coins do you accept? Only Hive? I was interested in placing bet using Bitcoin, I would like to try and test all of your games but I would possibly stay on the Crash game, I would also think that a public games is a good idea like all people can place bet at the same time on the same round or something like that.

We are glad that you liked our minimalistic design. If you are interested in trying out our games without a Hive account, do check out Fortunekingz (https://fortunekingz.com) which works on POLYGON blockchain. Fortunekingz, a sister site of Kryptogamers, is also a provably fair optionally custodial gaming platform based on POLYGON blockchain in which you can play with MATIC and USDT for now. Hope you win and have a fun playing experience

[klidex]

KYC leak or sold aren't only because of submitting KYC on the casino, but if anyone ever submitted KYC on a centralized exchange, it also carry a same risk since both of them are online.

That's right friends, if you only think about fear about KYC leaks or sales, then not only casinos but centralized platforms such as crypto trading platforms also require KYC for each user so there is no need to blame casinos too much for abusing and selling KYC.
KYC is not a scary thing if you can have a sense of confidence and trust in a casino that has been given KYC verification, besides that casinos that implement KYC will always be the security of every data that has been provided by its users.
Gamblers who want to remain anonymous and don't want KYC I can understand and respect them but strangely there are some gamblers who have excessive thinking about KYC that makes them argue everything about KYC.

The kyc policies in the exchanges and the casinos are almost the same, I don't know if the casinos make temporary kycs, as in the case of the exchanges that when they are going to make large withdrawals they demand a kyc like making a 3-second video or a quick photo, that is something that can be taken into consideration, however, casinos and exchanges unless they are centralized will never require kyc, something that seems fine to me because in the first instance if you work with crypto you should not require kyc , but well, since it is such a long topic, there are already acceptance criteria.

Almost a number of casinos have now implemented a KYC system, especially large casinos, and all of this is done because of compliance with the licenses that exist in certain casinos.
Even though many gamblers may disagree with such a policy, there are still some casinos that do not require KYC like this casino which can be a recommendation for gambling without risking KYC.
It's just that at the moment this casino only uses coins based on the Hive blockchain and for me it was quite interesting trying to gamble in this casino.

[LUCKMCFLY]

-snip-

-snip-

Money laundering, that classic hobby of crooked politicians and shadowy figures, am I right? But did you know crypto's the latest money laundering hotspot? Yup, forget those cash-stuffed briefcases, it's all about the digital dough now. So here's the deal: KYC? Pretty solid at fighting money laundering. But why do gamblers cringe at dropping their cloak of anonymity? Scared of getting busted? Or just digging that James Bond vibe when placing bets?

And I agree with you. If you're gambling with crypto, odds are you're buying and selling tokens on an exchange. What's with the double standards? Is KYC cool only when it suits you? Or are you hiding some dirty secrets? Listen, I feel you, nobody loves being bossed around. But money laundering's no joke, folks. We've all got a role to play in stopping it. So next time you're itching to dodge KYC, remember: you might be feeding a much larger beast.

It's no longer a secret, friends, that many people commit embezzlement of funds or corruption and then use crypto as a place for them to launder money so they can escape legal entanglement and suspicion of the criminal acts they have committed.
So far, KYC has actually been very useful for minimizing money laundering and almost all crypto exchanges have implemented KYC for investors or traders who will join there.
To be honest I never mind giving KYC to some of the casinos or crypto exchanges I use, after all this is also for the sake of keeping me from getting in trouble when I get big profits.
I entered into gambling and crypto exchanges by depositing some money so that I will do anything that can provide comfort and to avoid getting into trouble in the future, including KYC.

It seems that most gamblers are horrified and refuse KYC not only to remain anonymous but also to remain private when in the future they get a jackpot or big win because it also greatly affects their assets so that they can avoid being hacked more.

I think that as time goes by, not only the casinos that have the kyc will try to disguise their intentions with certain bonuses,or that they have free throws on roulette wheels to encourage players,I cannot deny that they can achieve many records like this sine mebago When they understand the risk involved in leaving a kyc in a place like casinos,excahnges, they will know that some authorities will have access to all the data of certain people,especially those who have more money, Players who have less or little money will not even be taken into account.

[danadc]

Almost a number of casinos have now implemented a KYC system, especially large casinos, and all of this is done because of compliance with the licenses that exist in certain casinos.
Even though many gamblers may disagree with such a policy, there are still some casinos that do not require KYC like this casino which can be a recommendation for gambling without risking KYC.
It's just that at the moment this casino only uses coins based on the Hive blockchain and for me it was quite interesting trying to gamble in this casino.

We cannot fight with what is impossible to beat, everything has been focused in that direction, even if we do not want things to happen with kyc, there will always be ways to force ourselves to comply with them, and the other is to use casinos that do not have kyc requirements that are centralized like freebitcoin, apart from this I don't know of others unless they are decentralized casinos that have other rules, but in general I prefer casinos that are centralized, because they offer more security and more guarantee that they do things better like in duelbits, this is It's just that I think and I believe that things should be done that way.

[Blitzboy]

Almost a number of casinos have now implemented a KYC system, especially large casinos, and all of this is done because of compliance with the licenses that exist in certain casinos.
Even though many gamblers may disagree with such a policy, there are still some casinos that do not require KYC like this casino which can be a recommendation for gambling without risking KYC.
It's just that at the moment this casino only uses coins based on the Hive blockchain and for me it was quite interesting trying to gamble in this casino.

We cannot fight with what is impossible to beat, everything has been focused in that direction, even if we do not want things to happen with kyc, there will always be ways to force ourselves to comply with them, and the other is to use casinos that do not have kyc requirements that are centralized like freebitcoin, apart from this I don't know of others unless they are decentralized casinos that have other rules, but in general I prefer casinos that are centralized, because they offer more security and more guarantee that they do things better like in duelbits, this is It's just that I think and I believe that things should be done that way.

I counter, but isnt this leaning towards non-KYC hubs like Hive blockchain somewhat amiss? Sure, the charm of non-KYC is irresistible, but at what sacrifice? Premier casinos insist on KYC, not for sport but for compliance and your guard. Arent we concerned about our funds going awry? Doesnt security hold more weight than simplicity?

Centralized venues like Duelbits, strictly following KYC, embody responsibility and dependability. If things go downhill, wouldn't you opt for a casino answerable to the law than some enigmatic decentralized stage? Isnt it smarter to risk on the game, not the platform?

[libert19]

Almost a number of casinos have now implemented a KYC system, especially large casinos, and all of this is done because of compliance with the licenses that exist in certain casinos.
Even though many gamblers may disagree with such a policy, there are still some casinos that do not require KYC like this casino which can be a recommendation for gambling without risking KYC.
It's just that at the moment this casino only uses coins based on the Hive blockchain and for me it was quite interesting trying to gamble in this casino.

We cannot fight with what is impossible to beat, everything has been focused in that direction, even if we do not want things to happen with kyc, there will always be ways to force ourselves to comply with them, and the other is to use casinos that do not have kyc requirements that are centralized like freebitcoin, apart from this I don't know of others unless they are decentralized casinos that have other rules, but in general I prefer casinos that are centralized, because they offer more security and more guarantee that they do things better like in duelbits, this is It's just that I think and I believe that things should be done that way.

I counter, but isnt this leaning towards non-KYC hubs like Hive blockchain somewhat amiss? Sure, the charm of non-KYC is irresistible, but at what sacrifice? Premier casinos insist on KYC, not for sport but for compliance and your guard. Arent we concerned about our funds going awry? Doesnt security hold more weight than simplicity?

Centralized venues like Duelbits, strictly following KYC, embody responsibility and dependability. If things go downhill, wouldn't you opt for a casino answerable to the law than some enigmatic decentralized stage? Isnt it smarter to risk on the game, not the platform?

Funds can go awry or need to be guarded if there is someone holding your funds in first place.

Users here don't try the platform, neither understand what on-chain is (I'm excluding lightning wallet part) and just come here and write in ignorance.

Hi Kryptogamers, I actually do like your design and the games you are offering I was wondering what coins do you accept? Only Hive? I was interested in placing bet using Bitcoin, I would like to try and test all of your games but I would possibly stay on the Crash game, I would also think that a public games is a good idea like all people can place bet at the same time on the same round or something like that.

We are glad that you liked our minimalistic design. If you are interested in trying out our games without a Hive account, do check out Fortunekingz (https://fortunekingz.com) which works on POLYGON blockchain. Fortunekingz, a sister site of Kryptogamers, is also a provably fair optionally custodial gaming platform based on POLYGON blockchain in which you can play with MATIC and USDT for now. Hope you win and have a fun playing experience

I'll update the op.