Eu Cina vs USA russia oil vs Green energy

[Hispo]

-snip-

-snip-

-snip-

-snip-

But what is it gaining? It is gaining credibility! That can't be converted into any currency, that is true. But as a citizen, I would love my administration to have principles and base lines that they live up to. This is what is happening.

I would say that Europe is mostly gaining energy independence from Russia, besides an acceleration towards the transition towards clean/green energy.
What do you mean exactly when you say Europe is gaining credibility from all this situation going on? Wasn't Europe credible enough before?

[1714732416]

1714732416

[1714732416]

1714732416

[1714732416]

1714732416

[1714732416]

1714732416

[1714732416]

1714732416

[og kush420]

I would say that Europe is mostly gaining energy independence from Russia, besides an acceleration towards the transition towards clean/green energy.
What do you mean exactly when you say Europe is gaining credibility from all this situation going on? Wasn't Europe credible enough before?

USA would not let an oil producing country grow
They did it with Iraq and Iran and now with Russia - Since Russia is a powerful state they did it the other way.

[Ozero]

There were reports a lot of the "trained" Russian troops that have been mobalised to Ukraine have come from it's previous biggest militarised area (the border between it and China). It might serve as a reason for China to keep watching Russia become weak until a point they can either start taking land or resources at an even greater extent than they have been already.

Russia has already concentrated about 95 percent of its troops in the occupied part of Ukraine, which has significantly weakened the defense of its own territory. The predominant mobilization for the war in Ukraine not from the central, but from remote areas of Russia, where they now receive the largest number of coffins from the war for Putin's imperial ambitions, causes great discontent among the population, and a liberation war from the oppression of the central government is brewing there. Of course, all states are watching this situation and the weakening of Russia, and especially those that still have territorial claims against Russia, especially Japan and China. China has already released a map with the former Chinese names of the cities of Siberia and the Far East, which previously belonged to China. At the most convenient moment, China will return its territories without much resistance from the Russian side. Today's Russia, it seems, will soon be torn apart.

[DrBeer]

There were reports a lot of the "trained" Russian troops that have been mobilized to Ukraine have come from it's previous biggest militarised area (the border between it and China). It might serve as a reason for China to keep watching Russia become weak until a point they can either start taking land or resources at an even greater extent than they have been already.

Russia has already concentrated about 95 percent of its troops in the occupied part of Ukraine, which has significantly weakened the defense of its own territory. The predominant mobilization for the war in Ukraine not from the central, but from remote areas of Russia, where they now receive the largest number of coffins from the war for Putin's imperial ambitions, causes great discontent among the population, and a liberation war from the oppression of the central government is brewing there. Of course, all states are watching this situation and the weakening of Russia, and especially those that still have territorial claims against Russia, especially Japan and China. China has already released a map with the former Chinese names of the cities of Siberia and the Far East, which previously belonged to China. At the most convenient moment, China will return its territories without much resistance from the Russian side. Today's Russia, it seems, will soon be torn apart.

Before Xi Jinping's visit to Moscow, the Chinese Ministry of Resources issued amazing maps. On them, a huge part of Russian territories is designated as "historical territories of China", and the names of cities and geographical objects are replaced with historical Chinese ones.
Although after the warrant for the arrest of the war criminal Putin, this may break, but the "bell" is very strong!
China just needs a greatly weakened Russia, its territories and its population. Primarily women of childbearing age. You probably know that in China there is a rather complicated and specific situation, and they need women of childbearing age. Residents of Russia, who are massively losing their husbands from the degradation of life and using them as "cannon fodder" in the war in Ukraine, are perfect for this role.
Read about the problem of declining population growth in China, and the prospects for this process, as well as trends in new URBAN Chinese families, which now account for more than 60% of all in the country ... China always looks to the future, and the distant one, and for him the loss of population growth is almost synonymous with the "death of the empire."

https://www.bbc.com/russian/features-64868325
https://www.svoboda.org/a/malo-rybok-v-prudu-v-kitaye-zamedlilsya-rost-naseleniya/31288866.html

[Smartprofit]

There were reports a lot of the "trained" Russian troops that have been mobilized to Ukraine have come from it's previous biggest militarised area (the border between it and China). It might serve as a reason for China to keep watching Russia become weak until a point they can either start taking land or resources at an even greater extent than they have been already.

Russia has already concentrated about 95 percent of its troops in the occupied part of Ukraine, which has significantly weakened the defense of its own territory. The predominant mobilization for the war in Ukraine not from the central, but from remote areas of Russia, where they now receive the largest number of coffins from the war for Putin's imperial ambitions, causes great discontent among the population, and a liberation war from the oppression of the central government is brewing there. Of course, all states are watching this situation and the weakening of Russia, and especially those that still have territorial claims against Russia, especially Japan and China. China has already released a map with the former Chinese names of the cities of Siberia and the Far East, which previously belonged to China. At the most convenient moment, China will return its territories without much resistance from the Russian side. Today's Russia, it seems, will soon be torn apart.

Before Xi Jinping's visit to Moscow, the Chinese Ministry of Resources issued amazing maps. On them, a huge part of Russian territories is designated as "historical territories of China", and the names of cities and geographical objects are replaced with historical Chinese ones.
Although after the warrant for the arrest of the war criminal Putin, this may break, but the "bell" is very strong!
China just needs a greatly weakened Russia, its territories and its population. Primarily women of childbearing age. You probably know that in China there is a rather complicated and specific situation, and they need women of childbearing age. Residents of Russia, who are massively losing their husbands from the degradation of life and using them as "cannon fodder" in the war in Ukraine, are perfect for this role.
Read about the problem of declining population growth in China, and the prospects for this process, as well as trends in new URBAN Chinese families, which now account for more than 60% of all in the country ... China always looks to the future, and the distant one, and for him the loss of population growth is almost synonymous with the "death of the empire."

https://www.bbc.com/russian/features-64868325
https://www.svoboda.org/a/malo-rybok-v-prudu-v-kitaye-zamedlilsya-rost-naseleniya/31288866.html

A neighbor like China is generally a very big challenge for Russia.... 

China has a very large population and a developed dynamic economy.  Having such a neighbor, one must conduct a very adequate foreign policy and maintain good relations with all other states. 

Practice shows that states cannot be divided into large and small, important and unimportant.  Snobbery and pride will not lead to good. 

I had to communicate with the Poles, historically they are not very fond of Russians, but the attitude towards you immediately changes if you talk to them politely, using the word "pan".  Politeness costs nothing to a polite person, but often saves him from trouble. 

A small country like Poland or Lithuania can cause huge trouble even to a superpower. 

Therefore, it is necessary to build partnerships with all countries, then China will not be a potential threat.

[Argoo]

Do you know who is the largest investor in the development of green technologies and alternative energy? UAE! They are leaders in renewable energy... They have a $27 billion Dubai Green Energy Fund. it is necessary to lay the foundation of a new era, the era of alternative energy...

This is a really interesting turn of events in the field of green energy development. The economic development of the UAE is determined by large oil production, which provides the majority of government revenues and almost all foreign exchange earnings. Thanks to the accelerated development of the oil and gas industry, the UAE has achieved the highest average annual income per capita of the indigenous population among the states of the Arabian Peninsula. This state, most likely, unlike Russia, also relies on the development of technologies that will ensure the further development of this country. A very wise decision. After all, oil and gas can be used not only as a fuel, but also as a raw material for many industries.

[DoverDoane]

If china and EU Will take over the world then rubles and dollars Will be Like simbawe dollars nobody really don't need it and oil countries economy Will fall down a lot.

Green energy, not as easy as you say and imagine, is used all over the world, even though some countries have abundant natural resources, apart from Green Energy requiring a large economy, other factors must also be considered.
Example:
Overall Green Energy has technical weaknesses for Green Energy and also other factors, such as required storage such as batteries so that they are not wasted, weather factors, because Green Energy is taken from various natural resources, plants, water and so on, not to mention the capacity of Green Energy users such as companies that require large amounts of electricity, I'm sure Green Energy can't handle all that.

China & EU can't shake the world, if you talk about Energy, oil and economy, the world has what China & EU don't have, they can't rule the world.

I agree with you, it is still too early for China and the EU to beat America and Russia in terms of energy sources, in general they have great power and many countries need energy sources and these two countries contribute greatly as oil energy suppliers, so it is still far to be able to overtake or even replace the main energy source to become alternative energy like this green energy, but to become a rival in the future does not rule out there will be intense competition between the two, all of them are countries that have great power in this regard.

[Synchronice]

I would say that Europe is mostly gaining energy independence from Russia, besides an acceleration towards the transition towards clean/green energy.
What do you mean exactly when you say Europe is gaining credibility from all this situation going on? Wasn't Europe credible enough before?

USA would not let an oil producing country grow
They did it with Iraq and Iran and now with Russia - Since Russia is a powerful state they did it the other way.

Russia is not a powerful state. I think it's clear for everyone how old their technique is and how their aim to conquer Ukraine in max three days has failed. One year has passed and they still aren't able to conquer Ukraine, which means, nothing is going according to their plans. They were bluffing all the time, they strength was their shadow and a nuclear weapon but it's something no one wants to happen also.

A neighbor like China is generally a very big challenge for Russia.... 

China has a very large population and a developed dynamic economy.  Having such a neighbor, one must conduct a very adequate foreign policy and maintain good relations with all other states. 

Life in China sucks, life in Russia sucks. Life in Western countries is good, that's why everyone wants to join western world and that's why USSR wasn't letting people to leave its borders and that's why China cencors everything and closed its country. They don't want to see people how life looks outside, because then there will be a protest.
These two countries can join each-other and then destroy each-other with their own plans and ambitions.
Russia shouldn't forget that Germany is going to rebuild its military and China shouldn't forget that Japan is on the West side.
This Russian-Ukrainian conflict won't end up well and it's very, very bad.

[DrBeer]

There were reports a lot of the "trained" Russian troops that have been mobilized to Ukraine have come from it's previous biggest militarised area (the border between it and China). It might serve as a reason for China to keep watching Russia become weak until a point they can either start taking land or resources at an even greater extent than they have been already.

Russia has already concentrated about 95 percent of its troops in the occupied part of Ukraine, which has significantly weakened the defense of its own territory. The predominant mobilization for the war in Ukraine not from the central, but from remote areas of Russia, where they now receive the largest number of coffins from the war for Putin's imperial ambitions, causes great discontent among the population, and a liberation war from the oppression of the central government is brewing there. Of course, all states are watching this situation and the weakening of Russia, and especially those that still have territorial claims against Russia, especially Japan and China. China has already released a map with the former Chinese names of the cities of Siberia and the Far East, which previously belonged to China. At the most convenient moment, China will return its territories without much resistance from the Russian side. Today's Russia, it seems, will soon be torn apart.

Before Xi Jinping's visit to Moscow, the Chinese Ministry of Resources issued amazing maps. On them, a huge part of Russian territories is designated as "historical territories of China", and the names of cities and geographical objects are replaced with historical Chinese ones.
Although after the warrant for the arrest of the war criminal Putin, this may break, but the "bell" is very strong!
China just needs a greatly weakened Russia, its territories and its population. Primarily women of childbearing age. You probably know that in China there is a rather complicated and specific situation, and they need women of childbearing age. Residents of Russia, who are massively losing their husbands from the degradation of life and using them as "cannon fodder" in the war in Ukraine, are perfect for this role.
Read about the problem of declining population growth in China, and the prospects for this process, as well as trends in new URBAN Chinese families, which now account for more than 60% of all in the country ... China always looks to the future, and the distant one, and for him the loss of population growth is almost synonymous with the "death of the empire."

https://www.bbc.com/russian/features-64868325
https://www.svoboda.org/a/malo-rybok-v-prudu-v-kitaye-zamedlilsya-rost-naseleniya/31288866.html

A neighbor like China is generally a very big challenge for Russia.... 

China has a very large population and a developed dynamic economy.  Having such a neighbor, one must conduct a very adequate foreign policy and maintain good relations with all other states. 

Practice shows that states cannot be divided into large and small, important and unimportant.  Snobbery and pride will not lead to good. 

I had to communicate with the Poles, historically they are not very fond of Russians, but the attitude towards you immediately changes if you talk to them politely, using the word "pan".  Politeness costs nothing to a polite person, but often saves him from trouble. 

A small country like Poland or Lithuania can cause huge trouble even to a superpower. 

Therefore, it is necessary to build partnerships with all countries, then China will not be a potential threat.

Here I will add that Russia itself "stirred up" a topic that, for example, in the post-war world, it was not customary to touch - it is the borders of states. And the First Russia again began the seizure of "new", supposedly "its historical" territories. And if you studied the history of the relationship between Moscow/USSR/RF and China, you know that approximately 25% of the territory of modern Russia can be attributed to such "historically Chinese"
But China is not a primitive "gopnik" (marginalized petty criminal), China always uses more thoughtful and far-sighted moves.
On the one hand, he can easily capture ALL of Russia very easily. On the other hand, then the "pet dog of Beijing" will disappear, which will carry out all the most idiotic orders, considering it to be China's support. Such a scarecrow for the West will disappear. It's like North Korea for the USA - they could have changed the government there a long time ago - but then there will be no one left to scare Congress and receive budgets for the military industry
Also, China needs Russia to be extremely intact but as weakened as possible - then it will be an ideal "slave of Beijing" - it will obey any order, Beijing's hands will be clean, if anything - it is possible to demonstratively punish the Kremlin's puppets. That is why Beijing's plan to regulate today's situation is essentially a "conflict freeze" with the goal of saving Russia from splitting into parts (due to external or internal factors)

[Hispo]

I would say that Europe is mostly gaining energy independence from Russia, besides an acceleration towards the transition towards clean/green energy.
What do you mean exactly when you say Europe is gaining credibility from all this situation going on? Wasn't Europe credible enough before?

USA would not let an oil producing country grow
They did it with Iraq and Iran and now with Russia - Since Russia is a powerful state they did it the other way.

Russia is not a powerful state. I think it's clear for everyone how old their technique is and how their aim to conquer Ukraine in max three days has failed. One year has passed and they still aren't able to conquer Ukraine, which means, nothing is going according to their plans. They were bluffing all the time, they strength was their shadow and a nuclear weapon but it's something no one wants to happen also.

I believe that it is obvious, the Kremlin underestimate the Ukrainian military and overestimated their own capabilities to win a war in weeks or less.
Actually, I have seen some news on YT which allegedly claim that people close to Putin have heard him say that he recognizes the lack of preparation of their troops, but he is glad they are discovering such flaw while them being the invaders and not the victims of a invasion.

Quite surreal, if you ask me. 

Let us see what happens in the future after this official visit of the Chinese Leader in Moscow..

[Smartprofit]

In my opinion, even China will not be able to capture all of Russia. 

First, the Chinese army has no combat experience.  In practice, the Chinese army may prove to be an ineffective structure (even taking into account its large numbers). 

At one time (until February 24, 2024), I listened to Strelkov-Girkin's arguments about how he planned to annex the territory of Ukraine to Russia.  And I understood from his words that in order to manage and control such a large territory, a lot of people are needed - soldiers, policemen, etc. 

And this is subject to the complete destruction of the regular army. 

And in order to capture and control such a vast territory as Russia, such a huge army of security forces is needed, which even China does not have. 

By the way, this is one of the reasons why foreign intervention against the young Russian Republic at the beginning of the 20th century failed.

[Argoo]

I would say that Europe is mostly gaining energy independence from Russia, besides an acceleration towards the transition towards clean/green energy.
What do you mean exactly when you say Europe is gaining credibility from all this situation going on? Wasn't Europe credible enough before?

USA would not let an oil producing country grow
They did it with Iraq and Iran and now with Russia - Since Russia is a powerful state they did it the other way.

In this situation, in any case, Russia itself is to blame, not the United States. After all, Russia attacked Ukraine, and not vice versa. If Russia had not done such a stupid thing, it would still now continue to boast of its military power so much that all NATO members were afraid of it. The United States, of course, took advantage of the situation, helped Ukraine and did not allow Russia to capture it. But after all, it was necessary to calculate everything in advance, and not use impudence, as Putin did. And now almost nothing can be changed. The Russian army was defeated, and the mobilization of 300,000 people did not help Putin either. Russia is now sorely lacking in heavy military equipment and ammunition, trying to beg all over the world.

[Synchronice]

I believe that it is obvious, the Kremlin underestimate the Ukrainian military and overestimated their own capabilities to win a war in weeks or less.
Actually, I have seen some news on YT which allegedly claim that people close to Putin have heard him say that he recognizes the lack of preparation of their troops, but he is glad they are discovering such flaw while them being the invaders and not the victims of a invasion.

Quite surreal, if you ask me. 

Let us see what happens in the future after this official visit of the Chinese Leader in Moscow..

Ukranian military isn't strong itself, they are strong because America and Europe helps them with better equipment and training. Russia is not as developed as western countries, in absolutely every aspect. Russia plays mind games, they aren't the best but they pretend to be to make apply psychological pressure on enemy.

I have heard that too. I don't know whether that's true or not but I think that too much dictatorship and fear pushes people to lie more and instead of telling the truth to dictator, these people are telling him what he wants to hear from them.
Maybe everything is clear for Putin and he just plays mind games, who knows.

USA would not let an oil producing country grow
They did it with Iraq and Iran and now with Russia - Since Russia is a powerful state they did it the other way.

In this situation, in any case, Russia itself is to blame, not the United States. After all, Russia attacked Ukraine, and not vice versa. If Russia had not done such a stupid thing, it would still now continue to boast of its military power so much that all NATO members were afraid of it. The United States, of course, took advantage of the situation, helped Ukraine and did not allow Russia to capture it. But after all, it was necessary to calculate everything in advance, and not use impudence, as Putin did. And now almost nothing can be changed. The Russian army was defeated, and the mobilization of 300,000 people did not help Putin either. Russia is now sorely lacking in heavy military equipment and ammunition, trying to beg all over the world.
[/quote]
To be honest, attack from their side is understandable. When your enemy comes near to your borders, any country that is capable to do so, would do what Russia did. But here is a thing that is often ignored in conversations. Russia is a country with low standards of living and this country wants to conquer another country. When the citizen of Ukraine sees that Russia can't take care of itself and improve life inside, what kind of benefit can Ukraine expect by joining Russia? But USA and Europe (EU countries), on another hand, are very well-developed countries with high standard of living. If these countries conquer Ukraine, for example, Ukraine loses nothing but gains American or EU culture and high standard of life similar to theirs.

[Ozero]

To be honest, attack from their side is understandable. When your enemy comes near to your borders, any country that is capable to do so, would do what Russia did.

You are clearly distorting facts and events. Ukraine did not pose a military threat to Russia. Let me remind you that on December 5, 1994, the leaders of Ukraine, Russia, Great Britain and the United States signed a memorandum on providing Ukraine with security guarantees in connection with its renunciation of the third largest nuclear potential and acquiring the status of a non-nuclear state. Since Ukraine did not see a military threat from other states, its armed forces were significantly reduced.

The fact that Ukraine has expressed a desire to become a member of NATO cannot be regarded as an enemy for Russia. This is just a far-fetched reason for military aggression by Putin and nothing more. After all, Russia had not previously attacked the Baltic countries - Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia due to the fact that they joined NATO and thus NATO became at the borders of Russia. Russia is also not going to attack Sweden and Finland because of their decision last year to join NATO. Why such selectivity in the object of aggression?

The actual reasons for the attack on Ukraine by Russia were different, and this is not a threat from Ukraine. Putin imagined himself a great conqueror and collector of the lands of the collapsed USSR. The next ones would be Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, and then the rest of Georgia, the states of Central Asia, and so on. But Putin's plans fell through in Ukraine.

[Synchronice]

To be honest, attack from their side is understandable. When your enemy comes near to your borders, any country that is capable to do so, would do what Russia did.

You are clearly distorting facts and events. Ukraine did not pose a military threat to Russia. Let me remind you that on December 5, 1994, the leaders of Ukraine, Russia, Great Britain and the United States signed a memorandum on providing Ukraine with security guarantees in connection with its renunciation of the third largest nuclear potential and acquiring the status of a non-nuclear state. Since Ukraine did not see a military threat from other states, its armed forces were significantly reduced.

Yes, I know that memorandum and I know that words lose their meaning over time. You have to think wisely, it's written on paper and looks nice but it doesn't mean that it's actually a letter of guarantee, it's just formal. When time comes, everyone forgets their promises.

The fact that Ukraine has expressed a desire to become a member of NATO cannot be regarded as an enemy for Russia. This is just a far-fetched reason for military aggression by Putin and nothing more. After all, Russia had not previously attacked the Baltic countries - Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia due to the fact that they joined NATO and thus NATO became at the borders of Russia. Russia is also not going to attack Sweden and Finland because of their decision last year to join NATO. Why such selectivity in the object of aggression?

That fact is the reason of why Russia waged a war against Ukraine. Russia doesn't want NATO near to its borders.
Sweden and Finland is really a headache for Russia but these countries are different case. Btw Putin stated that if NATO troops will be placed in these countries, then Russia will have a bad reaction.

The actual reasons for the attack on Ukraine by Russia were different, and this is not a threat from Ukraine. Putin imagined himself a great conqueror and collector of the lands of the collapsed USSR. The next ones would be Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, and then the rest of Georgia, the states of Central Asia, and so on. But Putin's plans fell through in Ukraine.

I don't deny that his wish is to rebuild Soviet Union but can you please answer me, why didn't Russia conquer Georgia back in 2008? Or after that? They only occupied 20% of Georgia. Georgia is post soviet-union country that turned into a pro-western country that wants to join EU and NATO. It has borders with Russia. This gives me a reason to say that they don't want NATO troops near their borders and it's their number one priority at the moment.

[Ozero]

I don't deny that his wish is to rebuild Soviet Union but can you please answer me, why didn't Russia conquer Georgia back in 2008? Or after that? They only occupied 20% of Georgia. Georgia is post soviet-union country that turned into a pro-western country that wants to join EU and NATO. It has borders with Russia. This gives me a reason to say that they don't want NATO troops near their borders and it's their number one priority at the moment.

The Russian attack on Georgia lasted only five days. Russian tanks stopped 30 kilometers from the Georgian capital, Tbilisi, and then turned back, although Russian troops had the opportunity and most likely the intention to occupy all of Georgia. The reason why Russia changed its mind about seizing Georgia was a call from their US administration to the Kremlin, in which it was stated that if Russia does not urgently withdraw its troops from Georgia now, then American ships and aircraft will approach the borders of Georgia, and then enter the war on side of Georgia.
But the reaction of other states to this aggression was very weak, so after a while the Kremlin decided to go on the offensive against its other neighbors.

[Argoo]

In my opinion, even China will not be able to capture all of Russia. 

First, the Chinese army has no combat experience.  In practice, the Chinese army may prove to be an ineffective structure (even taking into account its large numbers). 

At one time (until February 24, 2024), I listened to Strelkov-Girkin's arguments about how he planned to annex the territory of Ukraine to Russia.  And I understood from his words that in order to manage and control such a large territory, a lot of people are needed - soldiers, policemen, etc. 

And this is subject to the complete destruction of the regular army. 

And in order to capture and control such a vast territory as Russia, such a huge army of security forces is needed, which even China does not have. 

By the way, this is one of the reasons why foreign intervention against the young Russian Republic at the beginning of the 20th century failed.

It is hardly worth agreeing with your opinion. Almost the entire combat-ready army of Russia perished on the territory of Ukraine. That is, the military experience of the Russians was very short-term. In Russia, they continue to mobilize those who do not have combat experience into the army, and they are almost immediately thrown into the assault on the fortified positions of the Ukrainians, where they die ingloriously. Now the opinion is being expressed that two or three brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine may well be on Moscow and capture it. After all, there are no longer any significant military formations in Russia itself. That is why the Kremlin is now demanding a truce through the mouths of Lukashenka, Orban and other assistants.
China, with its population of almost one and a half billion people, can easily capture the whole of Russia without any problems. But China has the opportunity to do this not by military means, but by purely economic means. Apparently, the bet is already being made on this option.

[Minecache]

In my opinion, even China will not be able to capture all of Russia. 

First, the Chinese army has no combat experience.  In practice, the Chinese army may prove to be an ineffective structure (even taking into account its large numbers). 

At one time (until February 24, 2024), I listened to Strelkov-Girkin's arguments about how he planned to annex the territory of Ukraine to Russia.  And I understood from his words that in order to manage and control such a large territory, a lot of people are needed - soldiers, policemen, etc. 

And this is subject to the complete destruction of the regular army. 

And in order to capture and control such a vast territory as Russia, such a huge army of security forces is needed, which even China does not have. 

By the way, this is one of the reasons why foreign intervention against the young Russian Republic at the beginning of the 20th century failed.

It is hardly worth agreeing with your opinion. Almost the entire combat-ready army of Russia perished on the territory of Ukraine. That is, the military experience of the Russians was very short-term. In Russia, they continue to mobilize those who do not have combat experience into the army, and they are almost immediately thrown into the assault on the fortified positions of the Ukrainians, where they die ingloriously. Now the opinion is being expressed that two or three brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine may well be on Moscow and capture it. After all, there are no longer any significant military formations in Russia itself. That is why the Kremlin is now demanding a truce through the mouths of Lukashenka, Orban and other assistants.
China, with its population of almost one and a half billion people, can easily capture the whole of Russia without any problems. But China has the opportunity to do this not by military means, but by purely economic means. Apparently, the bet is already being made on this option.

Honestly, I don't know what you're saying. Do you have any proof for what you say? or just because you're on the side of the Ukrainian army, you spread baseless bullshit. I don't live in Russia, but as far as I know, Russia is dominating Ukraine. Another thing is Russia is the biggest nuclear power in the world, and China or any other country that intends to attack Russia is the stupidest thing they will do. And why should they go to war when China is reaping so many benefits from doing business with Russia?

[Ozero]

I would say that Europe is mostly gaining energy independence from Russia, besides an acceleration towards the transition towards clean/green energy.
What do you mean exactly when you say Europe is gaining credibility from all this situation going on? Wasn't Europe credible enough before?

USA would not let an oil producing country grow
They did it with Iraq and Iran and now with Russia - Since Russia is a powerful state they did it the other way.

Russia has made its own choice. No one forced her to attack Ukraine. The Kremlin hoped to capture Ukraine quickly, in a few days, even before the world came to its senses and did something in response. But the Ukrainians broke the Kremlin's plans with their stubborn resistance, and the United States and the NATO alliance as a whole successfully took advantage of this. The hands of the Ukrainians are now destroying the military power of the Russian "second army of the world", as well as sharply weakening its economy and increasing isolation from the outside world.
The war unleashed by Russia will accelerate the transition of many countries to alternative energy sources and help to somehow avoid the consequences of abrupt climate change on our planet.

[Argoo]

In my opinion, even China will not be able to capture all of Russia. 

First, the Chinese army has no combat experience.  In practice, the Chinese army may prove to be an ineffective structure (even taking into account its large numbers). 

At one time (until February 24, 2024), I listened to Strelkov-Girkin's arguments about how he planned to annex the territory of Ukraine to Russia.  And I understood from his words that in order to manage and control such a large territory, a lot of people are needed - soldiers, policemen, etc. 

And this is subject to the complete destruction of the regular army. 

And in order to capture and control such a vast territory as Russia, such a huge army of security forces is needed, which even China does not have. 

By the way, this is one of the reasons why foreign intervention against the young Russian Republic at the beginning of the 20th century failed.

It is hardly worth agreeing with your opinion. Almost the entire combat-ready army of Russia perished on the territory of Ukraine. That is, the military experience of the Russians was very short-term. In Russia, they continue to mobilize those who do not have combat experience into the army, and they are almost immediately thrown into the assault on the fortified positions of the Ukrainians, where they die ingloriously. Now the opinion is being expressed that two or three brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine may well be on Moscow and capture it. After all, there are no longer any significant military formations in Russia itself. That is why the Kremlin is now demanding a truce through the mouths of Lukashenka, Orban and other assistants.
China, with its population of almost one and a half billion people, can easily capture the whole of Russia without any problems. But China has the opportunity to do this not by military means, but by purely economic means. Apparently, the bet is already being made on this option.

Honestly, I don't know what you're saying. Do you have any proof for what you say? or just because you're on the side of the Ukrainian army, you spread baseless bullshit. I don't live in Russia, but as far as I know, Russia is dominating Ukraine. Another thing is Russia is the biggest nuclear power in the world, and China or any other country that intends to attack Russia is the stupidest thing they will do. And why should they go to war when China is reaping so many benefits from doing business with Russia?

Real confirmation of the fact that there are very few combat-ready troops left in Russia itself, because almost all of them are at war in Ukraine, are raids on the border regions of Russia by the Russian Volunteer Corps (RDC) and the Svoboda Legion, which almost unhindered captured a number of border with Ukraine Russian settlements. In addition, the "campaign of justice" of the Wagnerites against Moscow on June 23-24 also showed this. They left the territory of Ukraine, passed Rostov, Voronezh, and other regions of Russia, destroyed seven helicopters and one aircraft of the Russian Air Force along the way, and turned back 200 kilometers from Moscow. At this time, near Moscow, they began to hastily collect barrage detachments from the remnants of the police and military, who were on vacation. If desired, the Wagnerites, led by Prigogine, could well then seize Moscow and arrange a military coup in Russia.