Terrence Crawford vs Errol Spence - July 29

[LUCKMCFLY]

In the case of Spence vs Crawford, they are not that old when it comes to social media because indeed they are somehow active on it especially Instagram and Twitter.

Plus we can say that these two boxers are still famous and can create a hype even without marketing it just like how silent they are now because they know that their fans can do that for them for free and they are one of the reasons why both boxers and organizers came to a point to make it happen as they see a huge cashflow by having this fight.

Spence himself is enough to attract a lot of fans and people to watch his fight what more now that Crawford is added in it.

I can't say less, we know that in some cases things can be seen like this, but if we put it in another context and the most real one is because of the business model that both represent, of course now that they do great things we have considering that Spence attracts, and Crawford not to mention, so now if we compare him for example with a Nonito Donaire, I know that he will not attract as many fans as the previous ones, so that already changes a lot, first if they see that they bring more Money that happens, the case of Nonito happens in second place, as they see that it no longer it is so popular and it is something "old" the organizers think that it will not be the same money that they are going to bring.

I don't know if you've seen the news, but both boxers, both Crawford and Spence, have been very active in the news, on social media, in the articles, it's clear that Spence has also wanted to become more famous with this fight, I personally think that Crawford is the one who has to prove everything here, on the other hand I see that Spence is very relaxed, he talks as if he were Crawford's dad and that overconfidence is not good in boxing.

There is little left for this meeting, and things are getting difficult, I think that here I will be going more towards Crawford, because I see him more hungry, he is looking for the way to have that meeting and for a long time I have seen that Crawford has been struggling, I don't think he is going to come out with a bad performance, Crawford's training has to be of another level and for a long time.


and now:

Terence Crawford Reacts To Gervonta Davis’ Prediction For Errol Spence Fight

In a clip from before it was even official, Davis expressed extreme confidence in a Spence victory.

    “Errol. I know for sure. Imagine we in a gun fight, right? And I got a metal shield, and the opposite person got a glass shield. Who gonna come out on top?”

    “[It doesn’t matter] how much he run around, once them hands get on him it’s gonna slow him down … Ain’t no ‘if’ – he gonna touch him.”

Source: https://boxing-social.com/news/terence-crawford-on-tanks-pick-for-spence/

Well, things in boxing lend themselves to a lot of speculation, each person has their point of view, everyone says what they think best, and sometimes this must be respected, of course boxers are somewhat delicate when they talk about them, they can be good or bad things that are more delicate at this point, you have to know how to say them so as not to hurt their ego in any way, every boxer needs to have high self-esteem, a high ego, at least That is what we have always seen in every fight, and when someone speaks well or badly of a boxer, once in a while they can get a response , because they are messing with him , the spirits are there on the lookout.

[1714686410]

1714686410

[1714686410]

1714686410

[1714686410]

1714686410

[1714686410]

1714686410

[1714686410]

1714686410

[Kemarit]

There are still no significant changes in the betting odds.

Spence 2.20
Crawford 1.60

Crawford by KO or TKO 3.35
Spence by KO or TKO 7.00

All the attraction points to Spence if you like a big win. Also, you have to believe that Spence will win so you'll not regret your decision. Spence by KO could happen, actually, since Spence has heavy punches and his KO rate is high. Maybe the quickness belongs to Crawford, but who knows.

Their KO difference is not that far and so I think they are somehow equal in that regard.
But when it comes to speed and reach advantage, that will be hard to debate because it is clear that Crawford does have those qualities, still, we cannot discount Errol Spence in this fight because he too can give an explosive and unexpected outcome. It will be a tight fight for sure and I'm sure that I'm not the only one that is still thinking which side to bet.

If we base on Thier standings and career records then we can say that they are not too far Thier statistics are almost the same but for me Spence has the momentum and have a good percentage of winning. Also this fight is one of the greatest awaited fight in boxing history because both fighters are strong and popular so without a doubt this will be the star of the year and gamblers must know for this to choose Thier favorite fighters and bet with them.

Everyone have their own sides to take, whatever we say here, it will not change a single thing if they already locked it in their mind whether if it's Crawford or Spence. Same with how would the fight go, people will always have a say regardless of the result. Some will say that it's because of inactivity and some will say that this fight should've made years ago when they are both younger compared today where the other one is already approaching his retirement phase.

And it just shows how great this fight really is, everyone has it's own opinion and it seems that we are all in disagreement/agreement as who will win this fight. Crawford or Spence, the real winner here is the fight fans.

For sure though, those backers of either boxer are going to be happy to see their boy winning the fight and the arguments will still continue after the fight itself. Just like so many great fights in the past, the debate will continue. So I have my own take on here, and so everyone does, but it doesn't mean that we can't appreciate the talent of the opposite side.

[inthelongrun]

...
and now:

Terence Crawford Reacts To Gervonta Davis’ Prediction For Errol Spence Fight

In a clip from before it was even official, Davis expressed extreme confidence in a Spence victory.

    “Errol. I know for sure. Imagine we in a gun fight, right? And I got a metal shield, and the opposite person got a glass shield. Who gonna come out on top?”

    “[It doesn’t matter] how much he run around, once them hands get on him it’s gonna slow him down … Ain’t no ‘if’ – he gonna touch him.”

Source: https://boxing-social.com/news/terence-crawford-on-tanks-pick-for-spence/

Well, things in boxing lend themselves to a lot of speculation, each person has their point of view, everyone says what they think best, and sometimes this must be respected, of course boxers are somewhat delicate when they talk about them, they can be good or bad things that are more delicate at this point, you have to know how to say them so as not to hurt their ego in any way, every boxer needs to have high self-esteem, a high ego, at least That is what we have always seen in every fight, and when someone speaks well or badly of a boxer, once in a while they can get a response , because they are messing with him , the spirits are there on the lookout.

If I were to collect opinions from boxers so I can use them in my betting analysis, I would avoid Shakur Stevenson, Tank Davis, Jermell Charlo, etc. Tank Davis is not just handled by PBC and Showtime just like Spence but both are very close friends over the years. I would be more interested if Tank Davis shows us a $5 million bet on Spence if he is really that confident, see if he is willing to risk around 10% of his last fight's purse. Or news that says Tank is now willing to stop cherry-picking and fight the real dogs at 135. Shakur and Haney are waiting for this cherry picker to grow some balls.

Anyways, I already had a 1.77 ML bet on Crawford weeks ago. Thought of adding some but the odds are becoming more favorable to the turning 36 Bud Crawford.

[Distinctin]

If I were to collect opinions from boxers so I can use them in my betting analysis, I would avoid Shakur Stevenson, Tank Davis, Jermell Charlo, etc. Tank Davis is not just handled by PBC and Showtime just like Spence but both are very close friends over the years. I would be more interested if Tank Davis shows us a $5 million bet on Spence if he is really that confident, see if he is willing to risk around 10% of his last fight's purse. Or news that says Tank is now willing to stop cherry-picking and fight the real dogs at 135. Shakur and Haney are waiting for this cherry picker to grow some balls.

Anyways, I already had a 1.77 ML bet on Crawford weeks ago. Thought of adding some but the odds are becoming more favorable to the turning 36 Bud Crawford.

These boxers are wrong most of the time when picking the winner. It could be just a statement to mislead us, but what's important is that we trust our own prediction based on our analysis. At the end of the day, it's still our money at risk. That 1.77 ML odds is already good if you are confident enough that Spence will win, but if you aren't too confident, then I guess Spence has better value.

[coin-investor]

If I were to collect opinions from boxers so I can use them in my betting analysis, I would avoid Shakur Stevenson, Tank Davis, Jermell Charlo, etc. Tank Davis is not just handled by PBC and Showtime just like Spence but both are very close friends over the years. I would be more interested if Tank Davis shows us a $5 million bet on Spence if he is really that confident, see if he is willing to risk around 10% of his last fight's purse. Or news that says Tank is now willing to stop cherry-picking and fight the real dogs at 135. Shakur and Haney are waiting for this cherry picker to grow some balls.

Anyways, I already had a 1.77 ML bet on Crawford weeks ago. Thought of adding some but the odds are becoming more favorable to the turning 36 Bud Crawford.

These boxers are wrong most of the time when picking the winner. It could be just a statement to mislead us, but what's important is that we trust our own prediction based on our analysis. At the end of the day, it's still our money at risk. That 1.77 ML odds is already good if you are confident enough that Spence will win, but if you aren't too confident, then I guess Spence has better value.

I never include other boxers' opinions when it comes to my analysis too if they are friends with the other boxers they will go for them even to the point of favoring them for a knockout win, and if they have a quarrel with the other boxer they will show it on their opinion, and besides we have videos of their past fights and their records, from there we can do a comparison on how well they will perform, but on this particular fight its hard to favor one over the other, you can go with either one and your chances could be good or bad.
This is the kind of fight we all wanted to see two undefeated champions who fight dominantly in the ring, I think both fighters are now in Vegas we are now waiting for the press conference and of course their face-off, everybody's waiting for this.
 

[Pamadar]

If I were to collect opinions from boxers so I can use them in my betting analysis, I would avoid Shakur Stevenson, Tank Davis, Jermell Charlo, etc. Tank Davis is not just handled by PBC and Showtime just like Spence but both are very close friends over the years. I would be more interested if Tank Davis shows us a $5 million bet on Spence if he is really that confident, see if he is willing to risk around 10% of his last fight's purse. Or news that says Tank is now willing to stop cherry-picking and fight the real dogs at 135. Shakur and Haney are waiting for this cherry picker to grow some balls.

Anyways, I already had a 1.77 ML bet on Crawford weeks ago. Thought of adding some but the odds are becoming more favorable to the turning 36 Bud Crawford.

These boxers are wrong most of the time when picking the winner. It could be just a statement to mislead us, but what's important is that we trust our own prediction based on our analysis. At the end of the day, it's still our money at risk. That 1.77 ML odds is already good if you are confident enough that Spence will win, but if you aren't too confident, then I guess Spence has better value.

I never include other boxers' opinions when it comes to my analysis too if they are friends with the other boxers they will go for them even to the point of favoring them for a knockout win, and if they have a quarrel with the other boxer they will show it on their opinion, and besides we have videos of their past fights and their records, from there we can do a comparison on how well they will perform, but on this particular fight its hard to favor one over the other, you can go with either one and your chances could be good or bad.
This is the kind of fight we all wanted to see two undefeated champions who fight dominantly in the ring, I think both fighters are now in Vegas we are now waiting for the press conference and of course their face-off, everybody's waiting for this.
 

Which is valid. There's no reason why you should be influenced by someone when picking a pick, as there are other resources
that you can use to weight your decision.

In terms of this upcoming fight, both are highly dominated type of fighter and with how we witness
them inside the ring, it will be difficult to predict which will be better for this upcoming fight.

It will be depending on the performances that they will be going to show coming from the preparation
that they've prepared to execute. It's your own take to risk here. Both fighters are capable of winning.

[mirakal]

If I were to collect opinions from boxers so I can use them in my betting analysis, I would avoid Shakur Stevenson, Tank Davis, Jermell Charlo, etc. Tank Davis is not just handled by PBC and Showtime just like Spence but both are very close friends over the years. I would be more interested if Tank Davis shows us a $5 million bet on Spence if he is really that confident, see if he is willing to risk around 10% of his last fight's purse. Or news that says Tank is now willing to stop cherry-picking and fight the real dogs at 135. Shakur and Haney are waiting for this cherry picker to grow some balls.

Anyways, I already had a 1.77 ML bet on Crawford weeks ago. Thought of adding some but the odds are becoming more favorable to the turning 36 Bud Crawford.

These boxers are wrong most of the time when picking the winner. It could be just a statement to mislead us, but what's important is that we trust our own prediction based on our analysis. At the end of the day, it's still our money at risk. That 1.77 ML odds is already good if you are confident enough that Spence will win, but if you aren't too confident, then I guess Spence has better value.

I never include other boxers' opinions when it comes to my analysis too if they are friends with the other boxers they will go for them even to the point of favoring them for a knockout win, and if they have a quarrel with the other boxer they will show it on their opinion, and besides we have videos of their past fights and their records, from there we can do a comparison on how well they will perform, but on this particular fight its hard to favor one over the other, you can go with either one and your chances could be good or bad.
This is the kind of fight we all wanted to see two undefeated champions who fight dominantly in the ring, I think both fighters are now in Vegas we are now waiting for the press conference and of course their face-off, everybody's waiting for this.
 

Which is valid. There's no reason why you should be influenced by someone when picking a pick, as there are other resources
that you can use to weight your decision.

In terms of this upcoming fight, both are highly dominated type of fighter and with how we witness
them inside the ring, it will be difficult to predict which will be better for this upcoming fight.

It will be depending on the performances that they will be going to show coming from the preparation
that they've prepared to execute. It's your own take to risk here. Both fighters are capable of winning.

In this type of fight, analysts and boxer's opinions are quite biased specially the latter because it's either they have been defeated that is why they are choosing the opposite side or they are a friend which is understandable why they are favoring Spence or Crawford.

So, you see, we cannot really count on them because in the first place, it's not their money whom we are betting with, it is ours and so we have to choose it personally and not because of what they are saying. Yes, our bets may somehow be biased specially if we are looking up on a certain boxer but we wouldn't be in that position if they are not that good or strong which impressed us.

[wheelz1200]

...
and now:

Terence Crawford Reacts To Gervonta Davis’ Prediction For Errol Spence Fight

In a clip from before it was even official, Davis expressed extreme confidence in a Spence victory.

    “Errol. I know for sure. Imagine we in a gun fight, right? And I got a metal shield, and the opposite person got a glass shield. Who gonna come out on top?”

    “[It doesn’t matter] how much he run around, once them hands get on him it’s gonna slow him down … Ain’t no ‘if’ – he gonna touch him.”

Source: https://boxing-social.com/news/terence-crawford-on-tanks-pick-for-spence/

Well, things in boxing lend themselves to a lot of speculation, each person has their point of view, everyone says what they think best, and sometimes this must be respected, of course boxers are somewhat delicate when they talk about them, they can be good or bad things that are more delicate at this point, you have to know how to say them so as not to hurt their ego in any way, every boxer needs to have high self-esteem, a high ego, at least That is what we have always seen in every fight, and when someone speaks well or badly of a boxer, once in a while they can get a response , because they are messing with him , the spirits are there on the lookout.

If I were to collect opinions from boxers so I can use them in my betting analysis, I would avoid Shakur Stevenson, Tank Davis, Jermell Charlo, etc. Tank Davis is not just handled by PBC and Showtime just like Spence but both are very close friends over the years. I would be more interested if Tank Davis shows us a $5 million bet on Spence if he is really that confident, see if he is willing to risk around 10% of his last fight's purse. Or news that says Tank is now willing to stop cherry-picking and fight the real dogs at 135. Shakur and Haney are waiting for this cherry picker to grow some balls.

Anyways, I already had a 1.77 ML bet on Crawford weeks ago. Thought of adding some but the odds are becoming more favorable to the turning 36 Bud Crawford.

Just wait until the fight comes if the line doesn't move that much from here I can see some heavy bets coming in on Crawford.  Dude is getting up there but he is still a monster amd this is the fight he needs to win to put legitimacy onto his career.  I wouldn't be surprised if dude knocked out Spence in the first 3 rounds.

[Jating]

^^ I'm not really sure if Crawford though can knockout Spence in just 3 rounds. Both are elite boxers, so maybe in the first couple of rounds it could be just feeling each other reading the moves, throwing feints and see what the other side will do or how they will react.

Of course a knockout is possible, but this two has high boxing IQ and with that, they will avoid getting trap and being knockout that early. It's already fight week and so everyone is really very excited to see which boxer will become undisputed.

[Maslate]

^^ I'm not really sure if Crawford though can knockout Spence in just 3 rounds. Both are elite boxers, so maybe in the first couple of rounds it could be just feeling each other reading the moves, throwing feints and see what the other side will do or how they will react.

Of course a knockout is possible, but this two has high boxing IQ and with that, they will avoid getting trap and being knockout that early. It's already fight week and so everyone is really very excited to see which boxer will become undisputed.

We cannot say for sure because both of them is good in finishing the match by way of knockout but saying things like that in this situation is a bit of an overstatement knowing how good these two when they are fighting inside the ring. No need to underestimate either of the two because they are better than that and they are undefeated for a reason but in this fight, I'm ruling out the draw because one way or another, only one will come out victorious.

[freedomgo]

^^ I'm not really sure if Crawford though can knockout Spence in just 3 rounds. Both are elite boxers, so maybe in the first couple of rounds it could be just feeling each other reading the moves, throwing feints and see what the other side will do or how they will react.

Of course a knockout is possible, but this two has high boxing IQ and with that, they will avoid getting trap and being knockout that early. It's already fight week and so everyone is really very excited to see which boxer will become undisputed.

We cannot say for sure because both of them is good in finishing the match by way of knockout but saying things like that in this situation is a bit of an overstatement knowing how good these two when they are fighting inside the ring. No need to underestimate either of the two because they are better than that and they are undefeated for a reason but in this fight, I'm ruling out the draw because one way or another, only one will come out victorious.

I couldn't say less. Also, there is a big reason why the fans around the world wanted to witness this fight for some years now because apart from the entertainment that they will see if the fight will happen, it will also bring them an answer on who is more dominant between the two elites because that question has been asked by many people for a few years now and I know some are already arguing about it even though they are only speculating about what would be the outcome.

Well, this time, that question will finally be answered. Just a few more days to be exact!

[Viscore]

If I were to collect opinions from boxers so I can use them in my betting analysis, I would avoid Shakur Stevenson, Tank Davis, Jermell Charlo, etc. Tank Davis is not just handled by PBC and Showtime just like Spence but both are very close friends over the years. I would be more interested if Tank Davis shows us a $5 million bet on Spence if he is really that confident, see if he is willing to risk around 10% of his last fight's purse. Or news that says Tank is now willing to stop cherry-picking and fight the real dogs at 135. Shakur and Haney are waiting for this cherry picker to grow some balls.

Anyways, I already had a 1.77 ML bet on Crawford weeks ago. Thought of adding some but the odds are becoming more favorable to the turning 36 Bud Crawford.

These boxers are wrong most of the time when picking the winner. It could be just a statement to mislead us, but what's important is that we trust our own prediction based on our analysis. At the end of the day, it's still our money at risk. That 1.77 ML odds is already good if you are confident enough that Spence will win, but if you aren't too confident, then I guess Spence has better value.

I never include other boxers' opinions when it comes to my analysis too if they are friends with the other boxers they will go for them even to the point of favoring them for a knockout win, and if they have a quarrel with the other boxer they will show it on their opinion, and besides we have videos of their past fights and their records, from there we can do a comparison on how well they will perform, but on this particular fight its hard to favor one over the other, you can go with either one and your chances could be good or bad.
This is the kind of fight we all wanted to see two undefeated champions who fight dominantly in the ring, I think both fighters are now in Vegas we are now waiting for the press conference and of course their face-off, everybody's waiting for this.
 

Which is valid. There's no reason why you should be influenced by someone when picking a pick, as there are other resources
that you can use to weight your decision.

In terms of this upcoming fight, both are highly dominated type of fighter and with how we witness
them inside the ring, it will be difficult to predict which will be better for this upcoming fight.

It will be depending on the performances that they will be going to show coming from the preparation
that they've prepared to execute. It's your own take to risk here. Both fighters are capable of winning.

In this type of fight, analysts and boxer's opinions are quite biased specially the latter because it's either they have been defeated that is why they are choosing the opposite side or they are a friend which is understandable why they are favoring Spence or Crawford.

So, you see, we cannot really count on them because in the first place, it's not their money whom we are betting with, it is ours and so we have to choose it personally and not because of what they are saying. Yes, our bets may somehow be biased specially if we are looking up on a certain boxer but we wouldn't be in that position if they are not that good or strong which impressed us.

It's always biased mate because we too have our own preference and standard of which helps us think who got the upper hand between the boxers who will fight in the said match.

But sometimes, we cannot help it because there are some instances that when we are unable to decide which one to bet and that is where these speculations given by the boxers will come out to help us to weigh which is better and do have a much higher chance in winning. We just need to filter which speculations are better.

[Baofeng]

It's fight week guys,

Live streams before the fight:

Grand Arrivals: http://s.sho.com/729GA
Workout: http://s.sho.com/729UMW
Presser: http://s.sho.com/729PC
Weigh-In: http://s.sho.com/729WI

Hopefully, everyone by now has put their bets on this fight, Crawford is still the favourite as far as betting odds. But we all know that this is going to be a very close fight!!!

[harizen]

These boxers are wrong most of the time when picking the winner. It could be just a statement to mislead us, but what's important is that we trust our own prediction based on our analysis.

Not totally wrong but these boxers' picks are also based on self-preference. Sometimes, they are disregarding and not recognizing the strength of their dislike boxers because of personal reasons. In other words, they are biased in their picks because maybe they have had an issue before with that boxer, beaten badly before by that boxer, and something along those lines.

I'd rather read and referred to those boxing analysts who are neutral most of the time and the factors to consider are all technical and not being a fan or hater. There are lots of boxing analysts here in our local sports that is referring to pure technical analysis when giving a pick.

Anyways, as I also mentioned before, many will pick Crawford here because they hated Spence ducking the scene strategy for a long time.

Boxing week and full of big fights this week!

[LUCKMCFLY]

It's fight week guys,

Live streams before the fight:

Grand Arrivals: http://s.sho.com/729GA
Workout: http://s.sho.com/729UMW
Presser: http://s.sho.com/729PC
Weigh-In: http://s.sho.com/729WI

Hopefully, everyone by now has put their bets on this fight, Crawford is still the favourite as far as betting odds. But we all know that this is going to be a very close fight!!!

I think many of us are excited, for a while I wanted to see not only Spence and Crawford, I also liked seeing Inoue in action, all the controversy that has been unleashed with Fulton, the things a boxer can say are great, he is also in charge of welcoming this boy, and boy is Inoue showing that nothing is too big for him, not to mention the Crawford and Spence fight, when the news came out I remember posting it on the forum, and everyone believed it was fake. news, in fact I even questioned myself, but luckily it was true of the fight.

So shortly into this, I recognize that Crawford here has always been looking for this fight, and I think he deserves this fight, he needs it, lifting his spirits is one of the things that he really requires, and he's been looking for it for over 2 years, so I think it's time for Crawford to make this request count.

Errol Spence Jr. vs. Terence Crawford referee, judges revealed

Tim Cheatham, David Sutherland and Steve Weisfeld will serve as judges, with each receiving $3,000. The third man in the ring will be referee Harvey Dock, who will officiate the bout and be paid $4,000.

Dock has been an active referee since 2004, according to BoxRec.com, and this year he’s officiated 42 bouts.

Source: https://mmajunkie.usatoday.com/2023/07/errol-spence-vs-terence-crawford-referee-judges-revealed

Well, a lot is expected from this fight, I think that the winner here will undoubtedly be Crawford, I also think that this boxer has been dreaming of that moment, I have no doubt, but I think that things can be done very well, also as I said, CVrawford has been looking for this fight for a long time, it was about time that it could finally be done, if in any case he does not win the fight, I know what arguments the boxer could give, but he should do it with force gum.

Today's fight was very good with that of Inoue and Fulton, now the other good event that we have left is that of Spence and Crawford, I really feel lucky this week, which has been full of great boxing matches.

[Slow death]

the odds in the stake are in favor of Terence, with odds of @1.60 while Spence is at odds of @2.26 which honestly most of the time I see this type of difference in important fights tends to win the favorite fighter, I'm not saying that in this case Terence will win, but it's more likely that the bookmakers will be right, Spence has good size and strength, while Terence has a good counterattack and a good defense, good speed and good footwork s what can allow him to neutralize his opponent's attacks, perhaps for this reason he is being favored by bookmakers

that's why in my opinion Terence will win this fight by decision, I haven't placed my bet yet, but in case I place a bet I'll bet on Terence to win this fight, without a doubt that it will be a very difficult and well disputed fight which will make both fighters stay more in defense and the fight will be prolonged, but the fighter who has the best counter-attack and best defense will win, for that reason I see Terence winning this fight, and it's a shame that I won't be able to watch the fight after After the fight is over I'll watch videos of the most important moments of the fight

[btc_angela]

the odds in the stake are in favor of Terence, with odds of @1.60 while Spence is at odds of @2.26 which honestly most of the time I see this type of difference in important fights tends to win the favorite fighter, I'm not saying that in this case Terence will win, but it's more likely that the bookmakers will be right, Spence has good size and strength, while Terence has a good counterattack and a good defense, good speed and good footwork s what can allow him to neutralize his opponent's attacks, perhaps for this reason he is being favored by bookmakers

There are ways that the sport bookies or at least bookmakers favored Crawford. Although he has only 1 belt, but I guess they favored him on the straight of his performances recently. And maybe if you look at the fighters that this two has fought, like Porter Jr, Crawford won via TKO while Spence just decision Porter in a hard 12 round fight.

that's why in my opinion Terence will win this fight by decision, I haven't placed my bet yet, but in case I place a bet I'll bet on Terence to win this fight, without a doubt that it will be a very difficult and well disputed fight which will make both fighters stay more in defense and the fight will be prolonged, but the fighter who has the best counter-attack and best defense will win, for that reason I see Terence winning this fight, and it's a shame that I won't be able to watch the fight after After the fight is over I'll watch videos of the most important moments of the fight

It's a good analysis on your end if you think that Terrence will win and you should have put your bet already. ML is still very attractive and it's a good return if you will bet at least a good hundred dollars or more. And I think majority here will go with Crawford to win, maybe by decision or perhaps this fight will go over and last the full 12 rounds.

[Sanitough]

maybe by decision or perhaps this fight will go over and last the full 12 rounds.

This fight could last for 12 rounds if both boxers can absorb the punches thrown at them. They are not the kind of fighters who are slick enough; they always want to exchange punches. Since both are strong punchers, honestly, I doubt it will go to the judges' scorecards.

With only a few days remaining, I just want to be optimistic that Crawford will win, as I believe he is the better boxer. Terrence may have more belts, but Crawford's wins have been very dominant and convincing. Let's see if Crawford will live up to our expectations.

[Pamadar]

It's always biased mate because we too have our own preference and standard of which helps us think who got the upper hand between the boxers who will fight in the said match.

But sometimes, we cannot help it because there are some instances that when we are unable to decide which one to bet and that is where these speculations given by the boxers will come out to help us to weigh which is better and do have a much higher chance in winning. We just need to filter which speculations are better.

Indeed, we need to balance and check the weight of their statements and try to find more about the possibility of their opinions.

With that guide, you will be able to conclude your decision and have that good chance to sort or pick
the right one in your own interpretations, but then again, there's no accurate opinion all are a base from'
the person perceptions it's still you as the one who will going to bet that needs to decide who or which
party you will going to place your money.

[Vaculin]

maybe by decision or perhaps this fight will go over and last the full 12 rounds.

This fight could last for 12 rounds if both boxers can absorb the punches thrown at them. They are not the kind of fighters who are slick enough; they always want to exchange punches. Since both are strong punchers, honestly, I doubt it will go to the judges' scorecards.

With only a few days remaining, I just want to be optimistic that Crawford will win, as I believe he is the better boxer. Terrence may have more belts, but Crawford's wins have been very dominant and convincing. Let's see if Crawford will live up to our expectations.

I share your sentiment. Yes, 12 long rounds is possible but if these two will confront each other in a toe-to-toe fight to see who will survive then I guess we won't be seeing the 12th round as there is a big chance that one of them will give up as their body cannot handle it anymore. They might be strong and have the ability to absorb strong punches, but let's not forget that abilities like that has a limit.

Also, I seriously doubt that Errol Spence Jr. were able to possess those three belts because if he chose to accept Crawford's invitation, by now, we already have the answers. But he didn't because he knew that his chances are much slimmer if he fought Crawford in the past years and chose to follow Mayweather's guidebook instead.