AI-generated post discussion thread: how to identify & report

[nutildah]

I did not mention artificial intelligence detectors in my message, I had a specific question about the list of phrases used by ChatGPT, which was published by you. As I reported earlier, your list of phrases prepared by ChatGPT is identical to the one that people use. That is, ChatGPT uses the same phrases that are used by people and for this reason you cannot use it for identification. Only if ChatGPT used phrases that are not used by people, it would be possible to consider such messages as created by artificial intelligence.

Phrases not used by people? Who would they be used by then, martians? They are words and many words are used by a large percentage of the population.

The difference is ChatGPT's use of these phrases is exceedingly common. And like I said the presence of these phrases is just one part of the puzzle. Them on their own isn't enough to determine if a post is AI-generated or not, and nobody ever claimed that it was.

Let's take one at random and look at the 10 most recent forum posts to use it: "It is important to emphasize"

#1-2: in reference to AI discussion
#3-4: non-AI
#5: 71.8% probability for AI
#6: 84.9% probability for AI (post deleted as spam)
#7-8: non-AI
#9: in reference to AI discussion
#10: 99.5% probability for AI

So in the latest 10 instances of someone writing "It is important to emphasize" 3 of the posts are found to have a strong likelihood of being AI generated by a detector.

That makes the phrase exceedingly common in AI posts as compared to "Howdy", "What's up", "The trend is your friend", "Holy cow", etc., or anything not in the list of commonly used AI phrases.

[1714678869]

1714678869

[1714678869]

1714678869

[1714678869]

1714678869

[1714678869]

1714678869

[1714678869]

1714678869

[DdmrDdmr]

This is an interesting twist in terms of crypto related content that ChatGPT Plus can now generate. ChatGPT Plus, the version that works on a dataset that surpasses September 2021, and that has apparently moved on to include web browsing capabilities, can now connect to a plugin created by CoinMarketCap to interact with all their crypto related datasets.

The above, theoretically, gives ChatGPT better capacity to reference near real-time data, which can be used by some to further trick their way around here, citing real and recent data whilst not really having a clue themselves.

These are some of the examples that CoinMarketCap claims the combination can now respond to (although these examples do not strictly relate to close to or real time data):

•   "How correlated are Bitcoin and Ethereum in 2023?"
•   "Does Bitcoin typically perform better on weekdays or weekends?"
•   "What was Bitcoin’s performance in the month leading up to the US elections for the past 3 election cycles?"

See:
https://cointelegraph.com/news/coinmarketcap-launches-chatgpt-plugin
https://chainwire.org/2023/10/11/coinmarketcap-provides-a-personal-crypto-analyst-for-all-with-new-chatgpt-plugin/

[Haroon Akram]

Testing a few of those detectors on a text I just stumbled upon

https://writer.com/ai-content-detector/   - 100% HUMAN-GENERATED CONTENT Fantastic!
https://gptzero.me/                                  Your text is likely to be written entirely by a human
https://contentatscale.ai/ai-content-detector/  96%  Highly likely to be Human!
https://x.writefull.com/gpt-detector  https://x.writefull.com/gpt-detector
https://hivemoderation.com/ai-generated-content-detection The input is: not likely to contain AI Generated Text
https://paraphrasingtool.ai/ai-content-detector/   Text may contain AI-written sentences   
https://detector.dng.ai/                               Based on our Analysis your test has been most likely written by a Human.

ChatGBT:

https://i.ibb.co/sQKry9r/62148225.png

 

See? I interact and exchange ideas based on what is in my mind

This is not interaction you just copy-pasted stuff.

This is helpful and unique content

It's not unique content because anyone trying to do the same would come with the same result.
Unique content is generated by unique persons and ways of thinking, in this case, you're giving a standard response everyone could come up with, just like looking at a Wikipedia article and copy-pasting that paragraph.

Easy AI Checker provides 100% accuracy for checking AI generated content.
https://easyaichecker.com/

[Haroon Akram]

To achieve 100% accuracy check the content using Easy AI Cheker https://easyaichecker.com/

[nutildah]

Since June, the AI Spam Report Reference Thread has resulted in 500+ AI-generated (or AI-assisted) posts being deleted as spam. It's now 16 pages long and I'd say its been a massive success. Most of the accounts that continue to post ChatGPT-generated material are newbies who don't know any better and think they can get away with it. Most senior accounts don't bother, or else they've found a way to evade the detectors.

Anyway, I'd like to thank the following members for their consistent contributions to the thread:

@jokers10
@lovesmayfamilis
@light_warrior (RIP)
@Who is John Galt?
@Etranger
@Gladitorcomeback
@Shishir99

You guys have been really helpful & I encourage anyone who comes across AI spam to report such posts in the thread, following the steps outlined in the OP.

To achieve 100% accuracy check the content using Easy AI Cheker https://easyaichecker.com/

Thanks for this, I'll check it out & potentially add it to the list of checkers in our thread. Also, to address your question in another thread (since its related to this one):

I paid $100 using Binance pay to a writer after checking the content it appeared AI generated. Is there a methods to claim a refund?

Sources:
https://pay.binance.com/en
https://easyaichecker.com/

I don't think so. Even if you explicitly told the writer not to use AI to write the text, and they did anyway, I doubt Binance would help you recover the money from them.

[Shishir99]

@Shishir99

You guys have been really helpful & I encourage anyone who comes across AI spam to report such posts in the thread, following the steps outlined in the OP.

Thank you nutildah for opening this thread and helping to filter the forum.^{[Just realized it's the discussion thread.]} I was kind of scared when I started reading this post. I thought you were going to close the thread because there might be something wrong. After finishing the reading, I understood it's just a recap post where you wanted to thank the contributors. I appreciate it anyway.

I have noticed that you have created a thread in the service section for managers. I wish you success and I believe your good work for the forum will help you get more clients. Sorry for my terrible English