Can this be effective against the increasing numbers of gamblers?

[stomachgrowls]

I think it will not affect most of gamblers because it doesn't affect the game as well as their bets.
I guess it will be better if they will switch to a more effective strategy if their goal is to reduce the number of gamblers.
We all know that gamblers will always find ways to gamble and removing sponsor brands will not hinder them to enjoy sports betting.
Gambling still exists freely so there's no sense in removing brand logos.

I agree with your statement that when advertising through sponsorship on soccer team shirts is removed, it will not have any effect on increasing or decreasing the number of gamblers but only reducing gamblers from becoming more addicted to betting.
In fact, in this case I am still a little doubtful whether the regulation will actually be applied, even though it has been a long time ago when football teams were sponsored by any gambling for mutual benefit.

For sure it would be revoked or would really be removed later on considering that they would really be looking for its benefit rather than on blocking or prohibiting it out without even having the assurance that it could really be that lessening up the number of possible gamblers if they would tend to removed it so.This is why it would really be that understandable if decisions would really be having that u-turn but
if this one turns out to be finalized then it would be understandable that advertisement and sponsorships would definitely be going into other sport.
There's no way on these things to be stopped considering that this is one of the most effective way when it comes to advertisement or simply with marketing.

[Johnyz]

well, amount of gamblers is not an issue. this is enough to avoid pathological people to join? I don't think ....
Also because gambling in itself is not dangerous it is simply an activity like many others.
I believe that the "real problem" arises when people at risk of addiction start to bet like minors or people who cannot understand the danger of risk higher amount of cash.

You can barely see those logos on the uniform of the players so this might not be effective.
If they really want to decrease number of new comers going into gambling, then banned any gambling advertisements because this is their best way to attract players. Removing a logo can help might not be effective, many will still try a site because they are curious about it and many want’s to have some income as well with their bets.

[Russlenat]

Not gonna affect people.

People still gonna gamble, especially in "Football" which generated the most revenue on gambling. As you can see, even in the World Cup on QATAR with most religions countries.

Gambling revenue comparing 2018 world cup has just increase 13% without any betting sponsor.

I don’t see what OP has shared will take an effect to gamblers. As much as there is good team to bet, gamblers will never stop from gambling, regardless if there is no betting sponsor. Most particularly for an event like football, everyone is eyeing on it, so expect that the more viewers will pay to watch it, the bigger amount of gamblers will be more visible.

[DoublerHunter]

I think it will not affect most of gamblers because it doesn't affect the game as well as their bets.
I guess it will be better if they will switch to a more effective strategy if their goal is to reduce the number of gamblers.
We all know that gamblers will always find ways to gamble and removing sponsor brands will not hinder them to enjoy sports betting.
Gambling still exists freely so there's no sense in removing brand logos.

I agree with your statement that when advertising through sponsorship on soccer team shirts is removed, it will not have any effect on increasing or decreasing the number of gamblers but only reducing gamblers from becoming more addicted to betting.
In fact, in this case I am still a little doubtful whether the regulation will actually be applied, even though it has been a long time ago when football teams were sponsored by any gambling for mutual benefit.

^That is right and it could be true.
While it may be true that premium leagues and sports betting can attract more gamblers, it could be there is an outcome to this. Gambling addiction can have serious negative impacts on individuals and their loved ones. Considering the ethics of promoting gambling as a means to make money.
However, that is true that removing sponsorship advertising from soccer team shirts may not have a significant impact on the number of gamblers, but it can still be a step toward reducing the harmful effects of gambling addiction. By reducing the visibility of gambling sponsors, individuals may be less likely to feel encouraged to engage in excessive gambling behaviors. But as you pointed out, it remains to be seen whether such regulations will be strictly enforced. I think let us advocate for responsible gambling practices and measures that prioritize the safety and well-being of individuals over profits.

[adzino]

The Premier League have confirmed clubs have voluntarily agreed to remove gambling sponsors from the front of their matchday shirts from the start of the 2025/26 season.

This is a move to try to reduce promotion of gambling in the premier league with it's increasing audience, do you think it can successfully reduce the number of people who gamble? What do you think? Will these gambling platforms not just move to other sports, do you think other sports that wear their sponsors name in England will adopt this new development in the premier league?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/premier-league-clubs-to-remove-gambling-sponsors-from-front-of-shirts/ar-AA19Ogeu

Yeah, Premier League dropping gambling sponsors, is a step I think is in the right direction. Less exposure to gambling advertisement, means less new people joining gambling, and less "cravings" for already addicted gamblers. But, will it totally solve the problem? Nah, probably not. It could work because removing those gambling names from shirts means fewer people seeing them, right? So, it's kind of a like "out of sight, out of mind" thing, which could help some people avoid getting into gambling. But these gambling companies won't just sit back and chill. They'll definitely find other ways to advertise, like targeting other sports or going hard on online ads.  It's not just about ads. It's also about education and support for people with gambling problems. Maybe replace those ads with gambling addiction support organizations?

[michellee]

well, amount of gamblers is not an issue. this is enough to avoid pathological people to join? I don't think ....
Also because gambling in itself is not dangerous it is simply an activity like many others.
I believe that the "real problem" arises when people at risk of addiction start to bet like minors or people who cannot understand the danger of risk higher amount of cash.

You can barely see those logos on the uniform of the players so this might not be effective.
If they really want to decrease number of new comers going into gambling, then banned any gambling advertisements because this is their best way to attract players. Removing a logo can help might not be effective, many will still try a site because they are curious about it and many want’s to have some income as well with their bets.

Banning gambling ads can reduce the number of visits to casinos but the problem is whether all casinos will approve it and for how long because casinos also need lots of new people who can see their ads in many places. Perhaps moving the ad's display time to midnight, when minors could not view it, would be advisable. But still, people who are at risk of gambling addiction can become victims of gambling addiction.

It seems that the government has to think of every way to reduce the number of people who will gamble so that the number of people who are addicted to gambling can really decrease. Maybe the government should associate it with its citizens that playing gambling is not good for their finances and can lead to gambling addiction.

[Renampun]

The Premier League have confirmed clubs have voluntarily agreed to remove gambling sponsors from the front of their matchday shirts from the start of the 2025/26 season.

This is a move to try to reduce promotion of gambling in the premier league with it's increasing audience, do you think it can successfully reduce the number of people who gamble? What do you think? Will these gambling platforms not just move to other sports, do you think other sports that wear their sponsors name in England will adopt this new development in the premier league?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/premier-league-clubs-to-remove-gambling-sponsors-from-front-of-shirts/ar-AA19Ogeu

from what I see, the sponsors of gambling sites on Matchday shirts don't have a big influence on the number of gamblers.

So far, gambling advertisements are not only on the shirts of the football teams they sponsor but also on the running banners on the field's sidelines. Gambling is a business that will never die even though various methods are carried out, apart from that there are many people who already consider gambling as their habit even if there is or not ads from the gambling site that is on the shirt of the football item they are watching.

 

[len01]

The Premier League have confirmed clubs have voluntarily agreed to remove gambling sponsors from the front of their matchday shirts from the start of the 2025/26 season.

This is a move to try to reduce promotion of gambling in the premier league with it's increasing audience, do you think it can successfully reduce the number of people who gamble? What do you think? Will these gambling platforms not just move to other sports, do you think other sports that wear their sponsors name in England will adopt this new development in the premier league?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/premier-league-clubs-to-remove-gambling-sponsors-from-front-of-shirts/ar-AA19Ogeu

from what I see, the sponsors of gambling sites on Matchday shirts don't have a big influence on the number of gamblers.

So far, gambling advertisements are not only on the shirts of the football teams they sponsor but also on the running banners on the field's sidelines. Gambling is a business that will never die even though various methods are carried out, apart from that there are many people who already consider gambling as their habit even if there is or not ads from the gambling site that is on the shirt of the football item they are watching.

 

and I think there is a possibility that the regulation will not really be officially implemented in the coming year. because it is still in 2023 and the regulations will be formalized in 2025/2026. in the passage of time which may be a little longer sometimes the rules may change and I think gambling will still live and gamblers will always increase every year.
because gambling ads will always be circulating everywhere, not just through the clothes on the soccer team. so this kind of effort will only make pros and cons in the future.

[smyslov]

The Premier League have confirmed clubs have voluntarily agreed to remove gambling sponsors from the front of their matchday shirts from the start of the 2025/26 season.

This is a move to try to reduce promotion of gambling in the premier league with it's increasing audience, do you think it can successfully reduce the number of people who gamble? What do you think? Will these gambling platforms not just move to other sports, do you think other sports that wear their sponsors name in England will adopt this new development in the premier league?

No way it can reduce the number of gamblers playing gamblers will continue to gamble because of the habit,  but it can reduce the number of new people joining casinos, when a country has no restriction on gambling with or without marketing ads, gamblers will gamble, those ads serve those who gamble and prefer to return gambling when there are promotional giveaways or bonuses.
Based on the article it's only on the front of the shirt but sleeves gambling sponsorship is still allowed.

[Cling18]

The Premier League have confirmed clubs have voluntarily agreed to remove gambling sponsors from the front of their matchday shirts from the start of the 2025/26 season.

This is a move to try to reduce promotion of gambling in the premier league with it's increasing audience, do you think it can successfully reduce the number of people who gamble? What do you think? Will these gambling platforms not just move to other sports, do you think other sports that wear their sponsors name in England will adopt this new development in the premier league?

No way it can reduce the number of gamblers playing gamblers will continue to gamble because of the habit,  but it can reduce the number of new people joining casinos, when a country has no restriction on gambling with or without marketing ads, gamblers will gamble, those ads serve those who gamble and prefer to return gambling when there are promotional giveaways or bonuses.
Based on the article it's only on the front of the shirt but sleeves gambling sponsorship is still allowed.

The fact is, their shirt prints don't really matter to gamblers. Gamblers come because of the existence of gambling so I don't think their strategy will help reduce the increasing number of gamblers. As long as there will be gambling advertisements and ads in different ways, people would really get attracted to betting especially now that audiences don't just watch to support their favorite players but also bet on them.

[Cookdata]

The Premier League have confirmed clubs have voluntarily agreed to remove gambling sponsors from the front of their matchday shirts from the start of the 2025/26 season.

This is a move to try to reduce promotion of gambling in the premier league with it's increasing audience, do you think it can successfully reduce the number of people who gamble? What do you think? Will these gambling platforms not just move to other sports, do you think other sports that wear their sponsors name in England will adopt this new development in the premier league?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/premier-league-clubs-to-remove-gambling-sponsors-from-front-of-shirts/ar-AA19Ogeu

I believe that teams collaborating with the Premier League to display advertisements on their shirts are required to agree to a deal that mandates all clubs to wear the ads, similar to how we saw the "NO TO RACISM" campaign. While I find this practice cool, I don't think it is necessary for clubs to advertise on gambling platforms. However, the management of the Premier League may be attempting to generate revenue for the federation through these ads.

If clubs are permitted to create their own promotions and choose the gambling companies they wish to collaborate with, it could potentially generate more revenue. It should not be solely up to the Premier League to decide which companies the clubs must work with. It's even possible that the clubs themselves could negotiate better deals than what the Premier League currently offers.

[crwth]

The Premier League have confirmed clubs have voluntarily agreed to remove gambling sponsors from the front of their matchday shirts from the start of the 2025/26 season.

This is a move to try to reduce promotion of gambling in the premier league with it's increasing audience, do you think it can successfully reduce the number of people who gamble? What do you think? Will these gambling platforms not just move to other sports, do you think other sports that wear their sponsors name in England will adopt this new development in the premier league?

I believe it's about the people getting into it and knowing that they haven't gambled in any way, and they are the ones who will be curious about what they will do when they first try gambling. A lot o people are going to see the sponsor's brand, and people are going to try it, and that's what they are trying to limit, I think. People who are into gambling don't have that much of an effect compared to the newbies regarding sponsors, so I guess it's just fair play.

[DaNNy001]

Not gonna affect people.

People still gonna gamble, especially in "Football" which generated the most revenue on gambling. As you can see, even in the World Cup on QATAR with most religions countries.

Gambling revenue comparing 2018 world cup has just increase 13% without any betting sponsor.

I don’t see what OP has shared will take an effect to gamblers. As much as there is good team to bet, gamblers will never stop from gambling, regardless if there is no betting sponsor. Most particularly for an event like football, everyone is eyeing on it, so expect that the more viewers will pay to watch it, the bigger amount of gamblers will be more visible.

This is the total truth about this issue, gambling rates will never reduce because of the lack of sponsor from the teams in the premier league moreover the English premier league is the most watch and stream sport league in the whole world and just because few club refused to advertise gambling site on their jerseys isn't going to stop people from gambling, i mean they are still watching the soccer games every week and like what you said so far as they are still teams that people feel can give them cash when they predict  on the result nothing is going to stop them from doing so and gambling is an act that in already installed in the human nature.

[maydna]

The Premier League have confirmed clubs have voluntarily agreed to remove gambling sponsors from the front of their matchday shirts from the start of the 2025/26 season.

This is a move to try to reduce promotion of gambling in the premier league with it's increasing audience, do you think it can successfully reduce the number of people who gamble? What do you think? Will these gambling platforms not just move to other sports, do you think other sports that wear their sponsors name in England will adopt this new development in the premier league?

No way it can reduce the number of gamblers playing gamblers will continue to gamble because of the habit,  but it can reduce the number of new people joining casinos, when a country has no restriction on gambling with or without marketing ads, gamblers will gamble, those ads serve those who gamble and prefer to return gambling when there are promotional giveaways or bonuses.
Based on the article it's only on the front of the shirt but sleeves gambling sponsorship is still allowed.

Hopefully the reduction and education about the dangers of gambling can reduce the number of people who gamble so that it can be successful. But people who are used to gambling will indeed come back even though the number of gambling advertisements has decreased because they have found a casino that suits them. They will not be affected by the number of advertisements especially if their country still allows gambling without age restrictions, they can play gambling wherever they want, including using online crypto casinos that can hide their identity.

[bittraffic]

Those gambling platforms will advertise somewhere else and put their logo still visible to audiences and most likely they will also be advertising online. Who knows they are going to be in bitcointalk more.

The goal I think of removing their adverts on the shirts of the players is because it is somehow visible to fans who are kids, thereby generating minor gamblers.

[Mahdirakib]

Isn't the ban only on the front of the player's costume? meaning that it can still be included in other parts such as the arm or the back and also this regulation will take effect in 2026/2027 meaning that there will still be plenty of time for clubs and sponsors to determine the steps for this ban.

Not to mention, the restriction is only for the matchday. The players are allowed to use the betting site name in the front of their shirts during practice. Each club will still have the option to make posts about the gambling sites on their social media account. Moreover, a lot of sports players have become the brand ambassador of different casinos. So, this front side ban won't create impact in the gambling industry.

[Renampun]

...

and I think there is a possibility that the regulation will not really be officially implemented in the coming year. because it is still in 2023 and the regulations will be formalized in 2025/2026. in the passage of time which may be a little longer sometimes the rules may change and I think gambling will still live and gamblers will always increase every year.
because gambling ads will always be circulating everywhere, not just through the clothes on the soccer team. so this kind of effort will only make pros and cons in the future.

what you said is true, the possibility still exists, sometimes political conditions greatly affect the rules that have been made and it is possible that this will also happen for these rules in the EPL.

Based on H2 Gambling Capital data, this online gambling market is spread across many countries globally. The UK is the largest online gambling market with an estimated gross revenue of IDR 168.94 trillion in 2021.

The Guardian, the rise of online gambling has resulted in the UK having to bear losses of IDR 23.67 trillion per year. These losses are used to cover physical and mental health costs, criminal activity, employment and education, as well as finances as a result of online gambling.

based on the article above, England is the country with the world's largest online gambling market in 2021 and this is the basis for the FA being urged to tighten rules regarding gambling, especially football.
there are many clubs sponsored by gambling sites and depend on these sponsors, hopefully this rule does not affect the financial condition of the club.

[noormcs5]

The Premier League have confirmed clubs have voluntarily agreed to remove gambling sponsors from the front of their matchday shirts from the start of the 2025/26 season.

This is a move to try to reduce promotion of gambling in the premier league with it's increasing audience, do you think it can successfully reduce the number of people who gamble? What do you think? Will these gambling platforms not just move to other sports, do you think other sports that wear their sponsors name in England will adopt this new development in the premier league?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/premier-league-clubs-to-remove-gambling-sponsors-from-front-of-shirts/ar-AA19Ogeu

I do not think that this move will reduce the gamblers or the gamblers will not bet on premier league matches. Gambling will be on the rise through the tournament however this move is only to discourage the gambling platforms apparently but in reality everyone knows that Gambling and sports exists side by side and there is no way to control the gambling on the matches.

I am not sure how this news is taken by the gambling world but for the retail gamblers, it is not much concern as our target is to gamble on the matches and gain some money out of it.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

The Premier League have confirmed clubs have voluntarily agreed to remove gambling sponsors from the front of their matchday shirts from the start of the 2025/26 season.

This is a move to try to reduce promotion of gambling in the premier league with it's increasing audience, do you think it can successfully reduce the number of people who gamble? What do you think? Will these gambling platforms not just move to other sports, do you think other sports that wear their sponsors name in England will adopt this new development in the premier league?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/premier-league-clubs-to-remove-gambling-sponsors-from-front-of-shirts/ar-AA19Ogeu

I personally do not see anyway this is going to affect gambling negatively, or reduce the number of gamblers that have been increasing exponentially.
Simply because, gambling casinos do not just rely on their logo or name printed on the front of the shirts as a means of promoting their casino, casinos still have other means of promoting their products.

So for me, premier league officials removing the gambling sponsored from the from the players jeasey, will have very little to no impact at all, in reducing the number of gamblers that find their way into gambling everyday.

[Mr.suevie]

Its even funny to even think they can regulate or reduce gambling with this particular move. I mean gambling has been in existence since the early human and sport like soccer has been a played a major role especially the games from the premiere league. The love developed from gamblers in this league is quite strong and stopping players from advertising isn't going to have effect on this gambling sites from advertising else where. Advertising their gambling logo can be done through many effective means by the players they can just put on customized shits advertising this gambling sites but it would be an after wear during their games.